Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Tom O'Malley
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 120on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 4%5 of 120 questions
- Companies
- 20questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 120 of 120 questions from 20 companies
COHRCoherent, Inc.12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
So why aren't you getting more incremental fall-through on the gross margin side?
Show response
Luther defended progress with 530bp of improvement over 8 quarters, highlighting cost reductions, yield improvements, and pricing optimization. Emphasized they are early stages of the margin expansion opportunity.
Jim, you mentioned some bottlenecks that were being relieved in the OCS business. What specifically are you referring to?
Show response
Anderson acknowledged internal component constraints were resolved, enabling faster production ramp across 2 sites, but did not specify the exact component.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe talk about when you see the industry getting the product that it needs. Are we still in a position where the industry is short?
Show response
Jim expects sustained InP supply-demand imbalance through at least 2027, possibly longer if scale-up customer forecasts materialize. Driving aggressive capacity expansion goals beyond initial doubling target.
maybe you could spend some time talking about the components of that backlog. Where is the greatest area of strength?
Show response
Jim confirmed vast majority of 4x book-to-bill from 800G and 1.6T transceivers. 800G stronger than expected, 1.6T accelerating. OCS and CPO also contributing. Communications/DCI bookings also very strong.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Any way for us to link the percent of production, the amount of production to how much gross margin expansion you see?
Show response
Jim noted minimal gross margin impact this quarter since 6-inch just started. Benefits begin next calendar year, becoming more meaningful each sequential quarter. Sherri added 6-inch is less than half the cost of 3-inch.
Could you maybe help us understand what was the driver in the September quarter? I think you called out datacom as maybe being a little bit more of a driver
Show response
Jim provided clear segment breakdown: datacenter accelerating from 4% to ~10% sequential in Q2, comms up single digits sequentially, industrial stable to slightly up.
Calendar 2025 Q1
gross margins are pressured a bit. Should we be thinking about mix differential that gets you to lower gross margins
Show response
Sherri identified mix as primary potential headwind for Q4 gross margin, but noted cost reduction benefits seen across all segments and pricing optimization in lasers and datacom.
In your June guidance, what are you assuming from a revenue perspective from silicon carbide
Show response
Jim clarified SiC devices/modules was pre-revenue so no forecast impact; continued investment in differentiated substrate and EPI production with healthy customer demand.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any color on just the broader segments, what gets you to that flat guidance into March is the first question?
Show response
Jim provided clear segment-level guidance: communications up sequentially offset by industrial-related declines netting to flat midpoint.
are you starting to see a change in behavior from some of the hyperscalers as it relates to the domestication
Show response
Jim sees share gain opportunity driven by technology roadmap and supply chain resilience, noted geographic diversity increasingly valued by hyperscaler customers.
Calendar 2024 Q3
is that all that you identified as non-strategic? Could there be additional sales on the way?
Show response
Jim confirmed additional non-strategic actions underway beyond battery platform and Newton Aycliffe, to be shared at appropriate time and Investor Day.
do you think that you will have any contribution from 1.6T in the fourth calendar quarter of this year?
Show response
Jim declined to specify exact 1.6T timing beyond calendar 2025 ramp, emphasized multi-technology approach as competitive strength across EML, VCSEL, and silicon photonics.
NXPINXP Semiconductors12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you think that these acquisitions are going after same-area you guys have already kind of targeted?
Show response
Framed peer deals as validation and described integration progress, but did not size the TAM the analyst asked about.
Have you at least seen some normalization there where there has been some standardization around that 11 week mark
Show response
Said dispersion between low and high customers is unchanged from prior quarters but confirmed inventory digestion is over.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you think that you would expand it just given the stronger demand profile? Are you comfortable with it at that 11 weeks mark
Show response
Rafael confirmed channel went to 11 weeks in Q1 as planned, Q2 guide holds flat at 11 weeks long-term target.
could you maybe give us a flavor of are these new products beneficial to corporate gross margins?
