Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Anthony Crowdell
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 128on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%8 of 128 questions
- Companies
- 25questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 128 of 128 questions from 25 companies
DTEDTE Energy10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I just wonder if you could give us some insight into what’s the bottleneck there? What’s the more challenging part
Show response
Harris identified zoning as the single gating item, explicitly ruling out customer acquisition as the constraint for co-locators.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Any interest in Vantage looking at opportunity in whether it's PJM or other parts of the country?
Show response
CEO confirmed scanning environment for opportunities in other jurisdictions. Counterparty has expansion interest beyond first location. Application transferable to other hyperscalers/colocators. Focused on closing first deal before broadening.
what infrastructure does DT need to put in or build to reach their full ramp
Show response
CEO outlined near-term: renewables, battery storage, and demand response (incorporated in contract). IRP will then determine baseload generation build-out for longer term. Full resource mix to be detailed in Q3 IRP filing.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you know if there's a timing or a deadline on when they -- the commission will get back to the Attorney General?
Show response
CEO confirmed 21-day response period for commission to reply to AG's request regarding data center special contracts.
where did you end the year on FFO to debt?
Show response
CFO confirmed 15.4% FFO to debt at year-end 2025, above the ~15% target and well above 13-14% rating agency thresholds.
just any conversations, any color you could have on DTE's position with the large slate of candidates
Show response
CEO described bipartisan approach with focused messaging on reliability achievements (best SAIDI in 20 years), 3% bill growth vs 24% national average, and Oracle deal delivering $300M annual affordability benefits. Candidates receiving message well.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just is the cadence of spend, if you could just talk about that? And then also, the company previously or historically would file maybe an electric case every maybe 12 to 24 months. Does that stret...
Show response
CEO described IRM ramping to $1B over 3 years starting 2027 with intent to grow further in future cases. Current level provides 6-8 months of rate case deferral benefit; will lengthen as IRM grows.
As Vantage becomes a smaller and smaller portion of the company's earnings mix, any conversation with the agencies of an improved or a lower downgrade threshold?
Show response
CFO noted ongoing conversations with agencies; Vantage projects are increasingly utility-like which may help but no commitment to threshold improvement. Current threshold around 13-14%.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any legislative or regulatory goals or processes you're hoping to accomplish early on in your tenure
Show response
Incoming CEO Harris identified electric IRM expansion as top regulatory priority, supported by Liberty audit and proven track record in gas business.
how rigid is that 6% to 8% even if you get the 7 gigawatts on?
Show response
Management committed to 6-8% for current plan with update coming at fall/EEI; CEO Norcia added they'll provide new guidance when plan rolls together rather than piecemeal.
FEFirstEnergy10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you talk about maybe one of the differentiations or what's the competitive draw for one state versus the other?
Show response
Explained the vertically integrated one-stop-shop advantage in West Virginia plus the geographic position between the Northern Virginia and New Albany hubs.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does the state regulators that you -- the states you operating, does the regulators share that same view
Show response
Tierney cited Ohio legislature doubling down on deregulation last summer, utilities cannot own generation. All deregulated states firmly aligned with market-based approach.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what would cause that to maybe contract or expand as we move out to the forecast period
Show response
Tierney cited incremental investment and speed of rate recovery as the key drivers of spread between rate base and EPS growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are you guys applying for large load tariffs? Or are they all in place as this growth is hitting the PJM service territory
Show response
Tierney explained existing tariff and contract flexibility protects customers without needing separate large load tariff filings.
I wonder if you could help me connect the two dots there
Show response
Tierney explicitly clarified: CapEx increase gives extreme confidence in upper end of 6-8% but is not changing the growth rate range itself.
Calendar 2025 Q2
which state that's in the FE footprint do you think is maybe in the leader or going to be one of the first to solve that problem
Show response
Tierney highlighted PA as most active leader; Ohio relying on markets; WV has IRP advantage; MD and NJ governors engaged.
do you worry that maybe you don't have the equipment to deliver that? Do you quickly call your supply team to make sure we have it
Show response
Tierney expressed confidence in vendor relationships and supply chain planning to support delivery commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I believe in the current rate case that staff was against maybe an extension of the settlement window, guess, one, is that accurate
Show response
Tierney reframed staff's position as wanting expeditious resolution rather than opposing settlement per se.
