Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Karl Ackerman

BNP Paribas · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
90on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%3 of 90 questions
Companies
13questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 90 of 90 questions from 13 companies

WDCWestern Digital13 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
WDC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we think about the gross margin delta today between nearline versus non-nearline?

Show response

Irving said nearline and non-nearline gross margins are both in the mid-50s with little differentiation now.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you delineate that with respect to build-to-order and LTAs

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Kris clarified purchase orders placed ~1 year in advance, with LTA frameworks governing periods beyond the first year with more variability.

consider adding internal heads or media capacity to support these multiyear commitments from customers

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Irving stated focus is on areal density and platter count (up to 14 disks) rather than unit capacity. Will invest in heads/media capacity only if economically justified.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can talk about the interest beyond your initial customer given the robust hyperscaler demand for exabyte capacity

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Irving confirmed HAMR qualification started with one hyperscaler this month, second customer qualification imminent. Higher capacity drives key to meeting strong exabyte demand.

Do you believe Agentic AI demand can enable you to exceed your long-term exabyte growth CAGR of low 20s

Show response

Irving confirmed inference driving significant data generation. Hyperscalers manage economics across SSD/HDD/tape tiers, and inference data volumes favor HDD economics. Conversations with customers indicate inference will drive significant HDD storage requirements.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was hoping you could discuss the breadth and stickiness of the announced price increase you disseminated in September

Show response

Irving clarified price increase letter targets channel customers (client/consumer/low-end nearline), roughly 10-15% of business. Hyperscale LTA/PO terms unaffected.

could you perhaps update your thoughts on whether you intend to divest remaining stake

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kris confirmed 7.5M SanDisk shares remain, to be monetized before February 21 anniversary. May use debt-for-equity exchange again.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was hoping if you could discuss the adoption curve and willingness of hyperscalers to grow their hard drive base exclusively on UltraSMR

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Irving confirmed third hyperscaler qualified on UltraSMR, fourth in process. Technology extensible to HAMR. Legacy workloads use lower capacity, but new workloads all on highest capacity.

how do you balance the visibility with those customers as well as the demand request for those customers as you plan your capacity

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Irving explained 12-month lead times driven by 9-month head wafer production. LTA visibility extending from 12 to 18 months. Investment focused on head/media for areal density.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was hoping you could provide a bit more color on the growth curve of private cloud and SMB customers

DemandTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Irving sees opportunities in sovereign and private clouds. No pull-forward behavior observed; linearity consistent with historical patterns.

what are the hurdles for you to add manufacturing capacity? Is it driven by certain visibility you have on LTAs or other things we should consider

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Irving explained exabyte growth driven by areal density and Ultra SMR technology without CapEx. New 28TB and 36TB platforms coming in next few months.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was hoping you could discuss the order rates and visibility you see for these high capacity drives as we think about the sustainability and growth

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Irving confirmed qualifications completing in CQ1, with customers excited about the new drives. Nearline outlook remains healthy.

Calendar 2024 Q3

how much room do you have in your existing facilities to expand capacity of heads and media for hard disk drives?

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Asked about HDD capacity expansion room; management declined to quantify capacity but described sizing to demand, partial.

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
CSCO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Can you quantify how Cisco Cloud Control contributed to this product growth, or is that synergy a driver going forward?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins credited the broader platform approach rather than Cisco Cloud Control alone for driving the campus demand.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk about the order rates you are seeing for your 51 terabit and 100 terabit data center switch portfolio

Show response

Robbins said demand exceeds supply for 51.2T products. Huge acceleration in 800G optics and Acacia portfolio. Additional design wins in Q2.

could you speak to the order rates and new product demand traction of your security portfolio

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins detailed 1,000 new customers for new security products (up 100% QoQ), 4,000 total since launch. Third consecutive quarter of double-digit firewall unit growth. Organic security exiting Q4 near double-digit revenue growth.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how much of the incremental $1 billion in revenue in fiscal 2026 is coming from an earlier than expected enterprise campus refresh

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins said guide raise reflects both hyperscale AI and campus refresh strength, didn't quantify exact split.

have you been able to secure enough capacity are you constrained in any way from fulfilling a doubling of AI orders

Supply ChainCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Patterson showed inventory plus advanced purchase commitments up $1B in 90 days and 38% ($3B+) YoY, demonstrating capacity investment to meet accelerating hyperscale demand.

