Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Richard Sunderland
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 6).
- Questions
- 85on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%2 of 85 questions
- Companies
- 20questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 85 of 85 questions from 20 companies
ATOAtmos Energy12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is $0.08 to $0.12 still the right range to be thinking about over that period moving for the balance of the year on 4Q?
Show response
Guided APT second-half uplift to the low end of the $0.08 to $0.12 range after capturing $0.08 in Q3; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
on the ATM, I think if I'm reading the disclosures correctly, you didn't price anything on the quarter
Show response
CFO confirmed no ATM activity in Q2 due to market volatility, already fully priced for FY26 and partially for FY27. Will evaluate future pricing opportunities.
How do you think about that as a base for growth going forward?
Show response
CFO directly confirmed the updated $8.40-$8.50 range as a good launch point for the 6-8% growth framework into fiscal 2027 and beyond.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you remind us what you'd originally expected in '25 on that front? I guess I'm just trying to think of the puts and takes of the Texas benefit relative to the through-system
Show response
CFO explained FY2025 APT was expected to normalize but outperformed early. For FY2026, anticipating more normal operating environment but will adjust based on market conditions.
Is that essentially a half year's impact of the legislation that you're booking all in 4Q? Or how do we think about that $0.10 relative to the total uplift potential
Show response
CFO clarified the $0.10 impact is from June 20 through September 30, effectively one quarter, not annualized.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is the higher guidance for 2025 a fair base to think about growth going forward? Or does some of that normalization that you had originally anticipated
Show response
CFO deferred to late summer snapshot of market conditions before setting FY2026 guidance, acknowledging volatile APT conditions.
It sounded like in the Texas GRCs that there is some retroactive component to the reg asset tracker you were referencing
Show response
CFO confirmed regulatory asset tracker impacts are already embedded in current guidance assumptions.
it seemed like some of the higher O&M for '25 is a pull forward from '26. Is that a fair characterization?
Show response
CFO confirmed some compliance work pulled forward opportunistically from future periods, plus seasonal maintenance acceleration during summer months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
does this move you higher within the guidance range? Any other thoughts on sort of that benefit relative to guidance assumptions?
Show response
CEO acknowledged early-quarter spread benefit but declined to revise guidance positioning, citing uncertainty about weather and power gen load for the rest of the year.
How much equity should we be modeling for twenty twenty-five specifically, and should we assume that ATM is ratable?
Show response
CFO guided $600-$800M equity for FY2025 with timing dependent on cash flow needs, noting $380M already drawn in Q1.
Calendar 2024 Q3
The numbers seem to imply you, should be at or above the top end of the earnings range. I realize there is equity dilution, but I'm curious what is keeping the CAGR at 6% to 8%
Show response
CFO cited conservative approach and macro uncertainty. CEO added that increased O&M CAGR from 3.5% to 4% moderates EPS growth relative to rate base growth.
could you parse some of the factors underpinning the higher pace of system investment? I know you gave some color at a high level on sort of 80% for safety and reliability
Show response
CFO attributed higher CapEx to customer growth demand, risk model-guided pipe replacement programs, and APT system projects.
EIXEdison International8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you think the affordability conversation stands right now you know, whether in the context of that legislation
Show response
Pizarro framed affordability nationally and in California, argued housing dominates the consumer cost burden, and tied legislative inaction directly to downgrade-driven cost of debt.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you think that will differ in terms of the engagement given we have the CEA report out?
Show response
CEO noted CEA report gives legislature a more robust platform reflecting broad stakeholder voices. Expects continued governor's office engagement and possibly legislative working groups for complex details.
you've talked about some broader legislative engagement and mentioned affordability is a critical focus. Could you just expand on that a little bit more?
Show response
CEO noted SCE proud of affordability trajectory and lowest system average rate. CFO added affordability bills cover wide spectrum from rate structures to reporting and disclosure. CEO also noted affordability discussions extend to insurance market and earthquake hardening costs.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how are you feeling about the ability to reach a settlement in that over the next few weeks?
Show response
CFO expressed confidence in rebuttal testimony quality. Intervener focus was on program execution, and SCE believes it demonstrated prudent operation.
should we assume that if the PD stands that range case would essentially become your outlook?
Show response
CFO confirmed PD aligned with range case. Additional capital opportunities beyond GRC exist and will be communicated in the 6-week post-decision refresh.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you have any revised timing expectations on the investigation just as your own progresses here?
Show response
CEO was direct that no timing estimate is possible yet.
have you ruled out any third-party potential sources of ignition at this point?
