Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Michael Turrin
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 77on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%4 of 77 questions
- Companies
- 16questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 77 of 77 questions from 16 companies
ADSKAutodesk9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
where the company stands in terms of technology replatforming and evolution of the pricing model
Show response
Andrew described readiness for a blended subscription/consumption world and integration capability that makes MaintainX a natural fit. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you speak to what's driving the strength there
Show response
Janesh highlighted make business at 23% growth (construction + Fusion), with construction accelerating. Continued multi-seat adoption strategy in manufacturing, strong extension feature adoption, and AutoConstrain driving productivity. Broad-based strength.
Calendar 2025 Q4
maybe just expand on your perspective around what's driving that and how much of that is beyond the scope of just macro and business model changes
Show response
Janesh attributed Q3 to consistent momentum and prudent guidance assumptions not materializing. AutoCAD strength from NTM mechanics, Autodesk store, and emerging markets. Andrew emphasized results reflect three years of strategic business model and go-to-market transformation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm just wondering if you can help us at all parse whether any of that could be tied to macro settling a bit
Show response
Andrew attributed strength to Autodesk's diversification across built and rebuilt world, with data centers/industrial/infrastructure offsetting commercial softness. Need to build not going away.
Is that a bit more pronounced to Q4 than what you were previously expecting?
Show response
Janesh confirmed slightly more Q4-weighted FCF, reflecting EBA and product subscription renewal collection timing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was just curious if you'd be able to compare and contrast what you're seeing across geos at all
Show response
Andrew noted APAC softness from Japan still absorbing NTM impacts and China/Korea more exposed to trade uncertainty. Other regions broadly as expected.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how you ensure you're making the right level of change there, balancing efficiency with preserving the continuity
Show response
Andrew emphasized long-term framing, reinvestment in future capabilities, risk factored into guidance, and ongoing optimizations continuing into next year.
any perspective you can add given it is early in your tenure, so decision process that went into this
Show response
Janesh explained the framework retirement as intellectual honesty, the company hasn't reached the mid-to-high end of the range in recent years, making the framework misleading.
Calendar 2024 Q4
wondering if there are any added details you can provide for us on, just the overall macro spend environment
Show response
Andrew characterized macro as consistent with prior quarters, while Betsy noted noise from transaction model and elections makes it hard to parse specific trends.
ADBEAdobe Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
when you attempt to capture more of the value via price versus letting the freemium strategy continue to run.
Show response
Anil described a data-driven model optimizing conversion timing and paywall tuning after first proving value to newly acquired users.
how to think about the uptick in implied net new ARR for Q4 relative to what we saw in Q3?
Show response
Steven reaffirmed Q4 as the seasonally strong enterprise quarter, consistent with the prior second-half 10.2% ARR shape.
Calendar 2026 Q2
the decision to defer line optimizations on Creative Cloud I assume we are coming up on just potential price increase
Show response
Shantanu quantified the trade-off, attributing roughly half the ARR impact to the Creative Cloud deferral and half to the freemium push.
with Daniel leaving, I think we are going to feel questions on how the company manages through this level of transition
Show response
Shantanu directly addressed continuity, citing a seasoned finance team and confidence the company will not miss a beat.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what the team's thoughts are on potentially taking margin down to grow faster
Show response
Shantanu said Adobe is investing more marketing in Firefly and Express where data-driven operating model shows clear ROI. Also tracking internal token usage as efficiency metric. Below-the-surface efficiency gains fund incremental growth investment while maintaining margin profile.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Mentioned credit consumption up 3x this quarter. I was just hoping to hear a bit more around what you're seeing from an overall consumption perspective
Show response
David outlined a four-factor growth multiplier: apps with generative capabilities, media types supported, use cases integrated, and number of models available. Huge inflection in video consumption specifically. Seeing increasing user upgrades to higher price plans and credit pack add-ons.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Why aren't you seeing degradation from AI adoption, given some of the metrics you're providing
Show response
Dan cited focused prioritization on growth vectors, GPU training fleet utilization optimization, inferencing cost management, and internal AI-driven productivity gains.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping you could just maybe expand on how you're thinking about the adoption curve of those efforts
Show response
David outlined three differentiators (commercially safe, control, integration) and described video model tiering opportunity and Firefly Services enterprise traction. Dan confirmed these are meaningful contributors to FY2025 guide.
