Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Keith Weiss
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 67on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 21%14 of 67 questions
- Companies
- 16questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 67 of 67 questions from 16 companies
ADBEAdobe Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how you expect that to evolve? And maybe just the time frame for what today is a foundation-building initiative to when that becomes more of a ARR-driving initiative
Show response
Shantanu outlined phase-shifted monetization where MAU leads ARR. Firefly now a $250M business that did not exist a few years ago. GenStudio growing 30%, AEP and apps growing 30%. AI-first book of business tripled and expected to become next billion-dollar business.
Calendar 2025 Q4
When can we potentially see this sort of grow the totality or ex stabilize or accelerate the totality of growth
Show response
Shantanu described Q4 as an inflection point in leading indicators. Cited $2.6 billion net new ARR guide as highest beginning-of-year target ever, MAU growth, freemium usage, Creative Cloud core subscription growing sequentially, and combined enterprise strategy as driving confidence.
Calendar 2025 Q3
advertising platforms like Google or Meta putting diffusion engines in their ad platforms directly
Show response
Shantanu acknowledged SMBs may use proprietary channel tools but larger enterprises want cross-channel campaign creation, attribution, and analysis through GenStudio.
what part of that is the diffusion engine coming from Nano Banana
Show response
David explained Adobe differentiates on choice (all third-party models available) and integrations (precision workflows combining Photoshop with generative capabilities).
Calendar 2025 Q2
Any guidance you could give us on sort of your assumptions on where customers go number one
Show response
Shantanu wants CC Pro as sweet spot for creative pros, with Standard and Firefly single app as on-ramps. Dan said FX is small factor; vast majority of raise driven by ARR performance.
Calendar 2025 Q1
it feels kind of bullish to me that the business professionals and consumer group has a stronger growth rate
Show response
Shantanu confirmed the read, noting Creative and Marketing has large untapped TAM and new subscriptions like Firefly app will accelerate growth.
could this pace of share repurchases, can you guys sustain this throughout the year or is that more of a onetime pickup?
Show response
Dan Durn said they will continue to be strong capital allocators and opportunistic. Shantanu called it a vote of confidence in opportunities ahead.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there some leak in the bucket. Right? All this innovation, new monetization avenues, pricing going up, but the growth is going in the wrong direction
Show response
Shantanu pushed back noting Adobe beat all three ARR targets set during FY2024. Explained creative growth was understated because Acrobat Pro shifted to document cloud bucket. Highlighted GenStudio as enterprise unlock.
INTUIntuit8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
there is a sense that this feels a little bit like 2023-2024, right? The overall tax filings were disappointing
Show response
Sasan acknowledged the issue is different from 2023-24, requiring durable model change rather than one-time offers. Explained shift from complexity-based to value-based pricing, with monetization beyond tax through Credit Karma and money offerings.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is Anthropic and the Anthropic model going to be able to get access to all your good proprietary data, access to all your customers to your workflows and therefore, be able to replicate your business
Show response
Sasan explained data stays within Intuit, no economics shared, LLM partners rely on Intuit for regulated financial expertise. Sandeep reinforced moat: proprietary data, flow of funds, human intelligence all remain untouched.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Help us get a little bit of confidence about the durability of these types of results throughout the year.
Show response
Sasan noted payroll hours worked up, industry-specific variation (IT/construction/manufacturing up, real estate/lending down). Sandeep added Intuit's must-have positioning means products become more critical in tougher economy.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What should our expectations be for monetization around those agents? Is it still too early?
Show response
Sasan noted AI agent monetization not in FY26 guidance. Millions engaging after 1 month, repeat usage above expectations. Mailchimp to exit FY26 at double-digit growth via mid-market sales and product improvements.
Calendar 2025 Q1
it sounds like your hiring is going to plan. So, there wasn't like an outperformance in Q2 margins that came from delayed hiring
Show response
Sandeep clarified hiring was slightly below plan due to AI-driven productivity gains, not delays. 40% faster coding with GenAI tools.
we saw a really impressive margin expansion, a lot of leverage showing up on that bottom-line. Is that in any way due to maybe expense timing?
