Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Ken Hoexter
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 59on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 22%13 of 59 questions
- Companies
- 9questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 59 of 59 questions from 9 companies
WABWabtec9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
maybe thoughts on sustaining the 12-month backlog at that nearly one-time book-to-bill
Show response
Rafael addressed demand and backlog conversion directly, citing global pipeline strength and the Australia win.
Calendar 2026 Q1
talk about the impact. We've got a lot of questions over the last few days, the impact that you see on the business
Show response
Rafael confirmed all announced tariffs included in guidance with no revenue impact. John added Section 232 changes are financially neutral and administratively easier. Four-pronged mitigation approach performing well with tariff pressure expected to dissipate in second half.
you've taken the midpoint up about $0.20. I guess you had a huge tax benefit this quarter
Show response
John detailed $0.10 operational improvement from structural cost management and digital project exit, offset by rising input costs (copper, aluminum, steel, silver, transportation, memory chips). Other $0.10 from currency fluctuations on international assets and favorable tax timing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
were half of those already in the backlog as of last quarter? Is it all new?
Show response
Rafael clarified all announced Class 1 orders were signed in 2025 and in backlog. Declined to comment on competitor specifics but expressed confidence in Tier 4 portfolio with proven reliability on over 1,000 units.
what was in the backlog and what is new when you think about those recent announcements?
Show response
Rafael confirmed all Q4 Class 1 orders are in backlog. John noted balanced 2026 plan with headwinds from mods, railcar builds, and tariffs. Tariff costs grew significantly from Q3 to Q4 and expected to continue into first half 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about the two upcoming acquisitions? And then organic growth after that
Show response
John confirmed Inspection Technologies tracking on plan with accretive margins and EPS. Frauscher expected by year-end and Delner in 2026, both expected to be accretive.
we're not seeing maybe as much of the margin impact. John, you kind of mentioned that in prepared remarks
Show response
John explained operational excellence, favorable price escalation timing, and integration savings offset unfavorable mix. Q4 margins expected to expand YoY but be lower sequentially due to fewer production days.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the stock's bid down 8% this morning. Think there's a concern on the mid-single digit revenue growth outlook versus what you've been generating
Show response
Rafael clarified M&A not included in guidance, ~$100M portfolio optimization headwind, and coverage aligned with prior years. Defended guidance credibility.
I want to talk about the 2025 outlook, not the five year, which I think you've delved into a bunch. But maybe the upside downside given the range
Show response
John outlined balanced revenue growth H1/H2, with earnings more tempered in H1 due to prior-year comps and Integration 3.0 ramp. 72% of backlog in firm orders.
CHRWC.H. Robinson7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Does this give you pause, given the ruling, until appeals are done to ensure you know what you buy
Show response
Damon said capital allocation and M&A strategy are unchanged; due diligence reviews every target's legal docket and takes provisions accordingly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How is Global Forwarding in terms of the AI deployment? Or is it still all brokerage
Show response
CTO confirmed same NAST AI playbook being deployed in Global Forwarding, with more impact expected in second half 2026. Long runway ahead in GF similar to NAST's multi-year journey.
In dropping the 12% of employees or a little bit less year-over-year, does that -- is there any -- maybe walk through that process
Show response
CEO said focus is on engineering workflows in order-to-cash process, not headcount targets. Natural turnover allows non-backfill. Invested in customer-facing and SMB roles. Contract mix rose to 70% from 65% as team prioritized standing by customers with high tender acceptance. NAST president said transactional pricing didn't match capacity cost early in quarter.
Calendar 2025 Q3
maybe delve into the $6 potential for '26 that you talked about
Show response
CFO said $6 EPS assumes 120M diluted shares (includes existing 4.5M share authorization, not the new $2B program which extends mostly beyond 2026). Challenging Q4 and Q1 for GF, but self-help initiatives drive confidence. Optionality to deploy margin above 40%/30% targets for AGP-accretive market share gains.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how do you balance that, I guess, with the spot? We've seen spot really come in given the weakness in the market
Show response
Contractual rates improving minimally YoY. Transactional market very competitive. NAST able to maintain and grow top-line margins by finding right volume-margin combination.
Dave, I guess earlier you talked about the AGP deceleration rate, so from 14% in January down to minus 2% in March
Show response
CFO attributed month-to-month AGP trend to tougher comps, not a signal of significance. CapEx lowered due to discretionary item reprioritization; all strategic initiatives fully funded.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you talk about given how far, I guess, maybe the squeeze we've already seen on rates and then what, I guess, could happen
Show response
CFO noted rate normalization headwind was built into 2026 bridge with net $10M enterprise headwind. Forwarding team successfully decoupled headcount from volume growth in 2024.
