Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Sanjit Singh

Morgan Stanley · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
55on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%3 of 55 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 55 of 55 questions from 9 companies

DDOGDatadog14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Was it a similar duration? And in terms of the lower usage, is that a function of the customer getting lower unit price because of making a new commitment?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Olivier confirmed a usage reduction at the largest customer and that guidance was fully derisked for the rest of the year, but declined to share contract specifics, saying there is not a lot more they can share.

in terms of like the enterprise AI app dev cycle, what does that look like for Datadog over the last couple of quarters?

Show response

Olivier described broad enterprise AI adoption manifesting as more transformation and cloud workloads plus rapid growth in usage of Datadog's AI-first surfaces measuring agents, LLMs, and MCP endpoints.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the category look like when agents are doing the triaging investigating versus human engineers and human SREs

Show response

Olivier directly addressed that usage-based pricing model works regardless of whether humans or agents generate the usage. Noted both agent usage and human web interface usage are growing simultaneously.

Just wanted to do a sanity check just on the sort of overall backdrop macro backup, we do have some geopolitical tensions

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

David directly stated no macro impact seen in consumer or e-commerce businesses, with continuation of trends across industries. Acknowledged they watch analytics but have not seen effects yet.

Calendar 2025 Q4

In a world where there's a greater mix between human SREs and agentic SREs, is there any sort of evolution that we need to think about

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel described a three-pronged approach: UIs for humans, MCP server for agents (seeing explosive growth), and Datadog's own agents (Bits AI). All three will coexist as functionality delivery modes.

can customers use these tools to build, you know, homegrown solutions for observability. Just get your latest comments on the defensibility of the category

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel argued AI shifts value from code writing to production validation, exactly what observability does. More code, more complexity, and nondeterministic applications all increase observability demand.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What do you sort of put the improved performance in growth this quarter on

Show response

Pomel attributed non-AI growth to three factors: positive demand environment, go-to-market investments paying off with strong Q4 pipeline, and new products like Flex Logs and product analytics clicking with enterprise customers.

Is there any work you think Datadog has to do to sort of infiltrate that market or make sure that customers look to Datadog as that Agentic monitoring capability

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel argued customers won't manage observability across 60-150 separate integrations and that AI observability cannot be separated from non-AI, all belongs in a central unified platform.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the guidance is really strong, and so when I think about that potential risk, is it fair to assume that it's not something that you're seeing right now

Guidance ReliabilityCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Obstler confirmed AI native cohort continues growing rapidly with good market share, but conservative assumptions are embedded in guidance drawing lessons from prior cloud native cycle.

What's your prospect for this pool of the business, this part of the business to drive growth for the balance of the year and going into 2026

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pomel noted strong proof points with broad customer adoption and $1M+ security customers, but enterprise-wide top-down security selling is the next go-to-market focus.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what the vision is about moving into data observability and how consequential of an opportunity could it be for Datadog

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Pomel explained data observability is becoming a key enabler for AI workloads, with Metaplane acquisition completing the suite.

what are the trend lines on core cloud migration

Show response

Pomel described cloud migration trends as consistent and steady, with customers laying groundwork for AI adoption.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how you're thinking about this year in terms of the magnitude of change versus the prior year

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel detailed specific product-led GTM motions for Flex Logs and OnCall, and noted sales capacity growth was accelerating through second half.

what seems to be driving the renewed interest in logs and cloud SIEM that get you excited about the opportunity

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pomel cited new cost-efficient technology, cloud-first modernization, and opportunity to unify operational and security use cases.

PATHUiPath Inc.10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

As we look to the federal business in Q3, just their fiscal year is coming up at the end of September

Show response

Asked about the federal pipeline ahead of the September fiscal year-end and which use cases are resonating; management cited a strong federal pipeline and demand for RCM and financial-crimes solutions.

Calendar 2026 Q2

given Q1 revenue upside was strong, but the beat was largely driven by license revenue and the ARR was relatively in line

ChallengingRevenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Abhishek Murli on for Sanjit Singh. Direct: Ashim defended revenue quality, framed 15% on a trailing-12-month basis vs 12% ARR, and attributed the beat to 606 deal-mix timing.

anything you can share in terms of the mix between consumption-based revenue and per seat?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Direct: consumption and per-seat are both small; subscription and server-based execution pricing dominate the larger complex use cases.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you give us any details on sort of the split between IDP and what you're seeing on the agent side

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Management declined to split IDP vs agentic given fungibility in pricing but said agentic is a significant, growing portion.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you have the sales and go-to-market organization sort of prioritizing specific processes

Show response

Dines said UiPath is both strategic and opportunistic, prioritizing healthcare revenue-cycle, procure-to-pay, order-to-cash, and claims while learning deployment blueprints.

it kind of implies a return to positive net new ARR growth, which I think for a lot of investors

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Gupta pointed to the narrowing year-over-year gap, FX help, federal stabilization, and empowered field execution as reasons for confidence in the guide.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the trends you're seeing in retention just with some continued pressure there in the quarter

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ryan Krieger on for Sanjit Singh. Daniel attributed retention/expansion pressure to macro and federal dynamics while noting larger customers continued to grow.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you walk us through your pricing and monetization strategy for your agent portfolio?

