Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Michael Turrin

Wells Fargo · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).

Questions
77on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%4 of 77 questions
Companies
16questioned at least once
Reporting periods
9with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 77 of 77 questions from 16 companies

ADSKAutodesk9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
ADSK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

where the company stands in terms of technology replatforming and evolution of the pricing model

PricingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Andrew described readiness for a blended subscription/consumption world and integration capability that makes MaintainX a natural fit. Direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you speak to what's driving the strength there

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Janesh highlighted make business at 23% growth (construction + Fusion), with construction accelerating. Continued multi-seat adoption strategy in manufacturing, strong extension feature adoption, and AutoConstrain driving productivity. Broad-based strength.

Calendar 2025 Q4

maybe just expand on your perspective around what's driving that and how much of that is beyond the scope of just macro and business model changes

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Janesh attributed Q3 to consistent momentum and prudent guidance assumptions not materializing. AutoCAD strength from NTM mechanics, Autodesk store, and emerging markets. Andrew emphasized results reflect three years of strategic business model and go-to-market transformation.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm just wondering if you can help us at all parse whether any of that could be tied to macro settling a bit

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Andrew attributed strength to Autodesk's diversification across built and rebuilt world, with data centers/industrial/infrastructure offsetting commercial softness. Need to build not going away.

Is that a bit more pronounced to Q4 than what you were previously expecting?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Janesh confirmed slightly more Q4-weighted FCF, reflecting EBA and product subscription renewal collection timing.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was just curious if you'd be able to compare and contrast what you're seeing across geos at all

Geographic ExpansionMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Andrew noted APAC softness from Japan still absorbing NTM impacts and China/Korea more exposed to trade uncertainty. Other regions broadly as expected.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how you ensure you're making the right level of change there, balancing efficiency with preserving the continuity

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Andrew emphasized long-term framing, reinvestment in future capabilities, risk factored into guidance, and ongoing optimizations continuing into next year.

any perspective you can add given it is early in your tenure, so decision process that went into this

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Janesh explained the framework retirement as intellectual honesty, the company hasn't reached the mid-to-high end of the range in recent years, making the framework misleading.

Calendar 2024 Q4

wondering if there are any added details you can provide for us on, just the overall macro spend environment

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew characterized macro as consistent with prior quarters, while Betsy noted noise from transaction model and elections makes it hard to parse specific trends.

ADBEAdobe Inc.8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
ADBE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

when you attempt to capture more of the value via price versus letting the freemium strategy continue to run.

PricingSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Anil described a data-driven model optimizing conversion timing and paywall tuning after first proving value to newly acquired users.

how to think about the uptick in implied net new ARR for Q4 relative to what we saw in Q3?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Steven reaffirmed Q4 as the seasonally strong enterprise quarter, consistent with the prior second-half 10.2% ARR shape.

Calendar 2026 Q2

the decision to defer line optimizations on Creative Cloud I assume we are coming up on just potential price increase

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Shantanu quantified the trade-off, attributing roughly half the ARR impact to the Creative Cloud deferral and half to the freemium push.

with Daniel leaving, I think we are going to feel questions on how the company manages through this level of transition

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Shantanu directly addressed continuity, citing a seasoned finance team and confidence the company will not miss a beat.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what the team's thoughts are on potentially taking margin down to grow faster

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Shantanu said Adobe is investing more marketing in Firefly and Express where data-driven operating model shows clear ROI. Also tracking internal token usage as efficiency metric. Below-the-surface efficiency gains fund incremental growth investment while maintaining margin profile.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Mentioned credit consumption up 3x this quarter. I was just hoping to hear a bit more around what you're seeing from an overall consumption perspective

Show response

David outlined a four-factor growth multiplier: apps with generative capabilities, media types supported, use cases integrated, and number of models available. Huge inflection in video consumption specifically. Seeing increasing user upgrades to higher price plans and credit pack add-ons.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Why aren't you seeing degradation from AI adoption, given some of the metrics you're providing

Show response

Dan cited focused prioritization on growth vectors, GPU training fleet utilization optimization, inferencing cost management, and internal AI-driven productivity gains.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was hoping you could just maybe expand on how you're thinking about the adoption curve of those efforts

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

David outlined three differentiators (commercially safe, control, integration) and described video model tiering opportunity and Firefly Services enterprise traction. Dan confirmed these are meaningful contributors to FY2025 guide.