That something I could bake in post-2025 and maybe carry that through my forecast model
Show response
Taylor confirmed O&M momentum should carry into 2026 and beyond; Tierney added rate proceedings create ongoing tailwinds.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if that legislation that you spoke about does happen in the past, do you have the ability to move maybe things that you were looking to collect through the ESP back into the general rate case
Show response
Tierney confirmed they would immediately seek to move ESP recovery items into rate cases if legislation changes.
PCGPG&E Corporation9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Would you be willing to tell us maybe what bucket of spending would be most at risk on a plan b?
Show response
Poppe declined to name the bucket most at risk under a plan B, saying only that safety, compliance, and obligation to serve are protected.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of the $5 billion of incremental opportunities is dependent on the approval for the undergrounding plan
Show response
CEO clarified $5B is about accelerating reliability, new business connections, and transmission, unrelated to undergrounding plan. Undergrounding at ~$1B/year already in $73B plan.
Confidence of converting it to the construction mode
Show response
CEO explained generation capacity added through CAISO process (33 GW since 2020). Transmission engineering is primary work. Counterparties putting money on table. 1.8 GW by 2030 is current forecast.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just curious if you had any discussion with them. Just wondering if you think that may be a required big portion of support
Show response
CEO acknowledged engaging with new senate leadership including Senator Limón. Emphasized business model complexity requires education. Affordability is shared priority with legislature.
Calendar 2025 Q2
any thoughts on if we could see the solutions for AB 1054 combine and morph into also the affordability bills
Show response
CEO acknowledged combining packages is possible with 6 weeks left. Thinks holistic impact assessment for customers and IOUs is appropriate.
Are there any other items that you kind of want to see or don't want to see that would really cause you to think you might want to really volunteer to sign up
Show response
CEO set clear opt-in threshold: net better for customers, IOUs, and cost of capital. Fund durability and pathway to longer-term comprehensive reform both matter.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is that, you think, helping out the process and maybe showing your sense of urgency to the legislators
Show response
CEO emphasized affordability as top priority for both Sacramento and PG&E. GRC will be lowest ask in a decade, demonstrating that improved service and lower costs can coexist.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I'm wondering if you could share any conversation you've had with Moody's, following the events in Southern California
Show response
CEO said rating agencies looking for signals from policymakers. Two-notch upgrade off the table but progress expected to be recognized in time.
that may have to be resolved prior to a credit agency action or or I'm really jumping the gun with that
Show response
Management suggested agencies looking for signals rather than final resolution. CEO added December equity issuance had beneficial impact on credit metrics independent of wildfire risk.
DDominion Energy8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Are there any key risks that you would highlight to maintaining above the 15%?
Show response
Ridge gave a clear 'no' with supporting detail, financing plan supportive, already at target cushion, pleased with balance sheet positioning from business review.
On the CVOW installation cadence, you are averaging about two days per turbine on recent installations. What gives you confidence this pace is sustainable
Show response
Blue provided extensive historical precedent from monopile and transition piece installation ramps to demonstrate the learning curve pattern. Noted improving weather windows ahead.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what is the lag you are assuming in your Virginia and South Carolina jurisdictions
Show response
McFarland detailed Virginia lag of 30-40bp below 10.4% weighted average allowed, driven primarily by small NC segment. SC under-earning at lowest point 150-200bp before rate relief. RSA legislation could reduce SC lag to 75-100bp going forward.
There is a, I guess, proposal in the Senate of maybe eliminating a data center tax benefit or a tax shield going on. Just thoughts if you could comment on that
Show response
Blue declined to comment on specific pending legislation during active General Assembly session. Emphasized data centers are beneficial to state and local economies and expects to continue serving them for some time.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is there a cadence of generation needs that you guys look at in 2 to 3 years, whether it's like a gig a year
Show response
Blue outlined: 2.6 GW offshore wind by end 2026, 1 GW gas peaking in 2029, roughly 1 GW solar/year, plus 500 MW of gas fleet uprates in Virginia. Full detail in IRP.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Is this making approval of this may be more complicated by introducing a new tariff
Show response
Blue said rate class/cross-subsidy issues are standard in utility regulation and not expected to materially affect case resolution.
slide 20 residential sales look soft this first quarter. I don't know if you could provide some clarity around that
Show response
Ridge acknowledged slight residential weakness but noted overall sales trending above guidance driven by strong commercial segment including data centers. Expects residential to normalize.
