Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Kalei Akamine
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 36on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 36 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 36 of 36 questions from 6 companies
EQTEQT Corporation11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you seeing margin opportunities that maybe have been overlooked by others
Show response
Toby said opportunities aren't overlooked but out of reach for smaller peers; EQT's scale allows meaningful LNG exposure while still being a small portion of a diversified portfolio.
How would you guys frame up the near-term opportunity set in terms of scale? And also curious if terms are evolving beyond the
Show response
Toby cited big in-basin plans: NextEra 10 GW in PA, Portsmouth 9+ GW in Ohio, WV 50x50 plan; Jeremy quantified 2-3 Bcf/d already partnered with potential for 8-10 Bcf/d additional egress and pull.
Calendar 2025 Q4
That project was upsized from 300 million cubic feet per day to 400 million cubic feet per day. Just kind of curious what's behind that design decision
Show response
Jeremy detailed the Ohio opportunity: FT contracts rolling over, Utica inventory depleted by ~2030, positioning EQT to backfill volumes and capture premium pricing through Clarington infrastructure.
It shows really strong performance on the main line above nameplate capacity. Just kind of curious what you guys are learning about the effect of the capacity on that system
Show response
Toby noted the 2.1 Bcf/d record is weather-dependent; the more important signal is Station 165 pricing showing tremendous unmet demand that MVP Boost will address.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I appreciate the call out for maintenance CapEx, but for fair can we also get your view on maintenance production
Show response
Jeremy confirmed 2026 production approximately flat to 2025, with Q4 guidance (adjusted for curtailments) as the run rate to extrapolate.
Some would say that you don't have the same presence in Ohio as you do in Southwest PA. And, therefore, those projects might be out of reach
Show response
Toby described three tiers of opportunity capture: operational footprint, midstream footprint (3,000 miles), and commercial footprint (East of Mississippi), confirming Ohio conversations are active.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are there any guardrails that you can kind of offer around CapEx, how you plan to shape that maybe over how many years that could be spread over
Show response
Toby framed growth as low single-digit to meet demand, emphasizing scale, investment-grade balance sheet, inventory durability, and existing flowing volumes as enabling factors.
Can you kind of offer a view on where leading-edge D&C capital per lateral foot metrics are compared to maybe '24 and then offer a view on how much run rate is remaining
Show response
Toby noted single-digit well cost improvements continuing, compression program halfway done delivering twice the budgeted uplift, plus Olympus integration providing additional optimization runway.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you talk about whether you're making any upside in from your own best practices onto the Olympics assets
Show response
Toby confirmed conservative underwriting with well spacing and completion intensity tweaks as potential upside not yet factored into the acquisition economics.
Wondering if there are any opportunities to link that system into Equitrans? So differently, are there any synergies from linking into Equitrans
Show response
Toby confirmed plans to integrate Olympus midstream into Equitrans network and leverage the combined system for in-basin demand opportunities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
we saw a filing suggesting that the route would be shorter, 31 miles farther than 75 miles with maybe fewer water crossings
Show response
Jeremy confirmed Southgate is on track and cited it as a tangible example of upstream-midstream integration synergy not counted in the formal synergy numbers.
CTRACoterra8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think you guys are still calling out 12 years of drilling in the slide deck. And this year, you're doing about 11 wells. Is the inventory math as simple as [ A times B ]?
Show response
Akamine questioned Marcellus inventory calculation methodology. Deshazer clarified 12-year inventory based on 3-year average well count and capital spend, not current year TILs, with cost improvements allowing more wells per dollar.
maybe you can start by calling out some key operating wins. And then when you look at the Marcellus landscape, do you think that the application of your best practices could create value through M&A?
Show response
Akamine asked about Marcellus operating improvements since Cabot acquisition and M&A potential. Sirgo highlighted dramatic lateral length increases, well spacing optimization, and full cost value chain attack including converting all frac water from trucking to piping.
Calendar 2025 Q2
The argument for a more aggressive buyback, however, is that your share price is currently at a discount and that you don't have a balance sheet problem
Show response
Shane Young framed debt paydown as facilitating a return to robust buyback program, consistent with long-term strategy. Acknowledged current price attractiveness and hinted buyback pace may pick up in H2.
How do you think about using those lease sales to add to your position? Do you see it becoming a more material part of your capital budget going forward?
Show response
Tom Jorden expressed enthusiasm for returning federal lease sales, noting they had been nearly absent for years. Expects competitive pricing but Coterra will participate aggressively.
Calendar 2025 Q1
where the wells long enough to get a read on the productivity and how it compares to the Wolfcamp.
Show response
Tom Jorden confirmed laterals were long enough to assess productivity, with some DSUs performing as expected. Reiterated with high confidence this is mechanical not reservoir or spacing related.
If this is the new program, if this program is a new template kind of point forward, can you give us a sense of what the run rate capital and the oil plateau could look like.
Show response
Shane Young confirmed opportunity set extends well through end of decade even in Wolfcamp-only scenario. Tom reaffirmed the three-year plan remains intact with changes discussed on the call.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about your unit OpEx guide? It seems to be moving up meaningfully year over year. I just wanna understand what's driving that.
Show response
Blake Sirgo explained higher unit costs driven by oily acquired assets with low GOR, plus mix shift toward more oil BOEs versus gas. Emphasized the higher-cost barrels come with superior margins.
