Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Kevin Fischbeck
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q3 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 46on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 35%16 of 46 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 46 of 46 questions from 8 companies
DVADaVita13 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
based upon where you think the margins in that business can get to, how many more years of adding
Show response
Joel framed IKC growth as more than a margin story, emphasizing continued expansion in lives and dollars under management with room to run for a while.
the change in the expectation from Fresenius, is that just what you experienced in the quarter
Show response
Joel said the pickup is complete and tied solely to the 100 clinics Fresenius closed, with no further change expected this year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just give a little more color on the rate update? Why was the rate so strong in Q1 relative to your guidance for the year?
Show response
CFO attributed ~$6 of the $17.50 year-over-year RPT increase to timing (negative timing in Q1 2025 plus positive timing in Q1 2026). Remaining 2/3 from normal rate increases and mix shifts. Sticking with 1-2% full-year guide.
It sounds like you're saying it was coming in better, but it sounds like the guidance hasn't changed yet for the year to get that right
Show response
CEO confirmed commercial mix was flat Q4 to Q1, better than expected. However, effectuation rates and actual payment behavior are unknown in the first post-subsidy cycle. Maintaining $40M headwind assumption but trending slightly better.
is there any way that you can kind of break out whether weather had an impact, how much that was? And then the improved mortality?
Show response
CFO said weather was ~10bps better than last year but in line with forecast. Flu impact also as expected (modeled on 2-year-ago season). The mortality improvement was from underlying trends, not flu, since flu came in as expected.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the way to think about it is that number, the $1.125 billion, that's before the $200 million investment
Show response
CFO confirmed free cash flow guidance is before the $200M Elara investment, and no other major capital uses beyond share repurchases. Leverage at midpoint of 3-3.5x range provides room for additional buyback capacity from EBITDA growth.
I wanted to get a little more color on the commentary around, I guess, the confidence in getting back to the 2% plus volume number
Show response
CEO framed volume recovery as fundamentally a clinical story requiring mortality improvement. Estimated initial benefits in approximately 2 years with full effect by 2029. Cited vaccination, GLP-1s, middle molecules, and home care as key levers.
I forget, you gave some kind of multiyear guidance ranges. Was it 3 years you said? Or was it 5 years that you were giving those OI and EPS comments?
Show response
CEO confirmed the 3-7% OI growth and 8-14% EPS growth targets are framed as approximately 3-year commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there anything that you can provide color on there? I assume that's not something that necessarily shows up in a given quarter, but maybe there's optimism that, that can improve next year?
Show response
CEO framed mortality improvement as a long-term clinical effort across multiple protocol areas including time on therapy, fluid management, GLP-1s, and eventually middle-molecule clearance.
when you say swing factor, does it -- are you talking about just shifts in membership between payers that, that could have a meaningful impact as your rate with different payers are significant eno...
Show response
CEO explained two dynamics: MA membership shifts between payers with different rates, and enhanced premium tax credit expiration affecting open enrollment commercial mix. CFO clarified commercial mix is a more significant financial swing factor than MA mix.
What would that number look like this year?
Show response
CFO quantified the combined volume headwind from hurricane, cyber, and flu at 75-100bps, covering both census and missed treatment rate impacts.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does that mean when volumes do start to come back that you should be growing even faster than the 3% to 7% OI?
Show response
CEO confirmed no inherent roadblock to maintaining cost control if volumes grow, suggesting potential for upside above the 3-7% OI growth range, though declined to commit specifically.
I'm just trying to figure out why mortality in your view, is persistently elevated versus where it was historically
Show response
Management attributed elevated mortality to COVID holdover effects including delayed care and higher comorbidity acuity. Emphasized this is a national all-cause trend, not kidney-specific.
UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
the trend data points that we are tracking really imply that trends start off really low to start the year
Show response
Tim Noel rejected the acceleration premise, citing moderation in government programs, commercial stabilization north of 11%, and real-time data in pricing.
Calendar 2026 Q2
the outperformance this year is pretty dramatic. Just want to make sure that there's not something that we should be
Show response
DeVeydt confirmed $19.50 to $20 as the stepping off point and acknowledged it includes prior period development, but asserted the run rate is durable.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you maybe size how much of the trend component is this acuity dynamic? And then what exactly you can do to address it?
Show response
Tim described tools for early identification of outlier patterns, leaning toward HMO products for better management, network actions taken. Did not size the acuity component specifically, deferring granularity to Q2.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would you expect a similar dynamic with with these two coding components
Show response
Noel said coding component impact consistent with industry averages. Nelson cited Texas market example with 750,000 patients showing total cost of care approximately 30% better than competitors, NPS of 90, and margins already in target range. About 30% of mature VBC patients already inside or above target margin range.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you look at the market today and the markets you want to focus on, what percentage of MA really lends itself to a successful value-based care model?