CSXCSX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the 350 basis point target, that includes the gain on sale, right?
Show response
Kevin clarified the margin guide includes first-half results; the ~$93M property gain was a first-half figure, much less in Q2. Steve added any headcount increase would be very modest.
Calendar 2026 Q1
maybe just talk about timing and scalability of when the double stacking is going to be fully launched and loaded
Show response
Maryclare gave detailed timeline, explained capacity doubling on east-west corridor and new market connections to Northeast.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you maybe talk dollar amounts for buckets so we can, I don't know, track something
Show response
Kevin said productivity is roughly equally divided between labor and PS&O lines, with more absolute dollar savings from PS&O due to lower core inflation on that line. Also cited fuel efficiency and rent improvement opportunities.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what at CSX you see that needs to be changed. Is it the culture? Operations
Show response
Steve praised the team's Q3 response but emphasized building a high-performance culture from a stable foundation. Discussed profitability levers of efficiency, productivity, price yield, and volume without specific targets.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How is the consumer doing? And then the Howard Street Tunnel, it sounded like 2Q '26 is when you expect that to open
Show response
Kevin clarified: trains through tunnel in Q4 2025, but double-stack capability requires bridge clearance in Q2 2026. Said autos and housing remain critical watch items needing interest rate relief.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I presume that's longer term, or are you suggesting that there are things near term that can kind of offset that
Show response
Joe cited steel production pickup from tariffs, potential US auto production uplift, strong grain harvest, and mineral demand as near-term offsets. Mike confirmed service metrics are unadjusted for construction.
Calendar 2024 Q4
did you say met coal at these levels, the 191, is that down 3% sequentially? Is that based on these levels or does it go lower
Show response
Kevin confirmed 3% sequential coal RPU decline at current levels with hope for above-200 recovery in H2. Fire-related mine outage expected back online in H2 with other sources partially backfilling.
JBHTJ.B. Hunt7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
where does utilization get to before you start buying equipment?
Show response
Management said it will improve box turns and use remaining containers before committing capital; Darren expressed no concern on rail service.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you noted in the past about 30% excess capacity in intermodal. I do not know where that—maybe an update on where that stands now
Show response
Darren said network can support up to 20% more volume without new capacity; strategy is to grow into prefunded investments. No capacity exit mechanism in intermodal like highway since capacity is mostly containers. Driver wages affect intermodal drayage but are a lower percentage of total cost than highway.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are we seeing that sustainably? Are you seeing that in terms of the capacity come out? And stay out as we now move into the New Year
Show response
Nick Hobbs confirmed capacity exits driven by visa policies, immigration enforcement, and bankruptcies; teams and reefer particularly tight. ICS adding carriers back after compliance screening but shifted to mid-size, not micro carriers. Shelley clarified fragile is a positive signal: rejection rates near 10% elevated, little supply elasticity, small demand changes creating bigger ripples.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that what's driving kind of spot rates up the last few weeks? Is that capacity removal already being seen in the market
Show response
Nick Hobbs confirmed enforcement activity drove recent spot rate tightening in 8-10 markets, including non-domicile and cabotage issues. Darren Field declined to discuss specific rail conversations but clarified a future merger would not require JBHT to move traffic to CSX; current NS footprint would not be forced to change.
Calendar 2025 Q2
now you're ending the 7% down comps from a year ago. So maybe can you describe the market backdrop now
Show response
Darren noted some changes in TransCon flow patterns in Q2 and a handful of customers signaling potential extra business in July. Built early surcharge program so shareholders don't absorb peak-like costs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you're talking about losing some business on price. Does that mean you're not pushing hard enough on price
Show response
Darren Field explained margin pressure comes from living with prior-year pricing plus excess equipment costs and network imbalances. John Kuhlow declined to provide Q2 seasonality guidance.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you didn't think you'd get back to 1.8 to 2 turns per month, but it looked like utilization of boxes improved
Show response
Darren Field said 2.0 monthly turns are unlikely due to railroad scheduling changes, but 1.8 turns in peak months is achievable. Confirmed room for further utilization improvement.
ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is that impacting discussions with the brokers? Is it are you seeing any flows that might be changing?
