Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jasper Bibb

Truist Securities · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
22on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 22 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 22 of 22 questions from 3 companies

CTASCintas15 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 15 challenging
CTAS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

can you talk about what's driving the success there and where you are as far as the cross-selling penetration

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Jim said First Aid's growth mirrors rental's four inputs, pricing (flat), new business, retention (up), and cross-sell, with good cross-sell momentum.

I think the initial guide assumed about a 20 basis point year-on-year headwind.

Cost PressureGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Scott said energy was 1.8% of revenue, up 10 bps YoY but down 10 bps vs Q4, and the guide contemplates energy slightly above Q4, not a headwind to the guide.

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was hoping you could maybe just talk about, you know, broad expectations for that business next year.

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Jim flagged a ~100bps SAP headwind and acquisition-integration margin variability while affirming long-term Fire fundamentals; direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

after that closes, I imagine you're going to be looking for more acquisitions outside the uniform business. So just any thoughts on what might be next for you

Show response

Will continue M&A across all route-based businesses. In Fire, prefer service over installation business, right deal matters. Balance sheet and infrastructure support continued acquisitiveness.

Just wanted to ask what you're seeing in wearer levels at existing customers in uniform

Show response

Customer base resilient. Growth from current customers slightly improved. Jobs reports not as robust as desired but customers hanging onto people. Cross-selling opportunity remains strong.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted to get an update on your experience with sourcing costs and tariffs so far this year. I guess, how have things trended relative to your expectations when you initially set guidance for the...

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Tariff impact coming in about as expected. Supply chain flexible with geographic diversity and 90%+ dual sourcing. Amortization provides time to pivot. Guide contemplates current environment.

Can you provide a bit more detail on what the underlying mix has looked like in that business this year

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mix of business impacts margins quarter to quarter. Management comfortable with range. Running the business isn't linear. Low double-digit growth expected for foreseeable future.

Calendar 2025 Q3

curious about sales cycles for no-programmers. Has there been any change there so far this year and what you're seeing in customer behavior

Show response

Sales cycles remain consistent for no-programmers and overall business. Continuing to invest for future success.

I was just hoping you could update us on what you're seeing on the tariff-driven expense growth front at this point, and maybe that's -- how that's compared to your initial expectations for the year

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Not immune but supply chain is competitive advantage. 90%+ dual sourced with geographic diversity. Culture of positive discontent drives efficiency rather than passing costs to customers. Guide contemplates current tariff environment.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Hoping maybe you could give some color on what you're seeing in the ad stops and how you're thinking about that trend in your fiscal twenty-six guidance

Show response

Management declined to give specific ad stop numbers but characterized momentum as positive. Services sector (70% of base) performing well.

I was just hoping you could give a little bit more color on the cadence of your '26 outlook as I imagine you're going to have a lot more difficult comps

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

FY2026 guide consistent with prior year approach. Mid to high single-digit revenue, EPS 7-10.2% growth, operating margin above 23% at midpoint.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you thinking about the opportunity to consolidate, I guess, more midsized private platforms to be available in rental uniform

Show response

Tuck-in M&A key strategy for decades. Brings route efficiencies, customer base, and capacity. Pacing depends on family dynamics and retirement timing.

what you're seeing on the COGS side related to tariffs on Mexico and China, and I guess, is there any way to frame the exposure

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Too early to tell impact. Less than 10% sole sourced. Dual sourcing and geographic diversity provide advantage. Amortization gives visibility and time to pivot.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there anything you think might make incremental operating margins moderate in the second half versus the first half

Show response

Management guided for 25%-35% incremental margins long-term. First half outperformance above 40% not expected to sustain, but initiatives continue.

the proposed tariffs from the new administration and potential impact on your material costs, if those proposals come through

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management confident in supply chain resilience. Noted garment cost amortization over time provides buffer, and global supply chain positioned to pivot.

ITGartner5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
IT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you expect to add more salespeople in the second half to support that CV reacceleration?

Labor MarketRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gene Hall said Gartner will add sales headcount as productivity improves, noting significant underutilized capacity that BTI and engagement gains should lift.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you think we see a reacceleration in the ex Fed CV growth number next quarter

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Craig declined to provide per-segment per-quarter expectations but reiterated overall CV growth acceleration over the course of 2026.

can you just clear up kind of in response to that, like if there's anything that's changed on your approach to pricing or offering discounts

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Craig firmly denied any discounting changes. Normal annual price increase went into effect November 1 and remains in place. No change in discounting posture or philosophy.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you share some early indications on customer engagement there? And also, I just wanted to confirm whether that's going to be part of normal license access

Show response

Gene confirmed 100% rollout to licensed users with no additional fees. Key impact is increased content usage and engagement, expected to help retention.

Is that primarily on the small tech vendor piece? And do you expect client count to stabilize or increase in '26

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Craig confirmed client count decline driven by small tech vendor churn (going out of business, losing funding). Expects stabilization and modest growth over medium term as they target 12-16% CV growth.

RSGRepublic Services2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
RSG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

have you seen any retention impacts at your customers based on the pricing increases you've taken over the past couple of years

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jon acknowledged some ES churn primarily on event-based work pricing, not recurring revenue customers. Some lost customers are returning after discovering low price doesn't equal best value.

Any early indication on what you're anticipating for price/cost spread in '26

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jon confirmed 75-100bps price-cost spread maintained heading into 2026, with both pricing and cost inflation moderating in tandem.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CTAS Cintas150%none of 15 questions
IT Gartner50%none of 5 questions
RSG Republic Services2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CTAS
    Cintas · 15 questions
    0%none of 15 questions
  • IT
    Gartner · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • RSG
    Republic Services · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cost Pressure6
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Demand5
  • Margin4
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Pricing4
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • M&A2
  • Labor Market1
Show all 11 topics
  • Cloud & AI1