Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mark Murphy

JPMorgan · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q1 (7 quarters).

Questions
72on tracked calls
Challenge rate
1%1 of 72 questions
Companies
15questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 72 of 72 questions from 15 companies

DDOGDatadog12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how you might view the increasing heterogeneity of the environment at the silicon level

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Olivier confirmed heterogeneity plays in Datadog's favor, then highlighted the new development of landing hyperscaler AI labs for training workloads, validating a market that was not real a year ago.

I'm wondering how much of that code is going into production and therefore, driving activity for Datadog

Show response

Olivier confirmed more applications are being created and reaching production, with signs visible across every layer of the platform. Directly addressed the code-to-production funnel question.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you looking at this wave of CapEx and able to say it's going to create a predictable ramp in your LLM observability revenue

Show response

Pomel noted it's too reductive to peg hyperscaler CapEx directly to LLM observability. The conversion rate is unclear but the CapEx points to massive increases in system complexity, which benefits Datadog broadly.

do you see an opportunity to diversify that AI customer concentration

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel emphasized Datadog is not built for customer concentration. More large AI companies are inbound, including hyperscaler-level AI labs, driving both cohort size and diversification.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you speak to that because I would assume a higher commitment would carry a volume-based discount

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel explained the standard motion: higher commitment yields better unit economics (lower per-unit price), with short-term revenue dip followed by growth from increased usage.

We recall, I think about 6 months ago, you had ramped up and engaged a lot more of a channel partners, which is a key ingredient to grow in the security business. Is it a function of that

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel cited multiple drivers: channel investment, product maturity especially with Flex Logs underpinning Cloud SIEM, and learning how to properly go-to-market for security, all clicking together.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm curious what type of response do you expect to see here? And just help us understand maybe how that can sustain growth in future years

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pomel highlighted three AI agent categories (SRE, coding/dev, security) and noted Toto is a state-of-the-art time series model that demonstrates research capability to be incorporated into products.

We noticed the R&D spending is up noticeably in Q2. Just wondering what are the mechanics that are driving that on the R&D line

Capex InvestmentMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Obstler cited successful early-year recruiting execution plus FX impact from Paris R&D center. Q3 OI benefits from DASH timing ($13M in Q2) and cloud efficiency gains. Pomel added AI training/inference spending is growing within R&D.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you comment on the opportunity that might open up for Datadog if that sheer volume of applications being put into production starts to rise

Show response

Pomel argued AI shifts value from writing code to validating and observing it in production, which is core to Datadog's business.

What do you attribute that level of booking strengths to, it's a quarter where you have the specter of a trade war

Revenue GrowthMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Obstler attributed strength to strong pipeline, expanded go-to-market investment, and product strength enabling consolidation.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm curious how you're feeling overall about the book of business for AI native customers

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel explained AI native renewals involved higher commits, better terms, and usage optimization simultaneously, typical of larger customers at renewal time.

I'm just wondering if you felt the timing of the holidays, excuse me, had any impact on December

Show response

Pomel noted Datadog is meaningfully outgrowing the non-GPU part of hyperscaler business and is driven by digital transformation.

TWLOTwilio Inc.9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you thinking about the headcount that's going to be required to run the business

Labor MarketMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Aidan said headcount has been roughly flat for 2 or 3 years and should stay there, AI inference costs are manageable, and SaaS tooling costs should not grow meaningfully.

Calendar 2025 Q4

What is driving it, the shape of that adoption curve? And then remind us of any real economics to Twilio.

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Khozema said RCS is growing off a small base and sees marketing and small-business use cases ahead, but did not quantify the economics to Twilio.

where do you think the Achilles heels have been for your peers who are struggling in this kind of environment

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Khozema declined to assess rivals and credited developer experience, innovation and data context; Thomas cited $500,000-plus customers up 36%.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you seeing anything there that would cause you to think that messaging customers are going to expand toward RCS

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CRO said ISV customers are shifting some traffic to RCS with strong results, called it early innings, and expects the holiday season to be a proof point.

which part of this voice AI waive -- do those companies want Twilio to handle

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO said it ranges from bare voice infrastructure to the full ConversationRelay stack; AI-native firms lean on infrastructure, and voice is gross margin accretive.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you not seeing any impact of less consumers taking flights or less people dining out

ChallengingMacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO said daily data through April show no slowdown, travel is a small share of revenue, and conservatism was built into the second half.

