Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Steven Alexopoulos

TD Cowen · covers Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2025 Q3 (2 quarters).

Questions
24on tracked calls
Challenge rate
38%9 of 24 questions
Companies
11questioned at least once
Reporting periods
2with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 24 of 24 questions from 11 companies

HBANHuntington Bancshares4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
HBAN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you concerned that there are more credit quality issues out there lingering in the industry

CreditMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve acknowledged isolated industry issues but emphasized broad de-risking since GFC. Huntington's 15-year aggregate moderate-to-low risk appetite, broad diversification, and consumer reporting tightness provide confidence. Not seeing forward indicators of deterioration.

I'm looking at the 16 to 17% medium-term goal you're calling out for 2027, are you are you signaling that the return's going to decline

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Zach acknowledged ROTCE already exceeds high end of 16-17% medium-term target, may revisit range going forward. Dual approach: drive TBV per share (10% growth) while maintaining strong returns. High single digit to low double digit TBV growth signaled at Investor Day.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What's the thought behind not growing deposits a bit more aggressively here

ChallengingPricingMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Zach explained optimization of cash position and NIM management. Expects deposit growth to resume in Q4 and match loan growth in 2026 planning.

noninterest-bearing deposits were down in the quarter

ChallengingDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Zach noted modest continued mix shift but focus on growing lower-cost checking category, which shows nice growth trajectory.

RFRegions Financial Corporation3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
RF company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

should we assume that the increase in the expense outlook is sticky here, just given inflationary impacts

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

David Turner explained the expense increase is driven by $12M HR asset valuation impact (offset in NIR) and health insurance costs, not structural inflation. Approximately 2% full-year expense growth. Dismissed inflation concerns.

does that mean that if the Fed is cutting rates, can hold them steady from that? But continue to see NIM expansion from this mid-three 60 level

Show response

David Turner detailed 125bp front book back book benefit (down from Q2 due to lower 10-year). Hedge portfolio negative carry dissipates as rates fall, providing protection. Confident in 1-2% NII growth and mid-360s NIM in Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you unpack this for us? How do you expect to maintain that stable means you have to grow it if you're growing, total deposits to fund loan growth

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David Turner explained deposit growth strategy ties new money market deposits to checking account requirements. John Turner detailed 4.5M consumer checking accounts with $5,500 avg balance, 400K small business at $15K. NIM can reach 4% with normalized yield curve.

TFCTruist Financial3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
TFC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

do these represent an inflection point in the credit outlook for the industry compared to where we were three months ago

Show response

Rogers said early to call an inflection point, portfolio performance not demonstrating broad deterioration. Will review implications of external events as always.

When you guys look at the totality of your loan exposures, where do you rank the risk of the NDFI portfolio? Below average, average, or above average

Show response

Milsaps placed Truist 9th of 11 peers on NDFI exposure at 11% of total lending. Bender described long-tenured relationships with global financial institutions, sub-limits and top-of-house limits in place. Rogers framed NDFI as investment-grade looking portfolio with strong risk-adjusted returns, a client strategy counted in an NDFI category.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if we don't see any rate cuts, do you guys think you could still get into that revenue range and the positive operating leverage range

Show response

Maguire said yes if curve shape remains stable; offsetting forces between no cuts and stable long-end. More important for 2026 NII outlook than 2025.

BACBank of America2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
BAC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

it seems like the way you're thinking about stable coins is your -- it's a little wait and see, right

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brian cited need for legal clarity before customer-facing crypto activity. Noted the bank already moves $3-4 trillion daily digitally and the incremental value of stablecoins still needs to be proven.

how should we think about your company as you leverage these tools

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brian detailed the historical consumer headcount reduction from 100,000 to 53,000 while growing deposits from $400B to $900B+. Cited Erica's 60M monthly interactions replacing phone calls. Emphasized scale of application over speed of adoption.

CCitigroup2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
C company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much of the total company's revenue is cross-border

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fraser argued Citi Token Services is superior to stablecoin alternatives due to zero transaction cost, 24/7 cross-border movement, and compliance absorption.

what is holding the banks up today from joining together same way you did from Zelle

ChallengingInnovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fraser welcomed the Genius Act for a level playing field and asserted Citi's independent capability as the killer app in cross-border digital payments.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
JPM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

would it make sense for JPMorgan to consider acquiring an LLM, right?

