Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Macro sentiment aggregated across 500+ public companies, built from public earnings calls.
Showing calendar 2025 Q4Free· the newest quarter (2026 Q3) is Pro.
Tellvest Economic Sentiment Index · Calendar 2025 Q4
What CEOs are actually seeing in the economy, aggregated from earnings calls.
2024 Q4–2025 Q4. Each earlier point averages the available scores of this quarter’s 586-company panel in that quarter; companies without a score in an earlier quarter don’t contribute, so the number behind each point can vary.
Earnings-call analysis · calendar 2025 Q4
What management and analysts said on calls mapped to this calendar quarter.
Federal Reserve context
FOMC meetings held during calendar 2025 Q4. Each card shows its own meeting date.
The FOMC in its own words, read the same way we read earnings calls. Compare with the CEO macro signals below.
The Committee lowered the federal funds rate by a quarter point to 3.5 to 3.75 percent, its third consecutive cut and 75 basis points of easing since September, and characterized policy as now within a broad range of estimates of neutral. Powell framed the move as a response to a labor market that continues to cool gradually, with downside risks to employment having risen, even as inflation remains somewhat elevated near 2.8 percent on tariff-driven goods prices. The decision drew three dissents, two favoring no change and one favoring a larger cut, which Powell attributed to genuine tension between the two sides of the dual mandate rather than dysfunction. New statement language on the extent and timing of additional adjustments, paired with Powell's repeated point that the Committee is well positioned to wait and see how the economy evolves, signaled a more patient posture. Separately, the Fed announced reserve management purchases of shorter-term Treasury securities, roughly 40 billion dollars in the first month, to maintain ample reserves, a step Powell stressed is separate from the stance of monetary policy.
“we have lowered our policy rate ¾ percentage point over our last three meetings”
“we are well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves”
“inflation for goods has picked up, reflecting the effects of tariffs”
Earnings-call signals · calendar 2025 Q4
| Signal | Companies | Direction breakdown |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Demand | 255 | 521065146 |
| AI & Tech | 228 | 21837 |
| Trade & Tariffs | 226 | 211014757 |
| Enterprise Spending | 222 | 13945326 |
| CAPEX | 170 | 1461941 |
| Regulation Policy | 141 | 72173616 |
| Credit | 99 | 513774 |
| Inflation | 96 | 1040937 |
| Supply Chain | 92 | 32162321 |
| Housing | 58 | 2112718 |
| Labor Market | 56 | 1228610 |
| FX | 50 | 32558 |
| Oil Energy | 35 | 134126 |
Market & economic context
Public market and economic data. It is not limited to calendar 2025 Q4: the macro backdrop is as of the end of calendar 2025 Q4 (2025-12-31), and the S&P 500 chart covers the trailing year to the latest close.
Method & guides
A composite score derived from averaging overall earnings sentiment across all analyzed companies for the selected calendar quarter. Score is 0–10 (10 = most positive).
Guides: How to read the Economic Sentiment Index · How to read Tellvest Earnings Pulse · How to read Tellvest industry earnings-call sentiment · What companies say about the consumer on earnings calls
The Committee lowered the target range for the federal funds rate by a quarter point to 3.75 to 4 percent, its second consecutive cut, and announced it would conclude the runoff of its securities holdings, ending balance-sheet reduction as of December 1. Powell characterized the move as another step toward a more neutral policy stance, taken because downside risks to employment have risen while inflation remains somewhat elevated near 2.8 percent on tariff-driven goods prices. He stressed that a further reduction at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion, describing strongly differing views on the Committee about how to proceed. The decision drew two dissents in opposite directions, one favoring a larger 50 basis point cut and one favoring no change, which Powell framed as inherent tension between the two sides of the dual mandate. He also noted the labor market is cooling gradually amid a sharp drop in labor supply from lower immigration, and that the government shutdown has delayed official data, which could argue for more caution.
“we judged it appropriate at this meeting to take another step toward a more neutral policy stance”
“A further reduction in the policy rate at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion”
Quotes are exact substrings of the official transcript, verified automatically. The tone read is descriptive of communication, not a policy prediction.
Key economic indicators shown as latest level and year-over-year rate-of-change. Public data (FRED). Descriptive reference only, not investment advice.