Calendar 2024 Q4
a rule of thumb of how long it takes a project to transition from one category to next as it works itself down the chain
Show response
Ridge provided broad 4-7 year timeline from start to ESA but noted it is bespoke depending on location and existing delivery points, no specific conversion guidance.
PPLPPL Corporation8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there any preference for one region versus the other, given the different structures?
Show response
Sorgi distinguished PA (population proximity, latency-sensitive AI) from KY (low power prices, integrated utility control). Different data center types suit different regions.
do they have to be located adjacent to the data centers, or can they be located anywhere in PJM?
Show response
Sorgi confirmed backstop auction does not require colocation, but noted the JV strategy places generation proximate to load regardless.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Have you noticed parties may be more rigid or less flexible in these discussions than previously?
Show response
Sorgi said nothing different from governor's comments. Various views among intervenors is normal.
is there a clear preference for new generation that would benefit the partnership? Or are they just like whatever I could sign, I will take whether it is existing or new?
Show response
Sorgi confirmed clear preference for new generation driven by pressure from White House, governors, PJM, NERC, and FERC. JV specifically offers new build, not existing assets.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a concern of maybe an unhealthy revenue concentration that potentially could offset the solid regulatory balance you guys have achieved
Show response
Sorgi said not concerned due to 80% minimum load protections in ESAs and tariffs. Also expects hyperscalers to need more power over time as chip density increases.
Are you trying to highlight that the potential that the regions PPL serves is a candidate for breaking out in the next auction?
Show response
Sorgi clarified he was not suggesting zone breakout. Latest PJM submission is 16GW with timing differences from quarterly investor updates. PJM applies its own haircuts.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how much of that is ESAs?
Show response
Sorgi wouldn't disclose exact ESA volume citing confidentiality but reiterated multiple gigawatts signed.
in the filing, have you disclosed what the price is for the CCGTs and will that -- if it's not already locked in the price does that -- do you think that becomes an issue on approval of the unit?
Show response
Sorgi confirmed ~$2,000/kW estimate for CCGTs, feeling good about vendor positioning, noted 5% buffer before needing commission approval for cost overruns.
CNPCenterPoint Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the batch zero process, for the customers that do not get selected, maybe they applied
Show response
Acknowledged the 3 GW shortfall and that the good faith exemption does not cover it, but conceded the path forward is unclear.
the credit cushion is getting larger, but the Moody's outlook remains negative
Show response
Pointed to the 100bp improvement and 30bp CAMT tailwind but explicitly could not give timing on a Moody's outlook revision.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is that the same 8 gigawatts that in fourth quarter slide deck you guys are focused on getting that on by year-end '28
Show response
Foster clarified apples-to-apples: prior quarter's 7.5 GW by end of 2028 has increased to 8 GW by end of 2028. The 12.2 GW total is the new firmly committed top-line number.
is it just infrastructure investment that's driving that filing or anything else
Show response
Foster described Minnesota as straightforward replacement CapEx for safety and reliability. Indiana may combine two gas rate cases into one filing in Q4, which would benefit Southwest Indiana customers through cost allocation changes.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Does now this additional balance sheet capacity maybe delay future divestitures of the gas business
Show response
Foster noted Ohio sale was $400M better than planned. CAMT provides additional cushion near-term. However, substantial CapEx opportunities at back end of decade could require looking again at efficient financing, including potential asset recycling.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Have you quantified what that like optionality is for how much more additional CapEx you could absorb
Show response
Wells confirmed capacity north of $500M but declined to quantify further, deferring to Q3 plan refresh.
is it a 5% growth of operating cash flow or it's a 5% improvement that the total operating cash flow growth
Show response
Wells clarified it's a 5% improvement in total operating cash flows (300 basis point increase), driven by completed rate cases and legislative outcomes.
Show 19 more companies
EIXEdison International7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just any timing of a decision there or expected time line of the CPUC decision?
Show response
New CFO Aaron Moss took question. Filed March for $3B+ program replacing 20-year-old smart meters. Half in current capital forecast, half beyond 2030. Intervenor comments expected summer, decision follows.
At what point or clarity on maybe the pace of settlements give you enough visibility to provide a loss estimate?