Calendar 2025 Q3

could discuss whether Silicon One can represent half your switch ASICs in the next three years

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins confirmed intent to drive Silicon One adoption as fast as possible across 800G Nexus and smart switches, said half of switch ASICs in three years is approximately right.

I was hoping you could rank all of the segments that give you the most conviction in hitting the target

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins ranked: 1) Service provider/cloud, 2) Enterprise, 3) Public sector. Ex-federal, rest of world grew 10%. Federal expected to return to growth in FY26 but below FY25 levels.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was hoping you could quantify your AI orders for enterprise at our incremental to the $1 billion of order target

Show response

Robbins said enterprise AI orders are in the hundreds of millions with acceleration but noted NVIDIA partnership solutions start rolling out in ~60 days, so upside is still ahead.

when might Silicon One offer co-packaged optics solutions as you seek to broaden your data center switch offering

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Robbins said CPO was demonstrated in 2023, team actively working on it. Adoption driven by customer demand for power benefits and speed requirements.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Is the greater visibility and support of your April core outlook from enterprises and even telco operators, coming from just a return to normal order patterns or lead times extending

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Robbins and Herren confirmed demand is from normalized ordering patterns, not from extended lead times like the supply shortage era.

Calendar 2024 Q4

which areas of your business do you believe you need to accelerate investment to drive growth into '25 and '26

Capex InvestmentCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Scott said restructuring was about reallocation not cost cuts. Investment focused on AI and security. YoY OpEx growth mostly driven by Splunk addition.

is the growth in AI networking hardware primarily driven by one hyperscaler today

Show response

Chuck emphasized the distributed nature of AI infrastructure demand across multiple hyperscalers, not concentrated in one customer.

COHRCoherent, Inc.11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you unpack that a bit and describe how much of that is an uplift from perhaps 1.6T transceivers?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Jim attributed the $3 billion target primarily to data center and communications, spanning 800G and 1.6T transceivers, OCS, CPO, multi-rail, and LTA-linked pricing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you speak to the investments you're making today to drive growth and whether OpEx growth could grow at perhaps half of sales growth?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim sees R&D scaling slightly below revenue to maximize growth opportunities. Sherri confirmed SG&A target of 8% of revenue (Investor Day), R&D target of 10%. ERP consolidation and low-cost region G&A initiatives showing benefits.

Are you seeing a marked recovery across your broader industrial business excluding semi-cap, or is it too early to call out definitively yet?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed strong semi-cap orders pickup in December quarter expected to drive sequential industrial revenue growth from June quarter. Too early to call broad industrial recovery beyond semi-cap.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what about transceiver components for telecom? And as you address that, can you quantify the level of order visibility with your customers

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed record bookings for telecom and DCI components as well as transceivers. Customers booking over a year in advance for supply coverage, with large customers providing forecast visibility through calendar 2028.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you believe you can be in a position to service all or nearly all of your e-mail laser needs internally by the end of this calendar year

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim corrected that InP serves multiple products beyond EMLs (CW lasers, photodiodes). Will maintain internal/external mix for supply chain resilience.

do you believe that you can now grow or at least grow in line with your datacom growth rates that you've outlaid

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim confirmed targeting Investor Day growth range or better, actively adding capacity to support strong demand signals from datacenter customers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

could you quantify the gross margin impact on your March quarter and June quarter outlook from these portfolio optimization actions

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sherri noted no significant direct P&L impact from restructuring in Q3; benefits more long-term, though R&D shift to growth engines already visible.

how you see second half relative to first half in the context of your datacom transceiver business?

