Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Wes Carmichael
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 80on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%7 of 80 questions
- Companies
- 10questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 80 of 80 questions from 10 companies
METMetLife14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how are you thinking about base spreads trending in the back half of the year?
Show response
McCallion reaffirmed a 95 to 100 basis point core spread range, guiding Q3 toward the midpoint on a seasonal real estate income reversal.
So any help on where you think that might come in for the back half of the year or the full year?
Show response
Tadros pointed to Q1 flu seasonality and reiterated about two points of mortality normalization not expected to repeat in H2.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Sun Life issued a press release last week that they're settling a class action lawsuit with policyholders
Show response
Michel vigorously disputed the claim, noting MetLife was not a defendant, Sun Life has taken no legal action, and there are no proceedings between the parties.
any help on how you're thinking about core yield or spread? And how that should trend
Show response
John noted Q2 improvement expected from lower asset rotations but flat yield curve is a headwind. Total spreads tracking to full year 100-120 bps range.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think you had a little bit less favorable experience the quarter. I think the nonmedical health loss ratio was kind of flattish sequentially
Show response
Ramy Tadros attributed ~1pt disability pressure to higher average LTD severity, lower Social Security decisions, slightly lower recoveries, and slightly higher incidents, all within pricing expectations for the full year. Cautioned against extrapolating one quarter into 2026.
there's a lot of white space. You know, there's no Texas, no Florida. A lot of Central US states don't have the programs yet
Show response
Ramy Tadros placed PFML within broader disability growth strategy driven by secular trends and state-based regulations. MetLife's absence and disability serves as anchor product, vast majority of sales bundled with full product suite. PFML sales averaging 4-5 additional bundled coverages per deal.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how are you thinking about the base spread?
Show response
John McCallion noted spreads ex-VII up 1bp to 102bps, better than guided. Q4 expected relatively flat with potential 1-2bp temporary headwind from repositioning assets on large PRT mandates won in Q4.
I believe MIM manages a portion of assets for Brighthouse. But I just wanted to see if there's any other potential impacts to MetLife
Show response
John McCallion congratulated Brighthouse team on Aquarian deal. Confirmed key MetLife relationship is asset management, emphasizing unique capabilities that help Brighthouse achieve strategic objectives. Did not disclose specific AUM managed.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think you're the largest player in the market in terms of at least outstanding programs. But maybe you could touch on the outlook for that business
Show response
Ramy Tadros noted FABN program represents ~10% of GA liabilities with $6-8B annual issuance at favorable funding costs. Welcomes new market entrants as they attract more investors and establish FABN as a wider asset class.
can you unpack the surrender activity? How pronounced is that as we've seen a bit yen strengthening?
Show response
Lyndon Oliver confirmed surrenders normalized to expectations. Higher yen rates improve yen product economics, giving more product options. USD-yen rate differential sustains FX product attractiveness. John McCallion quantified underwriting impact at roughly $15-20M.
Calendar 2025 Q1
given the market volatility in April and some shelved IPOs in the wake of tariff announcements, are you expecting you can still come in at a more normal level for the year?
Show response
John McCallion noted PE returned 1.6% with over $600M in distributions from seasoned portfolio. Plans to provide preliminary Q2 VII disclosure in early July given unusual environment rather than attempt a forecast now.
as we're nearing implementation of the ESR in Japan, I think there are a couple of conversations with the industry and the regulator on some treatment of long duration and FX-denominated products
Show response
John McCallion said operational readiness is strong for April 1 ESR implementation. MetLife always priced under economic framework so no behavioral change expected. No indication it would change Japan dividend policy.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how does long-term care kind of flow into the free cash flow conversion ratio for the company?
Show response
Ramy noted more activity in risk transfer market. John explained LTC is still growing liabilities and not providing much cash flow currently.
can you provide a little bit more color on what you're seeing recently? And could this be something that persists a little bit longer term?