Show response
CEO noted need for both large volume and stability in claim types before extrapolating exposure. Referenced lessons from TKM and Woolsey where new facts and variety of claims made estimation very difficult.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you waited until when they actually matured, it was getting absorbed into the 2026 and '27 guidance
Show response
CFO confirmed write-off only occurs with refinancing. Additional options available now from TKM/Woolsey securitization success. Evaluating broad range of cost-efficient alternatives.
Calendar 2025 Q2
would the Eaton Fire be able to access whatever comes out of this legislative session at the end of September?
Show response
CEO indicated general Sacramento view is current fund covers current fires, expansion covers future fires. CFO reinforced fund has $22B capacity plus $1B self-insurance.
if we're still going to use AB 1054 going forward as an anchor for the solution that's going to be required
Show response
CEO emphasized prudency provisions as the most important element of AB 1054 that endures. Acknowledged risk-sharing is the direction but final evaluation depends on full package details.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there any ideas on the solutions of modifying AB 1054 that you believe are maybe resonating with the policymakers
Show response
CEO declined to share specifics, noting legislators are newer and still learning. Focus is on educating policymakers about implications for customer costs via credit ratings and cost of debt.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Slide 20 talks about prudency whether if you found 100% imprudent or 100% prudent. I'm just curious -- is there a middle ground there?
Show response
CEO confirmed CPUC has full discretion for partial prudency findings, noting prior SDG&E case showed binary approach was a mistake. Commission has explicitly recognized this discretion.
ESEversource Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you give a lot of clarity on the credit cushion. Just I am wondering if you guys have a targeted or a minimum, like, credit cushion that you operate in
Show response
John reaffirmed the 100bps-above-threshold target and said an incremental $880M refund, if required, would be funded in a balanced manner.
on the FERC refund There was a decision out I do not know, a month or 2 ago in MISO I am just curious if that you know, strengthens your appeal argument or complicates your appeal argument
Show response
John said the MISO facts differ and its rate impact was only a couple of basis points versus a much larger New England impact, and he is awaiting a court ruling on the stay.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Any update on maybe the timing of getting resolution on the storm cost securitization
Show response
Nolan said storm costs now top priority after Yankee and Aquarion. Currently a Q2-Q3 2026 event for PURA decision. Hoping new PURA can accelerate. Interest cost savings an additional motivation for speedy resolution.
it's 85% complete, Revolution. Just if you could talk about what are maybe the critical parts left bringing the project to completion
Show response
Nolan reported 52 of 65 turbines installed per Orsted. Onshore substation work nearly finished with back-feed power expected very soon. Schedule brought in by 4-5 months versus original. Orsted targeting H2 2026 but management hopes for improvement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What's the percentage breakout in rate base in New Hampshire? I think you guys have a decent amount of FERC the rate base there
Show response
Moreira disclosed PSNH distribution rate base at approximately $2.1B state-regulated, with FERC-regulated transmission at approximately $1.7-1.8B. FERC tariff based on actual equity ratio for all of New England.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I think on Wednesday there was a Berkshire Gas decision, that maybe changed some of the rules on the acronym I think is GSEP
Show response
GSEP cap lowered from 3% to 2.5% for NSTAR Gas and EGMA. Nolan said it is manageable and regulators still support investment, suggesting non-pipe alternatives.
the securitization, the public benefit and the storm cost recovery, are those rolled up together in same legislation
Show response
Nolan confirmed securitization, public benefit and storm cost recovery are addressed in SB 15/16. PURA prudence review of storm costs underway and going well.
XELXcel Energy7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
You're still under the insurance cap, I think, $525 million, you've been, I guess, aggressive on working through settlements. Just any color there
Show response
CFO noted statute of limitations passed for property claims, $60M delta between accrual and finalized settlements, and continued quarterly updates.
Any cadence on the remaining half? Are you looking to take care of it all in '26? Or any color you give on that
Show response
CFO declined to provide specific timing but noted forward ATM contracts push settlement out a couple of years, providing flexibility.
Calendar 2025 Q3
curious on the thought process of keeping it 6% to 8% plus
Show response
6-8% designed for sustainability beyond current 5-year plan, balancing affordability. 'Plus' represents current elevated growth period.
