Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Rishi Jaluria

RBC Capital Markets · covers Technology, Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
30on tracked calls
Challenge rate
7%2 of 30 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 30 of 30 questions from 8 companies

VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
VEEV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Can you maybe walk us through how you see that pricing model starting

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Peter described a simple predictable AWS-style price with usage overage charges, aiming for mostly predictable billing that large customers prefer.

Calendar 2026 Q2

How do you think about the opportunity not just to build your own custom Falcon agents to solve industry-specific problems

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Peter clarified Falcon is standard agentic labor to solve industry problems, not customer-facing AI tooling; custom agents use Vault AI.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how should we be thinking about the opportunity for Veeva to work with Anthropic, OpenAI, all the different kind of model providers out there

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Peter emphatically stated AI is not replacing core systems of record like SAP, Workday, or Veeva. LLM providers are an engine for the new wave of cloud computing, the new AWS. Relationship is symbiotic: Veeva couldn't build AI applications without foundational LLMs, just as Veeva couldn't exist without cloud infrastructure. AI will play out over 10-20 years.

do you see an opportunity to not just automate and drive faster time to value and efficiency but even leveraging AI within the Veeva platform to allow for better drug development, safer drugs

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Peter said 90% of value in life sciences is lost between diagnosis and correct treatment, not in drug discovery. AI doctors and LLMs can bridge the gap between patients, doctors, and pharma. Veeva will play a part connecting the industry to its external ecosystem. Benefits of AI over 10-20 years are underestimated.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there an opportunity that you can leverage your agents to make that transition and movement of applications easier

Product LaunchCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Peter said migration tooling is well-refined non-AI tooling. Over 20 migrated with ~300 more to go. AI will create pull for migration though. Expects more than two-thirds of migrations done in 2026 and 2027.

are you gonna be architecting your agents out in a way/have you already started to see this where, you know, it's not only living within the Vault ecosystem

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Peter gave example of filing a document to TMF from Microsoft Office via agent-to-agent protocol. MCP enables much less brittle integration than traditional middleware. Cross-vendor agent interoperability is an underappreciated benefit.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you talk about what you're seeing from early customer feedback and adoption of these

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul said bringing sales, marketing, and service together on a single customer database is resonating. Currently a smaller pool since customers must be on Vault CRM first, largely focusing on smaller and mid-sized customers.

where do you kind of see it shaking out other than, you know, the typical efficiency gains

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Peter said AI is deeply embedded in core applications (MLR agent, CRM agent, safety AI agent). LLM technology has settled down, and Veeva is building nondeterministic computing into specific use cases.

Calendar 2025 Q1

maybe can you walk us through kind of what's driven the desire or the momentum to push out these products kind of quickly

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Peter said the LLM landscape is stabilizing as expected. Veeva is now investing more in AI solutions with a centralized group and strong leader.

AKAMAkamai Technologies7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

some of these large, more central cloud driven AI deals to start to expand more to edge cloud

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Leighton framed compute as a core-to-edge continuum (robotics example of video ingestion plus low-latency inference); Akamai serves inference and small/medium models, not frontier training.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is the total ACV or whatever sort of metric you want to use, with those customers growing meaningfully as a result of this?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ed confirmed CIS is 100% additive to existing customer spend, not substituting for delivery revenue. The large deal was done out-of-cycle, not as part of a renewal. Good success with both existing and new customers. New verticals emerging that weren't traditional Akamai CDN customers. Total new customer count has picked up over the last 18 months.

Just can you maybe help us understand, I know this isn't the Akamai of 10 years ago when maybe live events were a lot more meaningful

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ed broke down event revenue impacts: Super Bowl/concerts are small ($0.5-1M capacity fees), Olympics a few million, World Cup $3-6M, NFL season much better. Gaming releases depend on popularity; console refresh cycles are larger (hundreds of millions of firmware updates). Events are nice to have but not overly material for a $1B+ quarter company.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what gives you confidence that as we get through this capacity constrained era, regardless of how long it lasts, that Akamai will still be well positioned

ChallengingCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tom emphasized it is not about capacity constraints. One hyperscaler uses Akamai for ad logic proximity, another for API orchestration, a third for media workflow via managed container service. It is about Akamai's unique 4,000+ POP distributed platform delivering faster performance.

