Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Mike Cikos

Needham · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
51on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 51 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 51 of 51 questions from 11 companies

AKAMAkamai Technologies8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
AKAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can we expect the full $1.8 billion to show up in RPO, is that all take-or-pay, and anything else to understand the mechanics?

Show response

Ed described the $1.8B deal as dedicated capacity with ratable revenue recognition once capacity is live. Some revenue in 2026, partial year in 2027 during build-out, then full run rate for remaining years. RPO will show most of it next quarter, building as capacity is delivered. Some nuance in first twelve months relating to goods receipt timing and pricing mechanisms.

it is great to hear that your largest security product, WAF, is seeing stronger growth. What is driving that?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Tom said AI advances are making it much better at finding vulnerabilities and enabling attackers. Billions of unpatchable devices are more vulnerable. Application-layer attacks from millions of distributed IPs require a vast distributed platform to defend, WAF in a single data center is insufficient. Akamai's platform with 4,300 locations is needed more than ever. AI helps defense but doesn't solve the problem; net-net a very challenging time for CSOs.

Calendar 2025 Q4

was this a new logo to Akamai? Or were they a previously existing customer within CIS or another portion of the Akamai portfolio?

Show response

Ed confirmed the $200M deal was an existing customer using Akamai for CDN and security, not one of the largest accounts. Discussions had been ongoing for several months on an exciting workload. Customer dramatically increased spend and Akamai hopes for more business with them.

how do we think about the level of CapEx you guys are deploying here? Are you changing in any way how you're sourcing servers or going in and buying hardware versus where we've been previously

Capex InvestmentSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ed said capital intensity increase is demand-driven, not structural. The $250M Inference Cloud investment is well-informed by having a large committed customer. No significant change in sourcing complexity, still buying servers and networking equipment. Looking at sourcing from different suppliers to mitigate memory chip cost increases. Still using third-party colo providers. Normalized CapEx excluding memory inflation and Inference Cloud investment would be at low end of typical range.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you just help us think about where we are in that inference curve

Show response

Tom described it as first inning. Cited commerce companies personalizing with video, AI-powered toys, robotics needing fast edge compute. NVIDIA Blackwell 6000 well suited for edge deployment. Just launching in last couple of weeks with very strong interest.

Are there any [ tea leaves ] or guardrails you can give us as we're thinking about '26

Guidance ReliabilityCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed said formal 2026 guidance will come in February. Only forward-looking comment: tremendous AI Inference Cloud demand creates a very good chance of CIS growth acceleration next year.

For security or compute, are we at this point reiterating the growth that we had spoken to last quarter?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ed confirmed security at about 10% for the year and compute maybe a touch under 15% as larger contracts ramped later than expected. But momentum is clearly accelerating in CIS.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just walk us through how the first half of the year transpired versus expectations, and why we're indicating how calendar '25 could finish up sub this targeted 15%

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tom explained CIS is meeting and exceeding expectations with 30% growth on nearly $300M ARR. Full-year compute could land slightly below 15% depending on timing of when large deals start generating revenue. Ed confirmed it comes down to whether customers ramp a month or two late.

PEverpure, Inc.8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
P company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

contract duration and deal size trends for Storage-as-a-Service customers that underlie the strong growth

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Charlie said Evergreen contract length remains 3 to 4 years with no substantial change, and higher prices drive relatively more StaaS demand.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are customers still viewing SaaS as advantageous to CapEx outlays and signing larger deals

Subscriber GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2027 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said Evergreen/One orders grew faster than overall revenue and faster than CapEx purchases; the economics are even better in a high-pricing environment (long-term contract, blended cost, buy only what is needed) and he expects it to grow further vs CapEx.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you just walk us through what that EXA customer win actually looks like, how that sales cycle unfolded?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

CTO said the first EXA win (a GPU cloud) initially chose an alternate vendor, then ran a performance test, was blown away, and ordered within days with follow-on orders; Everpure is in advanced talks with dozens more.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how early feedback has been on the enterprise data cloud with Pure Storage Cloud

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO said Enterprise Data Cloud / Pure Storage Cloud feedback has been extraordinarily positive with rapidly expanding demand; CTO added it is drawing CISOs and CIOs into more strategic conversations.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Aside from introducing a guidance range, how have you in any way changed the guidance philosophy?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

New CFO said his philosophy doesn't change how Pure guides, it's numbers-driven; the range aligns with industry practice and adds flexibility, with RPO giving comfort on the guide.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what the Venn diagram would look like if I'm thinking about the customers that are taking Evergreen//One

Subscriber GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said Fusion is part of the array software, so Evergreen//One customers get it almost automatically (Pure manages via Fusion) with high overlap; Portworx is a separate license so overlap varies.

Calendar 2025 Q1

do we have signs yet of customers that have adopted Fusion showing either faster expansions or stickiness?

Product LaunchSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said dozens of customers turned on Fusion within a quarter of launch, a fast uptake with enthusiastic feedback and an expected network effect over several quarters.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is the commentary around Evergreen subscription TCV and revenue, a reiteration of previous expectations?

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO confirmed higher-velocity Evergreen//One deals converted to traditional CapEx sales this quarter, lifting product revenue but lowering as-a-service TCV.