Show response
CEO confirmed no evidence of alternative ignition source has been found, which was a factor in changing disclosure to probable.
Calendar 2024 Q4
If a legislative solution does not emerge, are there any operational changes across PSPS practices or elsewhere you would consider?
Show response
CEO noted SCE already became more conservative on PSPS criteria during windstorm. SVP Powell emphasized risk-prioritized mitigation plan continuously updated based on new learnings.
PCGPG&E Corporation8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you speak a little bit more to the type of project you are seeing now?
Show response
Poppe said larger projects are entering the mix but the bulk remain sub-gigawatt, at 1.5-gigawatt or smaller.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you expect any new look to the legislative process this summer, like in earlier bill introduction or more debate on public text
Show response
CEO expects Assembly Energy Committee hearings in May per public statements. Complex subject benefits from committee hearings. Insurance and energy committees in both chambers relevant.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Do you see this affordability conversation as something that you can get to outcomes in this session
Show response
CEO highlighted public purpose programs ($12/month savings), NEM reform, and state-driven transmission debt financing as constructive proposals. 30-40% of bills are policy driven.
Can you expand on the San Jose update a little bit and particularly the path and timing to capturing some of those load growth benefits
Show response
CEO said load materializing predominantly 2027 with construction preparations through 2026. Rate benefits to customers expected starting in 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you speak a little bit to what you're focused on in the run-up to that application
Show response
CEO cited 98% wildfire risk reduction from undergrounding, $465M O&M savings and $280M vegetation savings over first 1,230 miles during current GRC cycle. Only $1/month on customer bills vs $20/month for vegetation management.
Curious if you can share any feedback on what you're seeing on the ground
Show response
CEO said market misunderstood Northern California power availability. Cluster study 1 results opened interest. Second cluster study underway with multiple incremental gigawatts not yet in 8.7 GW pipeline.
Calendar 2024 Q4
does the half billion to $1.6 billion of investment per gigawatt framework still hold?
Show response
CEO confirmed framework holds with customer cost savings of 1-2% maintained. CFO added capital could be additive, reprioritized, or extend growth duration.
do you think the firefighting capabilities in the region are sufficient for growing wildfire risks
Show response
CEO said utility doesn't need to invest in firefighting but community hardening is important. AI cameras and weather stations provide early notification.
AWKAmerican Water Works6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
How are you thinking about Pennsylvania stakeholder relationships and engagements in advance of the next rate case application in the state
Show response
Cheryl Norton emphasized strong stakeholder engagement, great customer service, and continued rate filing planning on normal schedule.
Curious if you would explore a forward issuance to take care of the '26 equity needs
Show response
David Bowler confirmed the plan remains to issue and take proceeds in 2026, keeping all options on the table but no change planned.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Any thoughts on pulling forward your 2026 equity issuance given the recent share price strength or just financing thoughts overall on approach to equity
Show response
David Bowler clearly stated no plans to pull forward 2026 equity despite share strength, maintaining needs-based issuance approach.
how do you see the landscape standing under a scenario where recession puts pressure on muni finances
Show response
John Griffith acknowledged recession could drive more municipal sellers alongside other factors like deferred capital, environmental remediation, and retiring operators.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is the 7% to 9% growth, is it based on 2025 guidance less that $0.10 of incremental interest income
Show response
John Griffith confirmed the growth base excludes the $0.10 incremental HOS note interest, and explained the $795M note mechanics and December 2026 termination.
Can you just walk through a little bit of what's been going on recently in the legislative
Show response
Cheryl Norton described collaborative effort with other utilities and commission to pass future test year legislation, noting multiple bills have been joined together.
NINiSource6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
How do you see the GenCo playing into this in terms of potential impact to near-term or medium-term earnings with the GenCo structure
Show response
Shawn emphasized flexibility in financing structure and balance sheet strength. Noted base business outperformance provides incremental cash flows. Will optimize once contracts are in hand.
could you speak to turbine queue positions and just your confidence in ability to deliver new supply to meet any large load growth
Show response
Michael confirmed queue positions secured without providing specifics. Noted strong position to deliver on fundamentals including serving new customers with speed and flexibility.
Calendar 2025 Q1
offer any thoughts on sort of the pace and engagement with your large load, prospective large load counterparties
Show response
Lloyd confirmed excellent progress while emphasizing complexity requiring management attention. Reiterated hyperscaler CapEx plans as demand signal. Committed to quick disclosure.
what would the regulatory cap structure look like for that entity?
