Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jason Haas
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 113on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 13%15 of 113 questions
- Companies
- 13questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 113 of 113 questions from 13 companies
FICOFair Isaac15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 15 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
there’s now some data out there that shows VantageScore gaining some share in the MBS market
Show response
Answered the volume-loss question head on and explained why gaming requires pulling both scores.
Can you also just comment on the mortgage originations revenue growth decelerated on a year-over-year basis?
Show response
Weber attributed both the YoY and sequential deceleration to the rate-driven mortgage slowdown, consistent with bureau data.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you could talk about the philosophy behind adjusting your pricing model going to the $0.99 upfront
Show response
Lansing explained the $0.99 repricing encourages 10T adoption and distributes IP monetization across more value chain participants rather than concentrating cost upfront.
what percentage of lenders do you think would shift fully away from FICO to just using VantageScore?
Show response
Lansing argued FICO wins on both predictiveness and price parity, and in a gaming scenario, originators would likely pull both scores, expanding total volume.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if you had any sense of what the time line looks like for the release of the LLPA grids and if you had any insight as to what those might look like?
Show response
Lansing said no one knows the LLPA timeline, citing gaming and adverse selection problems as significant obstacles that must be overcome before grids can be released.
there's a concern that the resellers, I guess, could improperly calculate the Scores and aren't taking, I guess, legal responsibility for it. So I think there's been some hesitancy from lenders
Show response
Lansing dismissed score accuracy concerns as misguided, confirmed extensive testing underway, and said regulators are reviewing and proceeding at pace.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you're thinking about price increases over the long run. And if there's any change to the pricing runway now that you're going through this direct model
Show response
Lansing reaffirmed the value gap thesis and commitment to closing it predictably over time, but declined to give specifics on future pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
following the FHFA announcement, if you've seen any lenders start to move over to VantageScore
Show response
Lansing confirmed no lender defections and detailed extensive infrastructure dependencies on FICO across the entire mortgage ecosystem.
is there any change in the thought about how you can normalize that going forward
Show response
Lansing said pricing decisions are made at fiscal year-end, reaffirmed the value gap philosophy, and noted FICO has competed with VantageScore for 15 years without change.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could give us any sense for what sort of price increase you took in auto. Just so we can get a sense for maybe in the quarter, how much was volume versus price driven
Show response
Lansing explained price increases feather in over the year but declined to quantify specific auto price increase percentage.
it looks like the growth in person outlet expense has maybe moderated a little bit. I wasn't sure if that was just timing where you're finding some efficiencies there
Show response
Weber attributed expense moderation to fringe cost true-ups on the supplemental retirement plan, not headcount changes, with a few million dollar benefit this quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious if you could talk about how fiscal 1Q came in versus your expectations?
Show response
Lansing confirmed Q1 aligned with internal expectations, noting FICO's rate assumptions were more conservative than market consensus.
any sense to be you're seeing as you've put in the new -- or started to put in new prices for mortgage scores and also auto scores?
Show response
Lansing confirmed smooth price socialization with no issues. Weber added they don't see any elasticity.
Calendar 2024 Q3
what sort of analysis you did to arrive at the $4.95 mortgage score price
Show response
Lansing described a multi-factor non-formulaic approach considering volumes, market conditions, and value delivered, without revealing specifics.
On the non-platform business declined slightly, which is a little off trend
Show response
Lansing attributed non-platform fluctuation to normal usage variation, emphasizing the legacy business remains healthy with no harvest mode.
ROLRollins, Inc.13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it sounds like things got better, but then the guidance is going to 6% organic revenue growth.
Show response
Asked to square improving trends with the cut to 6%-plus organic; management stressed caution after variable quarters and full-year framing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if the acceleration you saw in March was caused by any business from earlier in the quarter shifting into March?
Show response
Jerry said some backlog may have carried from February into March but February was not nearly as tough as January for branch closures. Most of March's organic strength was genuine demand arriving in-quarter as weather broke by the first week of the month.