Are there opportunities to take what you're doing in API security today and start to extend it now into these new kind of Agentic protocols?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tom confirmed they are already extending API security to detect AI agents, shadow AI apps, and protect inference applications with AI firewall. Sees this as one of the reasons they are so excited about API security business.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what can you do on your end to minimize the disruption from that. What are you assuming when you think about your 2025 guide

Competitive DynamicsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom emphasized avoiding account breakage by phasing changes over two years. Adding specialized sellers for new products rather than reassigning accounts all at once.

how should we be thinking about the pricing environment for the delivery? And can just having fewer players in the space help

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ed acknowledged fewer players could help pricing but noted delivery is still volume-driven. Seeing some rationalization with longer contract terms.

FIGFigma, Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
FIG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you seeing situations where you're actually landing net new customer logos as a result of having these

Product LaunchSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Praveer said new products deepen seats in the base and accelerate lower-end customer acquisition, with agent broadening paid users.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How do we think about the opportunity for you to, over time, start building out more formal partnerships with them

Show response

Dylan kept focus on the code-to-canvas round-trip and model-provider integrations over formal partnerships.

how do you expect that mix to shape over time? And then alongside that, how do you -- what tools in your arsenal

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Praveer described credit telemetry, co-termed add-on packs, and pay-as-you-go for burst usage as predictability levers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

when we think about your $100,000-plus customers that are using Figma Make today, what are the tangible results

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Praveer said Make weekly usage among $100K+ customers keeps growing and increasingly anchors the sales narrative.

Calendar 2025 Q2

why you expect that Figma is still going to be not just relevant, but, you know, market-leading in that new paradigm

ChallengingCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dylan argued agents will multiply design surfaces and increase the designer's role rather than replace design work.

TWLOTwilio Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how should we just be thinking about what that time line looks like

Show response

Khozema said AI-native customers are still early and relatively small, and the bigger opportunity is enterprise adoption, which is moving more slowly on buying cycles.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Maybe how do you think about investing for that opportunity? What are you seeing?

Geographic ExpansionCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Khozema said a simpler self-serve experience serves international customers too, with boots on the ground selectively in Australia, Japan and Singapore.

what is the steady-state free cash flow per share growth profile for this business look like?

Capital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Khozema declined to give a profile but cited cost discipline, workforce mix shift, AI and automation, and a buyback grid as ongoing levers.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk about why MongoDB, Inc. still has a strong role and some of the investments that you might be making

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dev outlined why MongoDB fits agents, JSON to model messy real-world data, integrated search/vector, and memory to connect context across sessions; well positioned as agents deploy.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What needs to happen as companies think about net new generative AI applications

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dev said AI's accelerating pace of change makes rigid relational databases untenable, positioning MongoDB's flexible document model, search, and Voyage embeddings for net-new AI apps.

MSFTMicrosoft Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
MSFT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how to maintain predictability within the customer base while increasingly growing consumption

Show response

Satya explained seats as convenient consumption packs with overages flowing to pure consumption billing. Long-term commitments get appropriate discounting. Value is evaluated by evals and outcomes on token-level economics.

Calendar 2024 Q3

how we should be thinking about your overall AI strategy on consumer versus enterprise

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Satya cited fastest-ever M365 suite adoption; Amy explained Copilot impact shows in M365 commercial ARPU, currently masked by lower-ARPU frontline and SMB seat growth.

Show 2 more companies
INTUIntuit1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you typically landing greenfield with a lot of these opportunities, or are there wins that you have

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sasan noted 800K mid-market customers already in base. Initial focus on existing customers and accountant partners displacing point solutions. Greenfield shift beginning.

WDAYWorkday, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
WDAY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

would you characterize anything different you saw in the month of April especially because that was post-liberation day and the institution of tariffs

Trade TariffsMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Carl confirmed no material tariff impact on Q1 or early Q2 trends. Watching SLED and international as potential headwind areas but emphasized strong ROI and consolidation value proposition.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
VEEV Veeva Systems Inc.90%none of 9 questions
AKAM Akamai Technologies714%1 of 7 questions
FIG Figma, Inc.520%1 of 5 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.30%none of 3 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MSFT Microsoft Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
INTU Intuit1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
WDAY Workday, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • VEEV
    Veeva Systems Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • FIG
    Figma, Inc. · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MSFT
    Microsoft Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • WDAY
    Workday, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q2425%1 of 4 questions3
2025 Q3813%1 of 8 questions5
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  9. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI19
  • Competitive Dynamics8
  • Innovation & R&D7
  • Product Launch6
  • Pricing4
  • Demand4
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Subscriber Growth2
  • Trade Tariffs1
Show all 14 topics
  • Macroeconomic1
  • M&A1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capital Allocation1