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dines said agents and Agentic Orchestration will be monetized on a consumption basis, with a detailed strategy to be announced ahead of GA in late April/early May.

Do you have confidence that federal will be a long-term customer of UiPath?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Gupta expressed confidence in the long-term federal relationship, framing the pressure as short-term, but declined to quantify underlying growth ex-federal.

Calendar 2024 Q4

would you think of stabilizing on sort of a dollars-added basis

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ashim framed net-new ARR stabilization as a positive execution signal but did not quantify the dollar target.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

the timeline on when you get these customers on the new AI features, what the ultimate

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

CJ said EA is now a durable second growth driver alongside Atlas, with fast (weeks, not months) time-to-value on the new AI features and no cannibalization.

Calendar 2026 Q2

which sort of part of the stack do you think is going to create the most value or the value capture opportunity?

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CJ ranked MongoDB's flexible JSON no-schema architecture first, then real-time intelligence on operational data with embeddings, as the value-capture layers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you satisfied with the quality of that growth in that cohort of application?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Mike clarified the second-half caution is a general consumption-model visibility comment, not a concern about signed workloads, which continue to perform as expected.

does that become more important as we think about potential upside to this guidance that you laid out?

Show response

CJ said AI's growth contribution is 'not if but when', large enterprises aren't running scaled customer-facing agentic workloads yet, so he won't predict the timing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Are there some initial things that you're looking at some kind of things that might fit in the

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CJ answered directly, framing three buckets (core modernization, enterprise AI agents, AI-native companies) and noting embeddings/reranking as the low-hanging entry point.

Calendar 2025 Q3

the acceleration in Atlas, which is now accelerated for two quarters in a row

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dev credited higher-quality upmarket workloads growing faster and bigger, plus search/vector adoption and strong new-customer adds; answered directly.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how you plan to sort of manage and message the metrics and the numbers.

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike (eight days in) gave a partial answer, endorsed the existing metrics and flagged future focus on capital structure, cash flow, and margins.

can you frame it in terms of the type of applications that are being built?

Show response

Dev answered directly, citing MongoDB's breadth across transactional, IoT/streaming, and AI use cases on one platform as the growth driver.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what sort of -- is it a function of sales execution? Is it a function of the end-user activity sort of improving?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael attributed the consumption trend to underlying application usage, clarifying it beat expectations but remains down year-over-year.

AKAMAkamai Technologies8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the company willing to go into either a net debt position or access more equity capital to fund

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mgmt cited $4.6B cash, laddered convert debt, an investment-grade rating and ample debt capacity; converts most attractive so far, no equity offerings, buyback paused to fund growth.

the ramp Q3 to Q4? Is it more of a sustained growth in CIS and then sort of a big hockey stick?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

McGowan expects a Q4 CIS hockey stick as sold GPUs are racked and big contracts begin generating revenue; on track and continuing to ramp into Q1 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

is that more of a public cloud opportunity, or was it specifically for Akamai Technologies, Inc. Inference Cloud?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tom couldn't discuss the specific deal but said Akamai has signed contracts across the spectrum for inference cloud and cloud capabilities for both GPUs and CPUs. On delivery, the biggest AI-driven growth will be in compute and then security. Agent-generated traffic replacing human traffic won't cause a huge swing unless agents deal with video. Delivery remains important, synergistic with the platform, and generates cash being reinvested into cloud growth.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Does that still hold? And as we think about this increase in CapEx, how should we think about that translating into revenue from a timing perspective, both this year and then maybe going beyond 2026?

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ed explained memory chip inflation skews the CapEx-to-revenue ratio, so $1-for-$1 doesn't hold exactly but is close. Larger deals with longer commitments get volume discounts. The upcoming GPU rental service at $250M list price would yield slightly better returns. Modeling slightly lower for 2026 given higher CapEx costs.

Can you speak a little bit about the pipeline? I know we have some really big customers looking at the opportunity. But just in terms of the breadth of interest pipeline. Any color you can provide ...

Show response

Tom said pipeline is very strong with the initial 20 GPU locations already sold out from beta customers alone. Broad areas of interest including transcoding, real-time translation, generative media, vision processing, customer support bots, gaming, commerce virtual fitting rooms, robotics, autonomous vehicles, and local LLMs. New verticals potentially becoming large compute customers.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there a security attach opportunity associated with Akamai Inference Cloud

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tom confirmed AI inference applications need API security and AI firewall protection. Greater vulnerabilities than normal applications. Hundreds of prospects and lots of proofs of concept for AI firewall with first customers adopting.