Show response
Declined to provide any detail on Genco financing or capital structure, noting focus remains on completing special contracts. Did not address peer comparison to higher ROE filings.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it looks like some of the NIPSCO and Columbia spend shifted across buckets. In your current base plan
Show response
Quickly dismissed the premise, confirming no material reallocation between segments. Offered offline follow-up for detail.
do you need IURC approval of that before you can announce a deal?
Show response
Clearly delineated that deals can be signed before IURC approval of Genco structure, with regulatory and commercial workstreams running concurrently.
AEPAmerican Electric Power4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious kind of on balance of all those developments and what's to come into the fall, how you're thinking about
Show response
Bill said engagement with PJM, FERC and the states has intensified since the first quarter call and expressed optimism for alignment following the July 23 technical conference.
how are you thinking about milestones into the 3Q plan update and if those projects will be ready for inclusion
Show response
Trevor expects Piketon definitive documents in the third quarter and roughly half of the 13 gigawatts of incremental generation to roll into the 2027 to 2031 plan.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you think there are opportunities on the transmission side that go beyond the sort of engineering construction efforts
Show response
Fehrman highlighted state-level policy support for transmission, accelerating right-of-way acquisition, and innovative design to reduce right-of-way needs.
I wanted to pick up a couple of the earlier themes around PJM, but kind of turn that to the SPP side
Show response
Fehrman contrasted SPP favorably with PJM on interconnection progress, noting SPP has been more aggressive with ARRIS filings.
Show 14 more companies
CMSCMS Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
to throw out the first question of kind of why now, is this all with an eye to higher utility growth
Show response
Rochow walked through the fiduciary review process, the capital reallocation, retained light-capital assets returning cash to the parent, and asset dispositions. Emphasized simplification and that nearly 100% of earnings come from the regulated utility after 2027.
Curious if you could speak a little bit more to what still has to go on the customer side
Show response
Rochow confirmed both the rate agreement and extraordinary facilities agreement are signed under the large load tariff, with local zoning still pending. Noted the customer is working multiple locations and the tariff travels with them across the service territory.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I am curious about the opportunities as it stands now relative to last quarter, and in particular, if you see both of these data centers come through, what is the potential to defer or delay your e...
Show response
Garrick said the pipeline has grown beyond 9 GW with new companies entering and others converting to contracts. Great progress on hyperscaler contracts and zoning. On rate case cadence, emphasized importance of annual filings to pass savings to customers, keep increases near inflation, and fund reliability investments. Would consider stay-outs but focused on affordability.
do you have any guiding lights around how you think about the qualitative versus quantitative aspects of a deal
Show response
Garrick declined to comment on M&A. Reiterated NorthStar positioning: DIG benefiting from rising energy and capacity prices with bilateral contracts, renewables hitting singles and doubles with utility-like returns, safe harbor through 2028-2029, and the whole segment is about 5% of earnings.
CNPCenterPoint Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you parse a little bit more around that short- and medium term capacity unlock referenced in the script?
Show response
Clarified the unlock has opened multiple customer conversations rather than serving only the first named customer.
How do you see that backdrop and that overlay impacting your routing work right now
Show response
Described a specific community-first process (webinars, town halls, narrowed route sets) with routing finalized in Q1.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how are you thinking about the market opportunity around those units as it stands now versus, say, a year ago
Show response
Foster noted smaller units already being marketed with strong receptivity at nearly double original 2021 lease rates. Larger units return from San Antonio by end of March 2027, then will be marketed as cash upside to plan.
I'm just trying to think about total dollars that might come this decade that aren't reflected in the plan right now
Show response
Wells explained the study targets the capacity gap between existing capacity exhaustion (~2029) and 765 kV import lines coming online (2031-2032). Expect intra-regional investments, system stability investments, and increased import capacity. Should be a fairly significant set of new transmission projects.
DTEDTE Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how are you thinking about positions there? Any expectations into what may come out in testimony?
Show response
Harris gave the testimony date and characterized pre-filing reception of the stay-out mechanism, while noting the case must still be reviewed in totality.
how might we see the load scenarios play out in there relative to the 2 gigawatts in advanced discussions
Show response
Clear three-scenario structure laid out for the Q3 IRP filing: signed contracts as base case, full pipeline as high end, and an intermediate case.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you lose an IRM outcome consistent with you're asked for the stay out? Or is it really around this newly proposed mechanism
Show response
CEO confirmed stay-out depends on the new excess margin mechanism, not IRM outcome specifically. IRM targeting $800M by 2029 with 2026-2027 already approved. Aligned to DSP and Liberty audit.
for that Oracle site, is there expansion potential there without additional zoning required?