Show response
Bill confirmed data center products are favorable to corporate gross margins, consistent with focus on value extraction across all applications.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it the decision to just not go to 11 weeks overall? Or is it just we're going to wait a little bit until we take it to the 11 weeks
Show response
Rafael confirmed shift from tight control to long-term 11-week target in 2026, reflecting improving demand. Finished Q4 at about 10 weeks.
you're guiding that business up 10%. Could you maybe walk through the moving pieces
Show response
Rafael attributed C&I sequential Q1 strength to digital networking normalization and secure card growth that should benefit throughout 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you give us a little bit of a feel of what's moving into your Q4
Show response
Rafael broke out 60% core industrial / 40% consumer IoT. Consumer IoT benefiting from smart glasses and wearables demand. Core industrial broad-based improvements in energy storage and building automation.
maybe again, what happened in the quarter, maybe the processor business versus the rest of auto
Show response
Rafael highlighted Q3 auto revenue only 3% below Q4 2023 peak. Accelerated growth drivers (SDV, radar, connectivity) continue to drive performance, reflecting secular shift to software-defined vehicles.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is 11 weeks the maximum that you guys would channel refill in this period of time? Or is there any circumstance in which you would go a little bit higher
Show response
Kurt confirmed 11 weeks as the stated long-term target based on bottom-up assessment, same as pre-COVID. It was part of the November Investor Day model.
any differences that we should be thinking about in the recovery between auto and industrial as the year closes
Show response
Kurt refused segment-level Q4 guidance, limiting commentary to total company flat to slightly up seasonal norm.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you just maybe talk about the inventory situation at the North American customers versus three months ago
Show response
Kurt confirmed inventory digestion continues at Western Tier 1s with individual customer plans, unable to predict timing of completion.
when do you start to make decisions about internal utilization? Like, is it like two or three quarter out scenario
Show response
Bill said they're balancing internal inventory dollars and utilization with foundry orders. Second half revenue growth would trigger increased utilization.
WDCWestern Digital12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much appetite do customers have to keep on taking pricing increases, and what is your strategy there
Show response
Irving emphasized predictable pricing philosophy over opportunistic pricing. Noted LTAs extend into CY2029 with base volume pricing and incremental upside on above-base volumes.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you maybe give us a little more detail on that, maybe the size of the purchase? And then what in particular you needed to add on the laser side that you felt like you need to go out and do a ...
Show response
Irving declined to share deal terms (confidential) but highlighted benefits: less real estate in the drive improving manufacturability and reliability, plus reduced energy requirements vs conventional laser diodes. More details planned for Innovation Day.
I was curious if you guys have been engaging with any large hyperscalers or any large procurers of storage for any kind of solution that would maybe attach on to custom silicon deployment
Show response
Irving noted NVIDIA's KV cache offload initiative accelerates inference, which increases data velocity and volume, benefiting HDD demand. WDC working on innovations to improve drive bandwidth and throughput, details to be shared at Innovation Day.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you talk about the hooks that are in these agreements? Are these take-or-pay
Show response
Irving distinguished firm POs (5 hyperscalers) from LTAs. Calendar 2027 agreement has significant commercial protections. A structurally different environment from DRAM/NAND pandemic era.
on $100 billion of AI spend you would see from a benefit to their business
Show response
Kris noted HDD share of AI CapEx trending from low single digits to 4-5%. Not a direct correlation but share is increasing as data storage needs grow.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You guys said ASPs in the June quarter were down low single digits. Is that correct
Show response
Irving clarified ASP per drive up, ASP per terabyte down low single digits. Stable pricing environment; the per-TB decline is mix-driven from higher capacity drives.
is there any mark that you would call out as that kind of waterfall? Is there a spot that you would say from this point forward, we only need technology transitions
Show response
Irving cited 190 exabytes achieved via technology rather than capacity investment. High yields at scale differentiate WDC. No incremental capacity investment needed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you talk about like what benefit you get from these LTAs? Is this take-or-pay agreements
Show response
Irving cited structural industry changes removing excess capacity. LTAs moved from 3-6 months to 9-12 months, giving better visibility and supply planning capability.
looking into the June units versus pricing, any commentary you have that get you to that guide
Show response
Don noted continued ASP progression driven by cloud mix shift. Price per unit expected stable to up as mix continues moving toward higher-capacity data center drives.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you help us understand where you guys start running into a wall in terms of capacity?