Can you help us understand in a case like that, how exactly are they using Twilio?

Show response

CEO said AI companies first attach to the voice stack, then add voice intelligence and Segment profiles for customer care, citing Cedar as an example.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is that AI business driving any tangible tailwind to revenue growth, you know, for instance, is it greater than

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management said AI use cases span 2FA to vertical AI startups and voice, but AI is not yet a huge revenue tailwind.

how commonly do you think we're gonna see that this kind of a huge prepayment?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said prepayments are episodic, used opportunistically with strategic vendors to secure better pricing and terms, not an every-Q4 pattern.

WDAYWorkday, Inc.7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
WDAY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm curious how you -- how your picture is shaping the next chapter for Workday, specifically as it relates to differentiating the AI strategy

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Aneel emphasized the core is rock solid and acquired agents are generating rapid growth. Organic agents in early access are even more deeply embedded and harder to replicate. Gerrit described 'lights out finance' vision with continuous AI compliance autopilot and document-driven accounting automation.

Calendar 2025 Q4

we're hearing some feedback that the venture-backed vibe creating startups have started seeing a slowdown or at least that some of them have or elevated churn

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Carl said CXOs cite data quality, data integrity, and security as top barriers to enterprise AI adoption, none of which are issues for Workday. Customers are returning to trusted platform vendors rather than evaluating point AI solutions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you mentioned the launch of Workday Government. I think you said as a wholly owned subsidiary

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Carl explained the subsidiary structure demonstrates focus to government customers and has been very well received in D.C. Building a specific cloud environment with higher security levels. Engagement spans DoD, intelligence agencies and civilian agencies.

Calendar 2025 Q2

wondering if you can comment on the adoption of Xtend and Xtend Pro. Are you seeing signs of customers building deeper customizations there

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Carl confirmed Extend Pro more than doubled YoY, with growing customer and partner innovation on the platform. Also highlighted Workday Wellness, Global Payroll Connect, and marketplace expansion.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I wanted to ask if you can walk us through the vision and the scale of the investment that you think is required for the agent system of record

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Carl explained restructuring savings are being redirected specifically into Agent System of Record and AI. David confirmed strong interest from both customers and partners in managing third-party agents.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how those agencies might be interpreting, if you've heard anything, the stated plans of this Department of Government efficiency

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Carl argued that DOGE push for efficiency will drive migration from on-premises legacy systems to cloud, positioning it as a tailwind rather than headwind.

is there any possibility you might have detected stabilization or any uptick in any employment indicators in your customer base

Labor MarketMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Zane confirmed employment trends have stabilized but not improved, consistent with their planning assumptions. Still seeing increased deal scrutiny globally.

ADBEAdobe Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
ADBE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you speak to the revenue acceleration, we were not expecting to see revenue accelerate quite yet

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Shantanu cited product innovation driving new user adoption, enterprise pipeline with GenStudio and AEP growing 30%, and improved ARR-to-revenue translation. Stock business is approximately $450 million; excluding it, ARR growth would have been 11.2% vs 10.9%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you speak to how customers are starting to use foundry in the early stages and perhaps just what type of economic potential that might be able to unleash for Adobe

Show response

David gave a detailed media company example: customer spending $10M ARR on creative products added $7M in Firefly services and Foundry. Models trained in 2-3 months as managed services, driving content production efficiency and new revenue-bearing opportunities like social shorts personalization.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I noticed on the Adobe Stock website that the volume of video content really took off during Q2

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David described expanding Stock with creative missions for video content. Emphasized Firefly's advantage in enterprise selection due to quality, controllability, and IP safety.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you think it's going to be the same composition or is something going to be coming in from the video models

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Shantanu confirmed video model is part of Firefly app and will contribute to the AI book of business, with more color to come at FA meeting.