We've heard that one of your competitors is being more aggressive with their marketing. So I'm wondering if you're seeing any change in the competitive environment
Show response
Ken dismissed competitive concern by pointing to 90bps organic growth improvement. Jerry said team stays on brand, focuses on targeting the right customers efficiently, and adjusts spend across channels. Not reacting to any specific competitor's marketing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How often does that translate into a recurring relationship with a customer?
Show response
Jerry said some convert but cautioned against selling recurring service to someone who wants one-time (sets up failure). Research shows many 'recurring one-time' customers return annually for 1-2 services, trusting the brand.
Curious if you could talk about how digital leads have been trending? And if you plan to make any changes to your marketing strategy?
Show response
Jerry said digital is one channel but not only channel; brand diversification is the competitive advantage. Door-knocking brands (Saela, Fox) growing exceptionally well. Ability to pivot across channels is advantageous.
Calendar 2025 Q3
You saw a bit of an acceleration there on an organic basis, and it was on a tougher comp as well. So curious if there's anything driving that momentum
Show response
Jerry attributed acceleration to cross-selling to existing customers as the least expensive lead-gen; multi-service customers are stickier and more loyal.
could we see similar, if not stronger margin expansion in 4Q? Or is that not how we should think about it?
Show response
Ken said some vehicle gains headwind continues in Q4 but at lower level. Jerry cautioned this is a short-cycle business subject to weather and hurricane season.
Calendar 2025 Q2
curious if you could comment on how ancillary performed in particular, it's good bellwether for the health of your consumers
Show response
Jerry said no consumer struggles on ancillary decisions; financing options help close deals. Ken noted June ancillary organic growth was several hundred bps above the 10.3% quarterly rate.
that would imply incremental margins in the mid-30% range in the second half of this year
Show response
Ken didn't directly confirm mid-30s but pointed to lower H2 2024 comps (~17% incrementals). Emphasized double-digit EPS growth and cash flow compounding as primary algorithm.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you talk about your playbook for driving synergies of the businesses you acquired? And I'm curious if there's a similar opportunity to what you saw with Fox.
Show response
Ken described pragmatic integration helping on fleet, materials, back office. Jerry highlighted technology sharing (BizSuite/HomeSuite) as growth enabler rather than pure cost synergy.
can you talk about what incremental margins might have looked like in 1Q, if you exclude some of these onetime impacts
Show response
Ken said ex-S&M investments, margins would be 25-30%; pulled-forward TV ad costs were a factor. Expects improvement through year as investments lap.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you just help us bridge to getting closer, to the 30% incrementals for 2025?
Show response
Ken identified $10-15M of one-time items in Q4 (claims, S&M ramp, non-recurring). First half margins may be lower but lifetime value of acquired customers drives confidence.
I was curious if you could comment on what you're seeing from an organic growth perspective so far this year
Show response
Jerry said January was strong and dismissed weather concerns about pest populations, noting insects are highly adaptive. Ken noted similar tough weather comp in Jan 2024.
TRIThomson Reuters Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious, yes, where those efficiencies are being found in the organization?
Show response
Hasker cited efficiency gains in software engineering (Joel Hron, cutting-edge tools, better code quality) and early progress in customer support, with the change program targeting agentic adoption across all functions over 12-24 months.
I guess by its nature, we shouldn't assume that continues. Is that the right assumption to make?
Show response
Bischoping said government transactional revenue may not repeat as strongly in Q3 (still confident on the full year), while Pagero has exceeded expectations and is expected to keep contributing in the second half.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just share why that was slower at 10% organic growth in 1Q and what drove the deceleration through the year
Show response
Eastwood attributed TAP Q1 slowdown to rev rec timing on 2 products normalizing in H2. Full year 11-13% confidence supported by Dominio product extension in Brazil (~20% growth), rev rec normalization, and newer AI offerings.
was there any negative impact to sales cycles or anything from the conflict in the Middle East in 1Q
Show response
Eastwood confirmed no negative impact. Hasker noted the conflict increased Reuters subscription interest and highlighted journalism quality, but core business is largely immune to geopolitical cycles.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was hoping to take a step back and curious if you could walk us through what is the moat around Westlaw and practical law and why can't those be easily replicated
Show response
Steve emphasized no new entrants in core legal research space. Competition only in white space AI workflow area. Two key differentiators: decades/centuries of editorially enhanced content, and deep domain expertise from thousands of attorney editors retrained to train agents. Westlaw Advantage is unmatched.