Show response
Ramy attributed favorable mortality to CDC population data trends for working-age population flowing into MetLife's ratios.
GLGlobe Life13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
does that change the outlook for capital deployment looking forward to 2027?
Show response
Svoboda said a higher stock price does not deter buybacks, still the predominant use of excess cash, and the company stays open to M&A only if it fits strategy, products and distribution.
first year lapses ticked down sequentially, but renewal lapses maybe remain a little bit elevated
Show response
Darden was pleased first-year AIL lapses normalized; renewal lapses remain modestly above pre-pandemic levels and are expected to stay in that range as a reasonable baseline.
Calendar 2026 Q1
have there been any other developments around that initiative since the last earnings call
Show response
No new developments. Working through audit of Bermuda entity financials. Reciprocal jurisdiction filing planned for Q2. More significant update expected on next call. No 2026 FCF benefit in guidance.
Are you thinking that sales growth might be a little bit negative over strong growth last year? How are you thinking about the remaining quarters of 2026?
Show response
Q1 benefited from new-business pricing at higher rates. Q2/Q3 still expected to grow slightly YoY. Q4 faces toughest comp (doubled prior year). Not a softening, just high hurdle from massive 2025 growth. Medicare Advantage tailwind dynamics being monitored.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Wondering if you could provide a little more detail on that transaction just in terms of size and scope.
Show response
$1.2B statutory reserves transferred to establish entity with auditable 2025 financials. Path to reciprocal jurisdiction requires 2 accounting periods. Plans to add new business and incremental in-force in 2026. Entity growth over 3-5 years toward $200M annual parent FCF uplift.
is it still possible to get early approval for reciprocal jurisdiction?
Show response
Early approval possible but subject to regulatory discretion (mid-year timeline). Any 2026 distributions would come at year-end and are NOT in guidance. 2027 expected to be first year with Bermuda benefit. $200M target over time still intact.
Calendar 2025 Q3
has there been any progress with the BMA or other regulators? And should we expect any change to your expectations on uplift to free cash flow or the timing there?
Show response
BMA approved business plan, company established, licensing and U.S. regulatory approvals in process. $200M trending-over-time target unchanged. More guidance expected early 2026 once final approvals received.
how should we think about sensitivity of your NII, if we get additional Fed cuts from here?
Show response
Minimal sensitivity: ~$1M per 100bp rate change. Floating rate assets well matched with floating rate liabilities and floating rate debt, creating natural offsets.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I just wanted to get a little more color on what was the technology that you guys put into place. I think if I think back, it was a lot of mailings and now it seems like that's changed.
Show response
Channel shifted to 75-80% digital. Data-driven underwriting automation eliminates follow-up friction, improving conversion. Higher conversion lifts ROI on marketing spend, enabling reinstatement of previously unprofitable campaigns. No impact on admin expenses - all costs are deferred acquisition costs.
Calendar 2025 Q1
do you expect some elevated as policyholders receive those rate increases?
Show response
Some lapse expected but not large-scale given industry-wide pricing and Medicare Advantage dissatisfaction providing tailwind.
are those pretty much baked in your view? Or could there be some deviation?
Show response
Included in guidance but depends on detailed assumption-setting across issue years/ages/genders. Q2 experience will inform final determination. Minor changes in assumptions can swing the number.
Calendar 2024 Q4
there was some legal accrual of about $12.5 million below the line. That's a little bit chunkier than it than it's run
Show response
Attributed to litigation settlements (not DOJ/SEC/EEOC) and short-seller related legal costs. Targeting commercial paper reduction to low $300s from $415M.
the stock's still trading at a pretty significant price earnings multiple discount relative to historical trends
Show response
Management will continue looking for opportunities to release additional capital and may front-end load buybacks slightly. Believes stock remains a good buy.
PRUPrudential Financial13 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what drove the negative impact in GUL in the quarter? How big was that?
