Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

George Staphos

Bank of America · covers Consumer Cyclical, Industrials, Real Estate

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
84on tracked calls
Challenge rate
24%20 of 84 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 84 of 84 questions from 7 companies

AVYAvery Dennison15 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 15 challenging
AVY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

And does that mean in essence, there is 6% or 6.5% that ultimately has to be destocked over the rest of the year.

Show response

Lovins reframed the math to roughly 2.5% for the first half rather than confirming 6-6.5%, and noted second-half pricing largely offsets the reversal.

should we worry instead that it is $0.30 that has to come out, and therefore, more of like a $0.60 sequential downtick

ChallengingInventoryGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Lovins confirmed the $0.30 first-half figure and said roughly $0.25 reverses in Q3 with the remainder hanging over into Q4.

Do you see AI as an enabler and an accelerator for Intelligent Labels, or might it be, in some ways, a competing

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Stander argued item-level tagging generates the data AI parses, creating a flywheel for further IL adoption, plus internal productivity gains.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you talk about how the work you are doing to offset cost pressure will materialize in terms of pricing in Q2 and perhaps more in Q3 given lags?

PricingCost PressureDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO expects low-to-mid single-digit price increases in Q2 to offset high-single-digit sequential inflation. CEO said pricing/inflation gap improved from historic quarter lag to near-real-time. HVC Materials softness from tough comps, distributor timing, and auto end market.

can you elaborate further on how you are expanding the scenario planning? Is it just pulling more levers on the productivity

Competitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO outlined expanded scenario planning: additional productivity in low-volume scenarios, accelerated innovation-to-market, and commercial share gains. CFO noted prebuy scale much lower than 2021-2022 cycle, about one month of inventory build vs three-to-four quarters previously.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you see the customer acquisition cost being at such a rate over the next couple of years where it sort of dilutes the impact of HVC on your margin mix

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said existing go-to-market teams are underutilized; no incremental cost expected. On paper supply, multiple sources secured post-2023 disruption with strategic procurement approach.

if you could parse a bit further the puts and takes, the pluses and minuses behind the 40 basis point drop in margin

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO detailed multiple factors: soft base volumes, prior-year one-time benefits, and extra calendar days with below-average shipping. Sequential Q3-to-Q4 decline in line with historical 60bp seasonality.

Calendar 2025 Q3

If you can talk a little bit about that. And what it might mean for you over the next couple, three years.

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO framed Walmart as both strategic catalyst for food IL adoption and material revenue driver, sizing it at high single to low double-digit IL growth over two years.

can you talk a bit about where you're seeing deflation in materials such that prices are a touch lower

Show response

CFO detailed paper-driven deflation in Europe/Asia. CEO explained IL apparel outperformance vs base driven by new rollouts including Inditex loss detection.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what were the exit rates if you can talk to this in your Materials businesses into the third quarter?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO indicated Materials exit rates flat. Embelex growth expected in Q4. Detailed IL apparel innovation in loss detection, read rate improvements, and self-checkout.

did you see any kind of pickup specific to the setting of tariffs in Vietnam, and that being established and then current orders coming

Trade TariffsDemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO confirmed some Vietnam-bound sourcing shifts within Q2 but overall muted. Current apparel orders roughly flat to prior year entering Q3.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Would you be able to satisfy that from your existing locations in other countries right now? Or would there be some leakage

ChallengingSupply ChainTrade TariffsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO confirmed ample capacity for apparel sourcing shifts and emphasized IL underlying programs are on track absent tariff impacts.

you talk about the trigger points for additional structural actions. Deon, Greg, can you talk a little bit about what you mean by that?

ChallengingTrade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO estimated ~10% of China apparel volume might move; CFO described scenario playbook including belt-tightening and restructuring acceleration.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If I then look at Materials, Materials are saying you’re looking for mid-single-digit growth out of your high-value categories

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO provided detailed growth expectations for each high-value platform including Embelex, Vestcom, and the World Cup 2026 tailwind.

can you talk specifically about what your assumptions are for growth in logistics within IL for 2025

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management directly addressed logistics volume assumptions, confirmed slight decline built into guidance and disclosed aligned volumes with customer.