growth. It did slow from 3Q to 4Q. So curious what drove that
Show response
Mike attributed the slowdown entirely to government. Ex-government, Legal has clear AI-driven momentum. Government grew 5% in Q4 but expected to slow in Q1 2026 from prior cancellations. Confident in 8-9% Legal for full year 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you made a comment about seeing some incremental competition in AI assistant space. So I was curious if you could just unpack that comment a little bit more
Show response
Steve clarified no new competition in core research/know-how or tax engines. New entrants are in the AI assistant white space, a greenfield opportunity for TR. CoCounsel remains clear market leader with aggressive product development plans.
It looks like the organic constant currency growth decels from 11% to 10%. I know these are rounded numbers. But I was curious if you could comment on that
Show response
Mike attributed fluctuation to normal quarterly variation, confident in 11% full year. For 2026 11-13%, cited SafeSend performing incredibly well, Materia additive, and strong synergy conference feedback from customers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what sort of price increase your customers will see if they upgrade from Westlaw Precision with AI to Westlaw Advantage
Show response
Mike said there will be a step-up premium and higher out-year increases for the overall commercial package, not just point solutions. Declined to specify exact percentages.
Harvey recently disclosed they're doing $100 million of ARR. So I was curious how CoCounsel compares to that
Show response
Mike declined to share specific CoCounsel revenue or ARR figures, saying only they are very pleased with progress across total TR.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could talk about what drives the implied acceleration in organic growth through the remainder of the year
Show response
Mike pointed to strong bookings across Big Three segments, product roadmap, recent acquisitions scaling, and 2026 segment targets as confidence drivers.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just give us a sense of how your ACV penetration varies across the different client sizes
Show response
Mike explained large law firms adopt first, followed by mid and small law, consistent with Westlaw Edge pattern. Newer GenAI products showing smoother adoption across firm sizes.
Can you maybe just remind us of your government exposure, you know, both within legal and I think maybe some in print
Show response
Mike detailed ~$600M government revenue with 8% organic growth expected for 2025-2026, diverse across federal/state/local with Westlaw, print, and CLEAR/TRSS products.
ITGartner12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious if you're still expecting the ex-federal government CV growth to accelerate to 4% plus by the end of this year?
Show response
Craig Safian confirmed the company still expects ex-Fed CV growth to accelerate as part of overall CV reacceleration this year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Did that accelerate from the 3.5% that you reported for 1Q in April
Show response
Craig declined to comment on April stats. Said they expect the whole CV base to accelerate over 2026, combining US Fed recovery and non-Fed acceleration.
do your pre-existing long-term targets still hold? Or are those no longer in place
Show response
Craig confirmed medium-term objectives unchanged, applicable to normal operating environment. Committed to 12%+ EPS CAGR. Rebaselined EBITDA margin at 24.1% with expansion expected. Addressable market and value proposition unchanged.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are there any changes to try to institutionalize some of the process that your analysts go through to collect proprietary insights
Show response
Gene described the neural network-based system that processes hundreds of thousands of client conversations to identify trending topics and route relevant proprietary data to the right analysts in real time. Core part of the BTI transformation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
as your clients start to use AskGartner, I'm curious if that's changing the types of reports that they're consuming
Show response
Gene said AskGartner drives more content consumption rather than different content. They continuously fine-tune document structure, length, and format based on client preferences.
how you're thinking strategically about that business. And I know it's been softer recently
Show response
Gene described the Digital Markets business as helping millions of small businesses find the right software, connecting end users with vendors. Adds value to both sides of the marketplace.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is there any way to dimensionalize like what percentage of your customers do you see now is not getting the full value of the Gartner subscription
Show response
Gene described the full service suite (experts, conferences, peer interactions, contract reviews, tools) and said tens of thousands of clients could benefit from peer interactions they aren't using. Declined to give specific percentage.