I think you mentioned about $10 billion of incremental CapEx. That is an addition or would be on top of current 9% EPS growth. Is that accurate
Show response
CFO confirmed $10B+ pipeline is on top of current 9% EPS growth forecast.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is a plaintiff claiming the cause of the fire was a UFO hit your wire and the wire fell and caused the fire
Show response
Management confirmed plaintiff theory used term 'unidentified flying object'; noted Xcel had no down power lines.
you maybe have scheduled maybe one or two plant retirements this year, maybe Comanche. Just thoughts if you go
Show response
Comanche unit retirement on track for year-end; Colorado Power Pathway provides reliability replacement for retiring unit.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there more of a sense of urgency, with maybe data center customers to hook up? Or do you see it's the same across whatever customers
Show response
Speed to market remains top priority for data centers; oil and gas customers also showing strong growth with electrification needs.
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
When do you file for approval for the uprates? Is that an additional CapEx opportunity, or is it further out in the five-year plan
Show response
Cregg confirmed uprate capital is included in plan. For license extension, NRC feedback expected within five years but construction work likely extends beyond.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I believe the BPU is in a 180-day pause right now coming from the governor's executive order
Show response
Cregg clarified the pause applies to regulations changed by the prior administration in months before the election, a 90-day freeze from inauguration (~January 12). No material impact on PSEG's labor, benefits, or rate riders.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think they're focused on the supplier generation side or the wire side
Show response
LaRossa confirmed both candidates understand the distinction between supply and delivery costs. Emphasized the need for an integrated resource plan to address the root cause.
is it possible that both segments of your business, the wires company and the generation, given the backdrop of affordability and everything else, that they actually both could win
Show response
LaRossa affirmed both segments can win simultaneously, pointing to financing benefits, state influence, and union alignment as advantages of the combined structure.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is that one of the multitude of options that the state could face
Show response
LaRossa confirmed FRR is among multiple paths NJ could pursue, noting the state currently relies on BGS from the deregulation era and PJM market.
is the state of New Jersey in a net long position on generation? And if so, what's the reserve margin there?
Show response
LaRossa confirmed NJ is a net power importer at peak, with PJM having only about 2% margin above target. As load grows, the resource adequacy question intensifies.
SRESempra6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
any timing on when they revisit it or any data points they're looking for to change that negative outlook
Show response
Karen tied the outlook to closing the SI transaction, deconsolidating $9 billion of debt, and SI project milestones, expecting changes early next year; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you talk about the $2.2 billion of cash expected after the plan period. Do you have to do some bridge financing or something to meet the needs through 2030
Show response
Jeff confirmed no bridge financing needed for the base plan, with the $2.2B available in the 2032-2033 timeframe, and noted potential for capital recycling at SI to accelerate returns.
Slide 10, you talk about $9 billion of CapEx opportunities. And then slide 22, on Texas, you talk about $10 billion of CapEx opportunities
Show response
Jeff clarified the difference is simply Sempra's 80.25% proportionate ownership of Oncor's $10 billion opportunity, which equals approximately $8 billion at the Sempra level.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What's the mix of regulated utility earnings to, say, your infrastructure earnings towards the end of your plan
Show response
Jeff confirmed the target of 90%+ regulated earnings mix with correspondingly lower SI ownership, to be achieved within the five-year plan.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Thoughts of not giving annual guidance further than just two years
Show response
Jeff acknowledged the lack of transparency and said they're open to providing more visibility, potentially including longer-term EPS guidance.
What confidence do you have that the plan is stressed enough that, you know, we don't have a repeat
Show response
Jeff highlighted multiple upside opportunities not in the plan: FERC ROE improvement, cost of capital mechanism, CenterPoint's equity layer precedent, and Oncor rate case.
EVRGEvergy5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are some of the positive attributes that make them choose Kansas or make them choose Missouri?
Show response
Campbell said both states are attractive with similar LLPS tariffs; customer choice comes down to land prospects and local community fit rather than a state preference.
does that fluctuate? Or is that pretty consistent? Is it dependent upon maybe rate outcomes
Show response
Campbell described the 250 bps spread as a steady rule of thumb, offset over time by steadily increasing load growth even as investment and financing lag earnings.
Calendar 2025 Q4
where did you end the year on an FFO to debt basis? And then thoughts -- and this maybe was the heart of Zimbardo's question
Show response
Buckler confirmed 14% FFO-to-debt for 2025 despite headwinds, with robust equity issuance plan and dividend moderation supporting balance sheet.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is the actively building category, is that what's currently in the 4% to 6% EPS growth rate and the finalizing advanced discussion is what's not included
Show response
Campbell confirmed only actively building customers (not the third) are in the 4-6% EPS growth target.
