Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Richard Sunderland

Truist Securities · covers Utilities

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 6).

Questions
85on tracked calls
Challenge rate
2%2 of 85 questions
Companies
20questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 85 of 85 questions from 20 companies

ATOAtmos Energy12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
ATO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is $0.08 to $0.12 still the right range to be thinking about over that period moving for the balance of the year on 4Q?

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Guided APT second-half uplift to the low end of the $0.08 to $0.12 range after capturing $0.08 in Q3; direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

on the ATM, I think if I'm reading the disclosures correctly, you didn't price anything on the quarter

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO confirmed no ATM activity in Q2 due to market volatility, already fully priced for FY26 and partially for FY27. Will evaluate future pricing opportunities.

How do you think about that as a base for growth going forward?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO directly confirmed the updated $8.40-$8.50 range as a good launch point for the 6-8% growth framework into fiscal 2027 and beyond.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you remind us what you'd originally expected in '25 on that front? I guess I'm just trying to think of the puts and takes of the Texas benefit relative to the through-system

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO explained FY2025 APT was expected to normalize but outperformed early. For FY2026, anticipating more normal operating environment but will adjust based on market conditions.

Is that essentially a half year's impact of the legislation that you're booking all in 4Q? Or how do we think about that $0.10 relative to the total uplift potential

Show response

CFO clarified the $0.10 impact is from June 20 through September 30, effectively one quarter, not annualized.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is the higher guidance for 2025 a fair base to think about growth going forward? Or does some of that normalization that you had originally anticipated

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO deferred to late summer snapshot of market conditions before setting FY2026 guidance, acknowledging volatile APT conditions.

It sounded like in the Texas GRCs that there is some retroactive component to the reg asset tracker you were referencing

Show response

CFO confirmed regulatory asset tracker impacts are already embedded in current guidance assumptions.

it seemed like some of the higher O&M for '25 is a pull forward from '26. Is that a fair characterization?

Show response

CFO confirmed some compliance work pulled forward opportunistically from future periods, plus seasonal maintenance acceleration during summer months.

Calendar 2024 Q4

does this move you higher within the guidance range? Any other thoughts on sort of that benefit relative to guidance assumptions?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged early-quarter spread benefit but declined to revise guidance positioning, citing uncertainty about weather and power gen load for the rest of the year.

How much equity should we be modeling for twenty twenty-five specifically, and should we assume that ATM is ratable?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO guided $600-$800M equity for FY2025 with timing dependent on cash flow needs, noting $380M already drawn in Q1.

Calendar 2024 Q3

The numbers seem to imply you, should be at or above the top end of the earnings range. I realize there is equity dilution, but I'm curious what is keeping the CAGR at 6% to 8%

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO cited conservative approach and macro uncertainty. CEO added that increased O&M CAGR from 3.5% to 4% moderates EPS growth relative to rate base growth.

could you parse some of the factors underpinning the higher pace of system investment? I know you gave some color at a high level on sort of 80% for safety and reliability

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO attributed higher CapEx to customer growth demand, risk model-guided pipe replacement programs, and APT system projects.

EIXEdison International8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
EIX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How do you think the affordability conversation stands right now you know, whether in the context of that legislation

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Pizarro framed affordability nationally and in California, argued housing dominates the consumer cost burden, and tied legislative inaction directly to downgrade-driven cost of debt.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you think that will differ in terms of the engagement given we have the CEA report out?

Show response

CEO noted CEA report gives legislature a more robust platform reflecting broad stakeholder voices. Expects continued governor's office engagement and possibly legislative working groups for complex details.

you've talked about some broader legislative engagement and mentioned affordability is a critical focus. Could you just expand on that a little bit more?

Regulation PolicyCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO noted SCE proud of affordability trajectory and lowest system average rate. CFO added affordability bills cover wide spectrum from rate structures to reporting and disclosure. CEO also noted affordability discussions extend to insurance market and earthquake hardening costs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how are you feeling about the ability to reach a settlement in that over the next few weeks?

Show response

CFO expressed confidence in rebuttal testimony quality. Intervener focus was on program execution, and SCE believes it demonstrated prudent operation.

should we assume that if the PD stands that range case would essentially become your outlook?

Regulation PolicyRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO confirmed PD aligned with range case. Additional capital opportunities beyond GRC exist and will be communicated in the 6-week post-decision refresh.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you have any revised timing expectations on the investigation just as your own progresses here?

Show response

CEO was direct that no timing estimate is possible yet.

have you ruled out any third-party potential sources of ignition at this point?

