Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Karl Keirstead
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 39on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 39 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 39 of 39 questions from 8 companies
WDAYWorkday, Inc.10 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
you gave us a preliminary look at 200 bps of margin expansion next year, a little bit more than I was modeling
Show response
Zane attributed the margin path to prioritization, scale leverage, and internal AI use with flat headcount, deferring specifics to the Investor Day.
Calendar 2026 Q2
what you are seeing in terms of seat growth versus module expansion as drivers of that nice overall expansion
Show response
Robert highlighted the long runway in agent and flex credit sales. Zane confirmed FSEs were flattish with tech sector declines offset elsewhere. Aneel noted AI is replacing labor not software, positioning Workday as a beneficiary of the shift to agentic work.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you were the disruptor 20 years ago, and you and others forced incumbents at the time, Oracle and PeopleSoft, et cetera, to react
Show response
Aneel argued this transition is different because AI is built on cloud, not replacing it. Keys are right data model for LLM reasoning, strong API investment, and identifying where customer savings come from. Role-based agent approach to improving business process execution at lower cost.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe a point year over year from the tenant contracts maybe a point year over year from Paradox and a quarter from Sana
Show response
Zane confirmed Karl's math was generally right. Added that both Sana and Paradox contribute roughly one point to Q4 subscription revenue growth combined. Absent Sana, Q4 guidance was consistent with view from a quarter ago.
can you just maybe express confidence level in hitting those DIA go lives
Show response
Zane expressed high confidence in DIA milestones worth roughly $15M in Q4. Carl added they are already negotiating a follow-on expansion to take the platform to next level with further security requirements across broader DoD.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you mentioned that the July quarter had a boost from elevated early renewals. Was that beyond what you were anticipating
Show response
Zane confirmed early renewals were above expectations and a big contributor to cRPO upside. Paradox guidance increase is $15M, which is a good rough proxy for Q4 contribution. Carl added early renewals are entirely customer-driven by demand for new AI solutions, not incentivized.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you're already at the fiscal 2027 target. So at first blush, it's easy to conclude that maybe that out your target hasn't an upward bias
Show response
Zane noted Q1 was not just an isolated data point and outlined continued efficiency efforts. But cautioned against getting ahead of themselves given investment opportunities and uncertain macro.
advising investors to think about the time frame when you'll see real monetization of these AI products, when it can be, you know, needle moving
Show response
Carl argued AI is already needle-moving with 100% YoY growth. Cited Recruiting Agent, Talent Optimization, Extend Pro, and Evisort (100%+ YoY). Seven new agents coming in H2.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what areas are you trimming as a result of the RIF, whether it's focused on functional areas, or GEOs that you're downsizing
Show response
Carl outlined reinvestment areas: AI in product/technology, international expansion including India and Costa Rica, go-to-market sales capacity, and partner ecosystem. Expects higher headcount by next year.
Calendar 2024 Q4
on Q1, you mentioned that it will likely be sub 14%. So that would be, call it, a 150-plus bps decel from the second half this year
Show response
Zane cited leap year as ~1pp Q1 headwind and strategic deals contributing ~0.5pp second-half improvement. Carl detailed AI pipeline with Recruiter Agent, Talent Optimization, and upcoming Expense, Successor, and Optimize Agents.
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how material do you think traction could be for open and custom models over the next year or two
Show response
Answered the architecture and Microsoft-benefit half fully (harness separate from model, Azure fungible across model families) but gave no sizing for open or custom model traction.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm just curious your confidence in working through the physical component constraints to hit that number does it involve the greater use of partners
Show response
Amy expressed strong confidence in executing the CapEx plan, noting efficiencies are speeding up data center deliveries. Allocation will balance Azure demand with first-party Copilot usage across coding, productivity, and security.
Calendar 2025 Q4
comment qualitatively on the amount of capacity that that's coming on
Show response
Hood said the sites are multiyear deliveries and told investors to abstract away from specific locations, the focus is adding capacity globally as fast as possible.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the investment in OpenAI that sits in other income at $4.1 billion is so large
Show response
Hood clarified no impact from the new agreement; the entire increase reflects Microsoft's equity-method share of OpenAI losses. No accounting change signaled.
Calendar 2025 Q2
this is the second quarter in a row of pretty material Azure upside
Show response
Nadella listed migrations, cloud-native scaling, and new AI workloads as the three compounding drivers, saying migrations are 'middle innings' and durable.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the one that stands out to me is the 16 point growth rate lift to Azure from AI
Show response
Hood corrected the framing: Azure outperformance vs. guidance was non-AI execution; AI upside was only from delivering supply early, since supply and demand were tightly matched.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to ask you about the Stargate news and the announced changes in the OpenAI relationship last week
Show response
Nadella reaffirmed OpenAI partnership strength and a fungible fleet strategy; Hood described the CapEx pivot toward more CPU/GPU spend tied directly to customer contracts.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how does Microsoft manage the demands on CapEx from helping OpenAI with its scaling ambitions
Show response
Satya called the partnership mutually beneficial; Amy explained the OpenAI loss is a mechanical equity-method entry capped by the $13 billion total investment.
MDBMongoDB, Inc.6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
what kind of AI use cases or workloads have you found have the greatest pull through to Kong?
Show response
CJ identified large customer-facing enterprise workloads and production AI agents at scale as the highest-pull-through use cases.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Did the incremental portion of those deals ramp during the April quarter?
Show response
Mike said the multiyear deals were booked as expected; incremental Atlas expansion sits ahead as those relationships grow.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I didn't hear the reiteration of the high teens total revenue growth. Is that still on the table
Show response
Mike confirmed the medium-term high-teens total revenue growth framework from September's Investor Day still stands.
if you could just perhaps describe the bundling impact that, as you said, nicked a point off of Atlas.