Show response
No change observed yet, but flagged double digit insurance premium inflation as a cost 3PLs will have to price for, potentially reversing the shift toward brokers.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Those truckload volumes you're talking about, are they good-quality freight or a -- I'm always confused if that's stuff you want
Show response
Marty confirmed returning freight is good quality at existing profitable LTL pricing. Adam said April softness is not market share loss, headcount is appropriately sized, and they have capacity to handle sequential growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
your thoughts on headcount down 6%. Shipments down almost 10%. So we're seeing a bit of a decoupling. Is there more opportunity as you think about the cost cycle?
Show response
Marty confirmed fleet age improved to 3.9 years (target ~4). Repairs and maintenance cost inflation flattened after 10-20% per mile increases in 2022-2023. Headcount drifted down through Q4 as expected via attrition. Hours per employee will flex up first before new hiring in recovery.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is it consistent? Is it -- did something fall off rapidly?
Show response
Adam maintained demand feels consistent; underperformance vs seasonality is similar to prior quarters. No pricing changes. Year-over-year comparison looks worse because Q3 2024 October was already weak.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are we getting a more competitive environment that just consistently is beating this market while we're in a decelerated market?
Show response
Adam defended yield trajectory as consistent with pre-COVID 10-year sequential averages. Market share steady per Transport Topics data. Share choppiness since Yellow closure makes comparisons difficult.
Calendar 2025 Q1
You talked about accelerating in the revenue a hundredweight up to 5%, 5.5%. Maybe just talk about what's driving that
Show response
Yield boost partly from lower weight per shipment in April (1,470 lbs vs 1,495 in March). Adam wouldn't speculate on tariff trajectory but noted consistent week-to-week revenue trends.
Calendar 2024 Q4
just sounds like a deceleration in the market if you're saying you're maintaining share volumes down seven percent, eight percent
Show response
Adam confirmed market share maintained in 2023-2024 using broader industry data including private carriers. Company outperforms publics by 600-800bp in expansions.
UNPUnion Pacific Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
One, a little confusion on the $0.14 fuel gain. Is that just all upside from fuel and the pricing?
Show response
Hamann clarified fuel added 120bps to the operating ratio and the $0.14 was the expense-versus-surcharge benefit.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any reason you switch the language to reported outlook from adjusted in you're calling out merger costs
Show response
Jennifer clarified 'reported' was added for transparency including merger cost headwind and suspended buybacks. Jim pushed back firmly on major concessions, noting minimal customer overlap.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just a quick one just to clarify that the base rate your mid single digit growth, is that the 11.98% reported
Show response
Jennifer confirmed mid-single-digit growth off reported $11.98 EPS and acknowledged this mathematically puts pressure on 2027. CapEx reduction to $3.3B reflects multi-year investment planning relative to network needs. Jim emphasized the team prefers conservative targets they can over-deliver on.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk to the puts and takes? You mentioned the favorable equipment settlements, the lower mix impact, your revenue thoughts
Show response
Jennifer declined specific Q4 guidance but noted volumes down 6%, favorable mix rotation with international intermodal declining, merger costs continuing, and productivity challenged by lower volumes against a record Q4 2024 comp.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You're at a 58.1%. Maybe can you talk about where you think you can still take this railroad in terms of operating ratio efficiency
Show response
Jennifer clarified no change to guidance language from prior quarters. Jim reiterated the goal is industry-leading OR without committing to a specific number.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do we have to see outsized seasonal performance given, I don't know, whether it's the LEAP day and fuel impact you were talking about
Show response
Jim confirmed historical seasonal improvement is already tracking in early Q2, with Jennifer noting first quarter is typically the worst margin quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Maybe can you delve into what happened in the fourth quarter? I think you mentioned the bad debt expense
Show response
Jennifer attributed the Q4 other expense improvement primarily to lower casualty costs, noting typical Q1 seasonality from payroll taxes, lower volumes, and weather.
Show 3 more companies
UPSUnited Parcel Service7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are the thoughts on ground growth underlying now, now that you're into the program?
Show response
Dykes committed to ex-Amazon volume growth in the back half but did not put a number on where international margin lands.
Calendar 2026 Q1
your competitor noted it posted the strongest quarter of profitable U.S. share gain in 20 years
Show response
Carol distinguished between deliberate volume exits (Amazon, Chinese e-commerce) and underlying market share. Excluding exited volume, UPS gained 1.2% market share. Competitor gains came from UPS's deliberately released volume.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think you threw out there that it was going to be low single digit for domestic. Your thought on how this should trend for core rate, both domestic and international?