What is giving you the resilience to reaffirm the FY '25 guidance

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Shantanu emphasized digital transformation remains fundamental regardless of macro turbulence, with technology helping companies on both top-line growth and efficiency.

AKAMAkamai Technologies5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

has this been brewing for a while in the pipeline, or have these been faster? What changed that brought this business to your doorstep seemingly quickly?

Show response

Tom said this was always the strategy, deploying distributed inference and compute platform desired by enterprises across the spectrum. Akamai's customer base features world's largest enterprises that spend 10x or more on compute than traditional delivery and security services. Platform has reached the point where it can deliver these results, with more expected going forward.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you see any changes in the competitive dynamics there? Is that improving for you guys versus the hyperscalers?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tom said no fundamental change in competitive dynamics, Akamai has competed successfully against hyperscalers for over a decade in delivery and security, with 2 of 3 being large Akamai customers. Now adding compute where all 3 use Akamai for distributed performance. Ed added it's not zero-sum, new inference workloads are expanding the market. Customers need ultra-low latency within a couple hundred miles, which differs from even traditional CDN requirements. Akamai is becoming a real player in this growing market.

Can you help us understand what those newer verticals are? And then are those coming more from the direct sell motion or from the channel?

Show response

Ed listed life sciences, manufacturing, health care, and industrials as newer verticals, companies that typically don't have large websites but spend heavily on compute and are good security customers. Mix of channel (including NVIDIA referrals) and direct motion. Strong customer interest and curiosity with many proofs of concept underway. Customers believe Akamai has a right to win in this space.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If we think about it organically, should we pencil out something like maybe mid- to high-single-digits organically

Show response

Ed confirmed mid-to-high single digits organic with about 1% from inorganic M&A. Not anticipating large acquisitions, more tuck-ins like Noname and Guardicore.

whether you see any signs of that opening up kind of a broader wave of experimentation for doing edge inferencing on Akamai compute

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom said DeepSeek validates their edge compute strategy, with entities already running it on Akamai. Lighter-weight models enable more edge use cases.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is the margin profile of those previously signed contracts slightly different than originally contemplated?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management said deals are priced with purchase orders and power costs locked in, protecting margins; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I'm curious what you're hearing in the marketplace just in terms of how those Blackwell-based models are coming along.

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management expects step-function model performance gains as Grace Blackwell clusters scale; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is it a shortage of power or manpower? Is it something outside of that with GPUs or memory or storage?

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management said the constraint is powered shells, not power itself, and expects ample power for years; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q2

did you mean that those expansions are already reflected in the Q2 backlog figures?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management clarified one expansion is in Q2 backlog and the other will land in Q3; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Could you unpack that a little bit and perhaps give us some insight into the nature of those customers?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management declined to name specific clients but pointed to a broad cross-section of enterprise adoption; partial detail.

Show 9 more companies
NOWServiceNow5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how will you measure and kind of derive that assist AI revenue stream? Just going forward under the new methodology

Show response

Amit explained AI is embedded in all tiers; incremental Assist contribution is measured the same way as before. Gina confirmed exact same methodology with $1.5B target.

Can you double click on what exactly you saw during Q1 amidst the Iran war?

MacroeconomicRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bill explained on-prem recognition creates lumpiness, said conversations are active and no long-term concern. Gina added full year guide was maintained despite conflict.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are you seeing signs that customers might use that as the central control plane for all of their agents, including third-party agents from OpenAI and Microsoft and others.

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bill confirmed AI Control Tower manages both ServiceNow and third-party agents working collaboratively across business processes. Amit added Nemotron model improves reasoning speed while customers retain choice of any LLM.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Bill, I wanted to ask you how grand are your aspirations in the front office market because you're speaking to just a huge breadth of capabilities.

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bill described ServiceNow's CRM strategy as a fully integrated AI-powered front office connecting sales and service, citing the Logik.ai acquisition for CPQ. Amit reinforced that legacy CRM systems can't keep up with modern AI-driven workflows.