Show response
Sasan cited expense discipline, AI efficiencies in customer success coming earlier than expected, and slower tax season start aiding Q2 margins.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is more of an idiosyncratic issue with that innovation and not a broader market commentary or macro weakness
Show response
Sandeep categorically denied macro weakness as a factor, attributing churn entirely to product innovation skewing toward larger customers.
on Mailchimp, the churn at the lower end of the base that you mentioned on the call, I don't recall hearing that previously
Show response
Sandeep attributed churn to mid-market innovation making discovery harder for small customers. Deeply integrated Mailchimp-QBO experience expected in several quarters.
IOTSamsara Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
the relative value of the data when it's brand new and it's just coming off of the devices
Show response
Sanjit answered directly: value compounds as data accumulates over time and across customers (maintenance, risk patterns).
Is it too simple to say that this is sort of Asset Tags and that new solution ramping up within the product portfolio?
Show response
Dominic answered directly: the acceleration is broad-based across emerging products, large deals and verticals, not one product.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how expansive could these products be within existing customers? How much further can you go
Show response
Dominic said most net new ACV comes from expansions, and emerging products are just scratching the surface, enabling larger landings across multiple products.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you remind us kind of what those were and how those have progressed versus your expectations
Show response
Sanjit cited dedicated strategic-account sales plus implementation/change-management and API/security investments; the $1M+ customer record shows it working.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How do you sort of tell the difference between what's like a macro-related deal cycle elongation
Show response
Dominic attributed elongation to direct customer conversations about prioritizing tariff-impacted vehicle and asset purchases after Liberation Day.
Gross margins continue to expand really well. Perhaps you could kind of unpack some of the drivers
Show response
Dominic pointed to the record 79% but guided to limited near-term gross-margin leverage, with software-only SKUs and asset tags accretive over time.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What's working well there? And how does that inform your plans for 2026 international expansion?
Show response
Stand-in Chris Quintero on for Keith Weiss. Dominic credited multi-year investment, product features and referenceability for Mexico/UK strength and expects continued international investment.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could maybe give us an update on kind of where we are
Show response
Dominic said the quarter was balanced, tilted slightly toward expansion, and that reps cover both new logos and expansions in their territories.
CRMSalesforce, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
where you guys garner your confidence of a back half organic subscription revenue acceleration
Show response
Washington pointed to net new AOV outpacing AOV since H2 FY26, with guidance raised for the year. Milano added that top 10 deals grew TCV 2.5x year over year, Informatica bookings reaccelerated beyond expectations, and 7 of 10 top deals added new seats.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can Agentforce catalyze the broader Salesforce product portfolio? Can it bring along everything
Show response
Marc acknowledged the comprehensive business dynamics but emphasized results exceeded expectations, while Robin noted seats still growing and multiple AI monetization paths.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I don't think we've made and Robin, enough justice to what is happening right now in front of us
Show response
Miguel emphasized the last mile problem requires enterprise context that only Salesforce provides, citing 400 customer meetings across 12 countries in three continents.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was there some technology catalyst or some implementation catalyst that caused that that increase of conversions
Show response
Srini cited forward deployed engineers, agent command center observability, and deterministic agent features, while Miguel gave Falabella and DirecTV examples.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what a lot of investors are wondering is transmission mechanism of when does this become a bigger driver for the overall growth rate
Show response
Marc committed to margin and cash flow frameworks while outlining a growth transformation through distribution expansion, and Miguel detailed 22% capacity growth targets.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Investors are asking me a lot of questions about the changing pricing model dynamics going from a seat-based model
Show response
Marc gave a detailed real-world example of a $20M telecom deal split $13M human products and $7M Agentforce, showing the mixed pricing model in action.