Show response
Wissam declined to comment on capacity ceiling, deflecting to supply-demand balance discipline and CapEx prudence.
given the reduction in utilization and just a broader pause, you're saying kind of a mid-cycle pause in the business. Any update on how you're thinking about spend
Show response
Wissam confirmed no change to disciplined CapEx approach. Next catalyst will be ramping the next NAND node; more detail at investor day.
Calendar 2024 Q3
you're saying that grows from 15% today to 15% to 20%. So nice tailwind throughout the year.
Show response
Asked to quantify the enterprise SSD margin tailwind; management called it accretive and among the best-priced Flash markets but did not quantify, partial.
CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd11 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
can you talk about, like, challenges that you are facing in scaling today?
Show response
Bill reassured on supply readiness (18-24 months of preparation, inventory build) and demand generation, but gave no hard numbers on the ramp.
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is there any optical revenue, ZF Optics, or Dust Photonics in that guidance? And if so, how much?
Show response
CFO confirmed the entire optical portfolio (3 legs, each >$100M) is in the FY27 guide; about half of the absolute-dollar growth is optical.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Maybe you could compare what a ZF customer engagement looks like versus an AEC customer engagement?
Show response
Bill framed ZF like AECs, moving straight from samples to customer qualification, and confirmed the ramp pulls into Q1 fiscal '27 with units already shipped.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe you could give us what the percentages of the top 4 were this quarter?
Show response
Dan gave the top-4 mix (42%, 24%, 16%, 11%) and noted a single hyperscaler's ramp is never linear, with 12-month visibility helping manage the give-and-take.
when you look at the ALC market, you could see that being double the AEC TAM
Show response
Bill said the ALC TAM is driven by both quantity and ASPs, with scale-up going row scale potentially up to 10x the number of scale-out connections.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you talk about what your feelings are about your competitiveness at that node
Show response
Asked about competitiveness at the 1.6T node and the three-nanometer DSP platform; Brennan said Credo moved to three nanometer for power efficiency and expects the 1.6T transceiver market to take time to develop.
do you see PCIe proliferation amongst other hyperscalers as well
Show response
Asked whether PCIe retimer demand is concentrated in two customers or proliferating; Brennan said it will be broader and expects PCIe to be the protocol most hyperscalers pursue near term.
Calendar 2025 Q2
And do you think that you need to be embedded deeply in one of those protocols/standards to have success?
Show response
Brennan said scale-up starts with PCIe Gen5/Gen6, and at the physical layer Credo's SerDes can span Ethernet SUE, UALink and NVLink Fusion; open standards help the market.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Do you guys have plans to move into the switching ecosystem? Is that like a natural progression
Show response
Bill said PCIe switching is a natural future progression from retimers but the near-term focus is retimers and PCIe AECs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you maybe just give your commentary on where do you think the back end moves towards longer term?
Show response
Bill said Credo is agnostic between Ethernet and PCIe; the trend toward faster lane speeds favors Credo regardless of which architecture wins.
could you maybe spend a little time on splitting out those growth drivers?
Show response
Bill said growth is driven across all product lines, with AECs the main FY26 driver by market size and optical potentially the faster-growing line.
KLACKLA Corporation10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you think that as this year goes along, maybe that view can change if you see an acceleration a bit more quickly on the NAND side
Show response
Rick noted any incremental NAND demand showing up today would translate to 2027 deliveries given industry supply constraints, and corrected the questioner by saying the other company is a peer, not a competitor.
Where should I be paying attention Is that more on the leading edge foundry logic side? Is that more in the advanced packaging side?