What percentage of folks are citing usage of like a publicly available large language model and therefore, not consuming the Gartner subscription
Show response
Gene confirmed that LLM usage as a cancellation reason is not material and essentially unmeasurable in their deal-level tracking data.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm curious if you put any thought to rolling out any sort of like chat functionality driven by AI
Show response
Gene confirmed they developed an AI chat tool being piloted with thousands of associates internally. Plans to release to clients once hallucination issues are fully resolved.
I believe you said that you're now expecting it to grow mid-single digits. Can you just talk about what's the reason for the reduction
Show response
Craig said it reflects US federal impact on GBS plus more challenging macro environment. Have recruiting capacity to accelerate if market improves.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is that expected to be the bottom here and each quarter should be above that? Or could it potentially be more sort of rough path from here
Show response
Craig confirmed directional acceleration to exit 2025 above 7.8% but cautioned the path may not be a straight line. Goal is 12-16% medium-term.
I saw the GTS productivity improved from 3Q to 4Q, despite the fact that you increased headcount
Show response
Gene attributed improvement to better recruiting, enhanced training, and continuously improved sales tools.
EFXEquifax11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the $100 million, are we supposed to take that and divide that by the $800 million of government revenue
Show response
Management declined to give a 2027 government number but reaffirmed the $100M is new revenue for 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Okay. So that SSA contract, was that like a onetime benefit?
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
I'm curious, why did our government verification business declined quarter-over-quarter.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Got it. That makes sense. Very helpful. And then I wanted to focus in on talent, which I thought was a bright spot.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Hey, good morning and thanks for taking my questions.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Sorry, the 33%, I meant was like you did 26% revenue growth and then inquiries were down 7%, so you got 33%...
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
This is Jun-Yi on for Jason Haas. Your USIS mortgage outperformance was 33% in the quarter, which was a step-up sequenti
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. Actually, I wanted to follow up on that twin indicator that you just m
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Is there any risk? Are you seeing any evidence? I know it's early days that there's been any cannibalization of the...
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Hey, good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. I'm apologies that I missed it.
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
Okay, great. That's very helpful. Thank you. And then as a follow-up can you talk about the implied USIS mortgage outper
Show response
Management addressed the question directly with specific data points.
CTASCintas10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
the growth moderated a little bit, but then there was a really nice improvement in the gross margin.
Show response
Jim reaffirmed Fire as a double-digit grower (TTM ~10.5%, finishing over 10%); Q1 margin benefited from an extra workday and favorable revenue mix that will vary quarterly.
the guidance implies incremental margins this year of 32% to 34%. Can you just clarify
Show response
Scott said the 32 to 34 implied incremental margin is based on the mid and high end of the revenue range.
Calendar 2026 Q2
I am curious if you could talk about the impact that automation has had on your business historically.
Show response
Todd noted the customer mix has shifted from 70% goods-producing to 70% services and that automation does not change the growth outlook; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just refresh us on the timing of the [ SAP Fire ] implementation costs
Show response
SAP Fire rollout expected to carry into FY2027 with ~100bps margin impact for Fire Protection. M&A also contributing to Fire margin pressure, 340bps of Q2 Fire growth from acquisitions running below target margins.
It sounds like those have maybe started to flow through the P&L, but there's more impact to come. Is that like a fair understanding. And then how is the industry reacting -- how are you reacting? H...
Show response
Not simply delayed tariff impact, culture drives active cost mitigation. Pricing at historical levels. Long-term approach focused on volume growth, not pricing pass-through. Extracting inefficiencies instead.
Calendar 2025 Q2
in this environment if you're seeing more competitive wins particularly from some of your larger competitors that are out there
Show response
No competitive landscape change. Focus on expanding pie: 1M+ customers vs 16-17M businesses in US and Canada. Not focused on competitor growth rates.