Show response
Brian outlined full-year RPP ~4.5%, higher in H1 from mix benefits then normalizing to ~3% in H2. Base rate contribution around 300bp consistent with recent quarters. No driver buyout cost estimate given as program not yet launched; described as tactical tool similar to 2025 to right-size positions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Just trying to understand your view on maybe the potential for accelerating that cost-cutting benefits above normal trend as we not only enter fourth quarter
Show response
Brian detailed Q4 drivers: ~20% sequential ADV step-up domestically, strong holiday demand surcharge take rates, 42 new automation projects live for peak. Network efficiency reduces need for variable capacity. Carol declined to speculate on Supreme Court de minimis outcome.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the concept, is the volume still on target with as you expected? Or it sounded like this quarter was a little lighter in terms of fading away
Show response
Carol explained Q2 lighter because volume they want to keep performed better. Ground Saver delivery density algorithm did not work, costing ~$85 million; reengaging USPS for solutions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the de minimis impact, and kind of the flow-through, and then maybe the sensitivity. Carol, you mentioned kind of the postponing of shipments
Show response
Carol emphasized UPS's brokerage capability for customs clearing. Kate highlighted non-China export lanes growing double digits with South Korea healthcare exports up 24%.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you qualify what Amazon revenues were for the full year, I know this was the first time you gave a mid-year at 11.5%
Show response
Carol confirmed 11.8% of total revenue from Amazon. She emphasized this was UPS's decision and Amazon will remain a customer on nutritive volume like returns.
FDXFedEx6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you talk opportunity there in terms of share gains and maybe talk about margins on international versus domestic?
Show response
Carere cited two straight quarters of international volume growth and 12 quarters of European share gains; Russ said international and domestic margins both improve in the transition year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
salaries and benefits up 13% year-over-year at FEC. John, you mentioned some of the incentive comp, purchase trends
Show response
Dietrich attributed the increase primarily to volume-related costs, benefits harmonization, and variable incentive compensation. Expressed confidence in cost containment initiatives and overall cost management discipline.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that the leftover $200 million is that due to weakening demand
Show response
Dietrich confirmed $200M is market-driven from lower ADV. $152M are one-time spin-off preparation costs. Subramaniam noted truckload capacity consolidation beginning which may eventually benefit LTL.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if I look at the incremental margin growth of 4% to 5% -- 4% to 6%, yet the incremental operating gains are not keeping pace
Show response
Dietrich pointed to $1B trade headwind absorbing margin gains. Subramaniam acknowledged it as the biggest FY26 headwind, noting the underlying business is very strong moving into FY27 and beyond.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there any initial volume loss or added costs such as software rollout that needs to be done, or do you need to
Show response
Subramaniam said Network 2.0 is progressing methodically with no issues. Dietrich confirmed staying within CapEx budget. Carere detailed multiple levers for economy cost structure: surface utilization, off-cycle sorting, dense loads, and tight SG&A.
Calendar 2024 Q4
You talked a little bit about peak season here and how it's shifting into third quarter.
Show response
Brie provided detail on December volumes running ahead of forecast and peak surcharge capture being up YoY, but cautioned December strength may not carry through the back half.
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
let's just start up with the operating ratio, just given the strong performance on the cost savings
Show response
CFO confirmed sub-64% OR needed for remainder of year, expects Q2 better than normal seasonal progression off 67.9% but declined quarterly specificity given macro uncertainty.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Was that all volumes then you see yields fairly balanced and so it's all a volume commentary
Show response
CEO confirmed couple-few points volume growth plus solid core pricing, offset by fuel and coal headwinds. Share buybacks to resume at measured pace after balance sheet deleveraging in 2025.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WAB Wabtec | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions |
| CHRW C.H. Robinson | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| CSX CSX Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| JBHT J.B. Hunt | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line | 7 | 43%3 of 7 questions |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| UPS United Parcel Service | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| FDX FedEx | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| NSC Norfolk Southern Railway | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- WABWabtec · 9 questions22%2 of 9 questions
- CHRWC.H. Robinson · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- CSXCSX Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- JBHTJ.B. Hunt · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line · 7 questions43%3 of 7 questions
- UNPUnion Pacific Corporation · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- UPSUnited Parcel Service · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- FDXFedEx · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- NSCNorfolk Southern Railway · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 50%5 of 10 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 8 |
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 40% (2 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 50% (5 of 10 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 8 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin19
- Demand19
- Guidance Reliability13
- Competitive Dynamics12
- Cost Pressure11
- Pricing11
- Revenue Growth7
- Capex Investment6
- Trade Tariffs5
- Capital Allocation4
Show all 16 topics
- M&A3
- Regulation Policy3
- Supply Chain2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Labor Market2
- Geographic Expansion1