Calendar 2024 Q4
When it comes to those 200 deals that you've already signed for Agentforce maybe you could give us some color on what those deals look like
Show response
Millham confirmed initial 200 deals are primarily Service Cloud add-ons but emphasized opportunity across Sales, Marketing, Commerce, and Data Cloud. Called it tip of the iceberg.
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how that demand translates into commercial bookings and how that might be changing
Show response
Amy explained the shift from pure seat-based to seat+consumption pricing model. Satya reinforced that value comes from eval and outcome, where agents create cost savings or revenue increases for customers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
CapEx is growing faster than we expected, and maybe Azure is growing a little bit slower than we expected
Show response
Hood reframed Azure guide as allocated-capacity; said had all Q1/Q2 GPUs gone to Azure, growth would have been over 40%. GPUs are being prioritized to Copilot, GitHub, R&D, then Azure.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there anything that you're worrying about in that evolution and particularly the evolution of these generative AI models
Show response
Nadella framed 'jagged intelligence' as the reality and said Microsoft's Copilot/Agent HQ systems are the organizing layers that smooth out model gaps; AGI per the contract is not near.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how do you guys manage that risk versus reward with these quickly emerging AI labs and these AI start-ups
Show response
Nadella drew parallel to Amazon/Netflix on AWS; said head apps shape the platform and broad diffusion follows, and Microsoft tracks both head and tier-2 usage.
Calendar 2025 Q1
changing data center commitments, maybe Microsoft walking away from some of those data center commitments
Show response
Nadella reframed as routine portfolio management; Hood added they'll remain tight on capacity through Q4 as they prioritize the right fleet shape and location.
Calendar 2024 Q4
we were a little disappointed on Azure coming in at the bottom end of the guidance range
Show response
Hood attributed shortfall to scale-motion execution issues in the partner channel and reaffirmed Q3 Azure guide of 31-32% CC; confidence on AI side unchanged.
Calendar 2024 Q3
what are the internal constraints or guardrails that Microsoft has when it comes to investing behind these innovations
Show response
Satya framed training capex as rate-limited by inference monetization and named power and data-center construction as the near-term external constraints.
TEAMAtlassian5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was hoping you could dig into that and how the Teamwork Graph and the broader system lowers the cost of these AI investments
Show response
Mike explained Teamwork Graph delivers higher quality AI at lower token cost. James detailed $50M DC pull-forward from future periods driven by EOL announcement, Q3 largest expiry base, and March pricing change. DC retention rates outperformed. Migration customers moderating DC seat expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
why is the full year absent the data center end of life coming down by 50 bps?
Show response
Joe explained cloud migrations drive revenue timing differences, cloud recognized ratably vs DC partially upfront, plus lower marketplace take rate on cloud apps. All other organic drivers in-line or slightly better. Mike emphasized this is positive for business citing 26% cloud growth and 42% RPO growth.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Maybe you can walk us through what you guys are seeing in the business today in terms of seed expansion with developers or more broadly?
Show response
Mike dismissed AI developer displacement concerns with data. Business users in instances with connected AI tools are growing faster. Cited Rovo Dev performance on SWE-bench and internal use of 3-4 cogeneration tools with 1,000+ daily users each.
Calendar 2024 Q4
who's going to be well positioned for that? And what's the Atlassian right to win in this ever increasingly crowded field for agents?
Show response
Mike outlined four pillars of differentiation: R&D speed, multi-model strategy (30+ models, 7+ vendors), data quality via Teamwork Graph, and interface/surface advantages.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how much of this is driven by your guys' like proactive activity versus driven by the market?
Show response
Joe acknowledged macro stability as a factor but also cited good sales execution, paid seat expansion, and migrations. Mike added consolidation as a growth driver.
Show 10 more companies
CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how the higher component pricing works through the contract and how that ultimately affects your profitability?
Show response
Management said component costs are priced into contracts, insulating targeted mid-20s unit margins; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how we should think about your guys' infrastructure and the infrastructure that you build and how fungible
Show response
Management said infrastructure is fungible and usable for training or inference, addressing overcapacity concerns; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you talk to us a little bit about sort of the mix of business that you're seeing?