AIC3.ai, Inc.6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
AI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

where are you seeing customers find budget for AI initiatives, and are you seeing any change in sales cycles

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Matt Calitri (on for Mike Cikos) asked where customers are finding budget for AI initiatives; Tom sized the enterprise AI market at ~$10B in 2026 growing ~50% and said customers are finding the budgets. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what your view is there for the rest of the year going forward

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Matt Calitri (on for Mike Cikos) asked about the public-sector outlook and lingering shutdown impacts; Stephen cited COTS focus, the AI action plan, and maritime reindustrialization as durable federal tailwinds. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how would you weight the underperformance this quarter between sales disruption and your impact on the sales process?

Guidance ReliabilityCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Asked by Matt Calitri on behalf of Mike Cikos. Tom weighted the miss roughly 70% sales disruption and 30% his reduced involvement and compared it to early misses at Oracle and NVIDIA. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you provide some color there on what the economics of the new deal look like

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tom said the deal broadened and extended three years but declined specific economics, citing the NDA. Partial. Matt Calitri asked on behalf of covering analyst Mike Cikos (attribution inferred).

How did you think through guidance construction this quarter, and what needs to happen

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tom attributed the wider band to real geopolitical, budget, and trade risk and companies withdrawing guidance. Direct. Matt Calitri asked on behalf of covering analyst Mike Cikos (attribution inferred).

Calendar 2024 Q4

should we now expect that the Company can turn free cash flow positive in fiscal '26

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management defended investing for market share and pointed to crossing into cash-positive at some point in fiscal '26. Direct.

DDOGDatadog6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
DDOG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are those one and the same here? Or are those 2 separate customers

Cloud & AISubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Olivier clarified the new lands are neuro labs using Datadog to observe and optimize model training, distinct from the hyperscaler AI labs previously landed, which run similar training workloads but are much larger companies.

When I think about those new logos ramping, is that a function of pull-through

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

David said the share of YoY growth from customers not present a year ago rose from 25% to 30%, reflecting a compounding of both new logo lands and the ramp of logos added over the past year.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I just can imagine myself a month from now starting to get inbounds from certain folks asking about the holiday season

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Obstler explained they have years of day-adjusted usage analysis experience and incorporate holiday calendar effects, including this year's specific weekday placement, into guidance as standard practice.

I'm just trying to get a better sense of the why now

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Pomel characterized the broad-based non-AI growth as consistent with Datadog's 15-year growth pattern, steady execution across products and go-to-market without a single dramatic catalyst.

Calendar 2025 Q2

could we please get an update on Flex Logs

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pomel confirmed Flex Logs is now part of all major enterprise deals, resonating strongly in legacy log migration scenarios by changing economics and cost predictability.

Is it analogous to like 15 years ago where we saw, hey, on- prem continues to see investment, but maybe more dollars are going towards cloud

Show response

Pomel drew distinction: AI natives have exploding traffic-driven growth while enterprises have controlled migration limited by bandwidth. Enterprise bookings are strong but usage growth is more moderate as attention shifts to figuring out AI adoption.

MDBMongoDB, Inc.6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
MDB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

the revenue mix from Atlas to total revenue over the next 3 to 5 years

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2027 Q2 →
Show response

Mike said Atlas should keep rising as a share of revenue but more slowly than expected, since EA is now a more durable contributor with AI demand landing in both.

Calendar 2025 Q3

why we did see such broad-based strength from large customers this quarter?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mike Gordon said Atlas consumption grew 29% consistent with last year, with notable strength in larger US customers whose workloads grow for longer and expand more than before.

Calendar 2025 Q2

why are we seeing this meaningful bump in the new logos acquired this quarter specifically?

Subscriber GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dev credited the self-serve motion (led by new CMO May Petrie) and its more sophisticated experimentation for the strong new-logo additions.

is that year-on-year growth in consumption in May back to the levels that we saw in February or March

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike confirmed May year-over-year consumption returned to February/March levels after an April dip, a direct answer on the recovery.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there anything specific to Q4 consumption that started to drive this dynamic on the growth?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Serge framed Q4 as the seasonally slowest consumption quarter around the holidays, then pointed to stronger fiscal '25 workload cohorts driving stable FY26 consumption growth.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is this across all vintages and geographies or is it potentially more concentrated in scope?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael described the consumption improvement as broad-based while cautioning it was slightly better rather than a step-function change.

ZSZscaler5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
ZS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

there was a lot of security vendors out there last week discussing some success and competitive displacements in the SASE market

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay said demand very strong in Zero Trust market. SASE term meaningless as every vendor claims it. Platform expansion driving customer base growth. Pipeline and win rate remain strong despite new entrants.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what does the average customer look like when they are deemed a Zero Trust Everywhere customer? How do you spend materially change?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jay said ZTE customers see 2-3x+ ARR expansion. No per-product quotas but financial incentives for new products and new logos. Workloads expected to grow even as users plateau, creating ongoing upsell.