In terms of when does that potentially stop being a headwind to overall growth?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Tom said OCA was flat quarter-over-quarter and not where they are investing. May separate CIS and OCA reporting going forward. CIS is where all excitement and future growth potential lies, including Edge Workers, managed container service and Inference Cloud.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you talk about the -- how much Edgio contributed to your revenue in the quarter

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ed said exact Edgio contribution is hard to track due to customer overlap but tracking as hoped, possibly on the higher end of the $85-105M range. Starting to see upsell of acquired logos. Overall delivery trends better with improved pricing and traffic growth.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

The spirit of my question is around the quality of the acceleration that you are seeing

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Sridhar answered directly: acceleration is broad-based, not concentrated in AI-native names, and CoCo's cost-management tools make optimization easier.

Calendar 2026 Q2

what sort of inflected in the quarter

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

Sridhar framed the inflection as three compounding forces: AI accelerating core-platform value, agentic products (Snowflake Intelligence, CoCo) coming into their own after CoCo's February GA, and CoCo in turn driving more core consumption; Brian added CoCo was the largest driver of the raised forecast.

Calendar 2026 Q1

just want to get your perspective on the durability of that 27%, given that it's a consumption model

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Brian said the guide reflects high stable core growth, growing AI workloads and ~1pp from Observe.

Calendar 2025 Q4

when I look at your Q4 guide, it's probably the best sequential guide I've seen from the company in a couple of years.

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Brian said the full-year raise, not the quarterly beat, is the most meaningful signal in a consumption model.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you see kind of durable growth, or is this customers addressing their legacy data infrastructure?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sridhar said modernization is the beginning of the journey and AI transformation makes it more important.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How was consumption sort of exiting the quarter and through the month of May?

Show response

Sridhar declined intra-quarter detail but said Q1 consumption was very strong; Mike pointed to the Q2 guide.

Calendar 2025 Q1

On your comment on these large customers in Q4 exhausting their commitments, but not necessarily renewing going on-demand

Show response

Mike explained the renewal mechanics and said he fully expects these customers to sign new commitments within months.

AIC3.ai, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

you noticed some like weakness in North America and Europe. Maybe some more detail on what particularly went wrong there?

Competitive DynamicsGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Stephen owned the North America and Europe shortfall as sales execution and said he will apply the federal flattening playbook. Direct. (Oscar Saavedra on for Sanjit Singh; attribution inferred.)

how much of the business today is recurring in nature versus onetime?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Hitesh said 90% of revenue was subscription with no nonrecurring subscription revenue in the quarter. Direct. (Oscar Saavedra on for Sanjit Singh; attribution inferred.)

Show 3 more companies
NOWServiceNow2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

give me some color on how federal performed via your expressed relative to expectations? I know we had a government shutdown to deal with.

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bill said OneGov offering well received with strong pipeline. What didn't happen in 2025 is pipeline for 2026. State and local growing. Global government business up 80% year-over-year across Europe, Middle East, and Asia.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Bill, could you just detail a little bit about your agent strategy in that more fragmented landscape, what's going to give ServiceNow, the license to win? And also importantly, what are you contemp...

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bill emphasized ServiceNow's single-platform architecture as the orchestrator and controller for all AI agents, with RaptorDB connectors into all major data sources providing additional differentiation versus fragmented competitors.

TEAMAtlassian2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
TEAM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

where does pricing go to and evolve over the next, one to three years?

Show response

Mike defended seat-based pricing as customers' preferred predictable model. Highlighted 1M Teamwork Collection seats in under 9 months as validation. Consumption offerings exist as hybrid (Forge, AI credits, Bitbucket) but seat-based remains primary. Gross margins improving despite 5M AI users.

Calendar 2025 Q1

does that sort of move the needle from that perspective? And then when you think about some of the uncertainty in the macro

Cloud & AIPricingGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Joe confirmed nothing in the macro changes the 20% CAGR commitment. Mike framed Rovo inclusion as a position-of-strength move to maximize adoption and drive wall-to-wall expansion.

NETCloudflare, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you think that there's going to be a security opportunity around not just running and orchestrating these agents

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Prince said demand to secure agents is already here; SASE/Zero Trust conversations are shifting agents-first, citing a UK government agency that canceled an RFP to reevaluate.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DDOG Datadog140%none of 14 questions
PATH UiPath Inc.1010%1 of 10 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
AKAM Akamai Technologies813%1 of 8 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.714%1 of 7 questions
AI C3.ai, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NOW ServiceNow2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TEAM Atlassian2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 14 questions
    0%none of 14 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 8 questions
    13%1 of 8 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 7 questions
    14%1 of 7 questions
  • AI
    C3.ai, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TEAM
    Atlassian · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q450%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q270%none of 7 questions5
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions5
2025 Q480%none of 8 questions6
2026 Q190%none of 9 questions6
2026 Q2922%2 of 9 questions6
2026 Q3333%1 of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  8. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI24
  • Revenue Growth21
  • Demand18
  • Guidance Reliability12
  • Competitive Dynamics11
  • Pricing5
  • Product Launch4
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Capex Investment3
  • Macroeconomic2
Show all 13 topics
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Capital Allocation1