Show response
Del Frias attributed the GUL update to a small surrender/policyholder-activity assumption change reflected in AOI and said, based on what they see through Q2, they do not expect a material statutory impact, without sizing the GUL charge.
is there any other change to your philosophy around capital management, whether that's buybacks, common dividends
Show response
Del Frias said capital-deployment priorities are unchanged and that the bar on issuing equity or adjusting buybacks is very high, requiring a clear path to value creation, with balance-sheet optimization and reinsurance as alternative capital sources.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Given that business seems to be generating a loss, how do you think about reserves there
Show response
Del Frias explained GUL losses are GAAP reserve build timing that will reverse over time. Passed loss recognition testing as of 3/31. Sullivan highlighted go-forward Individual Life quality now visible.
I am trying to get an idea for run rate. I think, Yanela, you mentioned $25 million of prepay income
Show response
Del Frias confirmed analyst's ~$600M run-rate math after adjusting for prepays and noise. Emphasized YoY growth driven by retail annuity and institutional sales momentum.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just wondering if you could touch on what -- how that moved in the quarter, higher yen rates
Show response
Yanela confirmed ESR well above 150% target even after sharp January rate increase. Cushion absorbed some rate impact. From current 30-year rate above 3.5%, additional 90-100bp rise would still keep ESR within operating target range.
I just wanted to ask on loan rates being much higher, are you seeing an impact to surrenders there? And then just maybe on POJ with any kind of fallout from this conduct
Show response
Yanela provided Q4 surrender rate of 6.3% vs 5.6% Q3. Customers with heightened FX sensitivity have already surrendered leaving less sensitive block. $50M estimated 2026 earnings impact from 2025 surrenders. POJ misconduct surrender estimates informed by post-press release observations.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just hoping you could unpack what the driver of the assumption review in that segment was and why there was an ongoing impact
Show response
Yanela explained fixed annuity reserve refinements accelerating GAAP reserve recognition timing. No impact on statutory results, capital, cash flows, or expected lifetime economic outcome.
I think Groups maybe 5% or so of the overall enterprise earnings. So I guess, is this a segment that you think can really move the needle
Show response
Andy highlighted 60% year-to-date sales growth (corrected to 13% YTD by IR), 96% persistency, 80.9% benefit ratio. Plans to continue investing and have group become larger percentage of business over time.
I just wanted to maybe get a little bit more color about what you're thinking
Show response
Yanela explained 70% of U.S. dollar Japan business reinsured, long history of utilizing reinsurance, product design influenced by capital optimization, and general discipline across all businesses.
could you provide any color on the PGIM flow pipeline in the second half of the year, particularly on third party
Show response
Andy cited $25B in total flows over 12 months ($16B affiliated, $9B third-party). Optimistic on institutional continuing, more cautious on retail given money on sidelines. Changes in PGIM model will be net positive over longer timeframes.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you give us any insight on your view of current capital in Japan if you had to implement ESR today
Show response
Yanela said ESR reporting starts March 2026, with preliminary information planned for summer. Transactions already executed to mitigate volatility.
I realize there's some seasonality and you guys have done a couple transactions, but can you give us any help on, you know, how you're expecting to kind of get that back to headline profitability
Show response
Caroline explained episodic large claims from legacy Hartford block, COVID transitioning to endemic state, and GUL in-force reduced by 60%.
how are you thinking about your direction as a leader of the business
Show response
Andy deferred specific strategy details, noting he is not yet in the role, but expressed confidence in strong opportunities.
PFGPrincipal Financial Group12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So any color on expectations for the third quarter going forward for VII?
Show response
Joel pleased with in-line VII, noted no real estate transactions in H1 and reiterated expected improvement through 2026.
Just wondering if we can get maybe a little bit more color on the strategic rationale there.
Show response
Amy gave strategic rationale (SMB reach, 25k employers, digital distribution); Joel confirmed funding intact with no guidance change.