IOTSamsara Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
IOT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

if you could kind of help us parse where the product interest, if there were certain verticals or announcements

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Sanjit said new products were >20% of bookings, spread across products with none over 50%. Direct.

Calendar 2026 Q2

one of the questions we field most often is just how to think about the durability of what you're delivering

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Dominic pointed to multiple growth vectors, large customers (62% of ARR), emerging products (more than 20% of net new ACV) and international (18%), sustaining ~30% growth.

Calendar 2026 Q1

just help us understand where the sources of upside came from? And if anything at all, surprised you

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Dominic answered directly: large deals, record 13 $1M-plus transactions, multiproduct strength and emerging products drove upside.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you just speak to what's enabling that from a product perspective and how significant a competitive advantage

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sanjit tied large-customer momentum to years of R&D and go-to-market investment in scale, security and data handling plus a partner-style sales motion.

Calendar 2025 Q3

hear you speak more to where your customers fit within those end markets and how you're prioritizing that opportunity

Show response

Sanjit named construction, field services and electric utilities as build-out beneficiaries, plus public-sector wins as agencies wake up to efficiency savings.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just speak to what you're seeing within those emerging verticals that's resonating in the current environment

Show response

Sanjit said construction and public-sector demand is driven by efficiency needs (fuel savings, insurance claims) in historically under-digitized verticals.

Calendar 2024 Q4

help us think through the ARR scale the current product set can address

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dominic cited deep under-penetration, >50% of U.S. commercial vehicles lack telematics, 90% lack video safety, plus $150 million-plus ARR in non-vehicle products.

TYLTyler Technologies7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
TYL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I think what stands out is the new SaaS ACV and Flips ACV growth. So I’m just curious, Brian, how durable is that

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Miller conceded the easier first half comps and harder second half comps while defending the absolute record bookings.

you’ve now bought back more than 5.5% of shares outstanding year-to-date. Just maybe speak to how

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Moore ranked buybacks above other uses of capital and signalled continued repurchases to reduce and hold share count lower.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted to just go back to the SaaS revenue line there. Given the initial guidance looks for a bit of a reacceleration in the coming years.

Revenue GrowthCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Brian deconstructed SaaS guidance: ~13% from prior bookings already in hand, ~3-4% from flips with good visibility, balance from new bookings in pipeline. Majority from things already booked gives high confidence around growth.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are the key drivers to bridge that gap from the current 2 to 3 products that customers kind of have right now?

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Lynn cited single cloud version consolidation, sales approach restructuring, client experience initiatives under new Chief Client Officer Andrew Call, and One Tyler approach to client success. Called it significant 5-10 year opportunity.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Was that 200 basis points for the full year, just given the change in the second half assumptions

Capital AllocationRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brian confirmed 200bps is full-year impact from $55M lower cash taxes. Q3 remains biggest FCF quarter from maintenance renewals. Minimal federal cash taxes through 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Lynn mentioned some Q4 pull forward. So it sounds like maybe it's more of that than the consulting commentary that may have had an impact on Q1.

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Brian confirmed consultant-driven delays are anecdotal, not a major driver. Expects pickup of awarded-but-unsigned deals in Q2.

Calendar 2024 Q4

The initial 2025 guide for overall growth, Brian, of 8.5% doesn't at least appear to fully capture some of that momentum.

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brian emphasized high-value revenue lines driving growth (SaaS 21-24%, transactions 10-12% ex-Texas ~17%), while maintenance and services decline as expected.

WDAYWorkday, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
WDAY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

I am curious where Workday fits within those discussions, if any of that

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Aneel declined to comment on PE; Gerrit said Workday is model-agnostic, deploys open-weight and frontier models, and started its own research lab.

Calendar 2026 Q2

maybe just speak to the progress and what you are seeing within flex credit or agentic usage or some of the efforts there

Cloud & AIMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Aneel credited the product team for building the right AI infrastructure, with organic agents like self-service and deployment agent gaining traction. Zane noted margin benefits from revenue outperformance plus AI-driven productivity gains across R&D, customer success, and go-to-market.