Is that a good spread going forward or the adoption of the large load tariff or the additional load, if you expect that to change
Show response
Campbell said the spread should be within peer company range and will be addressed in the year-end update.
SOSouthern Company5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Does that negative outlook or maybe change the view of maybe pulling forward or the timing of that remainder $2 billion of equity
Show response
Poroch said the company sees qualitative and quantitative factors improving and will continue proactive, disciplined equity execution. The 16% downgrade threshold provides the floor they're working above.
will we also get 2027 guidance on the fourth quarter call
Show response
Poroch said they expect to share clarity in February as contracts come to fruition in the latter part of the planning horizon, but didn't commit to specific 2027 guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q2
you guys maybe think about achieving a higher growth rate like you have such firepower and CapEx and a big raise today
Show response
Tucker explained their conservative nature: growth is accelerating in back half of decade, but as a large company they need momentum to be sustained before changing the long-term outlook.
Calendar 2024 Q4
The 5% to 7% growth rate from '24, is that off of '24 actual or off the midpoint of the '24 range?
Show response
Tucker confirmed the 5-7% growth rate is based off 2024 guidance midpoint, not actual results, to exclude one-time items from the baseline.
how will the announcements go or how can we track chipping away at this wood here? Is it on you give quarterly updates
Show response
Tucker indicated possible July update on incremental capital, with fourth quarter remaining the official refresh. The magnitude and pace of opportunities could accelerate disclosure.
DUKDuke Energy4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you think the regulation shifts where not only you have to show that it is no impact to the residential
Show response
Harry said data centers will reduce costs for existing customers over time through fixed cost spreading. Constructive discussions with regulators on tariff structures and ESA provisions.
do you think it is easier for parties now to come to a settlement? Or do you think with that affordability backdrop
Show response
Harry acknowledged affordability is on everyone's mind alongside housing, healthcare, and food costs. Duke's tools include $500M+ nuclear PTCs, one-utility merger, and rates below national average.
Calendar 2025 Q2
why the Florida subsidiary not Ohio or Carolina or South Carolina, what made the company lean towards the 20% sale in Florida?
Show response
Harry said Florida was chosen as a premium asset that attracted significant interest and delivered premium valuation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
What's a reasonable cushion to assume that that like, you would improve by. And the second question is more so as you've talked about
Show response
Brian affirmed 100bps Moody's cushion is sufficient given Duke's scale and diversity. Operating cash flow accelerating, with load growth step-up in 2027-2029 driving top-half earnings opportunity.
ETREntergy4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the 4.5 gigawatts, I guess, of the additional power equipment, is that incremental to what's on Slide 14
Show response
CEO confirmed 4.5 GW incremental to Slide 14 projects. Some additional units between Slide 14 and the 4.5 GW addition within overall 19.5 GW.
It doesn't seem like there's any issue getting craft labor contracts to build all the generation
Show response
CEO acknowledged real skilled craft labor challenges and increasing costs for combined cycle projects. Working through issues with EPCs but projects not immune to cost pressures.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you had to pick of those options or the options you spoke about, which one is in the lead or which one do you think is more likely
Show response
CEO candid that no single risk-sharing approach has emerged as frontrunner. Still exploring state, federal, customer, vendor, and sovereign fund options.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what's the impact to your FFO to debt metric if transferability were to sunset
Show response
CFO confirmed credit metrics would still exceed agency thresholds even without transferability. Safe harboring and tax equity partnerships provide additional mitigation.
PNWPinnacle West4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
What are the factors or timing for when we can maybe move that 20 gigawatts into the 4.5 gigawatts? Do you see a conversion through 2026 or timing of conversion?
Show response
Ted confirmed special rate agreement filings this year will show initial conversion. IRP will also reveal organic growth beyond just the 20 GW queue over 10-15 years.
do they have comments or preferences? Are they agnostic to the different types of large-load tariff that exist
Show response
Ted said general acceptance of cost reality. No excess grid capacity means all new construction pricing. Demand interest unchanged despite meaningfully higher prices than years ago. Both tariff and subscription must cover full cost of service.
Calendar 2025 Q4
You hope with the formula rate plan if it -- once it gets passed and enacted that we get a more linear trajectory of earnings longer trajectory of earnings or both?