Calendar 2025 Q2

It really sounds like macro trends you saw in April and May were a relative non-event versus some of the more mixed data points

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jay said macro still tight with large deal scrutiny, but cyber and Zero Trust architecture are high priority. Cost savings messaging helping close deals. Remo praised sales org under Mike Rich for large enterprise focus.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you maybe color the $1 million cohort that you have in light of some of these go-to-market initiatives

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jay highlighted account-centric selling and GSI growth. 6x upsell opportunity in installed base. GSIs embedding Zscaler into more solutions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is most of that unscheduled billings growth being sustained by those emerging products

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Remo confirmed growth is broad-based across core and emerging. Jay added ZDX, branch, workload, and AI analytics all contributing to emerging products ARR.

Show 5 more companies
NETCloudflare, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
NET company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you please provide an update on the trends you're seeing in the SASE market specifically? Would just love to get an update on traction you're seeing out there as well as how the competitive lan...

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Prince said SASE product performing extremely well in consideration with no significant competitive landscape changes. Key unlock is partner-first strategy after seeing Netskope S1 showing 95% channel sales. Doubling down on partner-led opportunities. SASE critical for margin balance against lower-margin Workers growth.

Calendar 2025 Q1

you had cited sequential improvement in sales cycles, which is -- which is something that we would not have expected just given this environment

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Prince acknowledged surprise at improving cycles despite larger deals and uncertain macro. Attributed to operational excellence and selling to existing customers for faster expansion deals.

How much of that is potentially incremental conservatism or prudence, however you want to phrase it versus visibility moving one way or the other

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Seifert cited prudence given macro volatility. Q1 results proved growth investment was the right decision. Confidence in long-term outlook has increased.

NOWServiceNow3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

What sort of spread are you seeing between early adopters that are moving with EmployeeWorks versus using external

Show response

Asked by Matt Calitri on behalf of Mike Cikos. Amit said external front doors still burn assists in ServiceNow, but gave no adoption spread between the two paths.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you help unpack, I guess, new logos coming to the ServiceNow Platform? Are you in any way seeing an increased volume of enterprises voting your way

Show response

Gina highlighted average new logo ACV growing over 100% YoY with 11 deals over $1M. Amit added AI is unlocking conversations with commercial customers who weren't previously considering enterprise-wide deployment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I know in the press release and the prepared comments, you had cited this go-to-market optimization. Can you just provide a little bit more color on that front as far as what ServiceNow has in store?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bill outlined the multi-layer strategy: core subscription unchanged, RaptorDB/data fabric as net new TAM, agentic AI consumption on top. Gina confirmed all of these factors are thoughtfully incorporated into guidance.

SNOWSnowflake Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
SNOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

is it fair to think that 3Q here was just a strong execution quarter, but maybe a more normalized return to typical migration activity?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sridhar called the ~2.5% Q3 beat solid and reiterated migrations are lumpy; guidance philosophy unchanged.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you discuss what's the monetization strategy that you're putting in place behind that adoption curve?

Show response

Sridhar described a deliberate, consumption-based approach with broad adoption ahead of monetization.

Calendar 2024 Q4

This is the healthiest quarter-over-quarter addition to RPO and CRPO during an October quarter

Show response

Mike said RPO growth was driven by larger customer renewal timing, not the two monthly-commit customers.

CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CRWV company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you talk about where we are on the sales front? As far as getting in front of those customers?

Show response

Management described strong integration and three new joint products but gave no sales metric; partial.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the acceleration of AI adoption curve at the enterprise level. What would you point us to from a from a metric

Show response

Management emphasized inference as the monetization of AI but did not provide a specific quantitative metric; partial.

CRWDCrowdStrike1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CRWD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

wanted to get a quick update on what you're seeing more from a macro standpoint as far as April and May

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kurtz largely deflected the macro question, pointing to strong results as evidence they powered through any noise rather than addressing specific macro data points.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
AKAM Akamai Technologies80%none of 8 questions
P Everpure, Inc.80%none of 8 questions
AI C3.ai, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
DDOG Datadog60%none of 6 questions
MDB MongoDB, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
ZS Zscaler50%none of 5 questions
NET Cloudflare, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
NOW ServiceNow30%none of 3 questions
SNOW Snowflake Inc.30%none of 3 questions
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • AKAM
    Akamai Technologies · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • P
    Everpure, Inc. · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • AI
    C3.ai, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • DDOG
    Datadog · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • MDB
    MongoDB, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • ZS
    Zscaler · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • NET
    Cloudflare, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • SNOW
    Snowflake Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • CRWV
    CoreWeave, Inc. Class A Common Stock · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CRWD CrowdStrike1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CRWD
    CrowdStrike · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q460%none of 6 questions6
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions5
2025 Q2120%none of 12 questions9
2025 Q3110%none of 11 questions8
2025 Q460%none of 6 questions5
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q330%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  3. 2025 Q212 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 9 companies
  4. 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand27
  • Revenue Growth15
  • Cloud & AI11
  • Competitive Dynamics10
  • Subscriber Growth8
  • Product Launch8
  • Guidance Reliability8
  • Macroeconomic4
  • Pricing3
  • Regulation Policy1
Show all 15 topics
  • Capex Investment1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Margin1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • M&A1