Show response
Mike explained one exceptionally large bundled deal forced more revenue attribution to EA than Atlas, shaving a bit off the Atlas growth rate, a unique and unexpected event.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you feel like it's possible that actually Mongo is already getting an AI tailwind
Show response
CJ tied core strength to modernization of unstructured-data workloads and agreed AI can drive further modernization, though not deterministically.
Calendar 2025 Q1
To what extent is that go-to-market transition reflected in your guidance?
Show response
Dev said the upmarket move is already yielding sales-productivity gains embedded in guidance, funded by reallocating sales resources rather than net new sales spend.
DDOGDatadog5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just wanted to unpack what's giving you that confidence? And in particular, is there anything interesting to call out
Show response
David explained Q2 confidence is grounded in record Q1 ARR adds that were very diversified and not concentrated. Olivier added that even excluding the largest Q4 customer land, Q1 was still a record ARR add quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are you able to clarify whether that was a 1-year deal or multiyear? And then related to that, David, what is the contribution to CRPO from that deal
Show response
Obstler declined specifics, noting the contract follows typical annual-plus commit structure. Clarified RPO acceleration was driven by broad bookings growth, not materially from this single contract.
what's the opportunity for Datadog to essentially follow that behavior and begin scaling on Oracle's target
Show response
Pomel noted custom-built training clusters like Stargate are more remote opportunities today, but if many companies adopt similar patterns, it becomes commercial. Datadog follows customers wherever they deploy.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you mentioned that you're optimistic about gross margins in the second half. Is that because of what Olivier just mentioned
Show response
Obstler confirmed H2 gross margin optimism is driven by cloud efficiency gains from Q2 being carried forward at run rate, plus further opportunities identified using cloud cost management tools.
do you think that this could be even short term, a modest source of margin pressure
Show response
Obstler explained margin differences are driven by customer size (volume discounts), not AI vs non-AI classification. Pomel added that engineering cloud efficiency efforts using their own products drove meaningful cost savings.
SNOWSnowflake Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I am just curious, during the quarter, did you detect any interesting behavioral shift
Show response
Sridhar and Christian confirmed customers want to switch and optimize across frontier and open models; neutrality and auto-routing are a clear advantage.
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think a lot of investors are worried that it's going to reach a point where customers might try to govern or throttle the use of these tools to try to contain spend.
Show response
Sridhar said cost governance (account- and agent-level token limits) is being built while the productivity value sustains adoption; Brian confirmed AI products carry lower gross margin but the full-year 75% product gross margin is maintained by offsetting with lower bandwidth cost from the new AWS contract.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was there anything unique that you did with Microsoft or with customers that are running on Azure worth calling out?
Show response
Mike said Azure grew 40% off a lower base on better field alignment with Microsoft; AWS still biggest.
Calendar 2025 Q2
there was really no mention of macro per se and no evidence in the numbers that you guys really saw much pressure.
Show response
Mike contrasted a more mature, cost-focused customer base and said no tariff or macro impact was visible.
TEAMAtlassian3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Yet, I'm looking at the Atlassian results and your margins, despite you guys also experiencing an uptick in AI usage, holding in there very well.
Show response
James cited disciplined hiring, resource reallocation, and moderating stock-based compensation, informing the 6.5% Q1 and 4.5% FY2027 GAAP operating margin guides. Mike added that a multi-year multi-model AI gateway blends models to hold gross margins despite surging AI usage.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I just wanted to test your confidence that the cloud revenue can be up enough such that you still feel comfortable with hitting that previous guide
Show response
Joe confirmed confidence in long-term targets. Cloud growth drivers consistent with Investor Day: large market opportunities, more users, higher ARPU, cross-sell/upsell, and differentiated AI position with Teamwork Graph.
Calendar 2025 Q2
maybe you could just unpack the Q1 guide. It's a reasonably large step down in growth
Show response
Joe attributed step-down to smaller Q1 expiration base vs Q4, headwinds from 1-year deal term programmatic change made a year ago, and beginning to lap server end-of-support migration benefit.
Show 2 more companies
NOWServiceNow2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm just wondering if you saw any even incremental change in broadly the selling environment in 2Q.
Show response
Bill said demand didn't change dramatically, geopolitical and tariff scenarios have become the new norm, which itself drives need for agentic AI to help companies respond in real-time to changing supply chains and pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I'm just curious whether all of this macro change and uncertainty in the last couple of months would have changed your view of that bookings CRPO seasonality?
Show response
Gina confirmed the CRPO seasonality shape is unchanged, Q3 trough followed by Q4 acceleration, and macro conditions have not altered the renewal backlog flow.
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there anything about the fiscal '26 5 point outperformance that in retrospect strikes you as somewhat nonrecurring
Show response
Brian said Crossix was a major driver of last year's 5-point beat. Expect continued healthy growth but would be surprised at same level of outperformance. Guidance philosophy unchanged: give best information and call it closest to the pin. No change in approach.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| DDOG Datadog | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| TEAM Atlassian | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| NOW ServiceNow | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- WDAYWorkday, Inc. · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- MSFTMicrosoft Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- MDBMongoDB, Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- DDOGDatadog · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- SNOWSnowflake Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- TEAMAtlassian · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- NOWServiceNow · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- VEEVVeeva Systems Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI18
- Revenue Growth14
- Demand11
- Margin7
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Guidance Reliability5
- Capex Investment4
- Cost Pressure3
- Capital Allocation3
- Macroeconomic3
Show all 17 topics
- Subscriber Growth2
- Supply Chain2
- Labor Market1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Pricing1