Show response
Bren cited positive momentum across packaging, memory, reticle inspection, and e-beam, with the largest businesses like broadband plasma growing faster than the market, influencing overall share numbers.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Do you agree with that statement? Or do you have any qualification for how you would look at that ratio?
Show response
Rick broadly agreed but added packaging brings it closer to $10B per $100B, noting KLA's participation is above average intensity given process control relevance across all three components.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you talking about additional customers coming in on the leading-edge side?
Show response
Rick confirmed both new customers entering leading edge and expanded opportunities with existing ones, driven by proliferation of design starts.
How are you comfortable in talking about the strength of the broader market where you're kind of describing a dynamic where maybe you're taking more of the pie
Show response
Rick explained customers are shifting WFE mix toward process control as design complexity, large die, packaging, and HBM all increase inspection needs at the expense of other equipment categories.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the DRAM side gets a little bit stronger and you see a little weakness on that? Are you seeing anything different just given or the timing of your NAND business?
Show response
Bren confirmed DRAM, specifically HBM, as the biggest driver with NAND limited to technology investments and upgrades.
Can you guys talk about what you guys did in order to get to that 100 basis points per quarter?
Show response
Bren described drilling through all business including service contracts and factory imports. Rick credited the logistics team that managed through COVID for the detailed analysis.
Calendar 2024 Q4
we'd love to try to figure out where the strength is coming from just on a sequential basis into March
Show response
Rick described NAND improvement as broad-based but from very low levels, expecting some WFE growth there but not significant in 2025.
Have you seen incremental spend there in the short-term or rush orders to try to catch up by customers?
Show response
Rick noted no short-term plan changes but growing demand momentum for AI infrastructure, with several critical products still supply constrained.
Calendar 2024 Q3
what are you seeing in the NAND market? Are you seeing intensity kind of pick up there?
Show response
Higgins expects some incremental NAND investment in 2025 off a very low base, driven by improving utilization rather than a broad recovery.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when do you see that crossover point happening in the data center GPU business and the CPU business
Show response
Su answered directly, framing both server and data center AI as significant 2027 drivers, with server up over 80% in the second half.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you talk about where you're concerned on supply, if you are? And then any gating factors as you look into next year
Show response
Lisa detailed Q2 double-digit sequential growth in both server and DC AI, Helios ramp starting Q3 with significant Q4 ramp. Acknowledged supply tightness but expressed confidence in meeting growth targets.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you maybe talk about procurement of memory, when that takes place, particularly on the HBM side?
Show response
Lisa Su said AMD plans HBM and wafer supply over multi-year time frames with multi-year agreements already extending beyond the current ramp, positioning AMD to grow substantially in 2026 regardless of market tightness.
Calendar 2025 Q3
where do you think that the constraint will be? Will it come first with components not being available?
Show response
Lisa Su said the entire ecosystem has to plan together, AMD feels very good about its supply chain preparedness, and expects constraints to open up as everyone works through it.
Could you talk about into next year what your view is on discrete sales versus system sales? When do you see that crossover kind of happening?
Show response
Lisa Su said early MI450 customers are focused on rack-scale Helios solutions, with phenomenal OCP reception and customer engineering teams actively engaging; other form factors remain available.
Calendar 2025 Q2
perhaps you could comment on when you get approval, if the supply chain is ready, what's currently in inventory?
Show response
Lisa Su said MI308 inventory is work-in-process not finished goods, so ramp will take a couple of quarters once licenses are granted; overall position is better than 90 days ago.
do you think that your Q2 results included some pull forwards and the second half should still be flattish?
Show response
Lisa Su denied meaningful pull-forward, citing strong sell-through and ASP-driven share gains, and said Client growth in the second half will be a little bit less than seasonal but not flat to the first half.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you think that you need more? Is that something that you're going to do internally? Look externally?
Show response
Lisa Su said AMD has all the building blocks plus ecosystem partnerships, with interoperability on networking being a customer priority across reference and custom configurations.
could you maybe talk about what you see the client business growing as a base level?