WYWeyerhaeuser14 questions · 6 reporting periods · 4 of 14 challenging
WY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you can quantify what the effect in 2Q on the slowbacks in the South might have been

ChallengingCost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO quantified the Q2 lumber hit at ~$20 million, roughly half transportation-related, and guided to improving costs and volumes in Q3.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what's your view, Devin and Davie, on where duties may reset come late summer

Trade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Devin provided specific math: softwood lumber duties plus 232 10% tariff total currently ~45%, could drop to ~35% with AR7 preliminary results around August, possibly pushed to fall.

how tariffs and duties will play out over the course of the year relative to your business

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Devin noted AR7 could bring all-in duties from 45% to 35% effective around August. SYP pullback after Q1 run-up is normalizing. Dave Wold quantified tariff impact on CapEx costs for steel and aluminum.

Calendar 2025 Q4

just wondering why we're not seeing that yet show up in EWP pricing

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Devin noted four consecutive down years in housing starts pressuring EWP unlike lumber/OSB which have seen curtailments. WY's realizations holding better than competitors. New products planned for Builders Show.

what else contributed to the mix benefits

MarginGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Devin attributed mix benefits to scale and customer diversity. Q1 expected slightly lower due to more thinning activity (pulpwood mix). India export timing affects quarter-to-quarter volumes depending on shipping schedule.

Calendar 2025 Q3

pricing was about the same, but the EBITDA loss was a bit further

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Devin attributed the wider loss to the extremely tough pricing environment. Emphasized continued focus on OpEx, efficiency, and reliability. Expects positive EBITDA with even slight pricing improvement.

would you be able to, within the course of a year or 2 years through whatever actions and things that you know you have on your whiteboard to actually get to a breakeven level

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Devin confirmed a path to breakeven exists through mill-level first-quartile roadmaps and innovation. Noted post-pandemic inflation has made it harder to reach pre-pandemic black-at-the-bottom levels. More detail at Investor Day.

What do you think the net cash generation has been benefited by the acquisitions relative to the divestitures

Show response

Dave Wold quantified the portfolio optimization benefit at approximately $50M annual EBITDA increase since 2020. Current acquisitions at 21x EBITDA multiple vs 45x for divestitures.

Calendar 2025 Q1

have you adjusted your harvest profile at all? Or should we still be expecting a 35.5 million tons?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Devin confirmed harvest levels remain stable at 35.5M tons regardless of short-term demand fluctuations, set to sustainable harvest levels.

do you think tariffs would have had much effect on lumber pricing as we sit here today?

Trade TariffsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Devin noted tariffs not yet meaningfully impacting lumber pricing today. Saw brief run-up around April 2 announcement that reversed when wood products were exempted.

Can you give us a bit more color relative to what we should be expecting in terms of cash flows, milestones, timing

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Devin declined to share deal-specific economics to protect commercial negotiations. CCS expected to start showing in P&L around 2029 with first injection.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you feel about your ability to ultimately hire to run the facility

Labor MarketCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Devin confirmed strong internal R&D resources and experienced leadership transferring from existing facility. CapEx will ramp in 2026 and taper in 2027.

why are we not seeing in your view or what you're hearing from the field more uplift in lumber pricing right now

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Devin cited cold weather impact and market skepticism that tariffs will actually go into effect as reasons for muted lumber pricing.

How should we think about your priorities in the next couple of years in terms of the dividend

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Dave Wold expressed confidence in continued dividend growth supported by timberland acquisitions, NCS growth, and OpEx improvements. $1B debt maturities in 2026 expected to refinance at comparable mid-5% rates.

BALLBall Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 13 challenging
BALL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you talk why you didn't see your normal or your at least targeted operating leverage.

