Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Rishi Jaluria
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 30on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%2 of 30 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 30 of 30 questions from 8 companies
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Can you maybe walk us through how you see that pricing model starting
Show response
Peter described a simple predictable AWS-style price with usage overage charges, aiming for mostly predictable billing that large customers prefer.
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you think about the opportunity not just to build your own custom Falcon agents to solve industry-specific problems
Show response
Peter clarified Falcon is standard agentic labor to solve industry problems, not customer-facing AI tooling; custom agents use Vault AI.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we be thinking about the opportunity for Veeva to work with Anthropic, OpenAI, all the different kind of model providers out there
Show response
Peter emphatically stated AI is not replacing core systems of record like SAP, Workday, or Veeva. LLM providers are an engine for the new wave of cloud computing, the new AWS. Relationship is symbiotic: Veeva couldn't build AI applications without foundational LLMs, just as Veeva couldn't exist without cloud infrastructure. AI will play out over 10-20 years.
do you see an opportunity to not just automate and drive faster time to value and efficiency but even leveraging AI within the Veeva platform to allow for better drug development, safer drugs
Show response
Peter said 90% of value in life sciences is lost between diagnosis and correct treatment, not in drug discovery. AI doctors and LLMs can bridge the gap between patients, doctors, and pharma. Veeva will play a part connecting the industry to its external ecosystem. Benefits of AI over 10-20 years are underestimated.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there an opportunity that you can leverage your agents to make that transition and movement of applications easier
Show response
Peter said migration tooling is well-refined non-AI tooling. Over 20 migrated with ~300 more to go. AI will create pull for migration though. Expects more than two-thirds of migrations done in 2026 and 2027.
are you gonna be architecting your agents out in a way/have you already started to see this where, you know, it's not only living within the Vault ecosystem
Show response
Peter gave example of filing a document to TMF from Microsoft Office via agent-to-agent protocol. MCP enables much less brittle integration than traditional middleware. Cross-vendor agent interoperability is an underappreciated benefit.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you talk about what you're seeing from early customer feedback and adoption of these
Show response
Paul said bringing sales, marketing, and service together on a single customer database is resonating. Currently a smaller pool since customers must be on Vault CRM first, largely focusing on smaller and mid-sized customers.
where do you kind of see it shaking out other than, you know, the typical efficiency gains
Show response
Peter said AI is deeply embedded in core applications (MLR agent, CRM agent, safety AI agent). LLM technology has settled down, and Veeva is building nondeterministic computing into specific use cases.
Calendar 2025 Q1
maybe can you walk us through kind of what's driven the desire or the momentum to push out these products kind of quickly
Show response
Peter said the LLM landscape is stabilizing as expected. Veeva is now investing more in AI solutions with a centralized group and strong leader.
AKAMAkamai Technologies7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
some of these large, more central cloud driven AI deals to start to expand more to edge cloud
Show response
Leighton framed compute as a core-to-edge continuum (robotics example of video ingestion plus low-latency inference); Akamai serves inference and small/medium models, not frontier training.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is the total ACV or whatever sort of metric you want to use, with those customers growing meaningfully as a result of this?
Show response
Ed confirmed CIS is 100% additive to existing customer spend, not substituting for delivery revenue. The large deal was done out-of-cycle, not as part of a renewal. Good success with both existing and new customers. New verticals emerging that weren't traditional Akamai CDN customers. Total new customer count has picked up over the last 18 months.
Just can you maybe help us understand, I know this isn't the Akamai of 10 years ago when maybe live events were a lot more meaningful
Show response
Ed broke down event revenue impacts: Super Bowl/concerts are small ($0.5-1M capacity fees), Olympics a few million, World Cup $3-6M, NFL season much better. Gaming releases depend on popularity; console refresh cycles are larger (hundreds of millions of firmware updates). Events are nice to have but not overly material for a $1B+ quarter company.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what gives you confidence that as we get through this capacity constrained era, regardless of how long it lasts, that Akamai will still be well positioned
Show response
Tom emphasized it is not about capacity constraints. One hyperscaler uses Akamai for ad logic proximity, another for API orchestration, a third for media workflow via managed container service. It is about Akamai's unique 4,000+ POP distributed platform delivering faster performance.
Are there opportunities to take what you're doing in API security today and start to extend it now into these new kind of Agentic protocols?
