Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Taylor McGinnis

UBS · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
20on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%1 of 20 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 20 of 20 questions from 3 companies

ADSKAutodesk7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
ADSK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

is it possible that, that at some point starts to become a headwind to billings growth?

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Janesh flagged the moving parts for fiscal '28 (transaction-model benefit not recurring, full-year MaintainX, continued productivity normalization) but said it was early to guide, emphasizing that core drivers like renewals, EBAs, construction, and operations remain strong. Partial by design given it is early for FY28.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Was there any pull forward of deals into 1Q, or is that just a reflection of the impact from some of the sales changes

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Janesh attributed the billings/revenue profile to sales-reorg timing rather than deal pull-forward. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you just help us unpack the mechanics there a little bit more

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Janesh provided detailed FY27 modeling framework: annual billing transition completes in Q1 FY27, normalizing billings/FCF growth. NTM impact smaller in FY27 than FY26. Incremental margin headwinds from NTM. Underlying business performing consistently well.

When you speak with customers regarding their spending plans across AEC manufacturing and M&E for calendar 2026

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew said customers investing in digital infrastructure to prepare for future productivity enhancements. Most flagging continuation of investment levels, some areas flagging increased investment. No changes in consistency.

Calendar 2025 Q3

could you just maybe walk us through how your expectations for expense growth for the year have changed

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Janesh clarified ~2/3 incremental margin flow-through on the underlying basis, with strong cost discipline and restructuring plan implemented well. Some timing effects quarter to quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q2

just how are you thinking about, you know, the reinvestment of those savings today? Have your views at all changed?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Janesh confirmed spend plan unchanged, Q1 revenue outperformance flowing to bottom line. Full-year spending growth at 4% CC vs 7% in FY25. Multiyear journey with ongoing optimization.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just break down and quantify the drivers of that expansion. So how much is from cost savings

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Janesh couldn't break apart savings vs reinvestment (integrated plan) but noted spending growth slowing from 7% to 4%, and committed to further FY27 margin expansion with details at Investor Day.

TWLOTwilio Inc.7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

as we look at the 3Q guide, it implies that the strength that you saw in the first half of the year is going to continue

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Aidan declined to break Q3 down by segment, recapped broad Q2 strength, and said 5% plus beats are not the new norm given tougher Voice and add-on comparisons.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is there any way to quantify, I guess, how much of that led to the acceleration that you guys saw in 1Q?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aidan said RCS and AI natives are not contributing meaningfully; Messaging is up about 18% operationally, in line with its mid- to high-teens trend.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you offer us what the operating income margin guide would have been relative to the 8.5% reported number

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Aidan sized the fee drag at about 60 to 70 basis points of operating margin and said Q1 opex is heavier on a full quarter of Stytch and product investments.

how are you thinking about the durability of double-digit growth potentially?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Khozema pointed to broad-based strength across products and the highest Q1 guide in 3 years rather than messaging-specific drivers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

So any early signs on what you guys are expecting there and maybe the puts and the takes of some of these emerging

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Aidan cited a tough holiday comparison and a more mixed macro that make holiday volumes harder to predict, but gave no early holiday read.

So just curious if anything surprised you guys or if there was any areas that performed better than expected?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Aidan said nothing surprised and listed ISV and self-serve both up 20% plus, accelerating software add-ons and healthy volumes across industries.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if I look at the implied organic guide, it looks like at the high end, it implies growth around 7% for 4Q

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO tied the implied slowdown to tougher comparisons from last year's political messaging traffic and deliverability tools, without naming incremental upside for Q4.

INTUIntuit6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

you placed a big emphasis on the new customer growth, mentioned online customer growth, in particular, decelerated

Subscriber GrowthDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Sasan pointed to a nearly $200 billion TAM only 7% penetrated, and said the focus on mid-market and money/workforce services taught Intuit the cohorts, go-to-market and platform motions to acquire customers. With QuickBooks Free and QuickBooks Lite recently introduced (over 20,000 active or upgraded customers in the last month monetized via payments), he expressed confidence in accelerating low-end acquisition alongside mid-market.

Calendar 2026 Q2

excluding Mailchimp, there was a bit of a deceleration in the online businesses, particularly on the services side

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sandeep explained Q2 had a seasonal benefit from tax-related payroll items (1099s) that did not repeat in Q3, causing the optical deceleration. Expressed confidence in strategy via mid-market IES scaling, QuickBooks Workforce launch, and money platform momentum.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it would be helpful if you could just offer some additional color on the drivers of growth

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sandeep cited continued GBSG online strength, mid-market momentum, and CK partner engagement. Desktop expected to decelerate in H2. CK comps get harder in H2 but key growth vectors continue executing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you maybe talk through the drivers of that performance and how durable you think some of those trends could be as we go into 2026?

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Sandeep attributed Q4 acceleration to mid-market scaling plus new lineup introduction and innovation in money portfolio. FY26 decel driven by less pricing actions, not underlying momentum deterioration.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I think you said that, that accelerated to 30% growth excluding Mailchimp, which is really solid

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sasan cited holistic money platform strength including payments, bill pay, credit. Sandeep added payment volume up 18% this quarter vs 17% last quarter.

Calendar 2024 Q4

if I look at the operating margin guide for the second half, it looks higher than what you guys have done in past years

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sandeep explained front-loaded investments in consumer marketing, mid-market sales force training, and GBS campaigns will yield higher returns in the back half as efficiency ramps.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ADSK Autodesk714%1 of 7 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.70%none of 7 questions
INTU Intuit60%none of 6 questions
  • ADSK
    Autodesk · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q3250%1 of 2 questions2
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth13
  • Guidance Reliability7
  • Demand6
  • Margin5
  • Cost Pressure4
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Pricing2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Competitive Dynamics1