Calendar 2026 Q1

whether you're able to offset just lower seat growth environment if that's the world we're in with more product expansion

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Rob said pushed deals are elongated not lost. Gerrit described two AI economic models: efficiency gains transferring labor costs to software costs (Self-Service Agent reducing case volume 20%+), and solving unsolved problems (contract intelligence optimizing procurement spend). Both delivering tangible ROI.

Calendar 2025 Q4

just I wanted to zoom in on some of the early feedback around Paradox and Asana, just what you're hearing from customers coming out of Rising

Show response

Carl said Paradox demand at EMEA Rising was very strong. Sana has three vectors: AI learning platform for 4,000+ existing Workday Learning customers, new conversational UI experience for Workday, and enterprise-wide knowledge management with Pipedream's 3,000 connectors. Zane confirmed no change to financial framework.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the billings growth we're looking at looks maybe a touch lighter in terms of Q1. I realize it tends to step down seasonally

Show response

Zane explained billings variability driven by payment terms and flexible payments in growing industries like education. In line with expectations and OCF guide.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just kind of speak to the trade-offs you're evaluating currently and then how we should think about those in the context of the overall margin potential

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Zane explained the 28% FY26 margin is on the path to 30%+ by FY27, balancing AI investment with operational scaling. Looking at efficiencies across every part of the organization.

Calendar 2024 Q4

maybe if you could add some more context and what informs the Q4 guide given just a bigger seasonal profile for Workday there

Show response

Zane noted cRPO growth exceeded their expected range and FX impact is limited given US-heavy revenue mix. Carl highlighted solid pipeline and AI momentum heading into Q4.

TWLOTwilio Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TWLO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are those fairly immediate for us to consider when we're kind of updating models from here going forward?

Show response

CEO said self-serve price rises act fast and enterprise pricing follows renewals; CFO added Verizon fees cost roughly 50 basis points of margin in Q3 and Q4.

I'd just be curious to get your updated view on the durability and drivers of growth profile you're delivering

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO said growth is durable across industries, customers and geographies with no single driver, but back-half comparisons are harder and he would not guide beyond the year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

The second half is sort of a more conservative growth assumption.

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO said only part of the Q1 beat flowed into the guide as conservatism for macro factors, not because the second half looks weaker than a quarter ago.

specifically on drivers of upside to growth in the communications segment you saw in Q1

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO said Q1 strength was broad, led by U.S. and international messaging, with all top five verticals growing and trends holding through April.

Calendar 2024 Q4

speaking the ways you aim to ensure the growth improvements you're seeing prove durable

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said Q4 growth was broad across products, industries and regions with political offset by Zipwhip, and the 7% to 8% guide reflects prudent usage-based planning.

are you confident in ability to continue deliver some level of gross margin expansion as you progress

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Blamed Q4 on holiday hosting costs and messaging mix; the 2027 operating margin framework assumes roughly flat gross margins, not expansion.

Show 10 more companies
CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

help us think through the linearity of capacity added. And when that 300 megawatts added in June started to hit more of a steady state in terms of model contribution

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management said the ~500 MW added in Q2 was back-end loaded, with 300 MW in June alone, so the revenue contribution flows through in Q3 and Q4; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you just speak to what gives you confidence in the $30 billion run rate by 2027?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management said the 2027 run-rate target is built from contracted power and already-sold contracts plus 2027 additions; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does this at all impact the cadence at which you're able to sign on new customers

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management said the single-site delay does not affect new-customer signings given a parallelized build; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how often is it the case that you can find a customer scale to move the needle sequentially there

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management pointed to large, heavily negotiated step-function contracts but gave no cadence; partial.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how you're thinking about go-to-market as the business scales and the opportunity to tap into broader enterprise.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management described extending the client universe down the enterprise long tail via Weights and Biases; answered directly.

FIGFigma, Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
FIG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

given the rise in focus around open source and open weight models, if there's anything you see there that could potentially help further improve the overall position of Make

Show response

Dylan said first-party models (incl. open-source post-trains) can improve latency, quality and cost; Praveer framed margin as cyclical with investment.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I've gotten some questions on just the free cash flow comment you made in terms of the guide.

ChallengingMarginCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Praveer tied the FCF guide to a full year of AI-feature costs, partly offset over time by AI credit monetization.

Can you just speak to what you're seeing from customers using Make and the user types that you're seeing?