Show response
Ted confirmed goal is both: longer visibility (matching peers at 5-year mark) AND more linear trajectory. Will develop new disclosures once rate case concludes and formula rate structure is understood.
where did you end the year on an FFO to debt basis? And will you be at 14% to 16% throughout the entire forecast period?
Show response
Andrew confirmed high 14% FFO-to-debt at year-end. Aspiration is 100bp cushion above 14% Moody's threshold. Regulatory lag pressures metric in 2026 but formula rate should improve numerator over time.
AESAES Corporation3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the powered land solution, I'm just wondering what it's between that program and also just maybe a PPA with a customer?
Show response
Andres explained powered-land product is providing both the data center site development and energy, versus a standard PPA which is just energy over a contract period. AES owns the land and builds with an attached PPA.
any thought to going out 5 years? Or does the company still plan to keep the outlook limited at 3 years?
Show response
Steve confirmed 3-year guidance horizon extending to 2028 at the February call, maintaining consistent framework rather than extending to 5 years.
Calendar 2025 Q1
some legislation passed earlier, I think this week, multiyear rate plans, but also maybe removal of OVEC revenues. Just curious the impact for AES Ohio
Show response
Ricardo called the bill net positive: ESP replaced by 3-year forward-looking rate case with annual true-up eliminating regulatory lag. OVEC impact estimated at $0-10M depending on capacity prices. Distribution rate case filing expected by year-end.
CMSCMS Energy3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just curious on why keeping DIG and not just selling all of NorthStar.
Show response
Maddipati said DIG throws off significant cash flow with minimal incremental capex, offsets parent financing, and is a core capacity and energy asset CMS knows well, so a sale would require significant value.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Does incremental large-load conversion above your base case reduce the need for equity, or does it accelerate capital intensity and therefore increase equity?
Show response
Rejji confirmed data center conversion would put upward pressure on both CapEx ($2B-$5B per GW) and equity needs. Growth drives additional rate base expansion requiring incremental financing across equity, debt, and other instruments.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Thinking to your next electric case, you asked for decoupling
Show response
Rejji said electric decoupling is not on the table, noting it is actually not permitted under Michigan legislation. Gas decoupling is embedded in the pending gas rate case filed in mid-December.
EXCExelon3 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
financing that $10 billion to $15 billion a good rule of thumb, 30% to 40% equity or I'm curious what would be a good rule of thumb
Show response
Jeanne confirmed 40% equity financing rule for incremental capital.
When do -- or timing on when I could see that move into the base plan for the company? Is that on like a fourth quarter refresh?
Show response
Jeanne confirmed Q4 refresh timing based on cluster study results, ComEd grid plan filing in 2026, and BGE next filing. Transmission historically up 30% in plan updates.
Is that creating a bigger opportunity or a unique opportunity for ComEd that may be it's different than the data center thematic
Show response
Calvin described quantum computing campus as additional upside not yet built into projections, with requests already coming from others wanting to be near the campus.
WECWEC Energy Group3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm curious if this is making earnings forecasting and rate base growth forecasting easier or harder?
Show response
Growth welcome but adds complexity from timing of in-service, load ramp, and turbine procurement. Key focus on execution.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would that mostly be met with gas or a combination of gas and renewables or any type of clarity you can provide on the generation needs
Show response
Confirmed combination of gas and renewables. Expected purchaser announcement in coming months, details for fall CapEx update.
really strong residential electric load growth there. I think 5.5%. Just wondering if you go through some of the drivers?
Show response
Attributed residential growth to weather normalization from record warm Q1 2024. Good customer growth but no fundamental read-through.
AEEAmeren2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
on the S&P rating just if you could just give me the numbers. I missed it to the earlier question
Show response
Moehn repeated the 13% S&P downgrade threshold, confirmed AEE is tracking well above at 17%+, closer to upgrade.
the challenges of procuring new gas fired generation. Just anything you could add on the ability to add that generation?
Show response
Moehn confirmed critical components are secured and procurement steps already taken despite industry-wide supply chain pressures.
