Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Michael Mani

Bank of America · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).

Questions
18on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 18 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 18 of 18 questions from 5 companies

COHRCoherent, Inc.10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
COHR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I just wanted to ask about the 2 incremental opportunities you highlighted for '27, right, with multi-rail and thermal

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anderson described typical engineering qualification milestones, sized multi-rail at $2 billion+, highlighted Thermadite material offering 2x to 5x better heat transfer than copper, and thermoelectric generators for waste heat recovery.

I wanted to dive in deeper with some of the CPO LTAs or long-term agreements that you're dealing with, including NVIDIA

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anderson emphasized breadth across CW lasers, VCSELs, external laser source modules, isolators, thermoelectric coolers, fiber attach units, and micro-lens arrays. Most customers leveraging majority of the portfolio.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you see a significant shift between silicon photonics and EML? In terms of what that mix looks like for 1.6

Innovation & R&DSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim confirmed no significant financial difference between EML and silicon photonics 1.6T. Customer application drives mix. Ramping InP capacity for both transceiver demand and high-power CW laser demand for CPO.

how much gross margin leverage is your six-inch indium phosphide ramp driving for you right now?

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim noted 6-month wafer-start-to-shipment cycle means benefits just starting. By year-end, half of internal capacity at roughly half the cost. Sherri detailed 470bp gross margin improvement since FY2024 from cost reductions, yield, and pricing optimization.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how much left is there in terms of these pricing tailwinds you can recognize, whether it's from the core data com side or industrial?

Show response

Jim reported stable expected transceiver pricing with supply-constrained market as positive dynamic. Sherri highlighted pricing optimization contributing to 70bp sequential and 200bp YoY gross margin improvement.

what's your confidence level in your ability to expand your share in 1.6T over 800 gig?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim confirmed multiple customers accelerating 1.6T timelines. Expects 800G to still grow YoY while 1.6T ramps on top. Highlighted being only company to demonstrate 1.6T with three different laser technologies.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you have any insight into what your relative share could be for the upcoming ramp? Maybe relative to 800 gig?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim deferred share quantification but noted faster adoption cycles with overlapping 800G/1.6T ramps; expects small early adopter group expanding rapidly as seen with 800G.

is there any cost headwind contemplated in your gross margin guide for the next quarter

MarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sherri confirmed tariff impact factored into guidance as not significant; cost reductions company-wide while pricing optimization primarily in industrial segments.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what initiatives worked well to deliver that and I guess, as we look throughout the rest of this year, what are some of the low-hanging fruits

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sherri highlighted volume, yield improvements, and lower costs in datacom as Q2 drivers, deferred long-term model details to May Investor Day.

as you get closer to the 1.6T ramp, do you have a better sense of which platform might be seeing relatively more pull from these customers?

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim declined to specify technology selection for competitive reasons, emphasized multi-technology approach as key competitive advantage recognized by customers.

KLACKLA Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
KLAC company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you help us with the linearity for revenue this year to the best extent you can

Show response

Bren indicated stability around $3 billion for at least the first half but declined to comment on second half specifics.

What exactly is happening to the process control part of the market this year?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bren detailed rising process control intensity at N2, HBM driving adoption due to less redundancy and larger die, and accelerating advanced packaging growth.

LITELumentum Holdings Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
LITE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How do you think about engaging with more contract manufacturers?

Supply ChainMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO noted the shift to contract manufacturing is margin-accretive since CM efficiency on common components more than offsets fees. Described the transition as early innings.

How large would it have been if you had been able to address all the demand that you saw in the quarter?

Show response

CEO estimated transceiver supply-demand imbalance in the 30% range but did not give a precise figure. Confirmed 1.6T margins are structurally better than 800-gig, with room for Lumentum-specific improvement.

LRCXLam Research2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
LRCX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Where are we in that kind of second phase of upgrades? Is there a way to kind of contextualize

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Archer confirmed the cycle repeats off a larger installed base but conceded the next wave has not been quantified, calling it an action item.

Could you talk about your share opportunity in traditional and conventional DRAM

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Explained the convergence of DRAM requirements toward leading-edge foundry logic and named the specific applications driving wins.

SWKSSkyworks Solutions2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
SWKS company page →

Calendar 2024 Q3

which areas have become maybe incrementally worse or better over the last 90 days and just where are you still undershipping to demand?

Show response

Kris provided segment-level breakdown: Edge IoT improving, networking/infrastructure still has excess inventory, automotive/industrial undershipping demand.

how do you think of about expansion into 2025? And then maybe more broadly, as you think about an eventual return to 50% or greater gross margins

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kris outlined FY25 gross margin flattish due to slower broad markets mix tailwind. Drivers: utilization, cost reductions, broad markets mix. Long-term targets: 50% then 53%.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
COHR Coherent, Inc.100%none of 10 questions
KLAC KLA Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LRCX Lam Research2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SWKS Skyworks Solutions2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • COHR
    Coherent, Inc. · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • KLAC
    KLA Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LITE
    Lumentum Holdings Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LRCX
    Lam Research · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SWKS
    Skyworks Solutions · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin7
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Demand4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Cloud & AI4
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Product Launch2
  • Supply Chain2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Pricing1
Show all 13 topics
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Inventory1