Show response

Jim confirmed strong short-term and long-term demand signals from datacenter customers, believes company gained share over last 2-3 quarters and focused on continuing gains.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is your AI transceiver opportunity this year gated by your current indium phosphide wafer capacity?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed InP capacity tripled YoY with CHIPS Act support for Sherman, TX expansion. Uses multisource strategy with external EML partners alongside internal production.

how should we think about OpEx in March and throughout '25? I guess do you anticipate growing OpEx in line with sales growth

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sherri explained OpEx increase driven by higher R&D spend for long-term growth, while SG&A was reduced sequentially. Deferred long-term model to Investor Day.

Calendar 2024 Q3

whether you are seeing data center customers reallocating procurement of optical transceivers to U.S.-domiciled suppliers like Coherent

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed supply chain resilience increasingly important to datacenter customers, highlighted geographic diversity and vertical integration as key differentiators.

CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
CRDO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Is not the customer mix moving more toward direct hyperscaler sales who are making their own custom transceivers

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Bill explained hyperscalers point module customers to Credo components and that component and module sales will remain complementary long term.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Should we assume a similar NIC-to-TOR attach rate for custom ASICs and agentic CPU servers

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said training, inference and agentic all deploy differently but each is a strong connectivity opportunity; agentic drives more front-end connections.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you speak to why gross margins are guided down roughly 360 basis points at midpoint of your outlook?

Show response

Dan attributed the guide-down to conservative forecasting and quarterly mix, noting Credo is running at or above the high end of its 63-65% long-term range.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you speak to why you are now licensing your active electrical cable IP to third parties

Competitive DynamicsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bill said Credo filed an ITC case to protect AEC IP built over 7-8 years, has reached licensing deals with 3 parties and more in flight, with no competitive change.

what was the largest delta in your upwardly revised outlook versus your prior outlook of 960 and change.

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dan attributed the raised outlook to broad, industry-wide forecast strengthening over recent quarters rather than a single customer or program.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you believe AECs offer greater competitive advantages to scale-up Ethernet or PCIe-based applications such as UA Link

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked whether AECs have a larger advantage in scale-up Ethernet vs PCIe; Brennan said the near-term scale-up opportunity is with PCIe and that Credo is protocol-agnostic on the 200 gig per lane SerDes.

you are seeing at least one of the two new hyperscalers adopting the AEC this year

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked whether new hyperscalers are adopting 100 gig per lane AECs across multiple programs; Brennan confirmed recent ramps are at 100 gig per lane and noted a pull-in versus the prior schedule.

Calendar 2025 Q2

you spoke about CapEx doubling this year to support your sales outlook for fiscal '26.

Show response

Fleming said CapEx is driven by 3nm production mask-set tape-outs, disconnected from customer contracts rather than take-or-pay commitments.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what's driving the uptick in gross margins in the April quarter? Is it IP licensing revenue related?

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dan attributed the margin uptick principally to scale, with product gross margin ex-services at 62.4%, plus the Amazon warrant contra-revenue rolling off.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Of the four customers greater than 5% of revenue that you mentioned, are they primarily concentrated in AECs.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dan said the additional four 5%+ customers are broad-based across products, while the 10%+ customers are largely concentrated in AEC.

I was hoping you could discuss the revenue contribution you anticipate in the January quarter

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bill reiterated Credo is fundamentally a product company; IP will shrink as a percentage and remains lumpy, and he expects it below 10% this quarter.

ANETArista Networks7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
ANET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could you address the growing partnerships you have with NeoClouds adopting custom SKUs?

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jayshree said NVLink dominates scale-up today but Arista is more engaged in non-NVIDIA accelerators (AMD MI, Google TPUs) for scale-up and scale-out.

Calendar 2026 Q1

change your ability to monetize your services to capture more of the value that you are adding to these applications

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree firmly stated ANET remains product-led and does not expect services as a percentage of revenue to increase despite deeper design engagement with customers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you to the demand process you are seeing for front end

Show response

Jayshree confirmed $3B+ AI target includes front-end demand tied to back-end clusters, with agentic AI applications expected to drive adoption across enterprise and XPU diversity.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How should we think about your market opportunity between disaggregated scheduled fabrics versus nonscheduled fabrics

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ken Duda highlighted 15 years of both architectures in production, offering choice between congestion-free scheduled fabric and lower-cost unscheduled, both running same EOS.