The high end appears to imply Permian oil jumping significantly in the second half of this year. I know your thoughts on where Permian oil can exit the year.
Show response
Blake Sirgo declined to provide a specific exit rate but characterized the trajectory as consistent rightward growth driven by steady activity.
FANGDiamondback Energy7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
64% is the lowest in your stack. Wondering if you could talk about any opportunities to increase that interest
Show response
Kaes confirmed always looking to increase WI; position built through partnerships with lower WI but organic netting-up (swaps, trades, mineral purchases) will follow.
the number of targeted drills and TILs expected this year, the DUC backlog that supports that program
Show response
Kaes said the model doesn't show meaningful DUC build or draw; Q1-Q2 CapEx at lower end of quarterly range with potential for H2 reductions if Barnett costs and surfactant results trend favorably.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is the associated maintenance oil production level maybe on an operated basis associated with that? And then is this spend level inclusive of all the ratable non-D&C spend
Show response
Kaes confirmed the Q4 CapEx range times four is the maintenance bogey for ~510K bbl/d, noting capital efficiency this year compares favorably to any year in FANG history.
can you give us an update on where you expect to be with that backlog at year-end? And then talk about activating that
Show response
Kaes said continuous pumping may reduce crew needs by half to one; drilling efficiencies resulted in more wells drilled than expected, keeping DUC backlog as a structural advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q2
does that marry up with your outlook for '26 oil prices
Show response
Kaes explained the light 2026 hedge position is a function of expensive put premiums and declining hedge needs as balance sheet and share count shrink.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just update us on where the progress is with respect to that goal
Show response
Danny confirmed 100-120 wells/year per crew is achievable and the team is working on pad configuration and water infrastructure to execute programmatically.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How should we think about how the financial benefits are gonna flow back
Show response
Kaes outlined multiple revenue streams: equity participation, gas supply contracts (fixed/collar/index), and power take-back, but noted terms still being negotiated.
DVNDevon Energy5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
LOE plus GP&T on the full year guide is lower than 1Q '26. Can you kind of talk about the cadence of the lower cost there
Show response
John attributed Q4 drop to condition-based maintenance savings, microgrid energization, and new GP&T contract; Q1 uptick from weather and workover timing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
this presidential administration has put federal lease sales back on the table, and they should occur with a pretty steady cadence
Show response
Clay confirmed participation in federal lease sales; existing infrastructure and efficiency machine gives competitive position.
Can you kind of compare how the Wolfcamp B results are comparing to your expectations?
Show response
John said Wolfcamp B mostly meeting/beating expectations; well productivity will be consistent forward; Delaware D&C at new 1,800 ft/day record.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you see any other opportunities to remove fixed cost on the gathering and transportation side maybe by buying in certain assets
Show response
Clay said they evaluate both buying and selling midstream assets objectively; Matterhorn proceeds go to balance sheet.
Can you talk about the productivity that you're seeing so far, i.e., how does it compare to Tier 1 zones like the A bench?
Show response
John said Wolfcamp B results consistent with expectations; oil cut varies geographically (higher north, gassier south).
EXEExpand Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
I am curious how much gas you have to commit to long-term sales agreements
Show response
Mike said Gulf Coast is where they can build and grow volumes to meet demand. Three-basin advantage provides unique commercial flexibility. Dan noted commitments are staged over five to fifteen year timeframes with new premium market sales added. Individual sales become assets with secondary optimization value.
What does desired exposure look like today? Is it a quarter of gas? Is it a third?
Show response
Brittany said the pre-merger 15-20% LNG target is outdated given broader demand growth including power and industrial. Now agnostic to specific premium market type, seeking highest-return diversification. Will not be overly prescriptive on LNG percentage.
Calendar 2025 Q1
kind of expecting a certain cadence for unit cost, that starts high and trend lower as you grow volumes. But in 1Q, you're already at the low end
Show response
Josh noted Q1 benefited from lower planned maintenance and workover expenses. Absolute spending expected to increase with production but maintaining full-year guidance.
Can you kind of give us a sense of where Haynesville gas production is in real time, i.e., what is it today or perhaps have been in March
Show response
Nick confirmed Haynesville production flattens after Q2 with no growth until 2026. NG3 will be filled by redirecting volumes from interruptible transport, optimizing delivery points.
COPConocoPhillips1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
it appears that you're still in the same production track. So kind of wondering if you can hit those production targets without adding significant activity
Show response
Ryan Lance confirmed capital-light efficiency-driven growth with no rig additions needed, production growth as an output of stable programs, and deep diverse inventory options.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EQT EQT Corporation | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| CTRA Coterra | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| FANG Diamondback Energy | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| DVN Devon Energy | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| EXE Expand Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| COP ConocoPhillips | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- EQTEQT Corporation · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- CTRACoterra · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- FANGDiamondback Energy · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- DVNDevon Energy · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- EXEExpand Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- COPConocoPhillips · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment18
- Demand8
- Innovation & R&D6
- M&A5
- Competitive Dynamics4
- Cost Pressure4
- Margin4
- Supply Chain4
- Guidance Reliability4
- Capital Allocation3
Show all 14 topics
- Revenue Growth3
- Cloud & AI2
- Regulation Policy2
- Macroeconomic1