Show response

CEO confirmed no evidence of alternative ignition source has been found, which was a factor in changing disclosure to probable.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If a legislative solution does not emerge, are there any operational changes across PSPS practices or elsewhere you would consider?

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO noted SCE already became more conservative on PSPS criteria during windstorm. SVP Powell emphasized risk-prioritized mitigation plan continuously updated based on new learnings.

PCGPG&E Corporation8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
PCG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you speak a little bit more to the type of project you are seeing now?

Show response

Poppe said larger projects are entering the mix but the bulk remain sub-gigawatt, at 1.5-gigawatt or smaller.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you expect any new look to the legislative process this summer, like in earlier bill introduction or more debate on public text

Show response

CEO expects Assembly Energy Committee hearings in May per public statements. Complex subject benefits from committee hearings. Insurance and energy committees in both chambers relevant.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Do you see this affordability conversation as something that you can get to outcomes in this session

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO highlighted public purpose programs ($12/month savings), NEM reform, and state-driven transmission debt financing as constructive proposals. 30-40% of bills are policy driven.

Can you expand on the San Jose update a little bit and particularly the path and timing to capturing some of those load growth benefits

DemandCloud & AIPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO said load materializing predominantly 2027 with construction preparations through 2026. Rate benefits to customers expected starting in 2027.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you speak a little bit to what you're focused on in the run-up to that application

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO cited 98% wildfire risk reduction from undergrounding, $465M O&M savings and $280M vegetation savings over first 1,230 miles during current GRC cycle. Only $1/month on customer bills vs $20/month for vegetation management.

Curious if you can share any feedback on what you're seeing on the ground

Show response

CEO said market misunderstood Northern California power availability. Cluster study 1 results opened interest. Second cluster study underway with multiple incremental gigawatts not yet in 8.7 GW pipeline.

Calendar 2024 Q4

does the half billion to $1.6 billion of investment per gigawatt framework still hold?

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed framework holds with customer cost savings of 1-2% maintained. CFO added capital could be additive, reprioritized, or extend growth duration.

do you think the firefighting capabilities in the region are sufficient for growing wildfire risks

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said utility doesn't need to invest in firefighting but community hardening is important. AI cameras and weather stations provide early notification.

AWKAmerican Water Works6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
AWK company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

How are you thinking about Pennsylvania stakeholder relationships and engagements in advance of the next rate case application in the state

Show response

Cheryl Norton emphasized strong stakeholder engagement, great customer service, and continued rate filing planning on normal schedule.

Curious if you would explore a forward issuance to take care of the '26 equity needs

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David Bowler confirmed the plan remains to issue and take proceeds in 2026, keeping all options on the table but no change planned.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Any thoughts on pulling forward your 2026 equity issuance given the recent share price strength or just financing thoughts overall on approach to equity

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

David Bowler clearly stated no plans to pull forward 2026 equity despite share strength, maintaining needs-based issuance approach.

how do you see the landscape standing under a scenario where recession puts pressure on muni finances

Show response

John Griffith acknowledged recession could drive more municipal sellers alongside other factors like deferred capital, environmental remediation, and retiring operators.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is the 7% to 9% growth, is it based on 2025 guidance less that $0.10 of incremental interest income

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

John Griffith confirmed the growth base excludes the $0.10 incremental HOS note interest, and explained the $795M note mechanics and December 2026 termination.

Can you just walk through a little bit of what's been going on recently in the legislative

Show response

Cheryl Norton described collaborative effort with other utilities and commission to pass future test year legislation, noting multiple bills have been joined together.

NINiSource6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
NI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

How do you see the GenCo playing into this in terms of potential impact to near-term or medium-term earnings with the GenCo structure

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Shawn emphasized flexibility in financing structure and balance sheet strength. Noted base business outperformance provides incremental cash flows. Will optimize once contracts are in hand.

could you speak to turbine queue positions and just your confidence in ability to deliver new supply to meet any large load growth

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Michael confirmed queue positions secured without providing specifics. Noted strong position to deliver on fundamentals including serving new customers with speed and flexibility.

Calendar 2025 Q1

offer any thoughts on sort of the pace and engagement with your large load, prospective large load counterparties

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Lloyd confirmed excellent progress while emphasizing complexity requiring management attention. Reiterated hyperscaler CapEx plans as demand signal. Committed to quick disclosure.

what would the regulatory cap structure look like for that entity?

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Declined to provide any detail on Genco financing or capital structure, noting focus remains on completing special contracts. Did not address peer comparison to higher ROE filings.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it looks like some of the NIPSCO and Columbia spend shifted across buckets. In your current base plan

Show response

Quickly dismissed the premise, confirming no material reallocation between segments. Offered offline follow-up for detail.

do you need IURC approval of that before you can announce a deal?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Clearly delineated that deals can be signed before IURC approval of Genco structure, with regulatory and commercial workstreams running concurrently.