IOTSamsara Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
if you could kind of help us parse where the product interest, if there were certain verticals or announcements
Show response
Sanjit said new products were >20% of bookings, spread across products with none over 50%. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q2
one of the questions we field most often is just how to think about the durability of what you're delivering
Show response
Dominic pointed to multiple growth vectors, large customers (62% of ARR), emerging products (more than 20% of net new ACV) and international (18%), sustaining ~30% growth.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just help us understand where the sources of upside came from? And if anything at all, surprised you
Show response
Dominic answered directly: large deals, record 13 $1M-plus transactions, multiproduct strength and emerging products drove upside.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just speak to what's enabling that from a product perspective and how significant a competitive advantage
Show response
Sanjit tied large-customer momentum to years of R&D and go-to-market investment in scale, security and data handling plus a partner-style sales motion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
hear you speak more to where your customers fit within those end markets and how you're prioritizing that opportunity
Show response
Sanjit named construction, field services and electric utilities as build-out beneficiaries, plus public-sector wins as agencies wake up to efficiency savings.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you just speak to what you're seeing within those emerging verticals that's resonating in the current environment
Show response
Sanjit said construction and public-sector demand is driven by efficiency needs (fuel savings, insurance claims) in historically under-digitized verticals.
Calendar 2024 Q4
help us think through the ARR scale the current product set can address
Show response
Dominic cited deep under-penetration, >50% of U.S. commercial vehicles lack telematics, 90% lack video safety, plus $150 million-plus ARR in non-vehicle products.
TYLTyler Technologies7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I think what stands out is the new SaaS ACV and Flips ACV growth. So I’m just curious, Brian, how durable is that
Show response
Miller conceded the easier first half comps and harder second half comps while defending the absolute record bookings.
you’ve now bought back more than 5.5% of shares outstanding year-to-date. Just maybe speak to how
Show response
Moore ranked buybacks above other uses of capital and signalled continued repurchases to reduce and hold share count lower.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to just go back to the SaaS revenue line there. Given the initial guidance looks for a bit of a reacceleration in the coming years.
Show response
Brian deconstructed SaaS guidance: ~13% from prior bookings already in hand, ~3-4% from flips with good visibility, balance from new bookings in pipeline. Majority from things already booked gives high confidence around growth.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are the key drivers to bridge that gap from the current 2 to 3 products that customers kind of have right now?
Show response
Lynn cited single cloud version consolidation, sales approach restructuring, client experience initiatives under new Chief Client Officer Andrew Call, and One Tyler approach to client success. Called it significant 5-10 year opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Was that 200 basis points for the full year, just given the change in the second half assumptions
Show response
Brian confirmed 200bps is full-year impact from $55M lower cash taxes. Q3 remains biggest FCF quarter from maintenance renewals. Minimal federal cash taxes through 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Lynn mentioned some Q4 pull forward. So it sounds like maybe it's more of that than the consulting commentary that may have had an impact on Q1.
Show response
Brian confirmed consultant-driven delays are anecdotal, not a major driver. Expects pickup of awarded-but-unsigned deals in Q2.
Calendar 2024 Q4
The initial 2025 guide for overall growth, Brian, of 8.5% doesn't at least appear to fully capture some of that momentum.
Show response
Brian emphasized high-value revenue lines driving growth (SaaS 21-24%, transactions 10-12% ex-Texas ~17%), while maintenance and services decline as expected.
WDAYWorkday, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I am curious where Workday fits within those discussions, if any of that
Show response
Aneel declined to comment on PE; Gerrit said Workday is model-agnostic, deploys open-weight and frontier models, and started its own research lab.
Calendar 2026 Q2
maybe just speak to the progress and what you are seeing within flex credit or agentic usage or some of the efforts there
Show response
Aneel credited the product team for building the right AI infrastructure, with organic agents like self-service and deployment agent gaining traction. Zane noted margin benefits from revenue outperformance plus AI-driven productivity gains across R&D, customer success, and go-to-market.