I'm curious if you expect the industry to pass on higher price increases in fiscal 2026 given the tariff-driven inflation
Show response
Pricing expected to remain at historical levels in FY2026. Company doesn't simply pass on tariff costs, finds efficiencies to offset.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I thought, at least as of last quarter, the pricing was running more like 2%. So I wasn't sure if that implied that there's been further moderation
Show response
Pricing flat vs last quarter at historical levels. No further moderation.
can you help me just understand what would drive the incremental margins back down to that 25% to 35% range
Show response
Property sale gain was one-time. Over time, expect 25-35% incrementals. Investment in technology, infrastructure, products, and training normalizes margins.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could help quantify where we are in terms of the price increases relative to history? Are we still like close to 3%
Show response
Confirmed price increases back in historical 0%-2% range. No vertical-specific differences, pricing environment is broad-based.
Show 7 more companies
ECLEcolab7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
curious if you could comment on what the customer and industry reaction has been to the 50-kilowatt cold plate
Show response
Beck described reception strong enough that Ecolab now manages supply rather than demand, but gave no timeline for when the cold plate starts contributing revenue.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if the conflict in the Middle East has had any impact on any of your end markets
Show response
Beck said Middle East is a few hundred million and immaterial overall. Competition struggling to supply, creating share gain opportunity. May slightly impact Q2 volume.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if there's, like, a go-over effect where you'll have more contribution from price in 2026 and then less in the second half
Show response
Beck confirmed trade surcharge fully converted to structural pricing. Not worried about tariff developments given full conversion. Expects consistent 2-3% value pricing through 2026 quarters assuming no new external shocks.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm asking if the customer acquisition costs have gone up at all, if you've seen any step-up in competition from one of the major players out there?
Show response
Beck said customer acquisition is getting easier as major retailers see pilot success and seek the technology. Digital capabilities and ECOLAB3D backbone provide competitive advantage no one else can match. Margins improving as 95% of time shifts from checking empty devices to solving problems.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm curious if you could maybe give some examples of the cost savings and efficiencies that you've been able to find as you've implemented One Ecolab
Show response
Kirkland reported 50bps SG&A leverage in Q2 and 20-30bps expected for full year. One Ecolab $140M savings program ahead of schedule with >50% realized in 2025. Five global centers of excellence driving scalable processes with Agentic AI.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could talk about what trends you're seeing in the Life Sciences segment and if you expect that growth to accelerate through this year?
Show response
Beck noted Life Sciences turning positive after years of building. Competition declined while Ecolab grew. Underlying OI in mid-20s, targeting 30%.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious if you could talk about what it will take to get the 2% volume growth to the long-term target of 3 to 4%
Show response
Beck cited OneEcolab penetration of $55B opportunity, new growth engines (high-tech, life sciences, digital), and core business wins as volume drivers.
FDSFactSet7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I am curious if you are seeing that and if you think MCP will maybe be a passing trend, or is it here to stay?
Show response
Said it is early and model types keep evolving, but FactSet is format-agnostic with APIs, cloud shares, and multi-format delivery.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just wanted to circle back to the implied margin cadence for the rest of the year.
Show response
Mgmt did not directly confirm comp pull-forward; said the margin range retains flexibility to pay for performance if ASV outperformance continues.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I wanted to focus on the expense side of things. I am curious if there has been any change into how you are thinking about expenses through the year. I think previously you had said that the invest...
Show response
Sanoke confirmed heavier investment in H2 but will moderate spend based on ROI. Intends to grow earnings into next year, with productivity gains accelerating as an offset to investments.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Based on some of my comments, it sounds like you're selling more AI-ready data through feeds and APIs and presumably, your clients are gonna be using that data with their own AI solutions. And I th...
Show response
Sanoke said AI-ready data distribution is a growing opportunity but not a cannibalization risk. Views workstation as one channel among many, and expects more of both as digital adoption scales.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could talk about what trends you're seeing in regards to bank hiring. And then we've heard this idea that the banks are already pretty fully staffed. So even if we see a continued rebound in...
Show response
Sanoke highlighted strategic convergence across banking, CRM focus, and highest intensity of tech/data investment in banking he has ever seen. Goran said Q4 hiring better than expected with similar trends in Q1. AI productivity tools receiving most attention in banking.
Calendar 2025 Q1
there was a nice uptick in the client count growth year-over-year. But then on the flip side, it looks like the amount of users per client declined for the first time in a while. So I wasn’t sure w...