Calendar 2026 Q1
pretty strong transfer deposits. Just curious if you could maybe just touch on the flow outlook for that segment for the rest of the year
Show response
Chris noted Q1 driven by strong transfer deposits, very strong contract retention, healthy recurring deposits and stable withdrawal rates. Q1 historically strongest quarter. Remaining quarters impacted by elevated markets increasing withdrawals plus large case lumpiness.
I think it's the best quarter that segment is produced in a long time, and I typically think about the first quarter as being seasonally weak from a mortality perspective
Show response
Amy acknowledged positive mortality volatility but guided full year margin toward lower end of 12-16% range. Deanna highlighted favorable results in both incidents and severity split approximately 50-50 which is unusual since volatility typically comes from severity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
one of your peers this quarter mentioned that they were redefining operating earnings related to real estate
Show response
Joel acknowledged merit in better reflecting total return by adjusting real estate depreciation treatment. Outlook based on excess fee basis so any definitional change not contemplated in guidance. VII expected to improve in 2026 versus 2025.
how you're thinking about the outlook for performance fees in 2026? I know they were a bit more muted in 2025, but curious if the outlook has changed at all
Show response
Kamal noted typical performance fee range of $30-40 million annually. No significant changes expected for 2026 versus 2025 trajectory.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any insight into how VII variable investment income is shaping up for the fourth quarter?
Show response
Joel noted VII performed well across all asset classes in Q3. Real estate had a $25M gain below the line from a Q3 transaction not in operating earnings. More transaction activity expected in Q4 as signaled. Very optimistic for second half trajectory.
Just curious if there's any color on the drivers of experience-related assumptions that's lapse or mortality
Show response
Joel broke down two-thirds model refinements adding sophistication to policyholder behavior modeling, one-third experience updates across multiple products with no single driver. GAAP only, noncash, no free capital flow impact. Immaterial to ongoing run rate and does not impact outlook.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think performance fees are around $9 million or so there. A bit higher than I was expecting. So just curious if there was more transactional activity in the quarter
Show response
Kamal explained performance fees came from direct lending and real estate debt rather than traditional real estate equity. Diversifying the performance fee base. Full year levels expected similar to 2024 with some fees pulled forward from Q3 into Q2.
I think last year, you'd launched a target date fund with an in-plan guarantee, but there was some plan around a product number two point o that was kinda in the works
Show response
Chris confirmed target date with guarantee launched off platform in Q1 2025 and rolled on platform in Q2. Client takeup beginning but very early innings. Good opportunity as advisors and sponsors become more accustomed to the product.
Calendar 2025 Q1
on variable investment income, it was a little bit of a headwind this quarter
Show response
Joel noted VII in line with recent quarters, 50% of alts in real estate not marked quarterly. Majority of RE transactions expected in H2. Hedgefund returns slightly lower.
I was hoping you could talk a little bit about your approach to new business in the quarter. I think you mentioned dental pricing in there
Show response
Amy detailed dental pricing actions flowing through, increased competition from mutuals and medical carriers. Bundle approach at all-time high coverages. Persistency exactly in line.
AFLAflac10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
every 10 points was approximately $750 million to $1 billion of excess capital. Just curious if that still is a good rule of thumb to use?
Show response
Max Broden confirmed the rule of thumb still holds and said Aflac manages its business and risk profile including USP, which better reflects the risks.
we're at JPY 37-and-change billion of yen sales. So just curious what you're thinking for the rest of the year.
Show response
Dan Amos said he would still be happy with JPY 80 billion in sales, which remains possible, and reaffirmed 2026 sales will exceed 2025.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there any help you can give us with an expected run rate of earnings power there? And I realize there's a few moving pieces
Show response
Max explained corporate segment driven by short-term rates on holdco cash, plus 8%/year natural decay on runoff reinsurance blocks. Expects slightly negative pretax in Q2.
do you expect sales to sequentially improve in the next quarter relative to the first quarter? I know it's competing a bit now with the new medical product
Show response
Yoshizumi confirmed momentum continuing with a system for all three products to be sold concurrently, expecting 2026 sales equivalent to 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q4
once ESR is printed in 2026, is there any change to the thinking around M&A or capital deployment, just given the capital flexibility you have?