Calendar 2026 Q1
whether you're able to offset just lower seat growth environment if that's the world we're in with more product expansion
Show response
Rob said pushed deals are elongated not lost. Gerrit described two AI economic models: efficiency gains transferring labor costs to software costs (Self-Service Agent reducing case volume 20%+), and solving unsolved problems (contract intelligence optimizing procurement spend). Both delivering tangible ROI.
Calendar 2025 Q4
just I wanted to zoom in on some of the early feedback around Paradox and Asana, just what you're hearing from customers coming out of Rising
Show response
Carl said Paradox demand at EMEA Rising was very strong. Sana has three vectors: AI learning platform for 4,000+ existing Workday Learning customers, new conversational UI experience for Workday, and enterprise-wide knowledge management with Pipedream's 3,000 connectors. Zane confirmed no change to financial framework.
Calendar 2025 Q2
the billings growth we're looking at looks maybe a touch lighter in terms of Q1. I realize it tends to step down seasonally
Show response
Zane explained billings variability driven by payment terms and flexible payments in growing industries like education. In line with expectations and OCF guide.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just kind of speak to the trade-offs you're evaluating currently and then how we should think about those in the context of the overall margin potential
Show response
Zane explained the 28% FY26 margin is on the path to 30%+ by FY27, balancing AI investment with operational scaling. Looking at efficiencies across every part of the organization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
maybe if you could add some more context and what informs the Q4 guide given just a bigger seasonal profile for Workday there
Show response
Zane noted cRPO growth exceeded their expected range and FX impact is limited given US-heavy revenue mix. Carl highlighted solid pipeline and AI momentum heading into Q4.
TWLOTwilio Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are those fairly immediate for us to consider when we're kind of updating models from here going forward?
Show response
CEO said self-serve price rises act fast and enterprise pricing follows renewals; CFO added Verizon fees cost roughly 50 basis points of margin in Q3 and Q4.
I'd just be curious to get your updated view on the durability and drivers of growth profile you're delivering
Show response
CEO said growth is durable across industries, customers and geographies with no single driver, but back-half comparisons are harder and he would not guide beyond the year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
The second half is sort of a more conservative growth assumption.
Show response
CFO said only part of the Q1 beat flowed into the guide as conservatism for macro factors, not because the second half looks weaker than a quarter ago.
specifically on drivers of upside to growth in the communications segment you saw in Q1
Show response
CFO said Q1 strength was broad, led by U.S. and international messaging, with all top five verticals growing and trends holding through April.
Calendar 2024 Q4
speaking the ways you aim to ensure the growth improvements you're seeing prove durable
Show response
CFO said Q4 growth was broad across products, industries and regions with political offset by Zipwhip, and the 7% to 8% guide reflects prudent usage-based planning.
are you confident in ability to continue deliver some level of gross margin expansion as you progress
Show response
Blamed Q4 on holiday hosting costs and messaging mix; the 2027 operating margin framework assumes roughly flat gross margins, not expansion.
Show 10 more companies
CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
help us think through the linearity of capacity added. And when that 300 megawatts added in June started to hit more of a steady state in terms of model contribution
Show response
Management said the ~500 MW added in Q2 was back-end loaded, with 300 MW in June alone, so the revenue contribution flows through in Q3 and Q4; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just speak to what gives you confidence in the $30 billion run rate by 2027?
Show response
Management said the 2027 run-rate target is built from contracted power and already-sold contracts plus 2027 additions; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q3
does this at all impact the cadence at which you're able to sign on new customers
Show response
Management said the single-site delay does not affect new-customer signings given a parallelized build; answered directly.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how often is it the case that you can find a customer scale to move the needle sequentially there
Show response
Management pointed to large, heavily negotiated step-function contracts but gave no cadence; partial.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how you're thinking about go-to-market as the business scales and the opportunity to tap into broader enterprise.
Show response
Management described extending the client universe down the enterprise long tail via Weights and Biases; answered directly.