Show response
Goran attributed lower users per client to significant uptick in PEVC clients which typically have fewer users. Phil added Irwin acquisition brought several hundred clients. Helen noted Irwin users not yet fully integrated, depressing the ratio.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm trying to reconcile a couple of comments that you've made. So it's good to hear that you're seeing some more optimism on client engagement and a better pipeline
Show response
Goran acknowledged budgets comment may have been pessimistic. Helen said budgets shifting to tech spend, and market share gains are key even with flat budgets.
MSCIMSCI7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Has there been any step change in the underlying demand, or would you categorize all this acceleration as coming from
Show response
Andy said new-product impact should keep growing, most visibly with hedge funds and traders given shorter sales cycles, with longer-cycle segments still to monetize.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. There has been a lot of fear in the private credit markets recently around credit risk. How is that impacting your PCS business?
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if you could help reiterate what's driving the strength in index recurring subscription revenue outside of asset managers.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q3
You've talked a bunch on the call about some of the improvements that you've been making to your offering.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Hi. This is Jimmy on for Jason Haas. So you touched on this briefly, but can you maybe give some more color on how adoption is trending for private capital solutions in the US and also
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Hi, good morning and thanks for taking my question. I was curious if you could talk about why the first quarter EBITDA expenses came in below your expectations.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Hey, this is Odedra [ph] for Jason Haas. Thanks for squeezing us in here. I just wanted to ask on the expense guidance.
Show response
Management addressed the question with specific commentary.
SPGIS&P Global7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you said that you were expecting an acceleration in MI subscription growth and it doesn’t look like it
Show response
Eric named the lagging consulting and sustainability products and reaffirmed the guide, but did not directly address the missed acceleration.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just clarify on the ACV growth? I think you said that it was 6% in the quarter
Show response
Eric acknowledged the 6% level but framed it as within the historical range of 6-6.5%. Noted some quarter-to-quarter volatility but underlying drivers moving in the right direction.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm curious if you could talk about your outlook for bank loan issuance in 2026. I'm curious why that's been soft over the past few months
Show response
Martina explained Q4 mix shift toward investment grade reduced effective monetization rate. Near-term maturity walls reasonably evenly mixed HY/IG. Guided to continued bank loan softness in 2026 with rate cuts and spreads as swing factors.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you said that the Market Intelligence ACV has grown 6.5% to 7.5%. So I take it to mean that that's a good indicator for the underlying subscription growth of that business
Show response
Eric confirmed ACV ticking up from low 6% to 6.5-7% range, driven by sales acceleration. Deferred long-term targets to Investor Day while expressing confidence in acceleration trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I wanted to follow up on the Indices margin since you now imply that there's going to be some pressure in the back half of the year
Show response
Eric explained H2 margin pressure from technology infrastructure refresh and new product launches, expected to drive inflows and revenue growth over multiple years.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Curious if you talk about the sensitivity of the mobility business to auto tariffs. Have you seen any impact from that so far
Show response
Martina explained 70% used car exposure provides insulation, with used car market potentially benefiting from higher new car prices. OEM subscriptions provide additional stability.
Calendar 2024 Q4
there was a comment in the prepared remarks that you're now expecting -- or are you now seeing the refi walls over the next 3 years going to be down 1%
Show response
Clarified the 1% decline is due to 2024 pull-forward, not a change in medium-term outlook. For Mobility, noted recall headwinds were small and isolated, with vehicle affordability as a minor headwind.
VRSKVerisk7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious if there's an opportunity here to use AI to maybe push a little bit more into workflow software
Show response
Shavel confirmed a software opportunity but framed the predominant path as integrating Verisk data into client and frontier-model workflows.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk about the moat around your underwriting data analytics solutions business
Show response
Saurabh Khemka outlined four moat elements: proprietary/contributory data, cross-platform normalization analytics, deep risk segmentation expertise (aerial imagery evolution), and trusted regulatory-ready filed analytics at scale.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was getting about a 60 bps tailwind from the divestiture of VMS. So that would mean that all the
Show response
Elizabeth Mann pushed back on the VMS margin math, noting other M&A elements in the line, and affirmed Verisk is still exhibiting operating leverage to deliver margin expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm trying to understand what caused that deceleration? Because in response to an earlier question, you said that the auto competition sounds like that's been a similar level
Show response
Elizabeth Mann cited three factors: government contract (anticipated), auto softness (anticipated, now materializing), and light weather (unanticipated). Subscription strength demonstrates no customer hesitation.