Calendar 2025 Q2

would you expect that all four cloud providers would adopt Arista switches for back-end deployments in 2026

Show response

Jayshree confirmed all four titans expected in back-end by 2026, with Neoclouds also adopting combined back-end and front-end deployments.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How do you see the general cadence of hyperscalers deploying 800 gig switch ports this year

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jayshree confirmed 800G activity picking up in 2025 following Etherlink portfolio introduction in late 2024, with some reflected in shipments and some in deferred.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Could you discuss the outlook for services relative to your outlook for March and the full-year

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Chantelle declined to guide services separately, noting timing effects from catching up to product post-COVID and suggesting historical trends as a guide.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

you noted that your growth of transceivers should accelerate over the next 4 to 5 quarters. Is that comment sequential or year-over-year

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael confirmed line of sight to $250M quarterly transceiver run rate. Wants to grow in margin-rich profitable fashion rather than unbounded. Added manufacturing capacity in Thailand to support bounded growth. Other growth drivers (CPO, OCS) provide additional upside beyond transceivers.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much of this, if at all, is from customers pulling forward transceiver demand ahead of potential tariffs

ChallengingCloud & AITrade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael dismissed pull-forward concerns, demand has been a constant race to keep up. Wupen confirmed ramps tied to dominant GPU and accelerator introductions but demand is broad-based.

is that for your Industrial Tech products or does that relate more toward Cloud & Networking

MarginCapex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wajid clarified DCI tunable products moving in-house. CapEx going in this quarter will add 50% more DCI capacity by end of CY2025. Contract manufacturers kept at full speed with incremental supply from Nava.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how should we think about the CapEx trajectory from here

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Wajid confirmed roughly matched CapEx in second half, primarily for EML capacity expansion in Japan. Thailand infrastructure mostly in place, needing some equipment orders.

are only 800G or could they be early samples of 1.6T

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Alan confirmed new customer wins are sub-1.6T. 1.6T with multiple customers but CY2026 timeframe. CW laser shortage impacting own transceiver production this quarter.

Calendar 2024 Q3

could you discuss whether the new wins that you're receiving are driven by data center customers reallocating procurement of these optical transceivers to U.S. domiciled suppliers

Competitive DynamicsTrade TariffsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris clarified wins are new opportunities, not reallocations, but U.S. headquarters and non-China manufacturing makes them more competitive. Scale-up optics still 1-1.5 years out.

are these transceiver opportunities being driven by hyperscalers or large customers connecting their own AI processors

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris declined to discuss customer architectures. Noted initial transceivers won't have Lumentum EMLs but future SKUs will increase vertical integration as they earn more share.

Show 7 more companies
SWKSSkyworks Solutions7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SWKS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

One of your competitors in mobile intra-quarter announced a long-term supply agreement with your largest customer.

Competitive DynamicsDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Could not comment on competitor terms; asserted the design pipeline is unchanged without addressing share risk directly.

Do you still anticipate Skyworks Solutions Inc.’s content to be relatively flat this year?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Reaffirmed flat blended content but declined SKU-level or timing detail, citing lack of visibility into sell-through.

Calendar 2025 Q4

should we expect that, you know, fiscal 2025 should be the trough in content at your largest customer?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Phil expressed satisfaction at defending key sockets but wants to do better. Cited strong tailwinds from upgrade cycles and AI demand pushing to edge. Seeing strong unit demand across mobile and broad markets.

could you also address where you're seeing the most strength of broad markets in March?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Phil identified three key growth areas: WiFi 7 with strong demand and path to WiFi 8, automotive connectivity in the sweet spot of growth with global wins, and data center power/timing products for 800G and 1.6T architectures.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was hoping you could clarify whether you're able to repurpose some of the RF designs that you've spent so much time on

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Technology building blocks are reusable across mobile and broad markets. 85% of large customer revenue is phone-related, 15% from watch/tablet/PC/home/vision. Non-phone content growing.