Show response
Lisa Su emphasized revenue-share gains in high-end notebook, commercial, and desktop; said internal planning assumes sub-seasonal second half given the strong first-half start.
Show 14 more companies
MRVLMarvell Technology8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I wanted to ask first on the warrants with Google.
Show response
Murphy characterized the warrant as very broad-based across products and product lines, declining to size any single one but framing the total envelope as massive and game-changing over the next 6 to 6.5 years.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you maybe give us some perspective on the base there? And then you've been really helpful in the next few years kind of giving the contributing factors
Show response
Murphy sized AEC and retimer business at approximately $200 million in FY2027, over-doubling from prior year. Expects continued doubling trajectory once established. Leverages DSP and PAM technology. Positioned as complementary to pluggable optics and CPO strategy, part of end-to-end interconnect provider vision.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is that one project winding down while another is then winding back up in the fourth quarter? Is that just a temporary pause
Show response
Murphy confirmed no product transitions driving Q3 softness, purely delivery timing on existing programs. Expects more diversity over time as additional programs ramp from a growing base.
are you seeing any stops and starts there in terms of product ramps as well? Are you hearing about any component issues
Show response
Murphy acknowledged noise in the system but said Marvell has managed through with deep supply chain partnerships. Koopmans confirmed strong execution staying ahead of changes.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is there something going on with optical? Is that flattening out a bit? Is there anything going on? Can you give us an update on the health of optical
Show response
Murphy confirmed optics growing throughout the year alongside custom. AEC ramping this year and switching revenue continuing to grow. Amazon agreement networking opportunities progressing.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what does that mean for your DSP business? Like obviously your share of the optical world is a little bit different
Show response
Murphy noted aggregation-layer CPO remains very long-term. Scale-up in-rack connectivity is where near-term opportunity lies. Stressed CPO is incremental TAM, not replacement of DSP pluggables.
potentially some headwinds in terms of inventory at 800-gig or the pricing dynamic as you move to 1.6T
Show response
Murphy pushed back on noise about 800-gig headwinds, saying demand is very healthy and 800-gig remains the workhorse. 1.6T transition happening but 800-gig continues strong.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you just do your best to maybe size how significant those are for you today?
Show response
Didn't provide specific revenue sizing but highlighted switching (TL10 in production with strong interest), AECs as a bright spot ramping through module partners, and other emerging categories. Framed within five-year AWS agreement as a long-term growth opportunity.
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when you see the intersection of NPO, does that need to be with a new generation of silicon
Show response
Michael said existing silicon lacks fast enough SerDes speeds; new GPU/XPU/TPU generations in mid-2027 to 2028 will drive NPO/CPO adoption.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Maybe you could walk through the contributions to the $600 million
Show response
Michael expects continued components strength, transceiver cloud modules to accelerate after near-term ebb in December/March/June quarters, and OCS layering in. Transport business also strong.
do you guys see a future in which that type of business becomes more significant for you
Show response
Michael downplayed 3D sensing as a growth driver but noted Lumentum gaining share with decent margins on current cycle. Innovation lead from Lumentum's heritage gives confidence in share gains.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Was that just you regurgitating that statement? Does it mean Q4 or could you possibly get there earlier
Show response
Alan reiterated $500M target without accelerating the timeline. Noted December quarter beat guidance and pipeline of new products supports confidence.
you talked about shipping to a proprietary interconnect customer and an exciting opportunity
Show response
Alan disclosed it's a chip-on-carrier with unique line width, preproduction volumes now with meaningful volume in CY2025 and very high volume in CY2026. Declined further specifics due to proprietary nature.
Calendar 2024 Q3
two new customers, are both of them qualified yet? And when they are qualified, when do you normally get a feel for the volume
Show response
Alan confirmed newest customer already qualified with orders received. First customer from prior quarter on track for qualification in calendar Q1 2025. Different timing but both progressing.
is more of that incremental the EML lasers or is more of that incremental the qualifications of the new transceiver customers
Show response
Alan outlined three drivers: EML chip growth starting summer, transceiver ramps starting December quarter, and DCI growth. Not counting on traditional telecom bounce back.