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Staphos questioned missing operating leverage; Lewis and Rabbitt cited tight capacity, startup costs and strong demand straining the network.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you seeing any effects that you could call out from the Middle East tensions in terms of increased costs that won't necessarily be passed through real time this year, any effects on volume

MacroeconomicCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Lewis confirmed no direct Middle East business or supply chain exposure. Aluminum cost impact managed through immediate pass-through contracts. Can is winning in every region including EMEA, with volumes accelerating entering Q2.

did European volume perform as you expected? Were there any one-off factors

Show response

Lewis identified two EMEA one-offs: Benepack closing February vs planned January, and UAC Saudi Arabia divestiture creating prior-year comp headwind. Core EMEA in line with 3-5% algorithm. No concerning contract renewals. Operating earnings per can is the new key profitability metric.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Why do you make a point of emphasizing that given that should be always what you're working on

ChallengingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Lewis acknowledged the doubling down on profitable growth is a rallying cry to achieve 2x operating leverage, which was missed in NA in 2025. Rabbitt confirmed $35M headwinds mean NA EBIT expectations should be tempered, validating Staphos's flat-to-down framing.

the leverage wasn't there in North and Central America. Can you comment a bit in terms of whether it was the tariff-related headwinds or something else

ChallengingMarginDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Lewis noted Q4 was strongest leverage quarter at nearly 2x, missed only by tariff-related ends import costs. For 2026, highlighted America's 250th birthday celebrations and World Cup as demand catalysts alongside ongoing can substrate shift.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you seeing any signs -- it doesn't sound like it that your customers are maybe contemplating moves to nonaluminum packaging because of costs

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fisher cited direct conversations with top strategic partners confirming can growth commitment. No returnable glass shift in South America yet despite inflation. Brazil 2026 protected by election and World Cup. CSD players pushing 7.5-oz format as value proposition.

how do you think tariff situations right now and aluminum strategies are affecting volume patterns and what it can mean for next year

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Fisher quantified tariff pass-through at 25-30% price increase to customers, negligible per can. Noted ICE enforcement impacts specific customer segments but cans offsetting through at-home channel gains. Tariff reversal would help customer COGS.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How much of that is predicated on what you're seeing right now in your customer mix and their strategies

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fisher said top-end 3% already embedded. If tariff-affected customer recovers, they can serve from Monterrey. If energy growth persists at 15-20%, will be living hand to mouth in peak season.

where do you think the -- your average large customer, however you want to define that, their embedded aluminum price is relative to sort of spot market

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fisher quantified hedge rolloff at about a quarter per 12-pack. Cans still cheaper than PET and glass. May shift buying patterns toward larger multipacks rather than substrate switch.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you seem cautiously optimistic about your beer customers being a bit more, I don't know what the right term would be, but more promotional

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Fisher cited direct conversations and public brewer statements about concentrated peak-season marketing efforts. Expects combination of public marketing and volume-oriented pricing.

you mentioned earlier in the call, you're activating initiatives and I just wanted to sort of peer under the hood there

Show response

Fisher explained Ball Business System rollout is about 2/3 complete, driving safety, quality, and production records. On pre-buy, estimated $100-200M possible but minimal YoY delta.

Calendar 2024 Q4

to what extent have you been able to determine the effect of tariffs and what that might have relative to the guidance that you're providing

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Fisher directly addressed both China aluminum tariffs (mitigated to minimal impact) and Mexico tariffs (volume risk depends on magnitude). Transparent on scenarios.

Can you talk a little bit about how these investments you talked about, including the Florida can business might affect your earnings and/or volumes

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Fisher confirmed investments are additive to existing goals, not required to meet them. Brief but clear answer after multi-part question.

PKGPackaging Corporation of America13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 13 challenging
PKG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you give us a rundown on what you are seeing in terms of bookings and billings to start the third quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hassfurther gave specific legacy billings up 1.5% so far and about 2% expected for Q3, against a tough comp.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk a bit about bookings and billings into April?