Calendar 2024 Q4

regarding the DeepSeek models, I'm very interested how you're assessing this moment where we have a Chinese AI model. It seems to perform well at a fraction of the cost, and I'm curious, if it's so...

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bill framed LLM cost declines as a positive for ServiceNow since differentiation happens at the application layer. Amit confirmed the platform is architecturally model-agnostic. Gina noted continued margin accretion despite AI investment.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you describe the $400 million deal in terms of the customer type

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Sridhar said the $400M-plus deal reflects Snowflake's maturity as a durable provider; Brian noted it was an existing customer.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you kind of seeing that sort of, you know, tying explicitly from customers of their Snowflake Inc. investments to the AI investment?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sridhar described a narrative shift where Snowflake sits at the center of customers' enterprise AI strategy.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you walk us through the underlying dynamic? Does that reflect pipeline growth stepping up proportionately?

Show response

Mike said first-half hiring exceeded the prior two years combined, focused on productive reps and SEs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are you hiring into a pipeline that is strengthening around Cortex or Snowpark or some other opportunity

Show response

Mike said Q1 is always the biggest hiring quarter and reflects confidence, contingent on productivity.

Calendar 2024 Q4

It's impressive to see the strength here simultaneously in both the consumption revenue and the bookings

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike attributed strength to broad-based demand plus early Iceberg and Snowpark contribution across verticals.

MSFTMicrosoft Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
MSFT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

the 200 accelerator for inference looked quite remarkable

Innovation & R&DMarginCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Nadella stressed end-to-end silicon-model co-design with the superintelligence team; Microsoft will keep NVIDIA and AMD in the fleet to maintain TCO leadership and avoid lock-in.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you evaluate the ability of those companies to follow through on these commitments

DemandCapital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Nadella said fleet fungibility plus balance between 1P, 3P, enterprise and digital natives mitigates concentration; Hood added fleet is flexible and delivery is phased.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the DeepSeek moment is a real thing

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Nadella framed software as the 10x amplifier on top of Moore's Law; Hood said depreciable life changes need longer history but acknowledged software drives most of the useful-life gains.

Calendar 2024 Q3

should we infer that the supply is constraining Azure growth by roughly a couple of few points in Q2

Supply ChainCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Amy said not to think in component terms; the pushout is third parties delivering end-to-end supply later, mostly into H2/Q3, alongside the Q1 accounting benefit.

PATHUiPath Inc.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

how did your U.S. Federal business perform? Did it grow faster or slower than the broader business?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management declined to disclose federal segment numbers but said renewals were on track amid ongoing budget-finalization pressure.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do you think this incremental uncertainty is kind of going to make customers a little bit less reluctant to invest

DemandMacroeconomicCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ari (on for Mark Murphy) asked about tech-investment reluctance; Dines said uncertainty applies to all investments but customer pull toward agentic remains strong, with Gupta noting tightening budgets and controls.

do you see any difference in the impact of these stressors to the US versus Europe

MacroeconomicGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ari (on for Mark Murphy) asked about regional differences; Gupta said the pressure is broad-based globally, with more pronounced sensitivity among Canadian customers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you comment on whether any of that activity might drive some UiPath usage

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel framed UiPath as the 'Switzerland of agents,' orchestrating its own and third-party agents; conceptual, no quantified usage uplift.

CRMSalesforce, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
CRM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

We haven't heard anyone saying that they reduced headcount by close to 40% there like you have

Cloud & AILabor MarketCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Marc cited timing, industry nonsense creating FUD, and fear of organizational change as barriers, sharing Adecco and Schneider examples from his European roadshow.

Calendar 2025 Q2

The CEO of Anthropic Re recently commented that AI could wipe out fifty percent of entry level white collar jobs

Cloud & AILabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Marc pushed back on alarmist AI job displacement claims, noting AI is built on word models with inherent accuracy limits and cited Salesforce redeploying support staff.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much labor do you think you can augment to replace, for instance, could a company with 1,000 employees

Cloud & AILabor MarketDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marc used Salesforce as proof point citing 30% engineering productivity gains and no new engineering hires, while planning 10-20% sales org growth from strong demand.

