Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Sung Nam

Scotiabank · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q2 (4 quarters).

Questions
10on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 10 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 10 of 10 questions from 3 companies

TECHBio-Techne6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TECH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was wondering about academic market outside the U.S., whether Spatial could be growing faster? And then also the recent launch of spatial protein proximity detection

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kim confirmed COMET still achieved double-digit instrument growth despite academic headwinds with strong win/loss rates. Highlighted unique multiomics capability now expanded to include protein-protein interactions alongside RNA and protein detection, with no competitor offering equivalent breadth.

in an environment where there might be significant CapEx spending going towards U.S., expanding U.S. manufacturing reshoring, et cetera. by potential pressure on the early stage

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim noted pharma sectoral tariff discussions added another layer of uncertainty factored into Q4 guide. However emphasized pharma companies are cash-rich and CapEx needs may not translate to R&D cuts. Kim added portfolio is now distributed across discovery through manufacturing, reducing early-stage concentration risk.

Calendar 2024 Q4

would you be able to comment on kind of how Biotech stacks up against competitors on that front? How game changing is this capability

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kim cited sustainable competitive advantages from combining internal expertise, decades of proprietary data, and early AI investment. Six designer proteins launched with steady cadence ahead.

how quickly do you do you expect the customers to adopt the multi omni capabilities whether that would require further market development?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kim emphasized COMET as only provider of true multiomics in spatial with 24 proteins and 12 RNA targets simultaneously. Key opinion leaders generating data with broader rollout underway. RNAscope already successful in clinical markets.

Calendar 2024 Q3

could you maybe elaborate further in terms of which of the product or business segments where you might have seen the strongest growth in the quarter?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kim noted academic growth was broad across product lines and regions, driven by research funding flowing into cancer and neuroscience fields that benefit Bio-Techne's portfolio.

Was wondering if there might be any updates in terms of any of the partnership opportunities, especially with the Exosome Diagnostics' technology

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kim confirmed Thermo kidney rejection partnership progressing, other signatures in the making, but primary focus now on developing exosome-based tests for Asuragen channel like upcoming ESR1 test.

WATWaters Corporation3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
WAT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Was curious about tariffs, specifically with India currently, just assuming that's not affecting your generics business

Trade TariffsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

No tariff impact seen on India generics; customers ramping capacity for semaglutide opportunity and upcoming patent cliffs.

Just curious about your drug discovery business out -- for your pharma end market, recognizing that's a very small part of your business

Show response

Drug discovery (~5% of pharma) and biotechs remain slow with replacement cycle not kicked in; CROs and China branded generics also lagging.

Calendar 2025 Q1

could you remind us kind of what is the latest number for that in terms of your exposure? And then also curious kind of what you're seeing on the ground currently

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

U.S. A&G is ~3% of revenue, grew double digits in Q1 but assumed -20% for rest of year as derisking.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ILMN company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

was kind of curious if you might be able to comment on kind of the opportunities for Illumina

Show response

Jacob framed Stargate as evidence of US commitment to genomics-enabled healthcare and Illumina as a natural partner.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TECH Bio-Techne60%none of 6 questions
WAT Waters Corporation30%none of 3 questions
ILMN Illumina, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TECH
    Bio-Techne · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • WAT
    Waters Corporation · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • ILMN
    Illumina, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand5
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Product Launch2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Cloud & AI1