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dylan said Make is pulling PMs, UX researchers and internal-tool builders into Figma, a seat-expansion opportunity.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the 4Q guide looks stronger than we were expecting. It doesn't sound like make or consumption is a

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Praveer attributed Q4 strength to new full-seat users and more paid teams; Weavy is immaterial to the guide.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how you're thinking about use of cash given just the $1.6 billion you have on the balance sheet currently

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Praveer cited flexibility to invest in AI and go-to-market; Dylan laid out a three-criteria bar for large-scale M&A.

PATHUiPath Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

how much more deployment capacity are you guys getting per FTE? And does that change any of your hiring plans

Cloud & AILabor MarketTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Asked how much deployment capacity coding agents add per FTE and whether it changes hiring plans; Dines said it is still a proving stage and framed the benefit as customer time-to-value, not headcount.

Calendar 2026 Q2

just on the net retention rate, just what you're seeing currently in the uptick there and how to think about the trend line

Show response

Direct: Ashim highlighted the first NDR increase in a while as net new ARR stabilizes, framing it as the step toward reacceleration.

just in terms of public sector, as we roll into midyear, maybe just remind us how you're thinking about public sector

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Direct: Ashim said public-sector budget stability is good and UiPath has strong agency relationships, while guiding prudently to funded projects.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what you're seeing around categories like automation and AI, it would be great to get just a top-down view

DemandCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Daniel framed Maestro as a differentiated process-orchestration engine and said coding agents will accelerate adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how should we think about those as a potential offset? And maybe just speak overall to how you're

DemandGuidance ReliabilityCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Gupta attributed the ARR delta to macro and public-sector factors, said execution has stabilized, and noted AI/agentic momentum but cautioned it won't be a material fiscal 2026 revenue contributor.

INTUIntuit4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

any commentary you can add on how we should think about the shape of pricing on that line?

Show response

Sandeep noted pricing consistent across quarters. Customer attrition below expectations post-price changes. Q2 margin shift driven by consumer marketing timing to maximize ROI. H1 total ahead of consensus on both revenue and EBIT.

Calendar 2025 Q2

would be good to hear you just speak through the impact you are seeing across segments, whether any of the headcount optimization you entered the year with

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sandeep cited broad-based margin strength from strong revenue performance and AI-driven productivity gains across technology, finance, marketing, and sales. Still early chapters.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you're thinking about capturing the value of those, whether it's through monetization

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan outlined three value vectors: improved conversion, better retention, and higher services adoption. Future potential for standalone done-for-you SKUs at separate pricing.

is there any way to help just split how much of that is macro versus something product-specific

CreditMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sandeep attributed the Credit Karma recovery roughly 50/50 to macro (stable rates helping personal loans) and product (go-to-market, insurance segment expansion starting Q3 FY2024).

NOWServiceNow4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

On the Q2 upside, you mentioned the Fed outperformance. And I guess the question is that strength at all

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gina addressed it directly, clarifying some on-prem was timing but the beat also reflected strong net new ACV, and Fed pipe looks good into Q3.

Calendar 2026 Q1

walk us through some of the feedback you're hearing from customers initially and help us think through the time it takes

Show response

Bill cited Moveworks quintupling business in one quarter. Gina confirmed prudent guidance on new acquisitions with significant upside expected into 2027 and beyond.

Calendar 2025 Q3

The one question we're getting is around the fourth quarter subscription revenue guide for 18%. That number is a touch lower than where the cRPO growth rates overall seem to be settling.

ChallengingRevenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Gina cited public sector prudence and on-prem dynamics as factors in Q4. Brief response, noted the full Q3 beat was passed through to full year and prior raises cumulate, but did not fully bridge the cRPO-to-revenue gap.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you also mentioned AI driving meaningful OPEX efficiencies. I'm just curious if you could speak to those a bit more and whether that gives you more confidence in the ability to continue to expand m...

Show response

Gina highlighted consistent 100bp annual margin expansion, noted operating margin guide holds even with expected M&A-related OpEx in H2. Current AI efficiencies are just a small piece of long-term potential.