Calendar 2024 Q3

do you have an inventory days target? Because you continue to make good strides in reducing inventory days now in the 130 range

Show response

Confirmed inventory reduced from >$1.2B to <$800M over seven quarters. Can reduce further though it pressures utilization and gross margin. Revenue seasonality affects inventory days.

do you believe the M&A environment is more favorable from a regulatory and funding perspective in '25?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Liam cited optionality but remained vague on M&A plans. Emphasized discipline and shareholder returns but avoided specifics on buyback acceleration.

CIENCiena Corporation6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
CIEN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

does that continue to tilt the TAM towards 2/3 line systems versus pluggables

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Marc said longer scale-across distances tilt mix toward photonics/line systems; the Nubis re-driver won't be meaningful in 2026 but ramps accretively in '27-'28.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Could you speak to the duration of this accelerated CapEx spending, which seems driven by enhanced visibility you now see extending over a multiyear period?

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mark confirmed FY2026 capacity CapEx up 50% from FY2025 (itself doubled). Benefits primarily show in late FY2026 and into FY2027. Not providing FY2027 CapEx guidance yet.

you also spoke about more aggressive cost reductions to support margins. I am curious if you could expand on that

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Scott outlined three cost reduction levers: volume scale over fixed costs, engineering redesign (vertical integration, part substitution, multi-sourcing), and supply chain ecosystem optimization. All actively being pursued with visible results.

Calendar 2025 Q3

why can't operating margins attain the your your long term goal of 15% next year?

ChallengingMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mark clarified that 15-16% operating margin IS being pulled forward to FY2026 from FY2027. Operating leverage from 17% revenue growth with flat OpEx drives this acceleration.

could you talk about whether your order visibility extends into fiscal twenty seven with these cloud providers

Show response

Gary described the opportunity as early innings of a secular shift. Noted that inside-data-center coherent adoption and new applications still ahead provide multi-year durability beyond FY2026.

Calendar 2025 Q2

does the increased backlog exiting 2026 assume a higher mix of transponder blades?

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed more capacity sales next year will drive margin improvement. Scott added that all major coherent ingredients are proprietary IP, with greater proportion on own components over time.

STXSeagate Technology Holdings6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
STX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we think about Seagate’s growing exposure to neo clouds and foundational model companies?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Dave described growing neo-cloud and model-developer dialogues but did not parse the September outlook across hyperscale, neo cloud and on-prem as asked.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how quickly might HAMR exceed half of your total exabyte shipments

Product LaunchCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Romano clarified 70% of nearline exabytes on HAMR by fiscal 2027 end, with majority of HAMR exabytes being Mozaic 4 by end of calendar 2026. Mosley noted wafer fab is full and blend management is key.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what portion of your LTAs for overall nearline HDD capacity has fixed or multi-quarter pricing agreements

Show response

Mosley confirmed pricing resets occur as customers transition to higher capacity product generations on new LTAs. Calendar 2026 is largely booked with 2027 planning underway.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does exabyte slowdown in the context of that 25% exabyte growth over time? Or do you think expect demand actually accelerates into '27

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mosley confirmed transitioning to 4TB per platter will significantly increase exabyte supply. Focus is on qualifying as many CSPs as possible on 4+ over the next year.

Calendar 2024 Q4

are your nearline and hyperscale customers giving you more visibility today, which I think was six months or longer last quarter

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mosley confirmed the production issue only affected PMR 24-28TB drives, not HAMR products. BTO visibility remains strong with customers viewing the issue as irrelevant to long-term plans.

Calendar 2024 Q3

if it would be better characterized as strong indications of interest

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Asked whether build-to-order visibility rests on take-or-pay contracts and about the SMR mix; Gianluca said agreements vary but the vast majority are orders fully committed by customers out in time.

SNDKSandisk Corporation4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
SNDK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Consumer revenue is down a bit this quarter. Is that allocation choice or demand driven?

Show response

Goeckeler said consumer pricing adjusts more slowly than transactional markets and they are still finding the right equilibrium; Visoso noted prices are up and the business is performing well.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you update us with your production roadmap to meet these new requirements? Like, I think they are high IOPS SSDs

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO confirmed compute-focused TLC drives are the current growth engine with BiCS8 migration coming, alongside high-IOPS SSD and HBF innovation for next-gen AI storage architectures.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is it fair to assume cost declines can approach, I suppose, high teens as you transition aggressively toward BiCS8?