FIGFigma, Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
given the rise in focus around open source and open weight models, if there's anything you see there that could potentially help further improve the overall position of Make
Show response
Dylan said first-party models (incl. open-source post-trains) can improve latency, quality and cost; Praveer framed margin as cyclical with investment.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I've gotten some questions on just the free cash flow comment you made in terms of the guide.
Show response
Praveer tied the FCF guide to a full year of AI-feature costs, partly offset over time by AI credit monetization.
Can you just speak to what you're seeing from customers using Make and the user types that you're seeing?
Show response
Dylan said Make is pulling PMs, UX researchers and internal-tool builders into Figma, a seat-expansion opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the 4Q guide looks stronger than we were expecting. It doesn't sound like make or consumption is a
Show response
Praveer attributed Q4 strength to new full-seat users and more paid teams; Weavy is immaterial to the guide.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're thinking about use of cash given just the $1.6 billion you have on the balance sheet currently
Show response
Praveer cited flexibility to invest in AI and go-to-market; Dylan laid out a three-criteria bar for large-scale M&A.
PATHUiPath Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how much more deployment capacity are you guys getting per FTE? And does that change any of your hiring plans
Show response
Asked how much deployment capacity coding agents add per FTE and whether it changes hiring plans; Dines said it is still a proving stage and framed the benefit as customer time-to-value, not headcount.
Calendar 2026 Q2
just on the net retention rate, just what you're seeing currently in the uptick there and how to think about the trend line
Show response
Direct: Ashim highlighted the first NDR increase in a while as net new ARR stabilizes, framing it as the step toward reacceleration.
just in terms of public sector, as we roll into midyear, maybe just remind us how you're thinking about public sector
Show response
Direct: Ashim said public-sector budget stability is good and UiPath has strong agency relationships, while guiding prudently to funded projects.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what you're seeing around categories like automation and AI, it would be great to get just a top-down view
Show response
Daniel framed Maestro as a differentiated process-orchestration engine and said coding agents will accelerate adoption.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how should we think about those as a potential offset? And maybe just speak overall to how you're
Show response
Gupta attributed the ARR delta to macro and public-sector factors, said execution has stabilized, and noted AI/agentic momentum but cautioned it won't be a material fiscal 2026 revenue contributor.
INTUIntuit4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
any commentary you can add on how we should think about the shape of pricing on that line?
Show response
Sandeep noted pricing consistent across quarters. Customer attrition below expectations post-price changes. Q2 margin shift driven by consumer marketing timing to maximize ROI. H1 total ahead of consensus on both revenue and EBIT.
Calendar 2025 Q2
would be good to hear you just speak through the impact you are seeing across segments, whether any of the headcount optimization you entered the year with
Show response
Sandeep cited broad-based margin strength from strong revenue performance and AI-driven productivity gains across technology, finance, marketing, and sales. Still early chapters.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you're thinking about capturing the value of those, whether it's through monetization
Show response
Sasan outlined three value vectors: improved conversion, better retention, and higher services adoption. Future potential for standalone done-for-you SKUs at separate pricing.
is there any way to help just split how much of that is macro versus something product-specific
Show response
Sandeep attributed the Credit Karma recovery roughly 50/50 to macro (stable rates helping personal loans) and product (go-to-market, insurance segment expansion starting Q3 FY2024).
NOWServiceNow4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
On the Q2 upside, you mentioned the Fed outperformance. And I guess the question is that strength at all
Show response
Gina addressed it directly, clarifying some on-prem was timing but the beat also reflected strong net new ACV, and Fed pipe looks good into Q3.
Calendar 2026 Q1
walk us through some of the feedback you're hearing from customers initially and help us think through the time it takes
Show response
Bill cited Moveworks quintupling business in one quarter. Gina confirmed prudent guidance on new acquisitions with significant upside expected into 2027 and beyond.
Calendar 2025 Q3
The one question we're getting is around the fourth quarter subscription revenue guide for 18%. That number is a touch lower than where the cRPO growth rates overall seem to be settling.
Show response
Gina cited public sector prudence and on-prem dynamics as factors in Q4. Brief response, noted the full Q3 beat was passed through to full year and prior raises cumulate, but did not fully bridge the cRPO-to-revenue gap.