STXSeagate Technology Holdings7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you guys had previously said 70% of nearline ex-pipes will be hammered by June of 2027. How are you tracking to that?
Show response
Gianluca confirmed the 40% nearline HAMR exabyte milestone was hit by June; Dave attributed the incremental tool spend to factory complexity from product transitions.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are you guys seeing that in the market? And would you ever consider this as new contracts come up over the coming years
Show response
Romano said not focused on prepayments given strong free cash flow, but doesn't exclude future implementation. Mosley emphasized demand predictability and architectural transitions as top priorities over economics.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you get to a crossover point in the first half '27?
Show response
Mosley suggested the Mozaic 4 ramp should be faster than Mozaic 3 due to shared components and learnings but cautioned that execution on yields and scrap rates will dictate the pace.
Calendar 2025 Q2
are customers two, three, et cetera, outside of customer one making up a significant portion of the ramp, like 10% or more
Show response
Mosley confirmed other CSPs beyond the first customer are contributing meaningfully to the HAMR ramp with strong pull from multiple customers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Should we be thinking about September, any kind of headwind from that 14-weeks?
Show response
Romano confirmed the 14-week period only impacts OpEx, not revenue. Mosley said 160 exabyte is not a hard ceiling as areal density transitions add capacity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how much of your business in terms of mix is HAMR today and maybe how much you think exiting the year
Show response
Mosley declined to give a specific HAMR mix number but confirmed the ramp will be aggressive with strong customer pull due to the value proposition.
Calendar 2024 Q3
If you guys were to see further delays on the HAMR side, what actions would you guys take
Show response
Asked what Seagate would do if HAMR qualification slipped further while at capacity; Dave said it can pivot easily between last-generation PMR and HAMR, which remains a high-margin product.
TXNTexas Instruments7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
anything that you could offer in terms of vectors of growth, particularly with auto acting a bit better in Q2?
Show response
Haviv said the demand signal is strong and broad across the board, framing execution as the priority into Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q4
There was no mention of auto there. You guys have said previously, maybe the auto business is a little bit slower off the bottom than industrial. Any update on the auto business
Show response
Haviv said auto was slightly down low single digits in Q4 but is back near 2023 peak levels. Secular content growth continues generation to generation even in ICE vehicles. China auto strength continued in Q4 but Q1 typically dips for Chinese New Year.
Is that because you raised pricing previously? You plan to in the future? The reason the question comes from your competitors are talking about an increase in pricing early in 2026
Show response
Haviv reiterated like-for-like pricing was low single digits down in 2025 (2-3%) and that's the 2026 assumption. Mike confirmed no step function planned in Q1, with Q1 typically seeing slight declines from yearly negotiations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you meet all of that demand with your China facility in country? Or could you help me just understand how much of that demand you can meet
Show response
Haviv said the constraint is logistics and cycle time, not capacity. TI has a decent fab in China plus a large assembly/test facility, calling the footprint a good answer for China customers.
is the back end always associated with that same foundry? Or are you shipping that to different places before it meets the end the end customer
Show response
Rafael explained front-end and back-end are not co-located, with wafers potentially going through multiple geographies. Haviv added that routing is the easiest change, then AT, then new wafer starts.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is the depreciation being at the lower end entirely a function or the updated guide that you're giving today entirely a function of those tax credits and grants, or is that a function of potentiall...
Show response
Rafael clearly stated CapEx unchanged at $5B for 2025. Haviv reinforced commitment to Phase 1 and Phase 2 manufacturing plans. Direct and unambiguous.
article is out on a China statement talking about dumping product in that market. I think there's an ongoing debate just around the sustainability of China longer-term
Show response
Haviv addressed both the strategic importance of China (20% of GDP, 20% of TI revenue) and the dumping investigation (not notified, business as usual). Comprehensive response.