Show response

Tom confirmed legacy bookings and billings up 4.5% in April. No prebuy seen. Some business being moved from legacy to Greif plants for system optimization. Customers continue to operate with very lean inventories. Tom described price increase environment as muddy waters.

Can you talk a bit about why Greif was a loss of $0.06 in the quarter?

Show response

Mark said storm caused ~$0.05 impact with Riverville hardest hit. Kent added higher recycled fiber and freight costs plus lower mix in January/February. Tom noted unexpected seasonality, Q1 is Greif corrugated's weakest quarter. February mill productivity was about 10% higher than pre-acquisition. Expected to be accretive starting Q2 with ~$0.10 sequential improvement.

Is there a way to provide some further quantification or at least direction on the sequential changes?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kent quantified: stock comp $6M higher than Q2 2025, freight/fiber/chemicals ~$0.15 higher Q1-to-Q2, DD&A ~$0.03 higher, outages $0.22 higher. Tax rate stepping up from ~23% to ~26% (Q1 had equity vesting benefit). Stock comp $17M higher for full year 2026 due to timing change.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there a way to maybe size or give us a bit more granularity on what looks like it will be a decent increase in cost per ton in the containerboard business?

Show response

Kent quantified Q4-to-Q1 mill cost increase at about $15 million or $10/ton, ex freight and with partial Wallula benefit. Mark said normal January inflationary items plus winter weather impacts. Storm assessment ongoing, multiple plants down from Texas to Mid-Atlantic.

What gives you comfort that at Massillon, you're through the reliability issues?

ChallengingM&ASupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mark said 200 PCA personnel spent 3.5 months rebuilding Massillon from bearings to gas turbines. 15% improvement in operational efficiency at both mills, now very close to PCA standards. Kent said inventory was ~10K tons above forecast from purchase commitment absorption and slightly lower shipments. Tom confirmed Greif had trade commitments that PCA is discontinuing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

any big picture, any large sort of boulders you could tell us about in terms of what you're finding with Greif relative to the deal model?

Show response

Mark said CorrChoice converting side well capitalized. Mills need operational improvements, 100+ PCA personnel deployed to each mill from Day 1. Kent confirmed $240M historical EBITDA run rate with $60M synergy target on run-rate basis after year 2, tracking to ~$20M by Q2 2026. Riverville already running at 97.2% in September, up dramatically. Culture highly compatible.

Can you talk about bookings and billings as we're starting fourth quarter?

Show response

Tom said Q4 bookings/billings up slightly over 1% against very tough comps. Beef (cattle herds at 70-year low) and building materials are the two large segments dragging volumes. All other segments performing very well.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you or Tom talk a little bit about traditionally, your comment on bookings and billings to start the new quarter?

Show response

Tom corrected to Q3 2024 comp. Bookings up 2% vs tough Q3 2024 comp and up 10% vs end of Q2. Mark cited 99% uptime and efficient operations during demand curtailment.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How do you view your ability to keep up with demand? Are there any risks as you see it in terms of being able to supply?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark not worried about near-term supply. Multiple levers available including export pullback, mill productivity improvements, and potential acquisitions.

Were there some other points that you wanted to delve into in terms of how you're adjusting how you're looking at forecast and guiding for the year?

DemandMacroeconomicGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tom confirmed bookings up 4.1% entering Q2. Mark characterized customer base as cautious. Bob noted Q1 beat included some pricing pull-forward expected in Q2.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you talk a little bit about bookings and billings to start the quarter what you're seeing?

DemandCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom confirmed bookings/billings up 8% in January. Mark acknowledged some cost inefficiencies from capital projects but said it's the growth engine.

where are you seeing the most cost inflation? Because when we look at cost per ton, it's been trending steadily higher over time

ChallengingCost PressurePricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mark cited energy, chemicals, labor/medical, transportation, rail increases, and service costs. Said capital spending helps but can't fully offset inflation without pricing.

IPInternational Paper11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 4 of 11 challenging
IP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

So can you talk about some of the individual items that make you comfortable with that outlook, Andy and Lance?