Show response
Tom confirmed they are already extending API security to detect AI agents, shadow AI apps, and protect inference applications with AI firewall. Sees this as one of the reasons they are so excited about API security business.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what can you do on your end to minimize the disruption from that. What are you assuming when you think about your 2025 guide
Show response
Tom emphasized avoiding account breakage by phasing changes over two years. Adding specialized sellers for new products rather than reassigning accounts all at once.
how should we be thinking about the pricing environment for the delivery? And can just having fewer players in the space help
Show response
Ed acknowledged fewer players could help pricing but noted delivery is still volume-driven. Seeing some rationalization with longer contract terms.
FIGFigma, Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you seeing situations where you're actually landing net new customer logos as a result of having these
Show response
Praveer said new products deepen seats in the base and accelerate lower-end customer acquisition, with agent broadening paid users.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How do we think about the opportunity for you to, over time, start building out more formal partnerships with them
Show response
Dylan kept focus on the code-to-canvas round-trip and model-provider integrations over formal partnerships.
how do you expect that mix to shape over time? And then alongside that, how do you -- what tools in your arsenal
Show response
Praveer described credit telemetry, co-termed add-on packs, and pay-as-you-go for burst usage as predictability levers.
Calendar 2025 Q3
when we think about your $100,000-plus customers that are using Figma Make today, what are the tangible results
Show response
Praveer said Make weekly usage among $100K+ customers keeps growing and increasingly anchors the sales narrative.
Calendar 2025 Q2
why you expect that Figma is still going to be not just relevant, but, you know, market-leading in that new paradigm
Show response
Dylan argued agents will multiply design surfaces and increase the designer's role rather than replace design work.
TWLOTwilio Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how should we just be thinking about what that time line looks like
Show response
Khozema said AI-native customers are still early and relatively small, and the bigger opportunity is enterprise adoption, which is moving more slowly on buying cycles.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Maybe how do you think about investing for that opportunity? What are you seeing?
Show response
Khozema said a simpler self-serve experience serves international customers too, with boots on the ground selectively in Australia, Japan and Singapore.
what is the steady-state free cash flow per share growth profile for this business look like?
Show response
Khozema declined to give a profile but cited cost discipline, workforce mix shift, AI and automation, and a buyback grid as ongoing levers.
MDBMongoDB, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you talk about why MongoDB, Inc. still has a strong role and some of the investments that you might be making
Show response
Dev outlined why MongoDB fits agents, JSON to model messy real-world data, integrated search/vector, and memory to connect context across sessions; well positioned as agents deploy.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What needs to happen as companies think about net new generative AI applications
Show response
Dev said AI's accelerating pace of change makes rigid relational databases untenable, positioning MongoDB's flexible document model, search, and Voyage embeddings for net-new AI apps.
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how to maintain predictability within the customer base while increasingly growing consumption
Show response
Satya explained seats as convenient consumption packs with overages flowing to pure consumption billing. Long-term commitments get appropriate discounting. Value is evaluated by evals and outcomes on token-level economics.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how we should be thinking about your overall AI strategy on consumer versus enterprise
Show response
Satya cited fastest-ever M365 suite adoption; Amy explained Copilot impact shows in M365 commercial ARPU, currently masked by lower-ARPU frontline and SMB seat growth.
Show 2 more companies
INTUIntuit1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you typically landing greenfield with a lot of these opportunities, or are there wins that you have
Show response
Sasan noted 800K mid-market customers already in base. Initial focus on existing customers and accountant partners displacing point solutions. Greenfield shift beginning.
WDAYWorkday, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
would you characterize anything different you saw in the month of April especially because that was post-liberation day and the institution of tariffs
Show response
Carl confirmed no material tariff impact on Q1 or early Q2 trends. Watching SLED and international as potential headwind areas but emphasized strong ROI and consolidation value proposition.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| AKAM Akamai Technologies | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| FIG Figma, Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| MDB MongoDB, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| INTU Intuit | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- VEEVVeeva Systems Inc. · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- AKAMAkamai Technologies · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- FIGFigma, Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- TWLOTwilio Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- MDBMongoDB, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MSFTMicrosoft Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- INTUIntuit · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- WDAYWorkday, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI19
- Competitive Dynamics8
- Innovation & R&D7
- Product Launch6
- Pricing4
- Demand4
- Revenue Growth3
- Guidance Reliability3
- Subscriber Growth2
- Trade Tariffs1
Show all 14 topics
- Macroeconomic1
- M&A1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Capital Allocation1