Show response
Management said infrastructure is fungible across training and inference and that inference workloads have grown materially; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Perhaps you could talk to us a little bit about the mechanism that enables you guys to outperform revenues in a quarter
Show response
Management attributed the beat to pulling forward infrastructure investment and prioritizing speed of delivery; addressed directly.
NETCloudflare, Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you talk to us a little bit more about that, how you're seeing the evolution in that Internet traffic? And where does it go next? And where do some of those newer acquisitions like Humenated an...
Show response
Prince explained Humenated team (from Google) thinking about next Internet business model beyond ads/subscriptions. ASTRO framework powers vibe coding platforms deploying to Workers. Cloudflare's ability to rewrite content in-transit means legacy Internet automatically comes along to whatever comes next. Working with Shopify, Visa, PayPal, Mastercard on small business enablement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What are the business models that you're looking to enable for your customers? And how do you monetize that for Cloudflare?
Show response
Prince acknowledged uncertainty in exact model, drew analogy to Apple's $0.99 songs evolving to Spotify. Focused on adoption and being universal translator regardless of protocol.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the net-adds on the 100,000 side was a lot skinnier at like only 30 up on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Any changes in like go-to-market strategy
Show response
Seifert explained no increased churn; fewer customers graduating to $100K threshold plus 2 fewer days in quarter impacted counts. Record $1M and $5M additions offset concern.
Can you give us any detail in terms of like the use case or of what they're using the platform for?
Show response
Prince described customer switching from hyperscaler after seeing significantly better performance and faster developer deployment on Workers. Actively hunting more $100M+ deals.
NOWServiceNow4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
when are we going to see this acceleration? When are we going to see the benefits of ServiceNow's positioning
Show response
Gina addressed each concern: Veza and Pyramid had tiny contribution, Q1 beat was organic, on-prem timing caused headwind. Pointed to Financial Analyst Day for long-range AI consumption flywheel plan.
Calendar 2025 Q2
outperformed really nicely in Q2 on overall operating margins, both you and Bill are talking about some -- what seem like pretty significant productivity enhancements and productivity gains in engi...
Show response
Gina explained Q2 margin upside partly driven by marketing spend timing shift to H2, maintaining expense flexibility for potential Moveworks margin headwinds, and choosing to invest AI efficiency savings into growth, quota-bearing reps and AI talent.
Is the cost of sale for AI just higher? Does it require you guys to be -- have more engineers like on site to help people understand agentic
Show response
Amit framed co-innovation with customers as building IP that gets deployed to many more customers, not incremental sales cost. Gina added that investing productivity gains into faster customer time-to-value accelerates the assist pack revenue ramp.
Calendar 2025 Q1
What are you seeing in your enterprise customers? Is there any delay in decision making, any elongation in the sales cycle? And have you put any of that potential risk into the guidance on a go for...
Show response
Gina confirmed demand remains strong with scrubbed pipelines and strong coverage ratios. Guidance incorporates comprehensive data-driven analysis of geopolitical exposure with a healthy degree of conservatism.
FIGFigma, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how well the pricing model today is capturing that value proposition and how it might evolve going forward?
Show response
Dylan expects customers to become more discriminating on token spend; Praveer cited expanded admin controls and pay-as-you-go.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you see the dividing line between what is in the wheel well of Figma and is always going to be
Show response
Dylan framed design as inherently non-verifiable, keeping humans in the loop as value moves up the stack.
Calendar 2025 Q3
where it kind of falls in terms of the design paradigm and how it expands your potential user base
Show response
Dylan framed Weavy as composing AI model outputs with pro editing tools, reinforcing the design-as-differentiator thesis.
WDAYWorkday, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How does Workday now stack up in that TCO versus building it yourself using these agentic code-generation tools?