AEPAmerican Electric Power2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
will the generation be there? Like, I worry that you guys are going to clearly execute on it, but then, you know, when you just think of the load of New York City, the hottest day is 13 gig
Show response
Fehrman noted T&D RTOs responsible for generation adequacy. PJM has reliability backstop auction, ERCOT has SB6. For VIUs, AEP has secured over 10GW of gas-fired generation. Focused on proper cost allocation to protect residential customers.
last month ERCOT came out with a new batch study, maybe on how large loads connect. Is that really factor into the hookups or your forecast of ERCOT load
Show response
Fehrman confirmed AEP is participating in the ERCOT batch study and views it as positive. Does not see significant hindrance to their interconnection plans.
AWKAmerican Water Works2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Curious if you could just talk about maybe percentage increase that you think you'll be asking in that case
Show response
David Bowler declined to disclose the California rate increase amount. The cost of capital proceeding was deferred to filing in 2026 for January 2027 effective date.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Do you time that with CapEx needs, or thoughts of maybe some not an annual program versus a block
Show response
David Bowler confirmed equity timing is driven by balance sheet needs, not CapEx timing specifically.
LNTAlliant Energy2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
how do you think investors should look at this or judge that every utility has given us a mature opportunities thing
Show response
Barton quantified mature opportunity threshold at 85% probability of closing. Acknowledged double-counting risk across utility sector.
What gets you to the lower end or the higher end of that range? Is it valuation? Is it CapEx opportunities
Show response
Durian explained stronger FFO-to-debt allows lower equity; weaker metrics push to higher end to maintain credit ratings.
NEENextEra Energy1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
you've seen some recent sales in the country already in service gas assets at attractive multiples. Just is that an avenue the company would pursue
Show response
Brian said pursuing gas on all fronts: new build, market acquisitions, and greenfield. Value must make sense with near-term contracting opportunity. Don't want to go spec long merchant generation. Turning over every rock.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| DTE DTE Energy | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| FE FirstEnergy | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| PCG PG&E Corporation | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| D Dominion Energy | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| PPL PPL Corporation | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CNP CenterPoint Energy | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| EIX Edison International | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| ES Eversource Energy | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| XEL Xcel Energy | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| PEG Public Service Enterprise Group | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
- DTEDTE Energy · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- FEFirstEnergy · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- PCGPG&E Corporation · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- DDominion Energy · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- PPLPPL Corporation · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- CNPCenterPoint Energy · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- EIXEdison International · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- ESEversource Energy · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- XELXcel Energy · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
Show all 25 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SRE Sempra | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| EVRG Evergy | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| SO Southern Company | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| DUK Duke Energy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ETR Entergy | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| PNW Pinnacle West | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| AES AES Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CMS CMS Energy | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| EXC Exelon | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| WEC WEC Energy Group | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AEE Ameren | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AEP American Electric Power | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AWK American Water Works | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LNT Alliant Energy | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| NEE NextEra Energy | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- SRESempra · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- EVRGEvergy · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- SOSouthern Company · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- DUKDuke Energy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ETREntergy · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- PNWPinnacle West · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- AESAES Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CMSCMS Energy · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- EXCExelon · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- WECWEC Energy Group · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AEEAmeren · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AEPAmerican Electric Power · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AWKAmerican Water Works · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- LNTAlliant Energy · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- NEENextEra Energy · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 16 | 6%1 of 16 questions | 11 |
| 2025 Q1 | 18 | 6%1 of 18 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q2 | 20 | 10%2 of 20 questions | 12 |
| 2025 Q3 | 23 | 9%2 of 23 questions | 13 |
| 2025 Q4 | 21 | 5%1 of 21 questions | 13 |
| 2026 Q1 | 19 | 0%none of 19 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 8 |
- 2024 Q416 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 11 companies
- 2025 Q118 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 18 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q220 questions · challenge rate 10% (2 of 20 questions) · 12 companies
- 2025 Q323 questions · challenge rate 9% (2 of 23 questions) · 13 companies
- 2025 Q421 questions · challenge rate 5% (1 of 21 questions) · 13 companies
- 2026 Q119 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 19 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 8 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Regulation Policy54
- Capex Investment26
- Demand23
- Capital Allocation22
- Guidance Reliability19
- Cloud & AI12
- Revenue Growth12
- Credit11
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Margin5
Show all 18 topics
- M&A4
- Supply Chain4
- Cost Pressure3
- Geographic Expansion2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Pricing2
- Labor Market1
- Macroeconomic1