Guidance ReliabilityCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Lance named the Riverdale ramp, June price publication flow-through and cost-out maturation, and said diesel is simply set to the strip.

Can you update us in total, what you've achieved in terms of 80/20 across both

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Andy said the big structural moves in the US footprint are done and Europe is still in the throes of facility rationalization.

Calendar 2026 Q1

This step up -- to the second half of '26 in North America, you lay it out, but it's quite large. Of the items that you have in that $650 million, let's hold the macro to the side

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

$450M of $650M highly reliable: $300M price/volume/mix/seasonality plus $150M planned maintenance timing. $100M Riverdale non-repeat also high confidence with ramp-up as only risk. The $150M cost-out is where risk concentrates, footprint rationalization execution, mill capacity utilization improvement, supply chain/procurement cube utilization. $20M of cost-out benefit already realized in Q1. Pricing bridge on Slide 13 reflects net $50/ton flowing through contract by contract.

if we sit back and look at 80/20, what have you achieved cumulatively across the enterprise in terms of cost out and commercial? And what's left to go through 2027

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

$700M cost taken out to date, targeting more than $1B total. US has $200-300M latent cost opportunity at normal operating rates (ancillary costs, mill productivity). IT outsourcing flowing through mostly in H1. EMEA has 31 facility closures delivering $200M run rate savings with another ~$100M to go. Savannah closure was ~$300M cost savings offset by EBITDA loss but a ROIC home run.

Calendar 2025 Q4

in your free cash flow guidance of $300 to $500 million, can you give us some of the other important assumptions that are in there

Capital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Maintaining dividend through 2026. Will review policy in conjunction with shareholders through the spin process. Substantial restructuring and one-time costs creating temporary FCF shortfall vs dividend. Price increase out to customers with $90M EBITDA per $10/ton not in guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the free cash flow number for us, from our vantage point moved a decent amount. I think it was $100 million to $300 million positive for the year, and it's now a comparable deficit

ChallengingCapital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

FCF swing driven primarily by $500M+ profit shortfall from market volume and price versus Investor Day expectations. Incremental $50-100M in transformation costs from accelerated timing. Silvernail committed to not pulling back on CapEx despite market softness.

What's been driving that? Are there any particular end markets where you that the new IP approach is particularly gaining traction

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Wins coming from medium-to-large customers through focused resource deployment on strategic accounts. Protein and fruits/vegetables segments highlighted as strengths. Added 22% more salespeople year-over-year. Silvernail described industry dynamic of chasing volume sugar highs and explained IP's discipline to avoid that trap.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the $900 million to $1.1 billion, is that operable this year?

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed EMEA EBITDA guidance range from Investor Day is being held despite softer demand. Clarified the $3.8B run rate reference was for the total company ex-GCF, not Europe alone.

there's obviously a big jump in earnings 2Q to 3Q. And as we look at it, North American GCF, it's really in ops and outages. In Europe, it's really on commercial conditions

Show response

Silvernail expressed more confidence in NA due to longer engagement, strong commercial progress under Tom Hamic, and converting side moving from underperformance to winning back share. Europe earlier in 80/20 journey with sequential improvement driven by commercial recovery.

Calendar 2025 Q1

we're looking at, I think, lower EBITDA sequentially from 1Q to 2Q, so $104 million to $85 million, despite there being an extra month

ChallengingM&AMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Silvernail corrected that the apparent decline is a bridge presentation issue, Q2 shows only the incremental one month vs Q1's two months of DS Smith, not a decline.

these accounts typically, and we hear they like you too, by the way. Are the types of accounts that initially, when things start to slow down, will actually pull in the horns

ChallengingDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Silvernail clarified IP focuses on 80 customers across all sizes. Wins are in local bigger customers where IP had previously fallen down on service. No major customer defections visible in pipeline.

AMCRAmcor9 questions · 8 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
AMCR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was wondering what was driving that price/mix negative, if I read it correctly, in the quarter?

ChallengingPricingMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Steve explained the -1% price/mix (excluding raw material pass-through) is consistent with the prior year and reflects normal competitive re-earning of business without a real economic impact, and pointed to the comparable (lower-left) segment view as the best like-for-like read on margins.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Are these really an aggregation of one-off discussions? Or are you triggering any extraordinary clauses in your contracts

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

PK explained: 30% non-contracted (quick general price increases), 70% contracted with some extraordinary clauses but mostly collaborative negotiations. Not one-off but ongoing dialogue as inflation evolves. Steve noted inventory buffer helps mitigate timing of cost increases and supports fair, consistent customer pricing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk about, especially in your focus categories in flexible, what the exit rate on volume was

Show response

PK noted focus categories 50-100bps better than core. Pet care high single-digit growth, meat protein low single-digit growth. Healthcare down slightly (weak flu season). Steve explained Flexibles EBIT: only $10M of $50M EBIT synergies in Flex, core Flex business actually roughly flat ex synergies. Rigid got $30M of synergies driving the 15% growth.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you talk a little bit more about how the sort of marriage, if you will, of Lat Am and specialty containers is going with legacy Berry

M&ARevenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

PK described LatAm combination rationale as broader complementary product suite. Beauty & Wellness win in LatAm combined Amcor rigid container with Berry closure (systems sell), plus multi-site contingency. Emphasized pipeline momentum at 180 days exceeding expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

why from what your customers are saying, you're still seeing such weakness in what should be stable to growing markets, especially markets that you think you're now gaining share in

ChallengingDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

PK noted North America was the sole source of weakness, with emerging markets growing and Europe slightly soft. Both legacy businesses saw similar trends. Berry slightly softer due to higher NA exposure and unconverted film end markets. Value-based pricing opportunity confirmed for Berry portfolio.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how has that affected your customers’ outlook on demand when in reality they’re producing staples, confectionery items, protein, coffee?

DemandTrade TariffsM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

PK described consumer value-seeking driving weaker demand and customer forecast volatility. On synergies, pipelines suggest more opportunities than expected but won't change targets given volatile environment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk to the degree to which incentives and/or FX might have impacted what otherwise would have been the EBIT conversion in Flexibles

Show response

PK confirmed H1 volumes within guidance range, no reason to expect differently in H2. Michael noted profit performance in line, FX and incentive impact not material. Cost focus continues but lapping tougher comps.

Calendar 2024 Q3

Can you update us on some of how some of your newer products in the last few years, AmLite, AmPrima, AmFiber are doing?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

PK described strong positioning in sustainable packaging solutions. AmPrima has meaningful scale, fiber growing off smaller base. Both developed to comply with packaging waste regulation.

Was there a trigger for you in terms of what sort of drove that?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

PK clarified innovation capabilities are already strong based on customer feedback. Focus is on leveraging existing successful products across global markets. On Rigids, earnings growth returned since beginning of calendar year despite weak volumes.

Show 1 more company
SWSmurfit WestRock9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
SW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How much pricing is assumed in your guidance for the year? The $100 per ton that you’ve announced

PricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ken gave an unambiguous answer, none of the increase is in the 2026 guide, and framed it as a 2027 platform. Materially clarifies the guidance cut.

when we look at the margin in North America, it was 13.3% 1Q. It was 14.8% Q

Show response

Tony confirmed the analyst's 3-4% estimate outright rather than deflecting, an unusually specific disclosure on segment-level box margin.

Calendar 2026 Q1

roughly half of the outage or downtime in the quarter, North America was unplanned. Can you tell us what implications, if any, you think that means for the mill system as it exists today

Cost PressurePricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tony described unprecedented speed of demand shift, sold out across practically all paper grades in April after March strengthening. Some pre-buying possible but not dominant. Capacity closures over last 18 months now having effect. Unplanned downtime from February electricity outage near a major mill, not expected to reoccur. No material downtime anticipated in Q2.

is there a way to dimensionalize what that might mean for your margin, how those customers are coming in relative to your margin expectations

Show response

Tony noted each month from January through March showed increasing new customer wins, with April new customer volume 30% up on March. Comfortable will start to lap positive in H2. Still working through some exiting uneconomic business. Comparators become easier in H2.