Calendar 2025 Q2
It looks like we're seeing moderating net written premium growth this year after several years of very strong growth. So I'm curious if it's possible that you'll be able to continue to take price a...
Show response
Saurabh Khemka acknowledged premium growth slowing but noted long-term contracts smooth the impact and value delivery drives renewals. Lee added Verisk has delivered 6-8% OCC through hard and soft market cycles.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm curious if you've seen any change in client conversation in the quarter-to-date period given the macro uncertainty, if you're seeing any pause in projects or anything like that
Show response
Lee Shavel noted no fundamental change in client priorities, with greater focus on tariff impacts to claims costs. Elizabeth Mann flagged federal government (<1% of revenue) and marketing segments as economically sensitive.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm curious if you could talk about how your marketing business performed in the fourth quarter and what's your expectation for that business in 2025?
Show response
Elizabeth Mann noted strong insurance segment growth with tailwinds into 2025, but the broader advertising/marketing customer base remains muted.
MCOMoody's Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
what caused ARR to come in a little better than expected since I think a few weeks ago
Show response
Fauber credited strong March execution and swing deals closing. Heuland confirmed confidence in high single-digit ARR trajectory for the full year supported by new product releases building pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk about what data sets were within that business are proprietary? And are you seeing the longer tail of competitors there stronger by being able to integrate AI
Show response
Rob detailed three proprietary datasets: Orbis (curated company data via global commercial ecosystem), politically exposed persons (from post-9/11 banking consortium), and AI-curated news. Linked together with world-leading beneficial ownership data.
Calendar 2024 Q4
MIS transaction revenue growth. It was up 29% in Q4, but the issuance growth was up 42%. So I was curious what drove that delta
Show response
Rob explained 55% of Q4 bank loan volume was repricings with much lower economics. Ex-bank loans, issuance was mid-teens growth with 30% transaction revenue growth.
CSGPCoStar Group1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious if you could talk a little bit more about the Apartments.com ChatGPT partnership
Show response
Candidly downplayed the ChatGPT channel as single-digit traffic and window dressing rather than a material driver, and explained why CoStar Suite is a poor fit.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| FICO Fair Isaac | 15 | 20%3 of 15 questions |
| ROL Rollins, Inc. | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| TRI Thomson Reuters Corporation | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| IT Gartner | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| EFX Equifax | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| CTAS Cintas | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| ECL Ecolab | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| FDS FactSet | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| MSCI MSCI | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| SPGI S&P Global | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
- FICOFair Isaac · 15 questions20%3 of 15 questions
- ROLRollins, Inc. · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- TRIThomson Reuters Corporation · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- ITGartner · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- EFXEquifax · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- CTASCintas · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- ECLEcolab · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- FDSFactSet · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- MSCIMSCI · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- SPGIS&P Global · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 17 | 12%2 of 17 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q1 | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q2 | 14 | 21%3 of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 15 | 13%2 of 15 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q4 | 16 | 13%2 of 16 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q1 | 16 | 19%3 of 16 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q2 | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q417 questions · challenge rate 12% (2 of 17 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q116 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 16 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q214 questions · challenge rate 21% (3 of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q315 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 15 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q416 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 16 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q116 questions · challenge rate 19% (3 of 16 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth31
- Demand27
- Margin20
- Competitive Dynamics20
- Cloud & AI17
- Pricing17
- Guidance Reliability16
- Innovation & R&D10
- Capex Investment8
- Credit8
Show all 19 topics
- Product Launch7
- Macroeconomic7
- Regulation Policy7
- Trade Tariffs5
- Cost Pressure5
- Labor Market4
- Subscriber Growth3
- M&A2
- Supply Chain1