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how we should think about Scorpio's gross margins now that it's becoming a bigger part of the business
Show response
Des said Scorpio's blended margin is broadly in line with corporate gross margin and reiterated the 70% long-term target, but did not directly address the Amazon warrant modeling question.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you saying that the 500 series will be native UA Link? Is it still going to be Ethernet supporting UA Link?
Show response
Management deferred to public info that the customer supports both but views native UA Link as the highest-performance scale-up protocol.
Calendar 2025 Q2
give us a picture of how many of those are engaged on PCIe today and how many of those are engaged on the UAL side?
Show response
Management said all 10-plus engagements are PCIe-based today, with many customers also evaluating UALink for the midterm.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you give us a feeling just how large that impact was and what that impact will be over the next couple of quarters?
Show response
CFO quantified China at less than 10% of revenue and manageable given strength in other product lines.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you mentioned, that over time, Scorpio would become your biggest product line
Show response
Management explained the switch TAM and higher ASP profile drive the expectation that Scorpio becomes the flagship line.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
How should we think about the attach rate of Tomahawk Ultra to the ASICs that you're developing?
Show response
Charlie said XPU customers are moving from Tomahawk 5 to Tomahawk 6 and some to Tomahawk Ultra, with Ethernet-based openness driving adoption in both XPU and some GPU clusters.
Calendar 2026 Q2
I noticed with the most recent deal with Anthropic, that you guys are using Broadcom chips as a backstop for the deal.
Show response
Hock corrected the premise, clarifying the Anthropic deal was Broadcom providing TPU chips and compute capacity, not a chip backstop.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you noted that customers are staying at direct attached copper through 400 gig SerDes. Is there any reason you're pointing that out in particular, especially as a leading pioneer in CPO?
Show response
Hock said copper is lowest latency/power/cost for scale-up; CPO will come 'in its time, not this year, maybe not next year'. Charlie confirmed Ethernet emerging as scale-up choice.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Maybe you could talk about when you see material uplift in revenue there and why it's important to start thinking about those type of switches as we move more towards inferencing
Show response
Hock said scale-across technology is already shipping in Jericho 3 to hyperscalers for the last two years; Jericho 4 at 51.2 Tbps extends handling to clusters beyond 200K compute nodes.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you talk about your view on the memory market longer term
Show response
Sanjay framed LPU/SRAM architectures as complementary, noting NVIDIA's Grok LPX uses 12TB of DDR5 per rack, and emphasized memory as a strategic AI asset with DRAM requirements in AI accelerators having doubled year over year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
the percentage of the DRAM business today that is HBM from a dollars perspective
Show response
Sanjay declined to break out HBM as a share of DRAM but emphasized HBM4 industry-leading 11+ Gbps performance, 30% power advantage on HBM3E, and reiterated that in tight supply Micron will manage HBM/non-HBM mix around strategic and profitability goals.
any color specifically on HBM contribution the November quarter and what you are expecting in the guide
Show response
Sanjay declined to break out HBM revenue but said HBM revenue was a record in fiscal Q1 and reiterated expectations for strong YoY HBM growth in calendar 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
where does utilization stand today
Show response
Sanjay confirmed ~10% structural NAND capacity reduction exiting fiscal 2025, with leading-edge NAND fully utilized and part of the older capacity still underutilized.
LRCXLam Research3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
you mentioned the tariff environment is very different in the December quarter versus the September quarter. I was curious if you could unpack that
Show response
Doug confirmed December will have incrementally more tariff headwinds than September but declined to break down specific tariff categories.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how long do you think that you can continue to grow on the NAND front before you start to get some greenfield kick in
Show response
Tim said the $40B upgrade opportunity plays out over three to five years, with an evolving mix of upgrades plus new tools for higher layer counts.
Calendar 2024 Q4
in terms of the upgrades really coming in strong, I think it's actually very impressive that you're able to guide
Show response
Doug explained sub-200-layer bits need upgrading to enable QLC enterprise SSDs and wafer bonding, which require above-200-layer capability.