Calendar 2025 Q4

in terms of the outlook for this year, can you talk to the extent that pricing is already baked into your forecast or not? And then ultimately, recognizing you don't manage the business week by wee...

Show response

Ken confirmed no pricing baked into FY2026 guidance ($5.0-5.3B). Tony described order books firming in late December, Q4 starting weak then improving. Expects volumes to normalize in H2 2026. Weather disruptions in January/February causing some logistics challenges. US stimulus seen as potential positive.

can you help us understand how important the evolution of consumer is relative to getting to that target across the segments? Why it seems like you see consumer being married to corrugated makes mo...

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tony sees consumer as central plank for growth, particularly in Europe where corrugated share gains are limited. Cross-selling corrugated+consumer to same customers is a strategic advantage. CRB mills described as not the best but highly cash generative and low-capital. Consumer EBITDA growth contribution described as broadly in line with corrugated percentage-wise.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you help us quantify how you're determining the 70%, if that's the right ratio

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tony detailed owner-operator model forcing local P&L accountability. Legacy WestRock used combined profitability masking individual plant losses. SBS competitive vs CRB due to: brightness, lower caliper, better printability, machine runnability. CUK advantaged for freezer applications.

If there's some rollback in tariffs, how might that change your overall view of the attractiveness of SBS

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tony said tariffs not a factor in SBS strategy, it's price-driven. FBB will come to US regardless due to European overcapacity. Developing newer SBS grades including lottery cards. SBS is a myriad of different grades at different price points.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What have been the learnings that you can share on kind of an open-mic discussion about the value-address of being able to sell both consumer and secondary packaging

Competitive DynamicsCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Tony admitted consumer market tougher than anticipated but sees great people, assets, and market positions. Still developing CRB, SBS, and CUK strategies individually. Cross-sell opportunity exists. Said they're 'not a million miles away' from communicating grade-specific strategies.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AVY Avery Dennison1520%3 of 15 questions
WY Weyerhaeuser1429%4 of 14 questions
BALL Ball Corporation1331%4 of 13 questions
PKG Packaging Corporation of America1323%3 of 13 questions
IP International Paper1136%4 of 11 questions
AMCR Amcor922%2 of 9 questions
SW Smurfit WestRock90%none of 9 questions
  • AVY
    Avery Dennison · 15 questions
    20%3 of 15 questions
  • WY
    Weyerhaeuser · 14 questions
    29%4 of 14 questions
  • BALL
    Ball Corporation · 13 questions
    31%4 of 13 questions
  • PKG
    Packaging Corporation of America · 13 questions
    23%3 of 13 questions
  • IP
    International Paper · 11 questions
    36%4 of 11 questions
  • AMCR
    Amcor · 9 questions
    22%2 of 9 questions
  • SW
    Smurfit WestRock · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q41020%2 of 10 questions5
2025 Q11331%4 of 13 questions7
2025 Q2825%2 of 8 questions5
2025 Q31414%2 of 14 questions7
2025 Q41233%4 of 12 questions7
2026 Q11414%2 of 14 questions7
2026 Q21136%4 of 11 questions7
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 31% (4 of 13 questions) · 7 companies
  4. 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 7 companies
  6. 2025 Q412 questions · challenge rate 33% (4 of 12 questions) · 7 companies
  7. 2026 Q114 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 7 companies
  8. 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 36% (4 of 11 questions) · 7 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand33
  • Margin23
  • Cost Pressure16
  • Pricing14
  • Competitive Dynamics14
  • Trade Tariffs10
  • Guidance Reliability9
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Supply Chain8
  • Revenue Growth7
Show all 21 topics
  • M&A7
  • Capital Allocation6
  • Capex Investment3
  • Inventory2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Fx1
  • Product Launch1
  • Labor Market1