Show response
Nelson said VBC potential is limitless but current focus is on operating discipline and returning to core. Hemsley added alignment to right products, processes and disciplines is what they are returning to. No specific TAM quantification provided.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you mentioned across a number of businesses that you had portfolio actions that you're delaying. Can you talk a little bit about what exactly those types of actions were
Show response
Hemsley said prior management pursued portfolio re-evaluation and divestitures which he stopped entirely. His orientation is to run existing businesses to full potential first. Removed all portfolio action assumptions from outlook. Will pick up portfolio assessment later but current focus is on performance of existing businesses.
CICigna5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
What kind of free cash flow are you expecting in the back half of the year?
Show response
Ann reaffirmed ~$9B operating cash flow (back-half weighted) and on-plan Signature transition spend; Brian called the risk-book transition 'very smooth' so far. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any way to think about the impact from the exchange side as far as capital you might recapture next year?
Show response
Brian confirmed both were proactive decisions driven by lack of scale and management focus redirection. Capital freed from exchange exit characterized as immaterial in context of overall company.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm a little bit surprised that the MLR in 2026 isn't expected to make any progress given exchanges should be repriced and smaller and stop loss
Show response
Ann walked through MCR bridge: reductions from stop-loss pricing and exchange repricing, offset by absence of 2025 one-time individual business items and mix dynamics. Appropriate prudence given continued elevated cost environment.
Calendar 2025 Q3
When you say that the investment spending will continue into 2027, are you saying that it's going to be a similar year-over-year drag in '27
Show response
Brian confirmed investment spend broadly consistent 2026-2027, not an incremental year-over-year headwind. Described substantial technology investments (market-facing and back-office) plus recontracting with manufacturers, pharmacies, and clients. David added enterprise expected back on algorithm for 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q2
one of your larger competitors talked about how at least they're under-earning on the commercial side of the business and need to reprice over the next couple of years
Show response
Brian described firm pricing market with no competitor appetite to underprice. 2026 price increases expected to exceed 2025. Ann noted exchange business and stop-loss as two exceptions running below target margins.
CNCCentene Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
because I think that is a concern that people have is that rates will catch up, but then the acuity keeps shifting
Show response
London conceded the acuity dislocation will mute near-term margin recovery and put the inflection in the back half of 2027, with Asher adding expansion-population detail.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you said that you were seeing pockets of deceleration in some areas of trends
Show response
Sarah detailed deceleration in behavioral health units per utilizer reflecting state benefit sophistication and provider evidence-based guidelines adoption. ABA trends stabilizing year over year as direct result of 12+ months of intervention. Not huge abatement but trend lapse, no continued year-over-year steps. Acuity shift from redetermination attrition (~1-1.5% per quarter) embedded in net 4.5% trend assumption for 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you talk a little bit about the confidence and the visibility? Obviously, the exchange members have changed dramatically
Show response
Sarah walked through confidence sources: Q3 repricing incorporated baseline morbidity, trend, risk pool shifts, and eAPTC expiry into mid-30s rate increase. February paid membership tracking in line with expectations. Bronze over 30% versus 19-24% historical but pre-eAPTC bronze data informs underwriting. Low-cost bronze footprint reduced year over year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are you guys expecting that 2026 is going to be basically more of a trough year and that you should be expecting to build on that in '27
Show response
Sarah confirmed goal of consistent margin improvement over next couple of years toward normalized levels. Work requirements impacts most likely in 2027-2028, with CMS guidance not scheduled until summer, making 1/1/27 earliest implementation.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Does that mean that you don't expect to be back to target margins in Medicaid in 2027
Show response
Sarah confirmed Medicaid margin recovery is 'when, not if' over next 4-6 quarters. Will need to account for OB3 work requirements and 6-month verifications impacting risk pool in 2027-2028.
ELVElevance Health5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you haven't improved your outlook for margin. Why isn't there a lift if rates are coming in better?
Show response
Mark said July rate updates were mid-single-digit but the full-year benefit is moderated by timing and book coverage, so the margin outlook is held prudent on elevated utilization; Gail framed exits as long-term portfolio discipline.
Calendar 2026 Q1
whether the high enrollment has come with any change in the underlying risk pool that you're seeing
Show response
Mark addressed risk pool concerns directly. Prior claims for renewing members running moderately higher than cancel cohorts, supporting view that attrition increased pool morbidity, but tracking consistent with or better than pricing assumptions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
given that the membership numbers have been lower than we would have thought, I guess, across most of the products, is there anything that we should be reading into as far as where you are strategi...
Show response
Gail pushed back firmly that membership declines reflect disciplined decisions not competitive weakness: ACA repositioned sustainably, commercial had conscious pricing decisions on below-profitability public sector, ASO had strong national account selling, Medicaid reflects redetermination, MA positioned for sustainable margin growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much of that risk pool shift that you kind of expect to be happening in 2026. I don't know how you would quantify that, whether it's 1/3 of what you'd expect in the next 5 years happens next year
Show response
Mark described margin decline as more balanced split between acuity and utilization versus prior quarter. On 2027 balanced growth, confirmed it means returning to the historical growth algorithm with contributions from Commercial, government, and Carelon supported by operating leverage.
Calendar 2025 Q2
why should we be assuming any improvement in Medicaid margins over the next couple of years if there seems to be this lag here between rate setting and the data coming in
Show response
Gail maintained Medicaid is a core strategic franchise with short-term volatility. Acknowledged work requirements create new unknowns but emphasized state partnerships and commercial capabilities.