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management confirmed cost headwinds turning to tailwinds in December quarter but pushed back on high-teens cost decline estimate as too aggressive.

would you anticipate simply transitioning client and edge wafer capacity to enterprise?

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management confirmed no dedicated capacity adds for enterprise SSDs; allocation will be optimized quarter-by-quarter for best financial returns across the portfolio.

AVGOBroadcom Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
AVGO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you speak to the supply chain resiliency and visibility you have with your key material suppliers, particularly co-ops as you not only support your existing customer programs

Supply ChainCloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Hock said Broadcom controls many of the key active components (DSPs, lasers, VCSELs) and sees supply chain visibility through 2026, with power/transformers/turbines being the out-of-scope bottleneck.

Calendar 2025 Q3

have you completely converted your top 10,000 accounts from vSphere to the entire vSphere Cloud Foundation virtualization stack

Subscriber GrowthProduct LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Hock said 90%+ of top 10,000 accounts bought VCF licenses. Second phase is enabling deployment. Acknowledged VCF commoditizes underlying hardware, no merchant silicon cross-sell benefit.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how important is demand adoption for co-packaged optics in achieving this 5 to 10x higher content for scale-up networks?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Hock said copper interconnects dominate scale-up today but optical will replace at larger cluster sizes; pluggable or co-packaged optics both on Broadcom's roadmap.

ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
ALAB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you discuss the breadth of customer wins, including a growing mix of neo clouds

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sanjay cited over 10 customers engaged on Scorpio X, more production ramps by year-end/early next year, support for both liquid and air cooling, and multiple platforms at the lead hyperscaler.

Calendar 2025 Q4

your customer opportunity for integrating your optical eyeglass cover technology is larger for a switch portfolio

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management said optical for scale-up is a very large opportunity, likely larger than signal conditioning, with scale-up deployments around 2028.

MUMicron Technology, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MU company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Are higher memory prices reducing demand in this area of the market?

Show response

Analytical probe about a trend; acknowledged a second sequential bit decline in mobile and client but noted revenue still grew on higher pricing and mix.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
WDC Western Digital130%none of 13 questions
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.120%none of 12 questions
COHR Coherent, Inc.110%none of 11 questions
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd119%1 of 11 questions
ANET Arista Networks70%none of 7 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.714%1 of 7 questions
SWKS Skyworks Solutions70%none of 7 questions
CIEN Ciena Corporation617%1 of 6 questions
STX Seagate Technology Holdings60%none of 6 questions
SNDK Sandisk Corporation40%none of 4 questions
  • WDC
    Western Digital · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • CSCO
    Cisco Systems, Inc. · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • CRDO
    Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 11 questions
    9%1 of 11 questions
  • ANET
    Arista Networks · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • SWKS
    Skyworks Solutions · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • CIEN
    Ciena Corporation · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • STX
    Seagate Technology Holdings · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • SNDK
    Sandisk Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 13 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AVGO Broadcom Inc.30%none of 3 questions
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MU Micron Technology, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • AVGO
    Broadcom Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • ALAB
    Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MU
    Micron Technology, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q370%none of 7 questions5
2024 Q4120%none of 12 questions8
2025 Q1911%1 of 9 questions6
2025 Q2100%none of 10 questions7
2025 Q3157%1 of 15 questions10
2025 Q4150%none of 15 questions10
2026 Q1911%1 of 9 questions6
2026 Q2100%none of 10 questions9
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 7 companies
  5. 2025 Q315 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  6. 2025 Q415 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 10 companies
  7. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 9 companies
  9. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand37
  • Cloud & AI25
  • Competitive Dynamics20
  • Revenue Growth17
  • Product Launch15
  • Supply Chain15
  • Capex Investment14
  • Innovation & R&D12
  • Margin11
  • Pricing6
Show all 19 topics
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Subscriber Growth2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Inventory1
  • M&A1