TEAMAtlassian4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
TEAM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

maybe you could compare and contrast how fiscal '25 closed for us relative to some of the execution risk you're embedding?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Joe detailed RPO growing to $3.3B (+38% YoY), 74% recognized in next 12 months (+29% YoY). Q4 cloud outperformed on paid seat expansion, cross-sell, and migrations. SMB and enterprise seat expansion rates demonstrated quarter-to-quarter stability.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the gross margin and the free cash flow margin stand out this quarter. I'm just curious if you can speak a bit to what you're seeing

MarginCloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Joe attributed 86% gross margins to price increases, premium upsell, and engineering-driven cloud infrastructure optimization. Savings described as structural.

Calendar 2024 Q4

any commentary you can add on how things like expansion or tracking relative to what you're expecting

Revenue GrowthMacroeconomicGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Joe confirmed stable trends across SMB and enterprise, with conservative guidance approach unchanged for H2 given macro uncertainty and GTM execution risk.

Calendar 2024 Q3

how much of the Atlassian user base this could eventually address over a much longer period of time

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mike cited the cloud platform, Teamwork Graph, Forge extensibility, and enterprise search engine as durable competitive advantages enabling Rovo's differentiation.

PANWPalo Alto Networks2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
PANW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

how you approach that exercise given the inflection points taking shape across cyber

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Nikesh said guidance is set thoughtfully against consensus with the expectation of exceeding it, and Dipak described an established, multi-input process (pipeline, territory and resource planning) rather than specific baseline assumptions.

Calendar 2026 Q2

what are the key metrics you'd point us to, to help us gauge progress as you continue to work towards those opportunities

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Nikesh emphasized durable long-term demand but cautioned against a near-term windfall, expecting robust rather than explosive growth.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm curious if you think that metric is at all turning a corner with optimizations fading into the background

Show response

Mike declined to guide NRR, attributing the uptick to large customers migrating new workloads.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I want to ask about that metric just in context with the go-to-market shift towards consumption.

Show response

Mike declined to guide NRR but said it feels stable, driven by core business and older customers adopting new features.

CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

The 1 q ARR was strong but a bit closer to the guide, especially relative to how the full year numbers went up.

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

George cited AIDR momentum and a full executive briefing center; Burt pointed to fundamentals and pipeline rather than a precise visibility framework.

MSFTMicrosoft Corporation1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MSFT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Impressive to hear expectations for flat operating margin in the upcoming year as you absorb some of the mix shift

MarginCost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Hood grounded margin in revenue growth from competitive product, S-curve efficiencies across the stack, and talent focused on high-TAM markets.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ADSK Autodesk90%none of 9 questions
ADBE Adobe Inc.80%none of 8 questions
IOT Samsara Inc.70%none of 7 questions
TYL Tyler Technologies714%1 of 7 questions
WDAY Workday, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
TWLO Twilio Inc.60%none of 6 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock50%none of 5 questions
FIG Figma, Inc.520%1 of 5 questions
PATH UiPath Inc.50%none of 5 questions
INTU Intuit40%none of 4 questions
  • ADSK
    Autodesk · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • ADBE
    Adobe Inc. · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • IOT
    Samsara Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • TYL
    Tyler Technologies · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • WDAY
    Workday, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • TWLO
    Twilio Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • FIG
    Figma, Inc. · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 16 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NOW ServiceNow425%1 of 4 questions
TEAM Atlassian40%none of 4 questions
PANW Palo Alto Networks2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CRWD CrowdStrike1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MSFT Microsoft Corporation1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • TEAM
    Atlassian · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • PANW
    Palo Alto Networks · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MSFT
    Microsoft Corporation · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4110%none of 11 questions9
2025 Q1100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q2110%none of 11 questions10
2025 Q3911%1 of 9 questions8
2025 Q4911%1 of 9 questions8
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions6
2026 Q21414%2 of 14 questions11
2026 Q360%none of 6 questions5
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
  3. 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2025 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 10 companies
  5. 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
  6. 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
  7. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q214 questions · challenge rate 14% (2 of 14 questions) · 11 companies
  9. 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth30
  • Demand25
  • Cloud & AI19
  • Guidance Reliability15
  • Margin14
  • Competitive Dynamics9
  • Macroeconomic7
  • Pricing6
  • Subscriber Growth5
  • Capital Allocation4
Show all 21 topics
  • Capex Investment4
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Product Launch2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • M&A2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Labor Market1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Fx1
  • Credit1