HUMHumana5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
why that change in exiting markets next year versus not doing it this year?
Show response
Explained the return-based plan selection and noted most exits were in plans rated 3.5 or lower, while stating this is not a Stars-driven decision.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you saying that the funding shortfall for '27 is bigger than this funding shortfall for '26 as far as Humana goes?
Show response
James confirmed gap between funding and medical cost trend is clearly larger than prior year. Other operational levers on track. Difference is funding environment relative to cost trend, which has been stable for 2 years. George added HUM was adjusting benefits 2 years before most competitors.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you guys believe your visibility is going to play out over the next several months?
Show response
James said April/May views are early enough to adjust bids. Priorities clearly ordered: #1 margin trajectory for 2028, #2 retention within margin constraints, #3 growth is a distant third. New member growth is not the focus.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just kind of remind us what the MLR or margin differential is between good channel, bad channel, plan to plan, new to plan
Show response
James outlined four factors: attrition/retention rates, cost of acquisition, engagement rates (Stars, diagnosis accuracy), all varying by channel. Reduced plan-to-plan sales correlates with better retention.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was wondering if you could talk a little bit more about the Part D performance and then any comments that you have on the CMS regulations
Show response
Celeste confirmed Part D tracking in line. George added PDP developing as expected, co-pay vs coinsurance structure working. 2026 national average bid slightly better than expected.
Show 2 more companies
HCAHCA Healthcare4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 4 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I am just it is not clear to me what the other $450 million is for the guidance reduction.
Show response
Marks confirmed the residual roughly $500 million and attributed it to growth moderation back toward the long-term algorithm rather than a new discrete headwind.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just talk a little bit about the $150 million impact from the exchanges this quarter and how that compares to the $600 million to $900 million annual number
Show response
Mike acknowledged $150M puts them at lower end mathematically but said it's too early to call full year at lower end. Medicaid conversion slowdown is nascent.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you guys have been over 20% margin last year, this year, even though you've got these headwinds coming in. Kind of think about 20% margin as kind of the high end for you guys
Show response
Mike noted 2026 margin guidance consistent with 2025 despite headwinds, reflecting resiliency and operating leverage. Deferred long-term margin framework, pointing back to comfort with long-term plan. Did not commit to sustained above-20% target.
Calendar 2025 Q2
did I hear you say earlier that you think that between the bill and the expiration of the subsidies, over the longer term, you still expect to grow EBITDA 4% to 6%
Show response
Mike stood by long-term guidance framework combining resiliency efforts and potential SDP approvals. Will roll together all policy impacts for 2026 guidance on Q4 call.
UHSUniversal Health Services3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
you at least had a competitor who is growing very quickly now. It seems like they're slowing, they're closing down capacity in certain locations. Is there anything else that you're seeing more broa...
Show response
Filton cited managed care MLR data and claims data showing behavioral utilization broadly up, but being served in fragmented non-traditional settings. UHS believes its in-network position and clinical product can capture more. Miller added competitors were overly aggressive and are now pulling back.
Can you talk a little bit about the barriers? Is it just lack of focus? Are there markets where you are doing it well and that are blueprint?
Show response
Filton acknowledged decades of inpatient-centric focus meant outpatient was neglected. Now reorganized with dedicated outpatient personnel. Two-pronged approach: step-down (post-discharge follow-up) and step-in (freestanding 1,000 Branches brand for patients uncomfortable entering on hospital campus). Existing referral and payer relationships provide advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there competition out there? Is that what's driving the weakness in volumes? Or is it still more of the staffing and other issues
Show response
Filton acknowledged multiple factors: competition for freestanding outpatient business, therapist staffing challenges, and insufficient outpatient capacity. Focus on all three improving sequentially.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| DVA DaVita | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions |
| UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated | 6 | 33%2 of 6 questions |
| CI Cigna | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| CNC Centene Corporation | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| ELV Elevance Health | 5 | 60%3 of 5 questions |
| HUM Humana | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| HCA HCA Healthcare | 4 | 100%4 of 4 questions |
| UHS Universal Health Services | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions |
- DVADaVita · 13 questions8%1 of 13 questions
- UNHUnitedHealth Group Incorporated · 6 questions33%2 of 6 questions
- CICigna · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- CNCCentene Corporation · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- ELVElevance Health · 5 questions60%3 of 5 questions
- HUMHumana · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- HCAHCA Healthcare · 4 questions100%4 of 4 questions
- UHSUniversal Health Services · 3 questions67%2 of 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 44%4 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q3 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 33%3 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q2 | 8 | 50%4 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 100%1 of 1 question | 1 |
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 44% (4 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 33% (3 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 50% (4 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin17
- Regulation Policy11
- Demand10
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Guidance Reliability9
- Subscriber Growth9
- Cost Pressure8
- Pricing6
- Capital Allocation4
- Revenue Growth3
Show all 14 topics
- Capex Investment1
- M&A1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Labor Market1