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dimon dismissed LLM acquisition. Barnum clarified inorganic opportunities are considered but Jamie said they're unlikely given high bar for deals. Small acquisitions continue.

What's holding up you guys and the other banks getting together to issue something joint, similar to what you've done with Zelle

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dimon acknowledged the point about interoperability was great but declined to answer directly, saying only that JPM is thinking about all of it.

Show 5 more companies
MTBM&T Bank2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
MTB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I saw you are guiding to the high end of the fee income range. And when I look at trust, there is a nice positive surprise this quarter again, $182 million. Can you get some color on what is drivin...

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bible highlighted corporate trust expansion into Europe, subservicing growth, RCC commercial mortgage business, and treasury management revenues up 12-13% YoY.

do you feel more of a burning need just to get larger to compete against the mega banks which are net growing checking accounts pretty well here

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bible firmly rejected need for scale, citing community-focused model, best-in-class efficiency ratios, and advantages of simplicity. May grow into contiguous markets when appropriate.

NTRSNorthern Trust2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
NTRS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you guys think you could remain fairly comfortably above that 30% medium term target moving forward? And even if the Fed's cutting rates?

Show response

O'Grady confirmed 30%+ pretax margin is the ongoing target, noted YTD margin closer to 29% with Q3 boost from provision release, and emphasized continued positive operating leverage drive even above 30%.

terms of the financial impact, so far, is this material Like, is this helping you this year keep expenses below 5%?

Cloud & AICost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

O'Grady acknowledged capturing AI efficiency gains is the challenge. GitHub/programming savings are real now. Broader capture requires discipline around headcount, span of control, and organizational design to ensure new business growth doesn't require proportional hiring.

USBU.S. Bancorp2 questions · 1 reporting period · 2 of 2 challenging
USB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

is 200 basis points enough of an objective to get the stock working? And do you need to do more on the revenue side

ChallengingMarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Gunjan acknowledged stock reaction; said investor confidence will grow with consistent delivery against medium-term targets; revenue growth opportunities are real.

what is going to change from what happened this quarter where you saw a migration to higher cost deposit products

ChallengingMarginPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

John highlighted Bank Smartly: 50%+ new-to-bank, 3x multiservice clients, 1/3 lower acquisition cost; improving pricing flexibility on retail deposit base.

CFGCitizens Financial Group1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
CFG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

So if we look at the $12 billion deposit target for the end of this year, I know the trends aren't linear, but just given what we saw in 2Q versus 1Q, what gives you confidence?

Geographic ExpansionInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Probed confidence in hitting $12B deposit target given Q2 spot deposits were flat. Follow-up asked whether reimagining initiative goes beyond call center AI to encompass full client experience and cost transformation. Good skeptical-but-engaged questions.

FITBFifth Third Bancorp1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
FITB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

What does it mean for business [indiscernible] as a relevant to a company like that if they have their own stablecoin

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tim explained stablecoin adoption creates more business: fiat on-ramp, off-ramp, reserve accounts, and instant payment rails via Newline. Cross-border is the primary use case.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
HBAN Huntington Bancshares450%2 of 4 questions
RF Regions Financial Corporation333%1 of 3 questions
TFC Truist Financial30%none of 3 questions
BAC Bank of America2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
C Citigroup2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MTB M&T Bank2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
NTRS Northern Trust2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
USB U.S. Bancorp2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
CFG Citizens Financial Group1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • HBAN
    Huntington Bancshares · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • RF
    Regions Financial Corporation · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • TFC
    Truist Financial · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • BAC
    Bank of America · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • C
    Citigroup · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • JPM
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MTB
    M&T Bank · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • NTRS
    Northern Trust · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • USB
    U.S. Bancorp · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • CFG
    Citizens Financial Group · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 11 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FITB Fifth Third Bancorp1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • FITB
    Fifth Third Bancorp · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q21656%9 of 16 questions10
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions4
  1. 2025 Q216 questions · challenge rate 56% (9 of 16 questions) · 10 companies
  2. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin10
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Innovation & R&D6
  • Credit4
  • Pricing3
  • Demand3
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Cloud & AI1
Show all 15 topics
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • M&A1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Guidance Reliability1