AEPAmerican Electric Power4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
AEP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious kind of on balance of all those developments and what's to come into the fall, how you're thinking about

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Bill said engagement with PJM, FERC and the states has intensified since the first quarter call and expressed optimism for alignment following the July 23 technical conference.

how are you thinking about milestones into the 3Q plan update and if those projects will be ready for inclusion

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Trevor expects Piketon definitive documents in the third quarter and roughly half of the 13 gigawatts of incremental generation to roll into the 2027 to 2031 plan.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you think there are opportunities on the transmission side that go beyond the sort of engineering construction efforts

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Fehrman highlighted state-level policy support for transmission, accelerating right-of-way acquisition, and innovative design to reduce right-of-way needs.

I wanted to pick up a couple of the earlier themes around PJM, but kind of turn that to the SPP side

Show response

Fehrman contrasted SPP favorably with PJM on interconnection progress, noting SPP has been more aggressive with ARRIS filings.

Show 14 more companies
CMSCMS Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
CMS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

to throw out the first question of kind of why now, is this all with an eye to higher utility growth

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rochow walked through the fiduciary review process, the capital reallocation, retained light-capital assets returning cash to the parent, and asset dispositions. Emphasized simplification and that nearly 100% of earnings come from the regulated utility after 2027.

Curious if you could speak a little bit more to what still has to go on the customer side

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rochow confirmed both the rate agreement and extraordinary facilities agreement are signed under the large load tariff, with local zoning still pending. Noted the customer is working multiple locations and the tariff travels with them across the service territory.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I am curious about the opportunities as it stands now relative to last quarter, and in particular, if you see both of these data centers come through, what is the potential to defer or delay your e...

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Garrick said the pipeline has grown beyond 9 GW with new companies entering and others converting to contracts. Great progress on hyperscaler contracts and zoning. On rate case cadence, emphasized importance of annual filings to pass savings to customers, keep increases near inflation, and fund reliability investments. Would consider stay-outs but focused on affordability.

do you have any guiding lights around how you think about the qualitative versus quantitative aspects of a deal

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Garrick declined to comment on M&A. Reiterated NorthStar positioning: DIG benefiting from rising energy and capacity prices with bilateral contracts, renewables hitting singles and doubles with utility-like returns, safe harbor through 2028-2029, and the whole segment is about 5% of earnings.

CNPCenterPoint Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
CNP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you parse a little bit more around that short- and medium term capacity unlock referenced in the script?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Clarified the unlock has opened multiple customer conversations rather than serving only the first named customer.

How do you see that backdrop and that overlay impacting your routing work right now

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Described a specific community-first process (webinars, town halls, narrowed route sets) with routing finalized in Q1.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you thinking about the market opportunity around those units as it stands now versus, say, a year ago

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Foster noted smaller units already being marketed with strong receptivity at nearly double original 2021 lease rates. Larger units return from San Antonio by end of March 2027, then will be marketed as cash upside to plan.

I'm just trying to think about total dollars that might come this decade that aren't reflected in the plan right now

Show response

Wells explained the study targets the capacity gap between existing capacity exhaustion (~2029) and 765 kV import lines coming online (2031-2032). Expect intra-regional investments, system stability investments, and increased import capacity. Should be a fairly significant set of new transmission projects.

DTEDTE Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DTE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how are you thinking about positions there? Any expectations into what may come out in testimony?

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Harris gave the testimony date and characterized pre-filing reception of the stay-out mechanism, while noting the case must still be reviewed in totality.

how might we see the load scenarios play out in there relative to the 2 gigawatts in advanced discussions

Regulation PolicyCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Clear three-scenario structure laid out for the Q3 IRP filing: signed contracts as base case, full pipeline as high end, and an intermediate case.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you lose an IRM outcome consistent with you're asked for the stay out? Or is it really around this newly proposed mechanism

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed stay-out depends on the new excess margin mechanism, not IRM outcome specifically. IRM targeting $800M by 2029 with 2026-2027 already approved. Aligned to DSP and Liberty audit.

for that Oracle site, is there expansion potential there without additional zoning required?

Cloud & AIRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed Oracle occupies portion of footprint with expansion potential. Hyperscalers and colocators engaging more fully with local communities, resulting in acceptance. Many pipeline projects have zoning or pathway to zoning.