Show response
CEO confirmed Oracle occupies portion of footprint with expansion potential. Hyperscalers and colocators engaging more fully with local communities, resulting in acceptance. Many pipeline projects have zoning or pathway to zoning.
DUKDuke Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how are you thinking about pacing future equity? And would you consider doing something upfront
Show response
CFO said Duke is opportunistic via the ATM and DRIP, locking in attractive pricing, with no large block equity planned in the 5-year plan.
there's been some talk around the sale of the Cayuga coal plant. Can you offer any update on that
Show response
Management said a study on operating and selling the Cayuga plant to a third party just came in and is being evaluated, with focus first on the new gas plant.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you speak a little bit to the timing of flowback to rate payers there?
Show response
Savoy described 4-year amortization schedule for tax credit flowback in North Carolina. Noted this could be accelerated as a rate case lever to keep rates lower.
Curious what you see as the timing for those remaining projects to begin construction
Show response
Sideris said ESAs require zoning and permits in place before signing, so construction starts rapidly after execution. Also exploring ways to accelerate bridge power to bring customers online earlier.
ETREntergy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I’m curious how you’re thinking about that process and maybe if settlements are a path to resolve that
Show response
Marsh emphasized Meta's tangible tax/community benefits and Fair Share Plus principles but deferred the settlement question to the regulatory process.
could you speak a little bit more about that upcoming Accelerated Resilience Filing and the goals of Phase 1A
Show response
Marsh said Phase 1A is about staging resilience investment to manage near-term customer affordability, not a change to the overall program.
Calendar 2026 Q1
did that move through the backlog until you then backfilled with new interest to get back to the 7 to 12 gigawatts
Show response
Kimberly confirmed Meta moved through the pipeline while additional interest continues to refresh it. Full pipeline update at Investor Day.
Could you speak a little bit more to sort of guardrails, timing, other elements you have
Show response
Kimberly quantified the renewables opportunity from Meta agreements and noted projects could come into the 4-year plan or extend beyond, with potential for batteries too.
PNWPinnacle West4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you speak a little bit more to kind of those knock-on effects out of the TSMC announcement
Show response
Geisler detailed TSMC's 12 committed facilities and accelerating schedule but said it was too early to quantify uncommitted-queue projects.
how are you thinking about gas supply overall? And what are you focused on right now
Show response
Geisler said current gas supply is adequate through this decade; the Desert Southwest pipeline is critical for next-decade expansion and on schedule.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you frame whether interest has shifted at all relative to expectations three to six months ago?
Show response
Ted confirmed interest meeting original expectations. Queue still ~20 GW. Contracts are complex involving generation, transmission, rates, financing, and timing. Making progress but not yet ready to file.
about a month ago the Governor's energy task force delivered a report. There was a lot in there, including new nuclear. What do you have an eye to out of that report
Show response
Ted outlined three report findings: support for new gas infrastructure, diverse resource mix anchored by dispatchable generation, and long-term nuclear opportunity. Won't risk utility balance sheet but open if large customers support financing.
XELXcel Energy4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
And is there anything else you'd highlight on the EPC front in terms of how the EPC side has enabled those wins?
Show response
Frenzel answered directly, framing the wind and solar resource base plus EPC partnerships as a durable strategic advantage in both competitive and directly assigned work.
Is 9% plus still the way to think about growth in the context of a 3Q update?
Show response
Van Abel acknowledged the enthusiasm but deferred any growth-rate revision to the Q3 roll-forward onto a new 2027-2031 base rather than quantifying the uplift now.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you expand a little bit more on the sort of settlement potential over the next month that you referenced in the script
Show response
Management provided detailed regulatory update on both Colorado and Minnesota, noting constructive starting points for settlement in both states.
the 4 gigawatts contracted by year-end '27, just any thoughts on sort of the gating factors to signing the $6 billion to $8 billion incremental CapEx framework
Show response
Both CEO and CFO provided comprehensive response on data center pipeline, NextEra JDA, and financing approach including proactive equity issuance.
AEEAmeren3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How are you thinking about the financing changes into this fall plan update
Show response
Lenny reiterated a balanced debt/equity approach; 2026 needs largely met via $600M forward sales and $1.2B YTD forward equity, with a fuller update in Q3.