Show response
Max confirmed ample capital for M&A but emphasized operational and strategic fit must come first. Acknowledged niche businesses make finding and integrating targets difficult.
we've seen super long yields in Japan rise pretty considerably. And I think more broadly, there's some concern that we could see additional, I guess, surrenders with interest-sensitive products
Show response
Max acknowledged theoretical surrender risk from higher yen yields but confirmed no actual increase in lapsation observed yet. Company closely monitoring and preparing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can I just get maybe a little bit of color on what that USP adjustment is and your view of the likelihood and timing of that?
Show response
Max confirmed USP approval expected by March 31, 2026. Internal model full approval will take considerably longer, similar to Solvency II rollout timeline.
is the macro changing there either at the margin or materially your appetite to sell additional products outside of third sector?
Show response
Max explained higher yen yields benefit Tsumitasu as a long-duration product priced off long end of curve, creating advantage over bank/asset manager products priced off short end.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk about the recruiting environment in the US? Are you seeing progress there, or is that kind of slowed?
Show response
Virgil confirmed recruiting around 10,000 mark back-to-back years with focus on conversion and compensation plans tied to recruitment.
the gains benefit has been flowing, which is, you know, perhaps not surprisingly given a pretty sizable unlocking in the third quarter. But when you look at trends going forward
Show response
Max acknowledged favorable trends post-pandemic but cautioned that higher claims on accident, hospital, and cancer products may reduce future remeasurement gains.
ACGLArch Capital Group6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
it sounds like there was a bit of a return of aggregate treaties with midyears. So I was just curious how you think about your exposure to aggregates and if your appetite at all has changed to writ...
Show response
Nicolas said no material change in aggregate treaty appetite. Always wrote some aggregates but very small portion of book. Haven't seen a huge comeback of aggregate dropdown features from softer market era. Team hasn't supported the few that came to market.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I think you mentioned a couple of times of primary companies retaining more risk. Just hoping you could provide a little more color on what you're seeing
Show response
Nicolas explained retention increases are most pronounced in property and energy where good results make cedents comfortable keeping more risk. Structured deals unwinding as capital relief needs diminish.
are you seeing any potential leading indicators of recessionary activity at this point?
Show response
Francois said too early for recession indicators but the portfolio is in a vastly different position vs 2008 with high credit quality, strong home equity, and excellent borrower fundamentals. A very severe scenario would be needed to create significant hardship.
Calendar 2024 Q4
just on on MI and the delinquency pickup, I I think you mentioned that can be impacted by cat exposed areas
Show response
Francois said about half the delinquency increase was from cat-affected areas with historically high cure rates; minimal expected financial impact. CA wildfires expected to have minimal MI impact.
you mentioned some competitive pressure where that's eroded margins in certain lines of business. Can you just talk a little bit about where that might be more pronounced
Show response
Nicolas identified public D&O and excess cyber as the two areas with double-digit rate decreases and persistent excess capacity.
question on favorable development quarter, particularly in reinsurance. Can you just give us a little bit of color on what drove most of that release
Show response
Francois confirmed favorable development was almost entirely from property (cat and non-cat), flat on casualty. Driven by prior-year events developing favorably and IBNR in excess of needs.
Show 4 more companies
TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc.5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Pretty strong premium growth there at 10% in the quarter. Seems like rate change is pretty stable.
Show response
Greg wouldn't give forward guidance on middle market pricing but pointed to strong rate, historically high retention, and active new business production as the three drivers of the 10% growth.