INTUIntuit3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I assume you mean that more as a timing difference this season, perhaps because I think some of the reports are showing that IRS staffing is down 27% versus last year

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sandeep confirmed timing difference and compared to prior year (IRS down 8pts, TT up 4%). On macro: hours worked up ~4% and stronger in January than October, cash reserves stable, mid-market up ~6%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you speak to whether you see ongoing runway to continue that type of motion where you're chipping away a couple of few points of share every year

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan cited TurboTax-Credit Karma platform convergence, Lightbox innovation where financial institutions embed proprietary credit models, and untapped money monetization opportunities.

Calendar 2024 Q4

On the QuickBooks Enterprise Suite, it's clearly showing robustness. Sasan, how's the early response you're seeing

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan shared overwhelmingly positive IES feedback from CFOs and owners. Key value: real-time business visibility (from days to minutes) and full digitization across payments, payroll, and bill pay.

NETCloudflare, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

we noticed that Cloudflare is upgrading its security to be quantum safe so that data stays protected even when quantum computers eventually arrive, whenever that's going to be. I'm wondering if you...

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prince described partnering with Google to develop post-quantum cryptography standards submitted to IETF and NIST. Already rolled out across entire Cloudflare network for all customers. Key risk is store-now-decrypt-later attacks, particularly important for government customers. Forward-leaning rather than science project.

You mentioned egress fees I think last call and again, this call, I should say, the elimination of egress fees. It feels like you're winning some real business that's partly tied to that

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prince explained hyperscalers maintain high egress fees to keep data captive despite dropping bandwidth costs. R2 object store allows customers to move data freely across multi-cloud environments, positioning Cloudflare as the connective fabric for secure, efficient multi-cloud operations.

Calendar 2025 Q1

we were looking at your stats, it looked like they were up more than 300% year-over-year. And the complexity looks like it went off the charts

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prince explained architectural advantage: every server runs every function vs competitors' separate scrubbing centers. Bandwidth cost model means DDoS attacks don't increase costs.

FIGFigma, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
FIG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

if your customers are developing a clear understanding of some of the limitations of those competing products

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dylan agreed, tying Figma's edge to Code Connect and design systems that carry into production code.

ORCLOracle Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
ORCL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what do you view as the right strategy for trying to optimize the location of your data centers

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Clay explained that for AI workloads, extra latency from remote locations is negligible vs model thinking time. Hardware architecture innovation (GROQ, Cerebras) matters more than location for latency reduction.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DDOG Datadog120%none of 12 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.911%1 of 9 questions
WDAY Workday, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
ADBE Adobe Inc.50%none of 5 questions
AKAM Akamai Technologies50%none of 5 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock50%none of 5 questions
NOW ServiceNow50%none of 5 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.50%none of 5 questions
MSFT Microsoft Corporation40%none of 4 questions
PATH UiPath Inc.40%none of 4 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • WDAY
    Workday, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • ADBE
    Adobe Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • MSFT
    Microsoft Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 15 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CRM Salesforce, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
INTU Intuit30%none of 3 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
FIG Figma, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
ORCL Oracle Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CRM
    Salesforce, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • FIG
    Figma, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • ORCL
    Oracle Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4120%none of 12 questions8
2025 Q1147%1 of 14 questions10
2025 Q2110%none of 11 questions9
2025 Q3100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q4120%none of 12 questions9
2026 Q1120%none of 12 questions10
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q114 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 10 companies
  4. 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
  5. 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  6. 2025 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 9 companies
  7. 2026 Q112 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 10 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI38
  • Demand21
  • Competitive Dynamics21
  • Revenue Growth11
  • Innovation & R&D11
  • Macroeconomic8
  • Labor Market7
  • Capex Investment5
  • Product Launch5
  • Margin4
Show all 18 topics
  • Subscriber Growth4
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Pricing2
  • Supply Chain2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • M&A1