Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Macro sentiment aggregated across 500+ public companies, built from public earnings calls.
Showing calendar 2025 Q3Free· the newest quarter (2026 Q3) is Pro.
Tellvest Economic Sentiment Index · Calendar 2025 Q3
What CEOs are actually seeing in the economy, aggregated from earnings calls.
2024 Q4–2025 Q3. Each earlier point averages the available scores of this quarter’s 585-company panel in that quarter; companies without a score in an earlier quarter don’t contribute, so the number behind each point can vary.
Earnings-call analysis · calendar 2025 Q3
What management and analysts said on calls mapped to this calendar quarter.
Federal Reserve context
FOMC meetings held during calendar 2025 Q3. Each card shows its own meeting date.
The FOMC in its own words, read the same way we read earnings calls. Compare with the CEO macro signals below.
The Committee lowered the target range for the federal funds rate by a quarter point to 4 to 4¼ percent, framing the move as a step toward a more neutral stance in response to rising downside risks to employment. Powell described the action as a risk-management cut, noting that payroll job gains had slowed to about 29,000 per month and that the balance of risks had shifted even as inflation remained somewhat elevated near 2.7 percent on headline PCE. He characterized the situation as unusual, with two-sided risk and no risk-free path, and stressed the Committee remained fully committed to restoring 2 percent inflation. Governor Stephen Miran dissented in favor of a larger half-point cut, while the median projection put the funds rate at 3.6 percent at the end of the year, a quarter point below the June path. Powell emphasized that policy is not on a preset course and that decisions would be taken meeting by meeting.
“I think you could think of this, in a way, as a risk-management cut”
“the downside risks to employment appear to have risen”
“we judged it appropriate at this meeting to take another step toward a more neutral policy stance”
Earnings-call signals · calendar 2025 Q3
| Signal | Companies | Direction breakdown |
|---|---|---|
| Trade & Tariffs | 257 | 301024481 |
| Consumer Demand | 256 | 61915252 |
| Enterprise Spending | 222 | 126533310 |
| AI & Tech | 214 | 20545 |
| CAPEX | 165 | 1371792 |
| Regulation Policy | 131 | 52164518 |
| Credit | 107 | 5538113 |
| Inflation | 93 | 841836 |
| Supply Chain | 93 | 35192019 |
| Labor Market | 59 | 1227812 |
| Housing | 59 | 1714523 |
| FX | 48 | 27957 |
| Oil Energy | 36 | 135117 |
Market & economic context
Public market and economic data. It is not limited to calendar 2025 Q3: the macro backdrop is as of the end of calendar 2025 Q3 (2025-09-30), and the S&P 500 chart covers the trailing year to the latest close.
Method & guides
A composite score derived from averaging overall earnings sentiment across all analyzed companies for the selected calendar quarter. Score is 0–10 (10 = most positive).
Guides: How to read the Economic Sentiment Index · How to read Tellvest Earnings Pulse · How to read Tellvest industry earnings-call sentiment · What companies say about the consumer on earnings calls
The Committee held the target range for the federal funds rate at 4.25 to 4.5 percent, with Chair Powell characterizing the stance as modestly restrictive and appropriate to guard against inflation risks. Powell emphasized that inflation remained somewhat above the 2 percent goal even setting aside tariff effects, while describing the labor market as broadly in balance with payroll gains averaging 150,000 per month and unemployment at 4.1 percent. He framed higher tariffs as beginning to push up some goods prices, with a base case that the effect represents a one-time shift in the price level rather than persistent inflation. Two members dissented in favor of a quarter-point cut, which Powell described as thoughtfully argued, and he noted the Committee made no decisions about September and issued no updated Summary of Economic Projections. He reiterated that policy should remain restrictive because inflation was the variable farther from the Committee's goal.
“modestly restrictive policy seems appropriate”
“Inflation has eased significantly from its highs in mid-2022 but remains somewhat elevated relative to our 2 percent longer-run goal.”
Quotes are exact substrings of the official transcript, verified automatically. The tone read is descriptive of communication, not a policy prediction.
Key economic indicators shown as latest level and year-over-year rate-of-change. Public data (FRED). Descriptive reference only, not investment advice.