Calendar 2025 Q1
curious how management's thinking about buybacks from here and perhaps some heightened macro uncertainty
Show response
Dan said Q1 buybacks were deliberately dialed back after the early-quarter California wildfires but Travelers intends to continue rightsizing capital rather than timing short-term stock moves.
with the $74 million of favorable development. You called out workers' comp as the primary driver
Show response
Dan said Travelers' calling convention means if only one item is mentioned (comp), the net result was essentially a workers' comp release with only minor puts and takes elsewhere.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Are you able to size the gross amount of favorable development for us in the fourth quarter?
Show response
Dan confirmed workers' comp favorable development was in the ballpark of around $250 million of good news in the fourth quarter, a large gross release partially offset by other BI puts and takes.
your full year assumption at 6.9 points, I think that's a little bit maybe below the last couple of years
Show response
Alan said the 6.9 point 2025 cat plan already has a bias toward the high end of recent experience and would cover cat losses in 7 of the last 10 years, though he cautioned against assuming recent years' high watermark is a new normal.
WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you think we're really there where things could start to turn at 1/1? Or is that going to take more time?
Show response
Rob said 1/1 depends on the feeding frenzy but further softening is expected given past rate and attachment changes; WRB has a clear margin view that will inform when to shift from offense to defense.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I heard you had extended duration a little bit, but is there anything else that you might be thinking about
Show response
Rob said a steeper yield curve could be a catalyst to extend duration further; new money into alternatives remains a high hurdle given the fixed income opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q1
just wanted to come back quickly to the increase in the underlying loss ratio that was driven by mix
Show response
Rich said quota-share ceding commissions can influence the expense ratio but that it was less of a factor in Q1; Rob said insurance segment growth is a mix of rate and exposure depending on line.
EGEverest Group2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there any framing you can do on how you're thinking about top line going forward
Show response
Mark declined formal guidance but indicated continued casualty discipline, property lean-in, and continued double-digit growth in international insurance.
how maintaining its -- maintaining ratings right now is to Everest strategically?
Show response
Mark said the A+ financial strength rating is secure; S&P negative outlook is being managed but isn't a major concern.
HIGHartford (The)2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just wondering if there's any updates on your thoughts on tariffs and I guess, relatedly, if the AARP relationship
Show response
Chris expressed improved optimism on tariffs given Japan/Europe agreements. 2025 impact expected modest and absorbable within loss picks. Watch area remains 2026 and beyond.
I'm just wondering if you're happy to sacrifice a bit of margin in order to get some growth in EB, and if you think that should come back to your 6% to 7% target range
Show response
Chris explained outcomes have been on benefit side of range; stripped out endemic COVID pricing so now clean. Fish added supplemental health growing low double-digits, renewal margins maintained, paid family leave 20+pts rate with strong persistency.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| MET MetLife | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions |
| GL Globe Life | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| PRU Prudential Financial | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions |
| PFG Principal Financial Group | 12 | 0%none of 12 questions |
| AFL Aflac | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| ACGL Arch Capital Group | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| TRV The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| EG Everest Group | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| HIG Hartford (The) | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- METMetLife · 14 questions14%2 of 14 questions
- GLGlobe Life · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- PRUPrudential Financial · 13 questions15%2 of 13 questions
- PFGPrincipal Financial Group · 12 questions0%none of 12 questions
- AFLAflac · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- ACGLArch Capital Group · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- WRBW. R. Berkley Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- EGEverest Group · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- HIGHartford (The) · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 16 | 13%2 of 16 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 16 | 13%2 of 16 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q2 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q416 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 16 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q111 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q216 questions · challenge rate 13% (2 of 16 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capital Allocation22
- Margin22
- Revenue Growth16
- Regulation Policy15
- Macroeconomic11
- Competitive Dynamics11
- Demand9
- Guidance Reliability7
- Pricing7
- M&A5
Show all 20 topics
- Credit5
- Product Launch3
- Capex Investment3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Cost Pressure2
- Geographic Expansion2
- Fx1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Labor Market1
- Subscriber Growth1