Calendar 2026 Q1
curious if you could speak a bit more to the fuel cell opportunity you alluded to there and how you see that fitting in as a solution
Show response
Management tempered expectations on fuel cells as a possibility not a commitment, noting limited options for new dispatchable generation within 5-6 years beyond current projects.
could you speak to the generation efforts overall from a supply chain perspective and a planning perspective as you think about that upcoming IRP filing
Show response
Michael Main detailed turbines under contract and delivered, EPC contracts in place, labor mobilized, and a consortium of national construction companies being assembled for the combined cycle project.
AESAES Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
How you're seeing overall inbounds and interest into your service territories? Anything notable either on the quarter or on the horizon here on the load front at the utilities?
Show response
Andres confirmed strong inbounds with AES Indiana and Ohio among the fastest-growing utilities, with about 2 GW of additional data center demand signed and more expected.
how you think about the risk to safe harboring from the executive order and potential changes to guidelines. Is there anything specific to your safe harbor activities that gives you confidence
Show response
Ricardo detailed that 6 GW of 7.9 GW US backlog will be in service by end-2027 and qualify by law. Remaining 1.9 GW nearly all safe harbored, no retroactive application expected. FEOC compliance ensured by domestic supply chain.
DDominion Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How do you think you might address that? Any thoughts on technology and timing? Any opportunity there around long duration in the next five to ten years
Show response
Blue noted pilot programs underway but declined to identify specific technologies or timelines. Limited disclosure given early stage.
is it still about working in the range of that 5% to 7% growth, or do you see the potential for structurally higher growth over time
Show response
Ridge acknowledged the question but stayed within existing messaging, monitoring catalysts to enhance or extend growth range rather than committing to higher numbers.
SOSouthern Company2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Any learnings you would highlight from some of that ramp-up and the sales trends?
Show response
Womack conceded ramp rates can differ from initial projections but argued minimum bills effectively decouple revenue from that timing risk.
Curious about kind of the tone and interest on the remaining upgrades and then the brownfield efforts.
Show response
Poroch called conversations fruitful and reiterated the disciplined contracting model, but did not commit to a date for the Southern Power update.
WECWEC Energy Group2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious how work is trending on the pipe program as you've been reramping that. Any recent learnings or takeaways
Show response
Direct: disclosed reduced 2026 spending and attributed it squarely to labor availability rather than execution.
the topic of future of gas that we've talked about a number of ways over the past few years
Show response
Partial: characterised the docket as slipping and expected something by year-end without specifying the outcome.
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you speak a little bit more to the project proposals? And I guess, any way to frame the scale and type of
Show response
Ralph described PSEG's retained generation skill set and utility-like opportunities but declined to size them, citing ongoing PJM changes.
SRESempra1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you speak to other opportunities that could fold into the upside bucket on that 4Q update?
Show response
Jeff walked through how prior upside buckets converted into base plan and signaled a fresh large upside bucket on the February call; direct.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ATO Atmos Energy | 12 | 17%2 of 12 questions |
| EIX Edison International | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| AWK American Water Works | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| NI NiSource | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| AEP American Electric Power | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| CMS CMS Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| CNP CenterPoint Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| DTE DTE Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| DUK Duke Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- ATOAtmos Energy · 12 questions17%2 of 12 questions
- EIXEdison International · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- PCGPG&E Corporation · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- AWKAmerican Water Works · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- NINiSource · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- AEPAmerican Electric Power · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- CMSCMS Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- CNPCenterPoint Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- DTEDTE Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- DUKDuke Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Show all 20 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ETR Entergy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| PNW Pinnacle West | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| XEL Xcel Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| AEE Ameren | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AES AES Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| D Dominion Energy | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SO Southern Company | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| WEC WEC Energy Group | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SRE Sempra | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ETREntergy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- PNWPinnacle West · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- XELXcel Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- AEEAmeren · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AESAES Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DDominion Energy · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SOSouthern Company · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- WECWEC Energy Group · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SRESempra · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q4 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q1 | 25 | 0%none of 25 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q2 | 26 | 0%none of 26 questions | 16 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q3No questions recorded
- 2025 Q4No questions recorded
- 2026 Q125 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 25 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q226 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 26 questions) · 16 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Regulation Policy35
- Capex Investment28
- Capital Allocation17
- Demand17
- Guidance Reliability10
- Cloud & AI9
- Margin5
- Pricing4
- Cost Pressure3
- Macroeconomic3
Show all 18 topics
- Revenue Growth3
- M&A3
- Supply Chain3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Credit2
- Competitive Dynamics2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Labor Market1