INTCIntel Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you talk about what the strategy will be going forward? Are you planning on launching a new product
Show response
Michelle confirmed Jaguar Shores still on roadmap. Lip Bu and Sachin re-evaluating full AI portfolio with workload-first approach. Details promised in coming months.
could you maybe just give us an update on if you're seeing any pull-ins, any changes in dynamics from a geography perspective?
Show response
Dave said Q2 off to a strong start in the first 20 days, but guidance builds in expectation that tariffs weigh on macro by June. Strong start could push to high end of range.
ONON Semiconductor2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the last remaining component there is depreciation. If you look at depreciation in the quarter, I think it was at a low
Show response
Thad said depreciation is steady state as ~12% of capacity comes offline, with CapEx staying below the 5% target and primarily maintenance.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you talk about your appetite to potentially expand the channel? And then the second one, around the direct customers, there was a time during the pandemic where we went from just-in-time to jus...
Show response
Trent said disti at 10.8 weeks in sweet spot, expects to stay there. Mass market through disti grew QoQ and YoY. El-Khoury said some technologies already on allocation. Lead times extending. Not carrying all inventory on balance sheet, shipping WIP as fast as orders come.
SWKSSkyworks Solutions2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give us an update on how content has trended since then?
Show response
Phil reiterated feeling good about content position. Cannot front-run customer announcements. Lead times are quite long but customers change forecasts continuously. Nothing suggests abnormal seasonality. Book-to-bill above 1, inventory low, strong demand signals.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you guys give what Android did in both of those quarters in the mobile business?
Show response
Android ~$70M in March, flat sequentially. Sizable sequential increase expected in June from new product launches. No evidence of tariff-related pull-forward in order patterns.
ADIAnalog Devices1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when you're looking at where the strength is coming from in auto today, are you seeing some restocking at those end customers?
Show response
Puccio gave comprehensive auto overview: content/share gains in ADAS and infotainment driving 10+ year compounding, China pickup drove Q2 upside, record bookings with positive book-to-bill, and lean customer inventory supporting continued growth.
ARMArm Holdings1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
when you look at your silicon business longer term, where do you see that fitting in?
Show response
Rene answered directly that the AGI CPU addresses traditional server, head nodes and agentic applications, naming Cerebras, OpenAI, Meta, Cloudflare and Oracle.
MCHPMicrochip Technology1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Could you maybe call out the areas in which you are seeing the most pressure?
Show response
Steve framed the price increase as one-and-done to capture absorbed costs; CFO added ramping utilization should offset further cost increases.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| COHR Coherent, Inc. | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| WDC Western Digital | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| LITE Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| STX Seagate Technology Holdings | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
- COHRCoherent, Inc. · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- NXPINXP Semiconductors · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- WDCWestern Digital · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- CRDOCredo Technology Group Holding Ltd · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- KLACKLA Corporation · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- LITELumentum Holdings Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- STXSeagate Technology Holdings · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
Show all 20 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| LRCX Lam Research | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| INTC Intel Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ARM Arm Holdings | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- LRCXLam Research · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- INTCIntel Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SWKSSkyworks Solutions · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ARMArm Holdings · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2024 Q4 | 18 | 6%1 of 18 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q1 | 19 | 0%none of 19 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q2 | 16 | 13%2 of 16 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q3 | 15 | 0%none of 15 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 16 | 0%none of 16 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 13 | 8%1 of 13 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q2 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 12 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2024 Q418 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 18 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q119 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 19 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q216 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 16 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q315 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q416 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 16 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q113 questions · challenge rate 8% (1 of 13 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q213 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 12 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand41
- Competitive Dynamics28
- Revenue Growth27
- Cloud & AI25
- Product Launch22
- Supply Chain19
- Innovation & R&D19
- Capex Investment14
- Margin12
- Inventory9
Show all 18 topics
- Pricing7
- Guidance Reliability5
- Trade Tariffs5
- Cost Pressure4
- Capital Allocation4
- Regulation Policy3
- Geographic Expansion3
- M&A2