Calendar 2025 Q1
you also mentioned AI driving meaningful OPEX efficiencies. I'm just curious if you could speak to those a bit more and whether that gives you more confidence in the ability to continue to expand m...
Show response
Gina highlighted consistent 100bp annual margin expansion, noted operating margin guide holds even with expected M&A-related OpEx in H2. Current AI efficiencies are just a small piece of long-term potential.
TEAMAtlassian4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
maybe you could compare and contrast how fiscal '25 closed for us relative to some of the execution risk you're embedding?
Show response
Joe detailed RPO growing to $3.3B (+38% YoY), 74% recognized in next 12 months (+29% YoY). Q4 cloud outperformed on paid seat expansion, cross-sell, and migrations. SMB and enterprise seat expansion rates demonstrated quarter-to-quarter stability.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the gross margin and the free cash flow margin stand out this quarter. I'm just curious if you can speak a bit to what you're seeing
Show response
Joe attributed 86% gross margins to price increases, premium upsell, and engineering-driven cloud infrastructure optimization. Savings described as structural.
Calendar 2024 Q4
any commentary you can add on how things like expansion or tracking relative to what you're expecting
Show response
Joe confirmed stable trends across SMB and enterprise, with conservative guidance approach unchanged for H2 given macro uncertainty and GTM execution risk.
Calendar 2024 Q3
how much of the Atlassian user base this could eventually address over a much longer period of time
Show response
Mike cited the cloud platform, Teamwork Graph, Forge extensibility, and enterprise search engine as durable competitive advantages enabling Rovo's differentiation.
PANWPalo Alto Networks2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how you approach that exercise given the inflection points taking shape across cyber
Show response
Nikesh said guidance is set thoughtfully against consensus with the expectation of exceeding it, and Dipak described an established, multi-input process (pipeline, territory and resource planning) rather than specific baseline assumptions.
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are the key metrics you'd point us to, to help us gauge progress as you continue to work towards those opportunities
Show response
Nikesh emphasized durable long-term demand but cautioned against a near-term windfall, expecting robust rather than explosive growth.
SNOWSnowflake Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I'm curious if you think that metric is at all turning a corner with optimizations fading into the background
Show response
Mike declined to guide NRR, attributing the uptick to large customers migrating new workloads.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I want to ask about that metric just in context with the go-to-market shift towards consumption.
Show response
Mike declined to guide NRR but said it feels stable, driven by core business and older customers adopting new features.
CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
The 1 q ARR was strong but a bit closer to the guide, especially relative to how the full year numbers went up.
Show response
George cited AIDR momentum and a full executive briefing center; Burt pointed to fundamentals and pipeline rather than a precise visibility framework.
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Impressive to hear expectations for flat operating margin in the upcoming year as you absorb some of the mix shift
Show response
Hood grounded margin in revenue growth from competitive product, S-curve efficiencies across the stack, and talent focused on high-TAM markets.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ADSK Autodesk | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| ADBE Adobe Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| IOT Samsara Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TYL Tyler Technologies | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| WDAY Workday, Inc. | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TWLO Twilio Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| FIG Figma, Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| PATH UiPath Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| INTU Intuit | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- ADSKAutodesk · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- ADBEAdobe Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- IOTSamsara Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- TYLTyler Technologies · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- WDAYWorkday, Inc. · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- TWLOTwilio Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- FIGFigma, Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- PATHUiPath Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- INTUIntuit · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Show all 16 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NOW ServiceNow | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| TEAM Atlassian | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- NOWServiceNow · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- TEAMAtlassian · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- PANWPalo Alto Networks · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- SNOWSnowflake Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MSFTMicrosoft Corporation · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 10 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 14 | 14%2 of 14 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q3 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 10 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth30
- Demand25
- Cloud & AI19
- Guidance Reliability15
- Margin14
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Macroeconomic7
- Pricing6
- Subscriber Growth5
- Capital Allocation4
Show all 21 topics
- Capex Investment4
- Innovation & R&D3
- Product Launch2
- Geographic Expansion2
- M&A2
- Cost Pressure2
- Regulation Policy2
- Labor Market1
- Supply Chain1
- Fx1
- Credit1