Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Raimo Lenschow

Barclays · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
70on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%3 of 70 questions
Companies
12questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 70 of 70 questions from 12 companies

DDOGDatadog11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if some people do more inference, how much more observability gets triggered by inference?

Show response

Olivier said inference will be the dominant workload and creates observability opportunity at every layer, from GPU infrastructure to LLM and tool calls up to agent outcomes, and noted growing adoption of GPU and agent monitoring products.

How did you do it historically? So did you always kind of put in the base level and then what happened happens?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

David said the guidance methodology has not changed, using observed inputs plus the commitment-and-usage model, and Olivier added they chose to fully derisk the largest customer this quarter with the same overall conservatism.

Calendar 2026 Q1

If you think about now the non-AI category doing better, how much of that is like people like the cloud migrations again

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

David attributed the acceleration to multiple factors: platform expansion, consolidation wins, and successful sales capacity ramp. Olivier added they are outperforming all competitors at scale and taking share.

in the industry, we still have a lot of like noise around that level. How do you see it in real life

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Olivier described how customers come to Datadog to unify fragmented monitoring stacks. Highlighted that even hyperscalers with unlimited resources are now choosing Datadog over internal builds, validating the platform consolidation thesis.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I assume they tried to do it with some open-source tooling, etcetera. But and actually went from, like, you know, almost paying not a lot of money to paying you more money. What drove that thinking

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel explained the situation mirrors all customer lands: DIY is rarely cheaper when accounting for engineer compensation and velocity. AI natives adopt Datadog for the same reasons as all customers, just at different volumes.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How do we have to think about the nature of those? Is this kind of -- are those kind of especially the bigger ones of those kind of model builders

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel described the AI native cohort as fairly representative of the space: model vendors (text, video, sound), coding assistants, infrastructure companies, and pure AI-powered applications, some new, some 5-8 years old.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How should we think about it in terms of when this goes much broader into inference, et cetera

Show response

Pomel outlined three layers: current infrastructure monitoring of inference apps, GPU-specific monitoring products, and a new category of observing nondeterministic AI-written applications in production.

Can you talk a little bit about that ramp and where they are in their productivity curve

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Obstler confirmed successful execution on sales hiring with evidence of productivity through new logo production and pipeline growth, though ramping still ongoing.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What was the thinking process in terms of kind of showing us that upside that you kind of might expect in Q2

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Obstler explained no change in guidance philosophy; raised based on run rate with conservatism, second half unchanged due to uncertainty.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you see like what you see in first feedback on people looking at inference workloads and trying to have observability on them

Show response

Pomel explained inference observability is still early with customers using third-party models, while running own inference stack is coming next.

What drives your confidence or what drives the decision to kind of think this year

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Obstler cited bottoms-up evidence from geographic white space, growing channel partner contributions, and large enterprise account momentum.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.9 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

the strength driven by Atlas What are the factors that you are considering there, and what is driving your confidence

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Mike directly pointed to consistent 29% Atlas growth, a 300bps full-year raise, and a ~$2.3B run rate as the basis for confidence.

Calendar 2026 Q2

So what are you seeing there in terms of that kind of consolidation move towards Mongo.

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CJ characterized demand as modernization and AI-readiness migration, including from Postgres, rather than a pure consolidation play.

Calendar 2026 Q1

At your big event in January in San Francisco, what were your impressions about developer buy-in?

Show response

CJ said the January dot local SF event drew strong builder turnout, ~70% of them non-MongoDB users, signaling growing mindshare among AI-native developers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

since next year EA is not seeing benefits from all the year. Should we anchor our numbers on the ARR performance?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mike gave a concrete steer: non-Atlas full-year growth is ~4%, and mid-to-low single digits is a reasonable range to model for next fiscal year.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you help us understand then what's driving that a little bit?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dev credited data-driven self-serve experiments and a new motion targeting SQL developers unfamiliar with MongoDB; direct, but cautioned against declaring victory early.

Calendar 2025 Q2

we saw Snowflake kind of move and make the move towards Postgres. We saw Databricks kind of doing something there.

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dev framed the moves as validation that the operational data store is strategic high ground for AI, and argued building organic OLTP is hard.

looking at this strong performance on the profitability in Q1, like, how do you think about this business?

Show response

Mike gave a bullish read, a scaled $2B+ business growing 20%+ with 70%+ gross margin and a model with inherent operating leverage.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is it just a mechanical problem or like -- or mechanical situation or is there also a change in behavior?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Serge said it is not a change in trend but a mechanical effect - a lower non-Atlas renewal base in FY26 after two exceptionally strong multiyear years.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What do you see from the big hyperscalers in terms of working with you guys and partnerships?

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dev said relationships across AWS, Azure, and GCP are strong, with large deals closed and deep integrations, calling the data layer critical for AI.