DUKDuke Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
DUK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how are you thinking about pacing future equity? And would you consider doing something upfront

Capital AllocationCreditTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO said Duke is opportunistic via the ATM and DRIP, locking in attractive pricing, with no large block equity planned in the 5-year plan.

there's been some talk around the sale of the Cayuga coal plant. Can you offer any update on that

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management said a study on operating and selling the Cayuga plant to a third party just came in and is being evaluated, with focus first on the new gas plant.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you speak a little bit to the timing of flowback to rate payers there?

Capital AllocationRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Savoy described 4-year amortization schedule for tax credit flowback in North Carolina. Noted this could be accelerated as a rate case lever to keep rates lower.

Curious what you see as the timing for those remaining projects to begin construction

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sideris said ESAs require zoning and permits in place before signing, so construction starts rapidly after execution. Also exploring ways to accelerate bridge power to bring customers online earlier.

ETREntergy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ETR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I’m curious how you’re thinking about that process and maybe if settlements are a path to resolve that

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Marsh emphasized Meta's tangible tax/community benefits and Fair Share Plus principles but deferred the settlement question to the regulatory process.

could you speak a little bit more about that upcoming Accelerated Resilience Filing and the goals of Phase 1A

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Marsh said Phase 1A is about staging resilience investment to manage near-term customer affordability, not a change to the overall program.

Calendar 2026 Q1

did that move through the backlog until you then backfilled with new interest to get back to the 7 to 12 gigawatts

Show response

Kimberly confirmed Meta moved through the pipeline while additional interest continues to refresh it. Full pipeline update at Investor Day.

Could you speak a little bit more to sort of guardrails, timing, other elements you have

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kimberly quantified the renewables opportunity from Meta agreements and noted projects could come into the 4-year plan or extend beyond, with potential for batteries too.

PNWPinnacle West4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PNW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you speak a little bit more to kind of those knock-on effects out of the TSMC announcement

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Geisler detailed TSMC's 12 committed facilities and accelerating schedule but said it was too early to quantify uncommitted-queue projects.

how are you thinking about gas supply overall? And what are you focused on right now

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Geisler said current gas supply is adequate through this decade; the Desert Southwest pipeline is critical for next-decade expansion and on schedule.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you frame whether interest has shifted at all relative to expectations three to six months ago?

Show response

Ted confirmed interest meeting original expectations. Queue still ~20 GW. Contracts are complex involving generation, transmission, rates, financing, and timing. Making progress but not yet ready to file.

about a month ago the Governor's energy task force delivered a report. There was a lot in there, including new nuclear. What do you have an eye to out of that report

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ted outlined three report findings: support for new gas infrastructure, diverse resource mix anchored by dispatchable generation, and long-term nuclear opportunity. Won't risk utility balance sheet but open if large customers support financing.

XELXcel Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
XEL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

And is there anything else you'd highlight on the EPC front in terms of how the EPC side has enabled those wins?

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Frenzel answered directly, framing the wind and solar resource base plus EPC partnerships as a durable strategic advantage in both competitive and directly assigned work.

Is 9% plus still the way to think about growth in the context of a 3Q update?

Guidance ReliabilityCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Van Abel acknowledged the enthusiasm but deferred any growth-rate revision to the Q3 roll-forward onto a new 2027-2031 base rather than quantifying the uplift now.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you expand a little bit more on the sort of settlement potential over the next month that you referenced in the script

Show response

Management provided detailed regulatory update on both Colorado and Minnesota, noting constructive starting points for settlement in both states.

the 4 gigawatts contracted by year-end '27, just any thoughts on sort of the gating factors to signing the $6 billion to $8 billion incremental CapEx framework

Capex InvestmentCloud & AICapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Both CEO and CFO provided comprehensive response on data center pipeline, NextEra JDA, and financing approach including proactive equity issuance.

AEEAmeren3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
AEE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How are you thinking about the financing changes into this fall plan update

Capital AllocationCreditTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Lenny reiterated a balanced debt/equity approach; 2026 needs largely met via $600M forward sales and $1.2B YTD forward equity, with a fuller update in Q3.

Calendar 2026 Q1

curious if you could speak a bit more to the fuel cell opportunity you alluded to there and how you see that fitting in as a solution

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management tempered expectations on fuel cells as a possibility not a commitment, noting limited options for new dispatchable generation within 5-6 years beyond current projects.

could you speak to the generation efforts overall from a supply chain perspective and a planning perspective as you think about that upcoming IRP filing

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Michael Main detailed turbines under contract and delivered, EPC contracts in place, labor mobilized, and a consortium of national construction companies being assembled for the combined cycle project.

AESAES Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AES company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

How you're seeing overall inbounds and interest into your service territories? Anything notable either on the quarter or on the horizon here on the load front at the utilities?