Show response
Aneel framed three paths for AI success, Workday agents, ExtendPro, and AI APIs, all requiring Workday's governance rails. Garrett added that differentiated agents need Workday's world model of work, business process logic, and flow-of-business embedding.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should part of our takeaway be that the M&A strategy is going to take more of a backseat
Show response
Aneel said primary focus is organic agent development but will remain opportunistic on M&A. Zane confirmed FY27 inorganic contribution is not a material component of the guide. Would call out any significant M&A impact separately.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you give us any rules of thumb that you're starting to see that could help us maybe model this out a little bit
Show response
Garrett shared that 5% of new sales and 35% of base expansions include AI. HiredScore recruiting agent commands a 2.5x uplift over standard recruiting SKU. Evisort had a record quarter with accelerating growth. Extend Pro grew 50% YoY.
SHOPShopify2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you help us understand the UCP versus ACP, the other standard that OpenAI and Stripe are putting forward. Are these overlapping standards do they compete?
Show response
Harley differentiated UCP as payment-agnostic and covering the full commerce journey including post-order, noting it flexes to complex commerce like subscriptions and white glove delivery. Did not directly address whether competing standards would fragment or delay market adoption.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how long these gross margin pressures are going to persist, particularly maybe enumerate what's happening with with the PayPal accounting change
Show response
Jeff declined to quantify PayPal impact but noted subscription solutions gross margin stable at 80% ±200bps. Higher-margin products like Tax, Capital, and FX are ramping but need time to offset payments mix at scale.
CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you give us a little bit of insight on what's hitting today? What's actually driving demand today for you guys
Show response
Kurtz distinguished current AI demand (Charlotte AI SOC automation, model scanning) from future opportunity (securing billions of autonomous AI agents with unique identities).
FTNTFortinet1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
What gives you guys confidence that you're still going to be able to perform to like the stronger second half pickup?
Show response
Christiane cited next-gen product releases and FortiGate outgrowing total product revenue as proof of momentum. Ken emphasized market share gains across all 3 pillars even if overall market growth slows.
PANWPalo Alto Networks1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
is this just about AIRS or is there a wider opportunity? What is it like pull-through from the Palo Alto portfolio when people are looking to secure this new surface area
Show response
Nikesh explained AI firewalls pull through software firewall adoption, accelerating the hardware-to-software transition. AI security runtime focus avoids the cloud posture mistake.
SNOWSnowflake Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping if you could give us some kind of visibility into the ramp that you're seeing with the new AI products like Cortex.
Show response
Management said Cortex is starting to take off but early innings; Snowpark tracking to 3% of revenue.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| INTU Intuit | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions |
| IOT Samsara Inc. | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 7 | 43%3 of 7 questions |
| TEAM Atlassian | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| NET Cloudflare, Inc. | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| NOW ServiceNow | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions |
| FIG Figma, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
- ADBEAdobe Inc. · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- INTUIntuit · 8 questions25%2 of 8 questions
- IOTSamsara Inc. · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- CRMSalesforce, Inc. · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- MSFTMicrosoft Corporation · 7 questions43%3 of 7 questions
- TEAMAtlassian · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- NETCloudflare, Inc. · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- NOWServiceNow · 4 questions50%2 of 4 questions
- FIGFigma, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
Show all 16 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| SHOP Shopify | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| FTNT Fortinet | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- WDAYWorkday, Inc. · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- SHOPShopify · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- FTNTFortinet · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PANWPalo Alto Networks · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SNOWSnowflake Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 38%3 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 13 | 23%3 of 13 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q2 | 12 | 25%3 of 12 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 67%2 of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 38% (3 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 23% (3 of 13 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 25% (3 of 12 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q111 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 67% (2 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI36
- Revenue Growth23
- Demand19
- Competitive Dynamics17
- Innovation & R&D9
- Margin7
- Pricing6
- Guidance Reliability5
- Macroeconomic5
- Subscriber Growth5
Show all 18 topics
- Capex Investment4
- Product Launch3
- Cost Pressure3
- Capital Allocation3
- Trade Tariffs1
- Geographic Expansion1
- M&A1
- Labor Market1