PATHUiPath Inc.9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

how do you think about the workflows you guys are doing versus the workflows you kind of want to share or AI

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Challenged on whether stronger frontier AI models threaten UiPath's deterministic workflows; Dines argued AI cannot learn on the job, so enterprises still need a governed automation harness around models.

revenue growth kind of run ahead of like what we see on ARR growth. Like how do you think about that relationship

Show response

Asked why revenue has run ahead of ARR growth and how to think about it going forward; Gupta attributed it to ASC 606 license-vs-cloud mix as more platform is sold upfront.

Calendar 2026 Q2

revenue at the moment keeps growing faster than ARR. How do we need to think about that dynamic?

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Direct: Ashim attributed the gap to 606 revenue timing and services mix, and said the two converge over a longer period.

who is doing then the probabilistic part. What are you seeing there in terms of where customers thinking

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Direct: Daniel said UiPath is model-agnostic, infusing agentic AI into deterministic orchestration with the auditability enterprise workflows require.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how is the market kind of behaving at the moment when you talk with customers

Show response

Dines said customers span the spectrum but most now see automation as essential to power agentic initiatives, which uncover more automation.

You raised by touch more than you beat. Can you speak to what's driving that confidence?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gupta credited a consistent philosophy of guiding to pipeline and field data plus momentum from go-to-market and agentic improvements.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there an opportunity to shift to more of a consumption-based model to help more tangibly align monetization to value

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Sheldon McMeans (on for Raimo Lenschow) asked about consumption pricing; Dines noted the IRS already consumes Document Understanding on a consumption basis but flagged a 30-day moratorium and urged prudence.

maybe customers waiting for more maturity around agentic AI before putting new automation use cases into production?

Show response

Sheldon McMeans (on for Raimo Lenschow) asked about AI-maturity hesitation; Dines said customers now take a more moderate stance on AI, favoring pragmatic agentic value over hype.

Calendar 2024 Q4

there's going to be the big vendors that have like the domain data like the Salesforce or Workday or an SAP

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel positioned UiPath's edge in multi-system agents spanning modern and legacy apps, distinct from in-application agents built by SaaS vendors.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

Can you talk a little bit about what you are seeing in other regions like Europe, Asia?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Brian said performance is not region-specific and all regions are operating well and factored into guidance, without giving regional detail.

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we think about the guidance philosophy that you have here?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Brian said there was no change to guidance philosophy; the larger beat reflected CoCo launching in the quarter (guidance is based on Observe behavior, so CoCo could only be layered in after a quarter of data) plus observed core-business acceleration now included for the full year.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Do you think that will impact you? And is it kind of does it drive more adoption?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sridhar framed zero-copy sharing as a win-win keeping Snowflake the single pane of glass for customer data.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wanted to focus on the new customer adds. Obviously, great progress there.

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sridhar said Europe is developing and contributing as the U.S. hunter/farmer motion is replicated.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how do you see this playing out at the moment and maybe more in the future in terms of like going wall to wall with one vendor

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sridhar said Snowflake works with complex ecosystems while leaning into ease-of-use consolidation.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how do we think about adjacencies for your offering that you kind of might want to consider

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Sridhar said streaming and ingestion are critical areas while continuing to partner with Confluent and others.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you talk a little bit about the acquisition from today? Like historically, you always said you wanted to do some ETL

Show response

Sridhar framed Datavolo as a connectivity multiplier bringing more data into Snowflake.

WDAYWorkday, Inc.7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
WDAY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you talk a little bit about is that kind of customer signing shorter contracts, there is a bit duration effect?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Zane clarified that contract duration has been consistent. The RPO vs CRPO growth differential is simply driven by mix, more customer base renewals (which have slightly shorter duration) versus net new deals, not a change in contract terms.

Calendar 2026 Q1

one of your mandates was to kind of think about more international, international build-out. Can you talk a little bit about what you've seen there

Geographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Rob highlighted European business with solid quarters, strong ASEAN growth, India market entry with initial deal closings, and Canadian business performing well. Expects organic agents to help reignite growth in customer base across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and broader Asia.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if I look at the growth rates, this month, much difference between U. S. And international

Geographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Carl highlighted all three international regions (Europe, APAC, Japan) delivered solid results, not just Europe as in prior quarters. Attributed strength to product internationalization, partner leverage, and strong talent in regional leadership.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if Paradox is $15 million is a kind of good proxy, then kind of underlying, you're actually guiding down because you beat in Q2

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Zane clarified the existing business guide would hold at $8.8B absent Paradox. Comfortable with the underlying outlook and pleased with execution. The $15M increase reflects Paradox contribution, with no synergies assumed.

on the international side, you talked about the good momentum in the U.K., Germany

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Carl confirmed strong European logos including large German customers in competitors' backyard. Highlighted continued Japan momentum and new India market entry with dedicated president, data center, and partner ecosystem buildout.