Show response

Andres confirmed strong inbounds with AES Indiana and Ohio among the fastest-growing utilities, with about 2 GW of additional data center demand signed and more expected.

how you think about the risk to safe harboring from the executive order and potential changes to guidelines. Is there anything specific to your safe harbor activities that gives you confidence

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ricardo detailed that 6 GW of 7.9 GW US backlog will be in service by end-2027 and qualify by law. Remaining 1.9 GW nearly all safe harbored, no retroactive application expected. FEOC compliance ensured by domestic supply chain.

DDominion Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
D company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How do you think you might address that? Any thoughts on technology and timing? Any opportunity there around long duration in the next five to ten years

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Blue noted pilot programs underway but declined to identify specific technologies or timelines. Limited disclosure given early stage.

is it still about working in the range of that 5% to 7% growth, or do you see the potential for structurally higher growth over time

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ridge acknowledged the question but stayed within existing messaging, monitoring catalysts to enhance or extend growth range rather than committing to higher numbers.

SOSouthern Company2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
SO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Any learnings you would highlight from some of that ramp-up and the sales trends?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Womack conceded ramp rates can differ from initial projections but argued minimum bills effectively decouple revenue from that timing risk.

Curious about kind of the tone and interest on the remaining upgrades and then the brownfield efforts.

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Poroch called conversations fruitful and reiterated the disciplined contracting model, but did not commit to a date for the Southern Power update.

WECWEC Energy Group2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
WEC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious how work is trending on the pipe program as you've been reramping that. Any recent learnings or takeaways

Labor MarketCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Direct: disclosed reduced 2026 spending and attributed it squarely to labor availability rather than execution.

the topic of future of gas that we've talked about a number of ways over the past few years

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Partial: characterised the docket as slipping and expected something by year-end without specifying the outcome.

PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PEG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you speak a little bit more to the project proposals? And I guess, any way to frame the scale and type of

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ralph described PSEG's retained generation skill set and utility-like opportunities but declined to size them, citing ongoing PJM changes.

SRESempra1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
SRE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you speak to other opportunities that could fold into the upside bucket on that 4Q update?

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jeff walked through how prior upside buckets converted into base plan and signaled a fresh large upside bucket on the February call; direct.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ATO Atmos Energy1217%2 of 12 questions
EIX Edison International80%none of 8 questions
PCG PG&E Corporation80%none of 8 questions
AWK American Water Works60%none of 6 questions
NI NiSource60%none of 6 questions
AEP American Electric Power40%none of 4 questions
CMS CMS Energy40%none of 4 questions
CNP CenterPoint Energy40%none of 4 questions
DTE DTE Energy40%none of 4 questions
DUK Duke Energy40%none of 4 questions
  • ATO
    Atmos Energy · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • EIX
    Edison International · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • PCG
    PG&E Corporation · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • AWK
    American Water Works · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • NI
    NiSource · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • AEP
    American Electric Power · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CMS
    CMS Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CNP
    CenterPoint Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • DTE
    DTE Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • DUK
    Duke Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 20 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ETR Entergy40%none of 4 questions
PNW Pinnacle West40%none of 4 questions
XEL Xcel Energy40%none of 4 questions
AEE Ameren30%none of 3 questions
AES AES Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
D Dominion Energy2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SO Southern Company2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
WEC WEC Energy Group2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PEG Public Service Enterprise Group1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SRE Sempra1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ETR
    Entergy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • PNW
    Pinnacle West · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • XEL
    Xcel Energy · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • AEE
    Ameren · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • AES
    AES Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • D
    Dominion Energy · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SO
    Southern Company · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • WEC
    WEC Energy Group · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PEG
    Public Service Enterprise Group · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SRE
    Sempra · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q3250%1 of 2 questions1
2024 Q490%none of 9 questions5
2025 Q1119%1 of 11 questions5
2025 Q2120%none of 12 questions6
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q4No questions recorded——
2026 Q1250%none of 25 questions13
2026 Q2260%none of 26 questions16
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 6 companies
  5. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  6. 2025 Q4No questions recorded
  7. 2026 Q125 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 25 questions) · 13 companies
  8. 2026 Q226 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 26 questions) · 16 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Regulation Policy35
  • Capex Investment28
  • Capital Allocation17
  • Demand17
  • Guidance Reliability10
  • Cloud & AI9
  • Margin5
  • Pricing4
  • Cost Pressure3
  • Macroeconomic3
Show all 18 topics
  • Revenue Growth3
  • M&A3
  • Supply Chain3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Credit2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Labor Market1