Calendar 2025 Q1

any expectations for change in go-to-market now with Rob Enslin kind of finally coming on board, and I'm thinking more international

Competitive DynamicsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Carl credited Doug Robinson's 14 years and noted smooth transition. Rob already traveling internationally and leveraging deep customer and partner networks. No major go-to-market changes expected.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how do you make sure you kind of get paid for those solutions

Show response

Carl described multipronged approach: embedded AI drives win/renewal rates, standalone SKUs like Recruiter Agent and Talent Optimization command premium pricing, and upcoming agents will be priced on value delivered.

CRMSalesforce, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
CRM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How do you think about that evolution from kind of getting new customers and getting those guys up and productive

DemandCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Miguel emphasized Salesforce has 40% market share in customer domain with 4,000 production customers and no competitor matching that scale and complexity.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How how do you think about the ramping of those, and and how do you also think about productivity for those extra reps

DemandLabor MarketRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Miguel described 20% capacity in place today finishing at 15% enabled, with pipeline growing double digits and the agentic enterprise creating exponential monetization.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you have more sales guys you know, as Miguel said, you you the agents should help you to get more productive

DemandRevenue GrowthLabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Miguel cited strong pipeline growth, H2 acceleration potential, customers refilling Agentforce credits multiple times, and high confidence in next fiscal year outlook.

Calendar 2025 Q2

The main highlight for me, if I look through the numbers, this quarter, was the strength in platform

Cloud & AIM&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Marc highlighted Tableau Next built on the ADAM framework deeply integrated into Data Cloud and metadata platform, with Srini explaining the enterprise data strategy.

Calendar 2025 Q1

What was the thinking in terms of combining those two roles? And how do you see that playing out going forward

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Marc explained Robin Washington's unique qualifications and introduced the new leadership team including Miguel Milano as CRO and expanded roles for Srini and David Schmaier.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how is the discussion about how you kind of participate or work with the clients about pricing for Agentforce going

Show response

Millham confirmed $2/conversation consumption pricing. Benioff illustrated value with a hospital call example costing $100 that Agentforce could handle for $1.50, making pricing conversations easy.

Show 6 more companies
INTUIntuit5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
INTU company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

This time last year, we talked about like 15% to 20% growth in the long run. Today, you're talking 10% to 15%

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Sasan said Intuit is resetting expectations by choice to give the team flexibility to both scale mid-market (up 39%, new customers up over 30%) and accelerate new customer acquisition at the low end. Sandeep added that desktop is nearly a quarter of GBS and is expected to decline, but the areas to underwrite for confidence -- mid-market and online ecosystem -- continue to grow with strong momentum.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How do you think about it in terms of the health of the consumer?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan emphasized innovation-driven growth over macro: 45M MAUs engaging 5+ times/month. Credit scores stabilized, card balances stabilized. Sandeep added Lightbox and innovation driving share gains regardless of macro.

Calendar 2025 Q2

that seems like a big step up. And in a way, what did you learn about visibility for that business unit?

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sandeep attributed results to AI-driven better offer matching, higher ARPC, and innovations like Lightbox and TakeShare. Called it 'management alpha' on a different trajectory.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If you look at the payment volumes, yeah, if I heard you correctly, it was 17% decelerated a little bit

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan attributed deceleration to East Coast storms and fewer days in the quarter. Impact is transient and already recovering; expects acceleration ahead.

how do you think about, like, the next iteration for how you weave that into the product

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sasan described full platform vision of done-for-you experiences across Mailchimp and QBO. Tax season will feature dramatically streamlined AI-powered experiences focused on speed and best price.

ORCLOracle Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
ORCL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

can you talk a little bit about like how your pricing is evolving between contract pricing, spot pricing?

Show response

Clayton said prices rise when demand exceeds supply and that component costs are not expected to change the gross-margin guidance.

Calendar 2026 Q2

the growth rate ticked down a little bit, but then you also mentioned on the call some very nice customer wins

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Mike defended double-digit apps growth at a $4.1 billion run rate with 16% deferred growth, and pointed to strong multicloud database momentum.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is that one of these investor things? Is that getting discussed on the customer side as well

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mike argued SaaS disruption applies to smaller single-feature players, not Oracle. Customers want AI embedded in existing mission-critical suites. Oracle has 1,000+ agents live in Fusion with banking suite alone having hundreds.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I had to go back to my model quite a bit to see 22% growth on Fusion. And the outlook looks really strong as well

Show response

Safra dismissed tariff impact, attributed growth to strategic SaaS products rolling out and AI capabilities requiring cloud migration. Larry added integrated suite strategy is winning against multi-vendor approaches.

Calendar 2024 Q4

we're at kind of a late-stage point of the cycle where people usually don't look at back office systems. But you guys putting up like really solid growth numbers

DemandProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Safra disagreed with late-cycle premise, citing strong demand from companies seeking operational efficiency. Highlighted AI agents driving SaaS interest and booking trends accelerating significantly.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How does your fleet need to evolve? Because inference needs to do a lot more CPU, a lot more storage, can you do that in the existing data centers?

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management said the platform is built as AI infrastructure serving the full training-to-inference loop, so existing infrastructure moves seamlessly into serving inference over time; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you speak as well about the sources of funding a little bit?

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management said it will use the most cost-effective financing structure deal by deal, including leasing; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q2

as you do more inference, how important is latency and hence location of data centers?

Show response

Management explained latency importance varies by use case, with latency-insensitive workloads suited to remote regions; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just help us understand maybe what was happening in Q1 and how we should think about CapEx on an ongoing basis?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management framed CapEx as demand-led and lumpy, following committed contracts; answered directly.

TEAMAtlassian4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
TEAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing there? What's driving it?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Mike cited strength across regions especially EMEA. Non-IT use cases growing with 60% of customers using Service Collection outside IT. AI features delivering value in AI Ops, Rovo platform, MCP servers, and CLI. Customer service management GA'd and contributing. Assets integrated into platform-wide Teamwork Graph.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how do you think about that in terms of as an incentive to move?

PricingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Joe confirmed pricing headroom with prices below peers and competitors. DC pricing changes will fit deliberate approach to incentivize cloud migration. Explicitly reiterated 20% CAGR through FY27 and 25%+ non-GAAP operating margin FY27 with conservative risk-adjusted FY26 approach.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think about M&A or build versus buy in this for you

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike outlined unchanged M&A philosophy: strategic fit, great teams, right timing, capital to execute. Highlighted Loom at $100M+ ARR after 2 years with AI SKU growing 100%+ YoY. Browser company thesis centers on AI reshaping knowledge worker interfaces, optimizing for SaaS apps with enterprise security.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How should we think about changes to the go-to-market because Brian coming from SAP

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mike emphasized continuous GTM evolution rather than abrupt change. Enterprise grew from 15% to 40%+ of sales. Brian adds enterprise experience while team learns from PLG model.

MSFTMicrosoft Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
MSFT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was wondering about the CPU side of Azure because we had some operational changes there

Cloud & AIDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Nadella said AI workloads aren't just AI accelerators, they spawn compute and storage close by; SQL Server IaaS growth on Azure shows migrations continuing alongside AI adoption.

Calendar 2025 Q2

one thing that we're all realizing is that Copilot is the AI part, but data is becoming more and more important

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Nadella said UI remains critical for instructing and inspecting async agent work; Copilot evolves from chat to spawning agents that do real work in the background.

NOWServiceNow1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Did there also, like, an argument that with agentic and, you know, more easier ROI use cases straight away and CRM and the business workflows, that you kind of mix will change from that perspective?

Show response

Gina said AI will drive transformation across all workflows, but CRM's larger addressable market could give it disproportionate benefit. Reiterated long-standing expectation that CRM and HR will grow as a percent of total.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DDOG Datadog110%none of 11 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
PATH UiPath Inc.911%1 of 9 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.70%none of 7 questions
WDAY Workday, Inc.714%1 of 7 questions
CRM Salesforce, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
INTU Intuit50%none of 5 questions
ORCL Oracle Corporation520%1 of 5 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock40%none of 4 questions
TEAM Atlassian40%none of 4 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 9 questions
    11%1 of 9 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • WDAY
    Workday, Inc. · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • CRM
    Salesforce, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • INTU
    Intuit · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ORCL
    Oracle Corporation · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • TEAM
    Atlassian · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
Show all 12 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
MSFT Microsoft Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NOW ServiceNow1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • MSFT
    Microsoft Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q1100%none of 10 questions9
2025 Q2100%none of 10 questions8
2025 Q31010%1 of 10 questions8
2025 Q480%none of 8 questions8
2026 Q170%none of 7 questions6
2026 Q2911%1 of 9 questions7
2026 Q3617%1 of 6 questions5
  1. 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  2. 2025 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 9 companies
  3. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  4. 2025 Q310 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 8 companies
  6. 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
  8. 2026 Q36 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand26
  • Cloud & AI24
  • Competitive Dynamics23
  • Revenue Growth22
  • Guidance Reliability9
  • Geographic Expansion6
  • Pricing5
  • Capex Investment5
  • Margin3
  • Subscriber Growth3
Show all 17 topics
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Product Launch3
  • Labor Market2
  • M&A2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Capital Allocation1